RESUMO

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has caused a global pandemic, leading to health, economic, and political crisis. The virus triggers the activation of inflammatory reactants including interleukin-6 (IL-6), ferritin, and C-reactive protein (CRP), causing multiorgan damage, particularly affecting the lungs. Tocilizumab, an IL-6 receptor blocker, has the potential to diminish the progression of the disease and reduce organ damage and long-term complications. The aim of this observational retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the efficacy of tocilizumab in decreasing CRP levels in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients compared to standard care without the drug. The study included 141 patients during their Hospital Stay (HS), with 100 in the Tocilizumab group and 41 in the non-Tocilizumab group. Clinical information was collected from the electronic clinical record, analyzed using statistical software, and homogenized the CRP levels from the severe group to the levels of the less complicated group at 48 h of hospitalization. The results showed a statistically significant greater decrease in CRP levels in the Tocilizumab group at 48 h after the use of the treatment, with no differences in mortality or length of stay between the groups. In conclusion, tocilizumab accelerates the diminishing of CRP levels compared to standard treatment alone, and its use may have potential benefits in the management of severe COVID-19 patients when used alongside with follow-up quantification of CRP levels reduction.IMPORTANCESevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has caused a global pandemic, leading to health, economic, and political crises. International guidelines for managing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) give recommendations according to the severity of the disease and the level of oxygen therapy needed. Tocilizumab is an option for the therapeutic management of hospitalized patients with any level of oxygen therapy; IL-6 serum level is the parameter for the follow-up on the efficacy, but it is not available at many hospitals. In this study, we demonstrate that C-reactive protein determination can predict the response to tocilizumab in severe COVID-19, the target patients for treatment with this drug. The use of this affordable and extensively available biomarker supports clinical decisions for the early escalation of the therapy and for the rational use of this drug on those prone to improve with the use of it.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Considering the lack of consensus related to the impact of selective IL-6 receptor inhibition on bone remodeling and the scarcity of reports, especially on large bone defects, this study proposed to evaluate the biological impact of the selective inhibitor of interleukin-6 receptor (tocilizumab) in an experimental model of critical calvarial defect in rats. In this preclinical and in vivo study, 24 male Wistar rats were randomly divided into two groups (n=12/group): defect treated with collagen sponge (CG) and defect treated with collagen sponge associated with 2 mg/kg tocilizumab (TCZ). The defect in the parietal bone was created using an 8-mm diameter trephine drill. After 90 days, the animals were euthanized, and tissue samples (skull caps) were evaluated through micro-CT, histological, immunohistochemistry, cytokines, and RT-qPCR analyses. Tocilizumab reduced mononuclear inflammatory infiltration (P<0.05) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels (P<0.01) and down-regulated tissue gene expression of BMP-2 (P<0.001), RUNX-2 (P<0.05), and interleukin (IL)-6 (P<0.05). Moreover, it promoted a stronger immunostaining of cathepsin and RANKL (P<0.05). Micro-CT and histological analyses revealed no impact on general bone formation (P>0.05). The bone cells (osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes) in the defect area were similar in both groups (P>0.05). Tocilizumab reduced inflammatory cytokines, decreased osteogenic protein, and increased proteases in a critical bone defect in rats. Ninety days after the local application of tocilizumab in the cranial defect, we did not find a significant formation of bone tissue compared with a collagen sponge.

RESUMO

Abstract Background Autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) is a group of inflammatory diseases characterized by the presence of antibodies against neuronal and glial antigens, leading to subacute psychiatric symptoms, memory complaints, and movement disorders. The patients are predominantly young, and delays in treatment are associated with worse prognosis. Objective With the support of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology (Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, ABN) and the Brazilian Society of Child Neurology (Sociedade Brasileira de Neurologia Infantil, SBNI), a consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of AIE in Brazil was developed using the Delphi method. Methods A total of 25 panelists, including adult and child neurologists, participated in the study. Results The panelists agreed that patients fulfilling criteria for possible AIE should be screened for antineuronal antibodies in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using the tissue-based assay (TBA) and cell-based assay (CBA) techniques. Children should also be screened for anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glucoprotein antibodies (anti-MOG). Treatment should be started within the first 4 weeks of symptoms. The first-line option is methylprednisolone plus intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or plasmapheresis, the second-line includes rituximab and/or cyclophosphamide, while third-line treatment options are bortezomib and tocilizumab. Most seizures in AIE are symptomatic, and antiseizure medications may be weaned after the acute stage. In anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis, the panelists have agreed that oral immunosuppressant agents should not be used. Patients should be evaluated at the acute and postacute stages using functional and cognitive scales, such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and the Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE). Conclusion The present study provides tangible evidence for the effective management of AIE patients within the Brazilian healthcare system.

