RESUMO
Immigration enforcement cooperation between final-destination and transit countries has increased in the last decades. I examine whether the Southern Border Plan, an immigration enforcement program implemented by the Mexican government in 2014, has curbed intentions of unauthorized migrants from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras to migrate to the United States. I use the announcement of the Southern Border Plan to implement a difference-in-differences approach and compare the evolution of short-run intentions to engage in additional unauthorized crossings of Central American (treatment group) relative to Mexican deportees (comparison group). The findings suggest that increased enforcement in Mexico decreases the likelihood of attempting repeated unauthorized crossings.
Assuntos
Emigração e Imigração/legislação & jurisprudência , Emigração e Imigração/estatística & dados numéricos , Aplicação da Lei , Imigrantes Indocumentados/estatística & dados numéricos , América Central/etnologia , Humanos , México/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study compared maternal risk factors by country of origin for 4,188 Mexican and Guatemalan unauthorized immigrants. METHOD: Data were drawn from 2007 to 2011 public birth certificate records of unauthorized immigrant mothers residing in Nebraska at the time of delivery. The study sample included 4,188 women ages 18 years or older and originating from either Mexico or Guatemala. Risk factors, including age risk, preexisting health risks, pregnancy health risks, and prior pregnancy risks, were examined by country of origin. Stata 11.0 was used to compute descriptive statistics and conduct χ2 test for binary variables and Student t test for continuous variables. RESULTS: Analyses found that Mexican and Guatemalan participants have distinct maternal risk factors. Mexican participants were older and at greater risk of obesity and excessive weight gain during pregnancy, while Guatemalan participants were more likely to receive inadequate prenatal care. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that both Mexican and Guatemalan immigrants encounter maternal risk factors that could threaten not only their own health but that of their infants as well. Health and social service providers can tailor education and outreach efforts that are specific to Latina subgroups by origin. Furthermore, targeted strategies to delivering prenatal care to unauthorized immigrants are essential for the well-being of mothers and newborns.
Assuntos
Hispânico ou Latino , Saúde do Lactente/etnologia , Saúde Materna/etnologia , Mães , Complicações na Gravidez , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Imigrantes Indocumentados , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Parto Obstétrico , Etnicidade , Feminino , Ganho de Peso na Gestação , Guatemala , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , México , Nebraska , Obesidade/complicações , Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Fatores de Risco , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This paper examines the occupational experiences of unauthorized immigrants employed in one of the most dangerous occupations in the United States: roofing. METHODS: We draw on 40 in-depth interviews with return migrants in Guanajuato, Mexico, to examine how the adoption of masculinity, dangerous working conditions, the labor market structure, and absence of legal status exacerbates injuries for unauthorized roofers. FINDINGS: Undocumented men return to Mexico injured with chronic pain, health complications, and trauma. We find that men "do gender" that is adopt masculine beliefs, when they skirt safety practices, police each other's behaviors, withhold their emotions, experience heightened stress, and engage in poor health behaviors. It is a combination of dangerous working conditions, economic insecurity, and men seeking to fulfill their masculine roles that all combine to create unsafe working conditions and lead to injuries.
Assuntos
Acidentes de Trabalho/psicologia , Indústria da Construção/métodos , Masculinidade , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/psicologia , Imigrantes Indocumentados/psicologia , Adulto , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde/etnologia , Humanos , Masculino , México/etnologia , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/etnologia , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Increased border enforcement efforts have redistributed unauthorized Mexican migration to the United States (US) away from traditional points of crossing, such as San Diego and El Paso, and into more remote areas along the US-Mexico border, including southern Arizona. Yet relatively little quantitative scholarly work exists examining Mexican migrants' crossing, apprehension, and repatriation experiences in southern Arizona. We contend that if scholars truly want to understand the experiences of unauthorized migrants in transit, such migrants should be interviewed either at the border after being removed from the US, or during their trajectories across the border, or both. This paper provides a methodological overview of the Migrant Border Crossing Study (MBCS), a unique data source on Mexican migrants who attempted an unauthorized crossing along the Sonora-Arizona border, were apprehended, and repatriated to Nogales, Sonora in 2007-09. We also discuss substantive and theoretical contributions of the MBCS.
Assuntos
Emigração e Imigração/estatística & dados numéricos , Emigração e Imigração/tendências , Migrantes/psicologia , Migrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Arizona , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , México , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
We provide the first evidence on the causal effect of border enforcement on the full spatial distribution of Mexican immigrants to the United States. We address the endogeneity of border enforcement with an instrumental variables strategy based on administrative delays in budgetary allocations for border security. We find that 1,000 additional Border Patrol officers assigned to prevent unauthorized migrants from entering a U.S. state decreases that state's share of Mexican immigrants by 21.9 %. Our estimates imply that if border enforcement had not changed from 1994 to 2011, the shares of Mexican immigrants locating in California and Texas would each be 8 percentage points greater, with all other states' shares lower or unchanged.
Assuntos
Aplicação da Lei , Imigrantes Indocumentados/legislação & jurisprudência , Imigrantes Indocumentados/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , México , Sudoeste dos Estados Unidos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Temporary and unauthorized migrants may face unique obstacles to access health care services in the U.S. OBJECTIVE: This study estimated levels of health care access among Mexican migrants returning to Mexico from the U.S. and factors associated with access to health care, with emphasis on the role of modifiable, enabling factors. METHODS: We conducted a pilot probability health care survey of migrants in the border city of Tijuana, Mexico (N=186). RESULTS: Approximately 42% of migrants reported having used health care services in the U.S. during the past year. Only 38% had a usual source of care and approximately 11% went without needed medical care in the U.S. About 71% of migrants did not have health insurance in the U.S. Lack of health insurance and transportation limitations were significantly related to various access indicators. CONCLUSION: These results have implications for future policies and programs aimed to address modifiable health care access barriers faced by these vulnerable and underserved segments of the Mexican migrant population.
RESUMO
This study explores the consequences of increasingly restrictive immigration policies on social capital among Mexican mothers with unauthorized immigrant status in Arizona. Three focus groups conducted in Arizona explore how mothers' experiences with immigration policies have affected their neighborhood, community, and family ties. Focus group content and interactions revealed that perceived racial profiling was common among mothers and led to fear of family separation. Several described direct experiences with detention and deportation. Although detention and deportation strengthened social ties between mothers and other unauthorized immigrants, these experiences were detrimental to social ties between mothers and members of the mainstream society, including their children's teachers. Finally, immigration policies were perceived to affect parent-child ties negatively, as mothers reported family stress, financial hardship, and decreased parental availability.