RESUMO
Foodborne Salmonella infections in humans, which results from the consumption of contaminated poultry meat and eggs, are a major public health concern. Vaccination of animals against Salmonella is one strategy to prevent these infections and reduce the risks to public health. Live attenuated Salmonella enterica vaccines can confer protection against salmonellosis by inducing both cell-mediated and mucosal immune responses. This study assessed a live, attenuated Salmonella enterica Typhimurium (ST) vaccine in broiler chickens against a heterologous challenge with Salmonella Heidelberg (SH) by evaluating bacterial quantification, immune cells infiltration, and cytokine gene expression in the cecum. The treatments were: T1, non-vaccinated, non-challenged; T2, non-vaccinated, SH-challenged; T3, ST-vaccinated and SH-challenged. At 28 days of age, the ST-vaccinated group had significantly recovered reduction of SH in the crop (P<0,01) and cecum (P = 0,021) compared to the non-vaccinated SH-challenged group, with no significant changes (P˃0,05) in macrophages, T CD4+, or T CD8+ cells dynamics during the same period. Aerosol vaccination on the first day promoted greater interleukin-12 expression in the liver (P<0,05) and interleukin-10 expression and T CD8+ cells in the ileum 16 hours after housing. After prime-boosted oral immunization on the 13th day, the vaccinated group had greater expression of macrophages and T CD4+ cells in the liver (P<0,05) than the control group. Two doses of a live ST-attenuated vaccine promoted a partial cross-protective effect against SH strain UFPR1 challenge in broilers.(AU)
Infecções por Salmonella transmitidas por alimentos como consumo de carne de frango e ovos contaminados em seres humanos constituem um importante problema de saúde pública. A vacinação de animais contra Salmonella é uma estratégia para prevenir essas infecções e reduzir o risco para a saúde pública. As vacinas vivas atenuadas de Salmonella enterica podem conferir proteção contra a salmonelose, induzindo respostas imunológicas mediadas por células e em mucosas. Este estudo avaliou uma vacina viva e atenuada de Salmonella enterica Typhimurium (ST) em frangos de corte contra um desafio heterólogo com Salmonella Heidelberg (SH), avaliando a quantificação de Salmonella, infiltração de células imunes e a expressão de genes de citocinas no ceco. Os tratamentos foram: T1, não vacinado, não desafiado; T2, não vacinado, desafiado com SH; T3, ST-vacinado, desafiado com SH. Aos 28 dias de idade, o grupo vacinado com ST apresentou significativa redução de SH no papo (P<0,01) e no ceco (P = 0,021) comparado ao grupo T2-não vacinado SH-desafiado, sem alterações significativas na dinâmica celular de macrófagos, T CD4+ ou T CD8+ (P˃0,05) durante o mesmo período. A vacinação por aerossol no primeiro dia promoveu maior expressão de IL-12 no fígado (P<0,05), maior expressão de IL-10 e células T CD8+ no íleo, 16 horas após o alojamento. Após o reforço de imunização oral ao 13º dia, o grupo vacinado apresentou maior expressão de macrófagos e células T CD4+ no fígado (P<0,05) do que o grupo controle. Duas doses de uma vacina viva atenuada de ST promoveram um efeito de proteção cruzada parcial contra o desafio da cepa de Salmonella Heidelberg cepa UFPR1 em frangos de corte.(AU)
Assuntos
Animais , Salmonella typhimurium/imunologia , Vacinas contra Salmonella/administração & dosagem , Galinhas , Salmonelose Animal/imunologia , Interleucinas , Macrófagos , Vacinação/veterináriaRESUMO
Foodborne Salmonella infections in humans, which results from the consumption of contaminated poultry meat and eggs, are a major public health concern. Vaccination of animals against Salmonella is one strategy to prevent these infections and reduce the risks to public health. Live attenuated Salmonella enterica vaccines can confer protection against salmonellosis by inducing both cell-mediated and mucosal immune responses. This study assessed a live, attenuated Salmonella enterica Typhimurium (ST) vaccine in broiler chickens against a heterologous challenge with Salmonella Heidelberg (SH) by evaluating bacterial quantification, immune cells infiltration, and cytokine gene expression in the cecum. The treatments were: T1, non-vaccinated, non-challenged; T2, non-vaccinated, SH-challenged; T3, ST-vaccinated and SH-challenged. At 28 days of age, the ST-vaccinated group had significantly recovered reduction of SH in the crop (P<0,01) and cecum (P = 0,021) compared to the non-vaccinated SH-challenged group, with no significant changes (P˃0,05) in macrophages, T CD4+, or T CD8+ cells dynamics during the same period. Aerosol vaccination on the first day promoted greater interleukin-12 expression in the liver (P<0,05) and interleukin-10 expression and T CD8+ cells in the ileum 16 hours after housing. After prime-boosted oral immunization on the 13th day, the vaccinated group had greater expression of macrophages and T CD4+ cells in the liver (P<0,05) than the control group. Two doses of a live ST-attenuated vaccine promoted a partial cross-protective effect against SH strain UFPR1 challenge in broilers.
