RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The creation of the da Vinci Single-Site© Surgical Platform (DVSSP) allowed robotic surgery to perform single portal procedures. Due to the characteristics of the robotic single-site system, the triangulation of the instruments was optimized, facilitating the execution of the movements. For this, the care in the placement of the portal have fundamental importance. In overweight and patients with obesity, the subcutaneous can impede the ideal positioning of the portal, affecting the movement of the robotic arms and creating discomfort for the surgeon and bringing risks to the patient. TECHNIQUE: Three points are made for subcutaneous reduction, allowing better adaptation of the device. EXPERIENCE: This technique is performed in all patients with obesity submitted to single-site robotic surgery at our service. CONCLUSION: It is a simple, fast, and low-cost method, allowing more safety to patient and comfort for the surgeon.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the gold standard surgical approach for small benign adrenal tumors [1]. Several surgical approaches were developed in order to overcome the difficulty to access the adrenal glands, located in the upper retroperitoneum space [2-4]. Laparoendoscopic single-site posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (LESS-PRA) is an emerging technique that reduced the multiple trocar-related trauma and improved cosmetic outcomes while minimizing postoperative morbidity [5-8]. The aim of this study was to describe our step-by-step technique for LESS-PRA and to compare our perioperative outcomes with the conventional 3-port lateral retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (LRA). METHODS: A retrospective review was carried out from February 2008 to January 2016 that included 100 patients with adrenal tumors smaller than 4 cm. Study exclusion criteria were defined as tumor size greater than 4 cm, patients older than 80 years, and body mass index (BMI) greater than 40. A total of 20 patients underwent LESS-PRA and 80 patients underwent 3-port lateral retroperitoneoscopic laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Patient's demographic data and perioperative outcomes were compared and statistically analyzed. The cosmetic satisfaction was evaluated with a visual analog scale. RESULTS: Estimated blood loss was higher in LRA (100 vs. 50 ml; p = 0.35). Operative time was longer in LESS-PRA than LRA (100.0 vs. 60 min; p < 0.001). Analgesic time necessary for LRA was longer than LESS-PRA (40 vs. 24 h; p < 0.001). Cosmetic satisfaction score was higher in LESS-PRA (9.5 vs. 8.6; p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in perioperative complications and length of hospital stay. No conversion to conventional laparoscopic or open surgery was necessary. CONCLUSION: LESS-PRA presented comparable functional and perioperative outcomes to LRA for small adrenal tumors. Although LESS-PRA was associated with longer operative time, it provided inferior estimated blood loss, analgesic time, and improved cosmetic satisfaction.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Robotic surgeries for cervical cancer have several advantages compared with lapa-rotomic or laparoscopic surgeries. Robotic single-site surgery has many advantages compared with the multiport approach, but its safety and feasibility are not established in radical oncologic surgeries. We report a case of a Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB1 cervical carcinoma whose radical hysterectomy, sentinel lymph node mapping, and lymph node dissection were entirely performed by robotic single-site approach. The patient recovered very well, and was discharged from the hospital within 24 hours.

RESUMO A cirurgia robótica para carcinoma do colo do útero apresenta vantagens quando comparada com cirurgias laparotômicas ou laparoscópicas. A cirurgia robótica de portal único tem muitas vantagens quando comparada com cirurgias de múltiplos acessos, porém a segurança e a viabilidade deste procedimento ainda não estão estabelecidas para cirurgias oncológicas radicais. Apresentamos um caso de carcinoma de colo do útero, tratado por histerectomia radical, identificação e biópsia de linfonodo sentinela e linfadenectomia pélvica realizada totalmente por cirurgia robótica de acesso único. A paciente recuperou-se bem e recebeu alta no primeiro dia pós-operatório.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The aim of this study is to analyze the current literature on single port radical prostatectomy (LESS-RP). Single port radical prostatectomy laparoendoscopic (LESS-RP) has established itself as a challenge for urological community, starting with the proposal of different approaches: extraperitoneal, transperitoneal and transvesical, initially described for laparoscopy and then laparoscopy robot-assisted. In order to improve the LESS-RP, new instruments, optical devices, trocars and retraction mechanisms have been developed. Advantages and disadvantages of LESS-RP are controversial, while some claim that it is a non-trustable approach, regarding the low cases number and technical difficulties, others acclaim that despite this facts some advantages have been shown and that previous described difficulties are being overcome, proving this is novel proposal of robotics platform, the Da Vinci SP, integrating the system into "Y". The LESS-RP approach gives us a new horizon and opens the door for rapid standardization of this technique. The few studies and short series available can be result of a low interest in the application of LESS-RP in prostate, probably because of the technical complexity that it requires. The new robotic platform, the da Vinci SP, shows that it is clear that the long awaited evolution of robotic technologies for laparoscopy has begun, and we must not lose this momentum.

