RESUMO

The first reports of viruses in psittacine birds date back to the early 1970s. Here, we elucidate the differences among these previous studies and the advances achieved. The objective of this study was to carry out a comprehensive review using both scientometric and systematic methods to analyze the evolution of published studies on viruses in psittacine birds up to 2022. The search descriptors "virus", "diagnosis", and "Psittaciformes" were used to find the articles of interest for this study. A total of 118 articles were manually selected, and the scientometric data were organized using the software VOSviewer® version 1.6.18. The present review revealed that: (i) on average, 2.5 articles/year on the diagnosis of viral infection in psittacine birds were published since 1975; (ii) the most productive research groups are concentrated in three countries: Australia, the United States, and Germany; (iii) the most important virus in psittacine birds is the Circovirus, which causes psittacine beak and feather disease; (iv) the diagnostic method of choice is polymerase chain reaction (PCR); and (v) the most studied psittacine birds were those in the Psittacidae family that were kept in captivity.

RESUMO

Microplastics, capable of absorbing persistent organic compounds, heavy metals, and emerging pollutants, are of global concern due to their potential to alter the behavior and metabolism of biota. In Latin America, the Pacific Alliance, comprising Mexico, Colombia, Peru, and Chile, stands out for its biological wealth and productive ecosystems, which account for 37% of the region's gross domestic product. The leaders of these countries expressed their concern about microplastic pollution and pledged to take joint action. We conducted an analysis of the scientific production of these countries and the collaborations of their researchers, focused on the period 2015-2023, using Scopus and SCImago. We observed that marine-coastal/wetland ecosystems are the most studied, with a focus on fish, and that Mexico leads in publications, followed by Colombia, Peru, and Chile. In addition, we note the absence of an inter-institutional group dedicated to microplastics research in these countries. We recommend promoting collaboration between academic institutions specialized in microplastic research and government agencies dedicated to the promotion of science and technology in the countries belonging to the Pacific Alliance.

Assuntos

RESUMO

RESUMO O artigo analisa a produção científica sobre gênero no campo de conhecimento e intervenção pedagógica da EF no Brasil. A pesquisa foi composta de uma fase exploratória-descritiva centrada na Cientometria. O corpus de análise foi constituído por 20 dissertações e teses defendidas entre os anos de 2013 e 2018. Evidenciam-se como resultados: a produção está concentrada nas regiões sudeste e sul do país; os principais programas são PPGEF/UFMG e PPGCMH/UFRGS; as temáticas estudadas se direcionam à questão das mulheres e esporte; e as mulheres despontam como autoras. Por fim, destacamos que as produções parecem refletir demandas políticas e sociais acerca da categoria gênero, o que pode ser inferido devido ao acréscimo da produção e efervescência de pautas antigênero a partir de 2013.

ABSTRACT The paper analyzes the scientific production on gender in the Physical Education, field of knowledge and pedagogical intervention, in Brazil. The research consisted of an exploratory-descriptive phase centered on Scientometry. The analysis corpus consisted of 20 dissertations and theses defended between the years 2013 and 2018. The results show us: the production is concentrated in the southeastern and southern regions of the country; the main programs are PPGEF/UFMG and PPGCMH/UFRGS; the themes studied are directed to the issue of women and sport; and women emerge as authors. We show that the production seems to reflect the political and social demands regarding the gender category, which can be inferred according to the increase in production and effervescence of antigender agendas from 2013.

RESUMEN El artículo analiza la producción científica sobre género en el campo del conocimiento y de la intervención pedagógica de la EF en Brasil. La investigación consistió en una fase exploratoria-descriptiva centrada en la Cienciometría. El corpus de análisis estuvo conformado por 20 disertaciones y tesis defendidas entre los años 2013 y 2018. Los resultados son: la producción se concentra en las regiones sureste y sur; los programas principales son PPGEF/UFMG y PPGCMH/UFRGS; los estudios están dirigidos al tema de mujeres y deporte; y las mujeres emergen como autoras. Mostramos que las producciones parecen reflejar las demandas políticas y sociales en torno a la categoría de género, lo que se puede inferir de acuerdo con el incremento en la producción y efervescencia de agendas anti-género a partir de 2013.

RESUMO

Background: Sporotrichosis has recently emerged as an important mycosis worldwide, with diverse transmission and epidemiologic profiles. For instance, in Brazil most cases are related to zoonotic transmission from naturally infected cats, and the majority of cases in China are due to external injury with environmental materials. Publications on sporotrichosis and on its etiologic agent may guide the direction of the research in this field. It can also define priorities for future studies. Methods: In this study, we evaluated the trends of global research in Sporothrix and sporotrichosis, based on publications records retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science databases for the period of 1945 to 2018. The overall productivity in the field, its geographical and temporal distribution, research themes, co-authorship networks, funding sources, and if audience and research findings are addressed in the abstracts. Results: A total of 4,007 unique publications involving 99 countries were retrieved, most of them published after 2000. Authors based on institutions from the United States of America and Brazil accounted for 57.4% of the publications. Brazil was the leading country in terms of research collaboration and networking, with co-authorship with 45 countries. The thematic mapping revealed a temporal shift from clinical to applied research. Despite the large number of countries publishing in this field, most of funded studies came from Brazil, Mexico, China, South Africa, or the United States of America. The analysis of content identified few specific public health recommendations for prevention, case-management, or research. Moreover, most papers do not have a clearly defined intended audience. Conclusion: As the research in this field is emerging in several countries, with the generation of a large amount of data, it is necessary that scientists strengthen efforts to translate the research results into practice to curb this neglected infection.