Infecções por Salmonella transmitidas por alimentos como consumo de carne de frango e ovos contaminados em seres humanos constituem um importante problema de saúde pública. A vacinação de animais contra Salmonella é uma estratégia para prevenir essas infecções e reduzir o risco para a saúde pública. As vacinas vivas atenuadas de Salmonella enterica podem conferir proteção contra a salmonelose, induzindo respostas imunológicas mediadas por células e em mucosas. Este estudo avaliou uma vacina viva e atenuada de Salmonella enterica Typhimurium (ST) em frangos de corte contra um desafio heterólogo com Salmonella Heidelberg (SH), avaliando a quantificação de Salmonella, infiltração de células imunes e a expressão de genes de citocinas no ceco. Os tratamentos foram: T1, não vacinado, não desafiado; T2, não vacinado, desafiado com SH; T3, ST-vacinado, desafiado com SH. Aos 28 dias de idade, o grupo vacinado com ST apresentou significativa redução de SH no papo (P<0,01) e no ceco (P = 0,021) comparado ao grupo T2-não vacinado SH-desafiado, sem alterações significativas na dinâmica celular de macrófagos, T CD4+ ou T CD8+ (P˃0,05) durante o mesmo período. A vacinação por aerossol no primeiro dia promoveu maior expressão de IL-12 no fígado (P<0,05), maior expressão de IL-10 e células T CD8+ no íleo, 16 horas após o alojamento. Após o reforço de imunização oral ao 13º dia, o grupo vacinado apresentou maior expressão de macrófagos e células T CD4+ no fígado (P<0,05) do que o grupo controle. Duas doses de uma vacina viva atenuada de ST promoveram um efeito de proteção cruzada parcial contra o desafio da cepa de Salmonella Heidelberg cepa UFPR1 em frangos de corte.
Assuntos
Animais , Galinhas , Salmonella typhimurium/imunologia , Salmonelose Animal/imunologia , Vacinas contra Salmonella/administração & dosagem , Interleucinas , Macrófagos , Vacinação/veterináriaRESUMO
Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg is a human pathogen also found in broilers. A strain (UFPR1) has been associated with field reports of resistance to short-chain organic acids (SCOA) in broilers in the South of Brazil, but was susceptible to a Bacillus subtilis-based probiotic added in feed in a related study. This work aimed to (i) report clinical symptoms caused by SH UFPR1 in broilers, (ii) study its susceptibility to some antibiotics in vitro, and (iii) SCOA in vivo; and (iv) relate these phenotypic observations with its genome characteristics. Two in vivo trials used 1-day-old chicks housed for 21 days in 8 sterilized isolated negative pressure rooms with 4 battery cages of 12 birds each. Birds were challenged or not with 107 CFU/bird of SH UFPR1 orally and exposed or not to SCOA in a 2 × 2 factorial design. Zootechnical parameters were unaffected (P > 0.05), no clinical signs were observed, and few cecal and hepatic histologic and immune-related alterations were seen, in birds challenged with SH. Formic and propionic acids added together in drinking water, fumaric and benzoic acid in feed (Trial 1), and coated calcium butyrate in feed (Trial 2) did not reduce the SH isolation frequencies seen in cecum and liver in broilers after SH challenge (P > 0.05). SH UFPR1 was susceptible to amikacin, amoxicillin + clavulanate, ceftiofur, cephalexin, doxycycline and oxytetracycline; and mildly susceptible to ampicillin + sulbactam, cephalothin, ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, and gentamycin in an in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration model using Mueller-Hinton agar. The whole genome of SH UFPR1 was sequenced and consisted of a circular chromosome, spanning 4,760,321 bp with 52.18% of GC-content encoding 84 tRNA, 22 rRNA, and 4,427 protein-coding genes. The comparison between SH UFPR1 genome and a multidrug-resistant SL476 strain revealed 11 missing genomic fragments and 5 insertions related to bgt, bgr, and rpoS genes. The deleted genes codify proteins associated with cell cycle regulation, virulence, drug resistance, cellular adhesion, and salt efflux which collectively reveal key aspects of the evolution and adaptation of SH strains such as organic acids resistance and antibiotic sensitivity and provide information relevant to the control of SH in poultry.