Resumo Antecedentes Encefalites autoimunes (EAIs) são um grupo de doenças inflamatórias caracterizadas pela presença de anticorpos contra antígenos neuronais e gliais, que ocasionam sintomas psiquiátricos subagudos, queixas de memória e distúrbios anormais do movimento. A maioria dos pacientes é jovem, e o atraso no tratamento está associado a pior prognóstico. Objetivo Com o apoio da Academia Brasileira de Neurologia (ABN) e da Sociedade Brasileira de Neurologia Infantil (SBNI), desenvolvemos um consenso sobre o diagnóstico e o tratamento da EAIs no Brasil utilizando a metodologia Delphi. Métodos Um total de 25 especialistas, incluindo neurologistas e neurologistas infantis, foram convidados a participar. Resultados Os especialistas concordaram que os pacientes com critérios de possíveis EAIs devem ser submetidos ao rastreio de anticorpos antineuronais no soro e no líquido cefalorraquidiano (LCR) por meio das técnicas de ensaio baseado em tecidos (tissue-based assay, TBA, em inglês) e ensaio baseado em células (cell-based assay, CBA, em inglês). As crianças também devem ser submetidas ao rastreio de de anticorpo contra a glicoproteína da mielina de oligodendrócitos (anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, anti-MOG, em inglês). O tratamento deve ser iniciado dentro das primeiras 4 semanas dos sintomas, sendo as opções de primeira linha metilprednisolona combinada com imunoglobulina intravenosa (IGIV) ou plasmaférese. O tratamento de segunda linha inclui rituximabe e ciclofosfamida. Bortezomib e tocilizumab são opções de tratamento de terceira linha. A maioria das crises epilépticas nas EAIs são sintomáticas, e os fármacos anticrise podem ser desmamadas após a fase aguda. Em relação à encefalite antirreceptor de N-metil-D-aspartato (anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor, anti-NMDAR, em inglês), os especialistas concordaram que agentes imunossupressores orais não devem ser usados. Os pacientes devem ser avaliados na fase aguda e pós-aguda mediante escalas funcionais e cognitivas, como Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), e Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE). Conclusão Esta pesquisa oferece evidências tangíveis do manejo efetivo de pacientes com EAIs no sistema de saúde Brasileiro.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to compare the efficacy of rituximab, tocilizumab, and abatacept in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to treatments with MTX or TNFi agents. METHODS: We searched 6 databases until January 2023 for phase 2-4 RCTs evaluating patients with RA refractory to MTX or TNFi therapy treated with rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab (intervention arm) compared to controls. Study data were independently assessed by two investigators. The primary outcome was considered as achieving ACR70 response. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 19 RCTs, with 7,835 patients and a mean study duration of 1.2 years. Hazard ratios for achieving an ACR70 response at six months were not different among the bDMARDs, however, we found high heterogeneity. Three factors showing a critical imbalance among the bDMARD classes were identified: baseline HAQ score, study duration, and frequency of TNFi treatment in control arm. Multivariate meta-regression adjusted to these three factors were conducted for the relative risk (RR) for ACR70. Thus, heterogeneity was attenuated (I2 = 24%) and the explanatory power of the model increased (R2 = 85%). In this model, rituximab did not modify the chance of achieving an ACR70 response compared to abatacept (RR = 1.773, 95%CI 0.113-10.21, p = 0.765). In contrast, abatacept was associated with RR = 2.217 (95%CI 1.554-3.161, p < 0.001) for ACR70 compared to tocilizumab. CONCLUSION: We found high heterogeneity among studies comparing rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab. On multivariate metaregressions, if the conditions of the RCTs were similar, we estimate that abatacept could increase the chance of reaching an ACR70 response by 2.2-fold compared to tocilizumab.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Takayasu arteritis is a chronic granulomatous vasculitis of unknown aetiology affecting the aorta and its major branches. Critical limb ischaemia may occur and eventually require surgical intervention. Surgical outcomes are influenced by disease activity, age, and comorbidities. We report a 43-year-old woman with Takayasu arteritis and stenosis of the left common iliac artery and occlusion of the left external iliac artery with limiting vascular claudication, who underwent angioplasty of the iliac artery with drug-eluting stent while being treated with infliximab. The artery ruptured a week later but was contained by the ilio-psoas muscle. She required subsequent stent placement to correct the lesion. Treatment comprised aspirin and clopidogrel, and the biological was switched to monthly intravenous tocilizumab. During an 8-year follow-up, serial imaging examinations showed a patent aorto-biiliac endoprosthesis, without evidence of thrombosis or restenosis. Clinically, the patient denies vascular claudication and pulses remain palpable in the left lower limb. This case highlights the risks inherent to these procedures in patients with large artery vasculitis and reinforces that the effectiveness of endovascular intervention can be increased by detailed preoperative evaluation, associated with a drug strategy including immunomodulatory and antiplatelet therapy as directed by the multispecialty team. Periodic imaging examinations are required because of the reported high rate of restenosis.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Resumen Introducción: El objetivo principal del estudio fue evaluar la mortalidad en los pacientes con COVID-19 graves y críticos, que recibieron tocilizumab (TCZ) -un antagonista monoclonal del receptor de IL-6- de forma temprana vs. tardía. Métodos: Cohorte retrospectiva multicéntrica de pacientes >18 años internados con COVID-19 desde el 1/7/2021-1/8/2022, con 5-7 puntos de gravedad inicial (GI) según Escala de la OMS. Se consideró adminis tración temprana o tardía a la infusión de TCZ ≤ ó > a 48 h del ingreso. Las variables de resultado fueron mortalidad a 28 días y cambio de la GI. Los factores relacionados con la mortalidad fueron evaluados con regresión de Cox. Resultados: Se incluyeron 266 pacientes, 159(60%) varones; edad 58(± 15); con hipertensión arterial (43%), obesidad (37%) y diabetes (27%);70 presentaban GI = 5 (oxígeno suplementario), 143 GI = 6 (ventilación no inva siva o cánula nasal de alto flujo) y 53 GI = 7 (ventilación mecánica invasiva). La mortalidad a 28 días fue 42%, asociada independientemente a: edad, obesidad, GI, días entre la internación y administración del TCZ, y días entre la fecha de inicio de síntomas y el TCZ. La mortalidad para GI 5, 6 y 7 fue 26%, 39% y 72%, respectivamente; 76% y 62% de los pacientes permanecieron estables o mejoraron la GI a los días 3 y 7 de la infusión de TCZ. La mortalidad a 28 días fue 39% (TCZ temprano) vs. 57% (TCZ tardío); p = 0.02; HR = 0.63[0.41-0.99, p = 0.05]). Discusión: Estos resultados apoyan la administración temprana de TCZ en pacientes con COVID-19 grave y crítica.

