RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Women with gynecologic cancer may suffer from pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). Before radiotherapy, prehabilitation with pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME) and vaginal dilator (VD) might prevent it and foster sexual life. This study aims to explore the experience of gynecologic cancer patients getting external beam radiation treatments regarding barriers to and facilitators of adherence to a prehabilitation program to prevent PFD. METHODS: This qualitative research with thematic content analysis included 11 women with gynecologic cancer and different levels of adherence to PFME and VD. Participants were interviewed based on a semi-structured script. The information was analyzed manually, assisted with Nvivo12® software, and triangulated with open coding. RESULTS: High self-motivation, desire to improve their health, symptoms of improvement, availability of time, the desire to resume sexual life, and the support of the partner were facilitators of adherence. The instructional exercise audio, clarity of the information, and closer communication with the physical therapist were also valued. The main barriers were general malaise secondary to oncological treatments, forgetfulness, lack of time, misinformation, lack of coordination with the treatment team, discomfort with the VD, and a feeling of shame. Feedback from the attending physician was a facilitator when present or a barrier when absent. CONCLUSION: These barriers and facilitators should be considered when designing and implementing preventive programs with PFME and VD. Behavioral counselling should consider the desire to remain sexually active; in such cases, including the partner in the therapeutic process is appraised. Otherwise, the focus should be on benefits for maintenance of pelvic floor function.
Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos , Diafragma da Pelve , Feminino , Humanos , Terapia por Exercício , Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
Vaginal dilation, currently considered as the first-line therapy for vaginal aplasia in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome, is a safe and effective treatment that aims to create a functional neovagina. However, rigid vaginal dilators classically described in the literature usually cause physical discomfort and side effects that can lead to vaginal necrosis. Here, we present two cases of MRKH syndrome patients with vaginal agenesis whose main complaint was the inability to have sexual intercourse with their partners. Considering unavailability of acrylic dilators and previous studies reporting good responses with the use of silicone dilators in women with post-radiotherapy vaginal stenosis, the medical team and patients opted for creation of a neovagina through the daily use of silicone vaginal dilators. Patient 1 developed an 8-cm vagina after 6 months of treatment and had a satisfactory sex life with her partner. Patient 2 developed a 7-cm vagina and reported significant symptom improvement. None of the patients developed side effects after the treatment. The use of inexpensive and easily accessible silicone vaginal dilators may be an effective and noninvasive alternative with few side effects for women with vaginal agenesis, particularly in the developing countries.