Assuntos

RESUMO

We aimed to review studies comparing the outcomes of the laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) pyeloplasty with those of conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty (CLP). A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis) criteria. The methodological quality of the studies was rated according validated scales. The level of evidence (LE) was reported as described by the Oxford criteria. Preoperative demographic parameters and perioperative outcomes between the two surgical techniques were assessed. A meta-analysis of the included studies was performed. A total of 5 studies were elected for the analysis, including 164 cases, 70 (42.6%) of them being LESS and 94 (57.4%) being CLP. Four studies were observational retrospective comparative studies (LE: 3a-4); one was a prospective randomized controlled trial (LE: 2b). There was no significant difference in age, body mass index, gender, side and presence of the crossing vessel, between the groups. There was no significant difference regarding the operative time (weight mean difference [WMD]: -7.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -71.82-57.79; P = 0.83) and length of hospital stay (WMD: 0.04; 95% CI: -0.11-0.20; P = 0.58), whereas the estimated blood loss was statistically lower for LESS (WMD: -16.83; 95% CI: -31.79--1.87; P = 0.03). The postoperative use of analgesic favored the LESS group but without reaching statistical significance (WMD: -7.52; 95% CI: -17.56-2.53; P = 0.14). In conclusion, LESS pyeloplasty offers comparable surgical and functional outcomes to CLP while providing the potential advantages of less blood loss and lower analgesic requirement. Thus, despite being more technically challenging, LESS pyeloplasty can be regarded as a minimally invasive approach for patients seeking fewer incisional scars.

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility of endoscopic extraperitoneal single site (EESS) inguinal hernia repair and compare it outcomes with the conventional totally extraperitoneal (TEP) technique. BACKGROUND: TEP inguinal hernia repair is a widely accepted alternative to conventional open technique with several perioperative advantages. Transumbilical laparoendoscopic singlesite surgery (LESS) is an emerging approach and has been reported for a number of surgical procedures with superior aesthetic results but other advantages need to be proven. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight uncomplicated inguinal hernias were repaired by EESS approach between January 2010 and January 2011. All procedures were performed through a 25 cm infraumbilical incision using the Alexis wound retractor attached to a surgical glove and three trocars. Body mass index, age, operative time, blood loss, complications, conversion rate, analgesia requirement, hospital stay, return to normal activities and patient satisfaction with aesthetic results were analysed and compared with the last 38 matched-pair group of patients who underwent a conventional TEP inguinal hernia repair by the same surgeon. RESULTS: All procedures were performed successfully with no conversion. In both unilateral and bilateral EESS inguinal repairs, the mean operative time was longer than conventional TEP (55± 20 vs. 40± 15 min, P = 0.049 and 70± 15 vs. 55± 10 min, P = 0.014). Aesthetic result was superior in the EESS group (2.88± 0.43 vs. 2.79± 0.51, P = 0.042). There was no difference between the two approaches regarding blood loss, complications, hospital stay, time until returns to normal activities and analgesic requirement. CONCLUSION: EESS inguinal hernia repair is safe and effective, with superior cosmetic results in the treatment of uncomplicated inguinal hernias. Other advantages of this new technique still need to be proven.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The transumbilical route began being clinically feasible with or without unique access devices. SETTING: The setting for this study was a private practice at Clínica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to describe our experience performing a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) via transumbilical route using a single-port access device in addition to standard laparoscopic instruments. METHOD: A prospective nonrandomized protocol was applied to patients fulfilling the following inclusion criteria: to have been medically indicated for an LSG, to have a body mass index (BMI) of less than or equal to 40 kg/m2, and the distance between the xiphoid appendix and umbilicus should be less than 22 cm. All patients were female with a median (p50) age of 34.5 (ranging from 21 to 57) years, a median weight of 92 (ranging from 82.5 to 113) kg, and a median BMI of 35.1 (ranging from 30.5 to 40) kg/m2. The device insertion technique, the gastrectomy, and postoperative management are described. RESULTS: LSG via transumbilical route was successfully carried out in 19 of the 20 patients in whom the procedure was performed; one patient had to be converted to a conventional laparoscopic procedure. Mean operating time was 127 (ranging from 90 to 170) min. On the second postoperative day, all patients were assessed through an upper gastrointestinal barium-contrasted radiological series. There was neither morbidity nor mortality in this group. Excess weight loss at 25 months after surgery was 114 %. CONCLUSIONS: Single-port LSG can be successfully performed in selected obese patients with a BMI of less than 40 kg/m2 using traditional laparoscopic instruments. The technique allows performing a safe and effective vertical gastrectomy.