Abstract Introduction: Tocilizumab (TCZ), an IL-6 receptor antagonist monoclonal antibody is warranted in severe and critically-ill COVID-19 patients. The objective was to evaluate 28-day mortality of patients with severe or critical COVID-19 treated with early vs delayed TCZ. Methods: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study in cluding patients>18 years hospitalized between 7/1/2021- 8/1/2022 with confirmed COVID-19, with 5, 6 and 7 points of WHO Ordinal Initial Severity Scale [SS]. Early or late administration was considered if TCZ was administered before or after 48 hours from admission. Outcomes were28-day mortality and change of SS. Factors related to 28-day mortality were evaluated with Cox regression. Results: 266 patients were included, 159(60%) male; aged 58(± 15); frequent comorbidities were hypertension (42%), obesity (37%) and diabetes (27%). Seventy patients had a SS = 5 (Supplemental O2), 143 had SS = 6 (NIV/ HFNC), and 53 had SS = 7 (IMV). 28-day mortality was 42%(112/266); predictors were age, obesity, higher SS, days between hospitalization and TCZ administration, and fewer days between symptoms onset and TCZ. Mortality of SS 5, 6 and 7 was 26%, 39% and 72% respectively. Com pared with baseline SS points, 76% and 62% of patients remained stable or improved on days 3 and 7 since TCZ administration. 28-day mortality was lower when TCZ was administered before 48 hours (39% vs 57%; p = 0.02; HR = 0.63;[0.41-0.99, p = 0.05]). Discussion: This study supports the early use of TCZ in patients with severe or critical COVID-19.

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Tocilizumab (TCZ), an IL-6 receptor antagonist monoclonal antibody is warranted in severe and critically-ill COVID-19 patients. The objective was to evaluate 28-day mortality of patients with severe or critical COVID-19 treated with early vs delayed TCZ. METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study including patients >18 years hospitalized between 7/1/2021-8/1/2022 with confirmed COVID-19, with 5, 6 and 7 points of WHO Ordinal Initial Severity Scale [SS]. Early or late administration was considered if TCZ was administered before or after 48 hours from admission. Outcomes were 28-day mortality and change of SS. Factors related to 28-day mortality were evaluated with Cox regression. RESULTS: 266 patients were included, 159(60%) male; aged 58(± 15); frequent comorbidities were hypertension (42%), obesity (37%) and diabetes (27%). Seventy patients had a SS = 5 (Supplemental O2), 143 had SS = 6 (NIV/ HFNC), and 53 had SS = 7 (IMV). 28-day mortality was 42%(112/266); predictors were age, obesity, higher SS, days between hospitalization and TCZ administration, and fewer days between symptoms onset and TCZ. Mortality of SS 5, 6 and 7 was 26%, 39% and 72% respectively. Compared with baseline SS points, 76% and 62% of patients remained stable or improved on days 3 and 7 since TCZ administration. 28-day mortality was lower when TCZ was administered before 48 hours (39% vs 57%; p = 0.02; HR = 0.63;[0.41-0.99, p = 0.05]). DISCUSSION: This study supports the early use of TCZ in patients with severe or critical COVID-19.

Introducción: El objetivo principal del estudio fue evaluar la mortalidad en los pacientes con COVID-19 graves y críticos, que recibieron tocilizumab (TCZ) -un antagonista monoclonal del receptor de IL-6- de forma temprana vs. tardía. Métodos: Cohorte retrospectiva multicéntrica de pacientes > 18 años internados con COVID-19 desde el 1/7/2021-1/8/2022, con 5-7 puntos de gravedad inicial (GI) según Escala de la OMS. Se consideró administración temprana o tardía a la infusión de TCZ = ó > a 48 h del ingreso. Las variables de resultado fueron mortalidad a 28 días y cambio de la GI. Los factores relacionados con la mortalidad fueron evaluados con regresión de Cox. Resultados: Se incluyeron 266 pacientes, 159(60%) varones; edad 58(± 15); con hipertensión arterial (43%), obesidad (37%) y diabetes (27%);70 presentaban GI = 5 (oxígeno suplementario), 143 GI = 6 (ventilación no invasiva o cánula nasal de alto flujo) y 53 GI = 7 (ventilación mecánica invasiva). La mortalidad a 28 días fue 42%, asociada independientemente a: edad, obesidad, GI, días entre la internación y administración del TCZ, y días entre la fecha de inicio de síntomas y el TCZ. La mortalidad para GI 5, 6 y 7 fue 26%, 39% y 72%, respectivamente; 76% y 62% de los pacientes permanecieron estables o mejoraron la GI a los días 3 y 7 de la infusión de TCZ. La mortalidad a 28 días fue 39% (TCZ temprano) vs. 57% (TCZ tardío); p = 0.02; HR = 0.63[0.41-0.99, p = 0.05]). Discusión: Estos resultados apoyan la administración temprana de TCZ en pacientes con COVID-19 grave y crítica.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Tocilizumab is an anti-human interleukin 6 receptor monoclonal antibody that has been used to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, there is no consensus on its efficacy for the treatment of COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab for treating COVID-19. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic Review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and IBECS for RCTs published up to March 2021. Two authors selected studies and assessed the risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence following Cochrane Recommendations. RESULTS: Eight RCTs with 6,139 participants were included. We were not able to find differences between using tocilizumab compared to standard care on mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (risk ratio (RR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.13; 8 trials; 5,950 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, hospitalized patients under tocilizumab plus standard care treatment seemed to present a significantly lower risk of needing mechanical ventilation (risk ratio = 0.78; 95% CI 0.64−0.94 moderate-certainty of evidence). CONCLUSIONS: To date, the best evidence available shows no difference between using tocilizumab plus standard care compared to standard care alone for reducing mortality in patients with COVID-19. However, as a finding with a practical implication, the use of tocilizumab in association to standard care probably reduces the risk of progressing to mechanical ventilation in those patients. REGISTRATION: osf.io/qe4fs.

RESUMO

Objetivos. Caracterizar los eventos adversos (EA) asociados a hidroxicloroquina (HQ), azitromicina (AZI), tocilizumab (TOB) e ivermectina (IVM) prescritos como «fuera de etiqueta» en el tratamiento de pacientes hospitalizados por la COVID-19. Materiales y métodos. Se realizó un análisis secundario transversal de la base de datos del sistema de farmacovigilancia del Seguro Social de Salud del Perú (EsSalud) de las notificaciones de EA a HQ, AZI, TOB e IVM provenientes del Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins de abril a octubre del 2020. Se revisaron las historias clínicas digitales, se estimaron las tasas de reporte de EA y se evaluaron sus características por tipo de fármaco, tiempo de aparición, tipo por órgano-sistema afectado, gravedad y causalidad. Resultados. Se identificaron 154 notificaciones que describen un total de 183 EA posiblemente relacionados con HQ, AZI, TOB e IVM, siendo 8% la tasa de reporte de EA. La mediana de tiempo de aparición de EA fue de 3 días (RIC: 2-5). La mayoría fueron cardiovasculares, destacándose la prolongación del intervalo QT. Se observaron EA hepatobiliares principalmente asociados a TOB. La mayoría de los casos fueron moderados, no obstante, el 10,4% fue grave. Conclusiones. Se identificaron EA potencialmente asociados al uso de HQ, AZI, TOB e IVM contra la COVID-19, siendo los más frecuentes los de tipo cardiovasculares. A pesar de que la AZI, HQ e IVM poseen perfiles conocidos de seguridad, su empleo en la COVID-19 podría incrementar la aparición de EA por los factores de riesgo propios de esta infección. Se sugiere reforzar la vigilancia, especialmente, de TOB.

Objective. To characterize the adverse events (AEs) related to the off-label use of hydroxychloroquine (HQ), azithromycin (AZI), tocilizumab (TOB) and ivermectin (IVM) for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients. Materials and Methods. We conducted a secondary cross-sectional analysis of the Peruvian Social Health Insurance (EsSalud) pharmacovigilance system database of AE notifications to HQ, AZI, TOB and IVM in the Edgardo Rebagliati Martins National Hospital from April to October 2020. Information was collected from digital medical records. We estimated AE reporting rates and evaluated their characteristics by drug type, time of occurrence, type by the affected organ-system, severity and causality. Results. We identified 154 notifications describing a total of 183 AE possibly related to HQ, AZI, TOB and IVM; the reporting rate was 8%. The median time of AE occurrence was 3 days (IQR: 2-5). Most were cardiovascular events; prolongation of the QT interval was the most frequent. Hepatobiliary AEs were mainly associated with TOB. Most cases were moderate, however, 10.4% were severe. Conclusions. We found AEs potentially associated with the use of HQ, AZI, TOB and IVM against COVID-19; cardiovascular events were the most frequent. Although AZI, HQ and IVM have known safety profiles, their use against COVID-19 could increase the occurrence of AE due to the risk factors inherent to this infection. Surveillance systems must be improved, especially those for TOB.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) established the mortality reduction by tocilizumab (Actemra), baricitinib (Olumiant), and sarilumab (Kevzara) in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. However, uncertainty remains about which treatment performs best in patients receiving corticosteroids. OBJECTIVES: To estimate probabilities of noninferiority between baricitinib and sarilumab compared to tocilizumab in patients treated with corticosteroids. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and MedRxiv. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Eligible RCTs assigning hospitalized adults with COVID-19 treated with corticosteroids to tocilizumab or baricitinib or sarilumab versus standard of care or placebo (control). METHODS: Reviewers independently abstracted published data and assessed study quality with the Risk of Bias 2 tool. Unpublished data, if required, were requested from authors of included studies. The outcome of interest was all-cause mortality at 28 days. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven RCTs with 13 549 patients were included. Overall, the risk of bias was low. Bayesian pairwise meta-analyses were used to aggregate results of each treatment versus control. The average odds ratio for mortality was 0.78 (95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.65, 0.94) for tocilizumab; 0.78 (95% CrI: 0.56, 1.03) for baricitinib; and 0.91 (95% CrI: 0.60, 1.40) for sarilumab. The certainty of evidence (GRADE) ranged from moderate to low. Bayesian meta-regressions with multiple priors were used to estimate probabilities of noninferiority (margin of 13% greater effect by tocilizumab). Compared to tocilizumab, there were ≤94% and 90% probabilities of noninferiority with baricitinib and sarilumab, respectively. RESULTS: All but two studies included data with only indirect evidence for the comparison of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Among hospitalized COVID-19 treated with corticosteroids, there are high probabilities that both baricitinib and sarilumab are associated with similar mortality reductions in comparison to tocilizumab.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Background Our aim was to compare the efficacy of rituximab, tocilizumab, and abatacept in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to treatments with MTX or TNFi agents. Methods We searched 6 databases until January 2023 for phase 2-4 RCTs evaluating patients with RA refractory to MTX or TNFi therapy treated with rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab (intervention arm) compared to controls. Study data were independently assessed by two investigators. The primary outcome was considered as achieving ACR70 response. Results The meta-analysis included 19 RCTs, with 7,835 patients and a mean study duration of 1.2 years. Hazard ratios for achieving an ACR70 response at six months were not different among the bDMARDs, however, we found high heterogeneity. Three factors showing a critical imbalance among the bDMARD classes were identified: baseline HAQ score, study duration, and frequency of TNFi treatment in control arm. Multivariate meta-regression adjusted to these three factors were conducted for the relative risk (RR) for ACR70. Thus, heterogeneity was attenuated (I2 = 24%) and the explanatory power of the model increased (R2 = 85%). In this model, rituximab did not modify the chance of achieving an ACR70 response compared to abatacept (RR = 1.773, 95%CI 0.113-10.21, p = 0.765). In contrast, abatacept was associated with RR = 2.217 (95%CI 1.554-3.161, p < 0.001) for ACR70 compared to tocilizumab. Conclusion We found high heterogeneity among studies comparing rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab. On multivariate metaregressions, if the conditions of the RCTs were similar, we estimate that abatacept could increase the chance of reaching an ACR70 response by 2.2-fold compared to tocilizumab. Key messages Abatacept could increase the chance of reaching an ACR70 response by 2.2-fold compared to tocilizumab.

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: there is evidence on the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab (TZC) used in combination with systemic corticosteroids for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treatment. The purpose of this study was to describe epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory features as well as clinical outcome of patients receiving this combination therapy compared with those receiving only corticosteroids. METHODS: a retrospective cohort study, which included adults with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, was conducted between March and August 2021. Enrolment included 101 patients, 46 with corticosteroids and 55 with corticosteroids plus tocilizumab. RESULTS: median age was 58 years old and 63.9% were females. High blood pressure was present in 36.1% and obesity in 54.6%. Survival in the cohort was 81.4%, with a median hospital stay of 19.0 days. Secondary infections were present in 47.4% of the cohort. Patients in the TZC group had a lower C reactive protein (CRP) at discharge, lower rate of multiple organ failure, better functional status at discharge and shorter hospital stay. In a bivariate analysis, no differences were found in mortality rate and secondary infections occurrence. When assessing clinical status as per WHO Ordinal Scale there was a significant difference in its variability from worsening to discharge (or 14 days), evidencing a better functional status in patients receiving TCZ. DISCUSSION: we were able to demonstrate its efficacy in reducing inflammatory biomarkers and a trend towards fewer days of hospitalization, with no impact on mortality.

Introducción: existe evidencia sobre la efectividad y seguridad de tocilizumab (TZC) utilizado en combinación con corticosteroides sistémicos para el tratamiento de la neumonía grave por SARS-CoV-2. El propósito de este estudio fue describir las características epidemiológicas, clínicas y de laboratorio, así como el resultado clínico de los pacientes que recibieron esta terapia combinada en comparación con los que recibieron solo corticosteroides. Métodos: se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo, que incluyó adultos con neumonía grave por SARS-CoV-2, entre marzo y agosto de 2021. Se incluyeron 101 pacientes, 46 con corticosteroides y 55 con corticosteroides más tocilizumab. Resultados: la mediana de edad fue de 58 años y el 63.9% eran mujeres. La hipertensión arterial estuvo presente en el 36.1% y la obesidad en el 54.6%. La supervivencia en la cohorte fue del 81.4%, con una mediana de estancia hospitalaria de 19.0 días. Las infecciones secundarias estuvieron presentes en el 47.4% de la cohorte. Los pacientes del grupo TZC tenían valores menores de proteína C reactiva (PCR) al alta, una tasa más baja de insuficiencia multiorgánica, un mejor estado funcional al alta y una estancia hospitalaria más corta. En un análisis bivariado, no se encontraron diferencias en la tasa de mortalidad y la ocurrencia de infecciones secundarias. Al evaluar el estado clínico según la Escala Ordinal de la OMS hubo una diferencia significativa en su variabilidad desde el empeoramiento hasta el alta (o 14 días), evidenciando un mejor estado funcional en los que recibieron TCZ. Discusión: pudimos demostrar su eficacia en la reducción de biomarcadores inflamatorios y una tendencia a menos días de hospitalización, sin impacto en la mortalidad.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can cause cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which leads to high mortality rates. Tocilizumab suppresses CRS by blocking the signal transduction of interleukin-6 (IL-6). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and laboratory parameters associated with mortality among patients receiving tocilizumab treatment. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective observational study conducted in the chest disease departments of two different training and research hospitals in the center of Ankara, Turkey. METHODS: Patients who were hospitalized and treated with tocilizumab in September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Their laboratory parameters and clinical characteristics were obtained from the hospital information system database. Comparative analyses were performed between the patients who died and the ones who survived. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients who received tocilizumab treatment were included in this study, among whom 35 (60.3%) died. There was no difference between the mortality and survival groups in terms of white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, lymphocyte, ferritin or C-reactive protein (CRP) levels detected on admission. WBC, lymphocyte, neutrophil and CRP levels measured on the third and fifth days after tocilizumab administration were found to be significantly lower in the survival group (P < 0.05). In multiple logistic regression analysis, age and oxygen saturation were determined to be independent risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSION: Persistently high WBC, CRP and neutrophil levels and low lymphocyte levels could be considered to be valuable indicators of mortality among COVID-19 patients treated with tocilizumab. Age and low oxygen saturation are independent risk factors for mortality among patients receiving tocilizumab treatment.

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction: there is evidence on the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab (TZC) used in combination with systemic corticosteroids for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treatment. The purpose of this study was to describe epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory features as well as clinical outcome of patients receiving this combination therapy compared with those receiving only corticosteroids. Methods: a retrospective cohort study, which included adults with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, was conducted between March and August 2021. Enrolment included 101 patients, 46 with corticosteroids and 55 with corticosteroids plus tocilizumab. Results: median age was 58 years old and 63.9% were females. High blood pressure was present in 36.1% and obesity in 54.6%. Survival in the cohort was 81.4%, with a median hospital stay of 19.0 days. Secondary infections were present in 47.4% of the cohort. Patients in the TZC group had a lower C reactive protein (CRP) at discharge, lower rate of multiple organ failure, better functional status at discharge and shorter hospital stay. In a bivariate analysis, no differences were found in mortality rate and secondary infections occurrence. When assessing clinical status as per WHO Ordinal Scale there was a significant difference in its variability from wors ening to discharge (or 14 days), evidencing a better functional status in patients receiving TCZ. Discussion: we were able to demonstrate its efficacy in reducing inflammatory biomarkers and a trend towards fewer days of hospitalization, with no impact on mortality.

Resumen Introducción: existe evidencia sobre la efectividad y seguridad de tocilizumab (TZC) utilizado en combinación con corticosteroides sistémicos para el tratamiento de la neumonía grave por SARS-CoV-2. El propósito de este estudio fue describir las características epidemiológicas, clínicas y de laboratorio, así como el resultado clínico de los pacientes que recibieron esta terapia combinada en comparación con los que recibieron solo corticosteroides. Métodos: se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo, que incluyó adultos con neumonía grave por SARS-CoV-2, entre marzo y agosto de 2021. Se incluyeron 101 pacientes, 46 con corticosteroides y 55 con corticosteroides más tocilizumab. Resultados: la mediana de edad fue de 58 años y el 63.9% eran mujeres. La hipertensión arterial estuvo presente en el 36.1% y la obesidad en el 54.6%. La supervivencia en la cohorte fue del 81.4%, con una mediana de estancia hospitalaria de 19.0 días. Las infecciones secundarias estuvieron presentes en el 47.4% de la cohorte. Los pacientes del grupo TZC tenían valores menores de pro teína C reactiva (PCR) al alta, una tasa más baja de insuficiencia multiorgánica, un mejor estado funcional al alta y una estancia hospitalaria más corta. En un análisis bivariado, no se encontraron diferencias en la tasa de mortalidad y la ocurrencia de infecciones secundarias. Al evaluar el estado clínico según la Escala Ordinal de la OMS hubo una diferencia significativa en su variabilidad desde el empeoramiento hasta el alta (o 14 días), evidenciando un mejor estado funcional en los que recibieron TCZ. Discusión: pudimos demostrar su eficacia en la reducción de biomarcadores inflamatorios y una tendencia a menos días de hospitalización, sin impacto en la mortalidad.

RESUMO

The use of biological immunotherapeutic drugs is one of the options currently being evaluated and employed to manage COVID-19, specifically monoclonal antibodies, which have shown benefit by regulating the excessive immune response seen in patients with severe infection, known as a cytokine storm. Tocilizumab has received particular importance for this clinical application, as has sarilumab. Both drugs share a substantial similarity in terms of pharmacodynamics, being inhibitors of the interleukin six receptor (IL-6Rα). Furthermore, sotrovimab, a neutralizing anti-SARS CoV-2 antibody, has gained the attention of the scientific community since it has recently been authorized under certain circumstances, positioning itself as a new therapeutic alternative in development. However, despite their clinical benefit, biological immunotherapies have the potential to generate life-threatening immune-related adverse events. Therefore it is essential to review their incidence, mechanism, and risk factors. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the safety of the biological immunotherapeutic drugs currently recommended for the treatment of COVID-19, provide a review of the known immune-mediated adverse events and explore the potential immune-related mechanisms of other adverse reactions.

RESUMO

A la fecha, excepto los glucocorticoides, ningún otro tratamiento farmacológico ha demostrado disminución de la mortalidad en pacientes con COVID-19 grave-crítico. Con el objetivo de discutir su utilidad en la terapéutica, se realizó una revisión y lectura crítica de los estudios publicados más significativos sobre el uso de tocilizumab.Se llevó adelante una búsqueda en las principales bases de datos bibliográficas priorizando la inclusión de revisiones sistemáticas y ensayos clínicos aleatorizados controlados (ERC) que analizaran el efecto del tocilizumab en COVID-19 en diferentes puntos de valoración.Se incluyeron 5 ERC y 4 metaanálisis en la evaluación, todos ellos incluyeron pacientes con COVID-19 confirmado y mayoritariamente graves-críticos. El punto de valoración principal (PVP) fue la mortalidad a los 28 días y como resultado secundario de relevancia, la progresión a ventilación mecánica invasiva (VMI). Se analizó, además, la seguridad de la intervención, fundamentalmente a nivel de la ocurrencia de infecciones secundarias.Del análisis surge que la mayor posibilidad de beneficio parece estar circunscripta a pacientes con enfermedad grave-crítica, que reciben corticoides, con marcadores de inflamación elevados (PCR >10 mg/dL) y enfermedad rápidamente progresiva. Existe alto grado de certeza respecto del impacto del tocilizumab en evitar la progresión a VMI, con una pequeña magnitud del efecto y moderado grado de certeza respecto de su impacto en la mortalidad; además de que resultó una medicación segura

Up until now, other than corticosteroids, no other pharmacological treatment has shown a decrease in mortality rate in patients with severe-critical COVID-19. In order to discuss its place in therapy, a review and critical reading of the most significant published studies on the use of tocilizumab was carried out.Search was done in the main bibliographic databases, prioritizing the inclusion of systematic reviews and randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs); that analyzed the effect of tocilizumab on COVID-19 at different endpoints.5 RCTs and 4 meta-analysis were considered in the evaluation, all of them including patients with confirmed COVID-19 and predominantly severe-critical illness. The primary endpoint was 28-day all-cause mortality and, as a secondary outcome of relevance, progression to invasive mechanical ventilation. The safety of the intervention was also analyzed, mainly the occurrence of secondary infections.From our analysis it appears that the greatest possibility of benefit seems to be limited to patients with severe-critical illness, who receive corticosteroids, with high markers of inflammation values (CRP> 10 mg/dL) and rapidly progressive disease. There is high certainty regarding the impact of tocilizumab in preventing progression to IMV, with a small effect size and moderate certainty regarding its impact on mortality. Moreover, it was a well-tolerated and safe medication

Assuntos

RESUMO

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: In coronavirus disease 2019, a rapidly progressive inflammatory process is considered to be the main cause of organ damage and mortality. Therefore, the importance of anti-inflammatory treatments such as tocilizumab is increasing. METHODS: A total of 107 patients who received tocilizumab between March 2020 and March 2021 were included in the study. The primary termination point was mortality. We compared surviving and deceased patients by the stage of the disease and where the drug was given (service or intensive care unit). RESULTS: The mean age was 60.8±14.6 years (minimum 29 years, maximum 96 years). According to the WHO staging system, 16 (15%) patients had moderate, 47 (43.9%) patients had severe, 44 (41.1%) patients had a critical illness. Although all patients were admitted to the service, 26 (24.3%) patients received tocilizumab in the intensive care unit. Of 107 patients, 80 (74.7%) survived and 27 (25.2%) died. Mortality was found to be significantly higher in critical patients (96.3%), severe patients (3.7%), and moderate patients (0%) (p<0.001). Peripheral oxygen saturation measured at admission was found to be significantly lower in patients who died. The initial saturations (p=0.008) were found to have independent effects on mortality. CONCLUSION: The results showed that tocilizumab is an effective treatment option for coronavirus disease 2019 disease and reduces mortality, but the key point is timing.

RESUMO

Abstract Recently it has been demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of tocilizumab (TCZ) associated with systemic steroids for the treatment of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia with rapid progression. The objective of this work was to describe the epidemiological, clinical, laboratory and evolution characteristics of the patients who received this treatment. Between March and June 2021, TCZ was administered in a cohort study of adults with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, in a private hospital in the City of Buenos Aires; 30 patients were included, 63% men, middle age 55 years. Obesity (33%), arterial hypertension (26%) and diabetes (25%) were the most frequent comorbidities. We found associated infections during hospitalization in half of the cohort, within them, pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation was the most frequent and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, the most prevalent germ. Patients with secondary infections had a higher requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (100% vs. 19% p < 0.001) and more days of hospitalization (median 23 vs. 15 p = 0.009). Of the entire cohort, seven who died during hospitalization had the highest requirement for IMV (100% vs. 43% p = 0.010) and secondary infections (100% vs. 35%, p = 0.006). In this relatively young cohort of patients with severe or critical SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, obesity does not appear to be a predisposing factor for superinfection or death. The presence of secondary infections, organ failure and shock are presented as probable factors of worse evolution, as well as the requirement of IMV.

Resumen Recientemente se demostró la efectividad clínica del tocilizumab (TCZ) asociado a esteroides sistémicos para el tratamiento de la neumonía grave por SARS-CoV-2 con rápida progresión. El objetivo de este trabajo fue describir las caracterís ticas epidemiológicas, clínicas, de laboratorio y evolución de los pacientes que recibieron este tratamiento. Entre marzo y junio, 2021, se realizó un estudio de cohorte en un sanatorio privado de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires en adultos con neumonía grave por SARS-CoV-2 que recibieron TCZ. Se incluyeron 30 pacientes, hombres 63%, mediana edad 55 años, obesidad (33%), hipertensión arterial (26%) y diabetes (25%) fueron las comorbilidades más frecuentes. Encontramos infecciones asociadas durante la hospitalización en la mitad de la cohorte, den tro de ellas, la neumonía asociada a la ventilación mecánica fue la más frecuente y el Staphylococcus aureus meticilino sensible, el germen más prevalente. Los enfermos con infecciones secundarias tuvieron un mayor requerimiento de ventilación mecánica invasiva (VMI) (100% vs. 19% p < 0.001) y más días de internación (me diana 23 vs. 15 p = 0.009). De la totalidad de la cohorte, siete que fallecieron durante la internación tuvieron el mayor requerimiento de VMI (100% vs. 43% p = 0.010) e infecciones secundarias (100% vs. 35%, p = 0.006). En esta cohorte relativamente joven de pacientes con neumonía grave o crítica por SARS-CoV-2, la obesidad no parece ser un factor predisponente para sobreinfección o muerte. La presencia de infecciones secundarias, falla orgánica y shock se presentan como probables factores de peor evolución, como así también el requerimiento de VMI.

RESUMO

Recently it has been demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of tocilizumab (TCZ) associated with systemic steroids for the treatment of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia with rapid progression. The objective of this work was to describe the epidemiological, clinical, laboratory and evolution characteristics of the patients who received this treatment. Between March and June 2021, TCZ was administered in a cohort study of adults with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, in a private hospital in the City of Buenos Aires; 30 patients were included, 63% men, middle age 55 years. Obesity (33%), arterial hypertension (26%) and diabetes (25%) were the most frequent comorbidities. We found associated infections during hospitalization in half of the cohort, within them, pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation was the most frequent and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, the most prevalent germ. Patients with secondary infections had a higher requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (100% vs. 19% p < 0.001) and more days of hospitalization (median 23 vs. 15 p = 0.009). Of the entire cohort, seven who died during hospitalization had the highest requirement for IMV (100% vs. 43% p = 0.010) and secondary infections (100% vs. 35%, p = 0.006). In this relatively young cohort of patients with severe or critical SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, obesity does not appear to be a predisposing factor for superinfection or death. The presence of secondary infections, organ failure and shock are presented as probable factors of worse evolution, as well as the requirement of IMV.

Recientemente se demostró la efectividad clínica del tocilizumab (TCZ) asociado a esteroides sistémicos para el tratamiento de la neumonía grave por SARS-CoV-2 con rápida progresión. El objetivo de este trabajo fue describir las características epidemiológicas, clínicas, de laboratorio y evolución de los pacientes que recibieron este tratamiento. Entre marzo y junio, 2021, se realizó un estudio de cohorte en un sanatorio privado de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires en adultos con neumonía grave por SARS-CoV-2 que recibieron TCZ. Se incluyeron 30 pacientes, hombres 63%, mediana edad 55 años, obesidad (33%), hipertensión arterial (26%) y diabetes (25%) fueron las comorbilidades más frecuentes. Encontramos infecciones asociadas durante la hospitalización en la mitad de la cohorte, dentro de ellas, la neumonía asociada a la ventilación mecánica fue la más frecuente y el Staphylococcus aureus meticilino sensible, el germen más prevalente. Los enfermos con infecciones secundarias tuvieron un mayor requerimiento de ventilación mecánica invasiva (VMI) (100% vs. 19% p < 0.001) y más días de internación (mediana 23 vs. 15 p = 0.009). De la totalidad de la cohorte, siete que fallecieron durante la internación tuvieron el mayor requerimiento de VMI (100% vs. 43% p = 0.010) e infecciones secundarias (100% vs. 35%, p = 0.006). En esta cohorte relativamente joven de pacientes con neumonía grave o crítica por SARS-CoV-2, la obesidad no parece ser un factor predisponente para sobreinfección o muerte. La presencia de infecciones secundarias, falla orgánica y shock se presentan como probables factores de peor evolución, como así también el requerimiento de VMI.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Trials evaluating safety and efficacy of tocilizumab in coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) show contradictory results. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of tocilizumab in hospital mortality among patients with severe COVID-19 in a third-level medical center. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included patients with severe and critical COVID-19. Primary outcome was death during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), days on IMV, ventilator-free days (VFDs), length of hospital stay (LOS), and development of hospitalacquired infections (HAIs). Bivariate, multivariate, and propensity score matching analysis were performed. RESULTS: During the study period, 99/794 (12%) patients received tocilizumab. Male patients, health care workers, and patients with increased inflammatory markers received tocilizumab more frequently. No difference in hospital mortality was observed between groups (34% vs. 34%, p = 0.98). Tocilizumab was not independently associated with mortality. No significant treatment effects were observed in propensity score analysis. IMV was more frequent (46% vs. 11%, p < 0.01) and LOS was longer (12 vs. 7 days, p < 0.01) in the tocilizumab group, reflecting increased severity. Although HAIs were more frequent in the tocilizumab group (22% vs. 10%, p < 0.01), no difference was seen after adjusting for IMV (38% vs. 40%, p = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, tocilizumab was not associated with decreased hospital mortality among patients with severe COVID-19.

Assuntos