Assuntos

RESUMO

A parallel within the development of flow analysis and the consolidation of Talanta as one of the main journals in analytical chemistry is drawn. Influence of scientific divulgation, meeting organizations, thematic issues devoted to scientific events and Talanta awards in the recent development of flow analysis is emphasized. For didactic purposes, the discussion is focused on three 20-year periods. A scientometric overview demonstrated the consolidation of Talanta as the main journal for divulgation of recent innovations in flow analysis.

RESUMO

Because the Amazon rain forest is ecologically relevant on a global scale, we applied scientometric techniques to integrate studies dealing with mercury research in this unique ecosystem between 1991 and 2017. Using a combination of co-authorship and co-citation analyses, keyword mapping and overlay visualization of topics in the field, this article identified three major areas in the 26-year period of mercury research: (1) human exposure to mercury (artisanal small-scale gold mining-ASGM) and methylmercury through fish consumption, and their respective risks for human health; (2) mercury accumulation in the environment and its relation to ASGM and atmospheric concentration; and (3) mercury geochemistry and its presence in soils, sediments, and water. The paper also identified the leading institutions related to the published research and respective influential scholars in the context of this study. Overall, the analyses revealed patterns of convergence and divergence between authors, specialization, and interdisciplinary engagement in mercury investigation, thus highlighting strengths and weaknesses of research topics in the field. This scientometric approach could be a useful tool to monitor/assess the implementation of the Minamata Convention.

Assuntos

RESUMO

We performed a scientometry to validate trends in the scientific production on phytotelmata and the importance of these microenvironments in the maintenance of biodiversity. We searched for articles in the Web of Science and looked at publications from 1987 to 2016. We collected years of publication, surveyed organisms, countries where the surveys took place, plants that accumulate phytotelmata, scientific journals that publish more about the topic and their respective IFs (Impact Factor) and the keywords of each article. We built a heatmap using the most frequent keywords in the studies, to investigate the topics studied over the years. We have found 293 publications, increasing over the years. Insects, anurans and crustaceans were the most studied organisms. The most studied plant families were Bromeliaceae, Poaceae and Apiaceae. The published studies analized were carried out mainly in Brazil, Argentina and Peru. The most published journals on the subject are: Zootaxa, Hydrobiologia, Biotropica and Journal of Natural History. Some main global concerns such as climate change, habitat fragmentation has gained the attention of the phytotelmata studies in the recent years. The results contribute to the knowledge about phytotelmata accumulated biodiversity and research trends.(AU)

Realizamos uma cienciometria para demonstrar tendências na produção científica sobre fitotelmata e a importância desses microambientes na manutenção da biodiversidade. Buscamos artigos no Web of Science e analisamos publicações de 1987 até 2016. Coletamos os anos de publicação, organismos estudados, países onde ocorreram as pesquisas, plantas que acumulam fitotelmata, revistas científicas que mais publicam sobre o tema e seus respectivos FIs (Fator de Impacto) e as palavras-chave de cada artigo. Fizemos um heatmap, utilizando as palavras-chave mais frequentes nos estudos, para investigar os tópicos estudados ao longo dos anos. Encontramos 293 publicações, com aumento ao longo dos anos. Os insetos, anuros e crustáceos foram os organismos mais estudados. As famílias de plantas mais estudadas foram Bromeliaceae, Poaceae e Apiaceae. As pesquisas foram realizadas, principalmente, no Brasil, na Argentina e no Peru. Os periódicos que mais publicam sobre o tema são: Zootaxa, Hydrobiologia, Biotropica e Journal of Natural History. Os resultados contribuem para o conhecimento sobre a biodiversidade acumulada em fitotelmata e tendências nas pesquisas.(AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

We performed a scientometry to validate trends in the scientific production on phytotelmata and the importance of these microenvironments in the maintenance of biodiversity. We searched for articles in the Web of Science and looked at publications from 1987 to 2016. We collected years of publication, surveyed organisms, countries where the surveys took place, plants that accumulate phytotelmata, scientific journals that publish more about the topic and their respective IFs (Impact Factor) and the keywords of each article. We built a heatmap using the most frequent keywords in the studies, to investigate the topics studied over the years. We have found 293 publications, increasing over the years. Insects, anurans and crustaceans were the most studied organisms. The most studied plant families were Bromeliaceae, Poaceae and Apiaceae. The published studies analized were carried out mainly in Brazil, Argentina and Peru. The most published journals on the subject are: Zootaxa, Hydrobiologia, Biotropica and Journal of Natural History. Some main global concerns such as climate change, habitat fragmentation has gained the attention of the phytotelmata studies in the recent years. The results contribute to the knowledge about phytotelmata accumulated biodiversity and research trends.

Realizamos uma cienciometria para demonstrar tendências na produção científica sobre fitotelmata e a importância desses microambientes na manutenção da biodiversidade. Buscamos artigos no Web of Science e analisamos publicações de 1987 até 2016. Coletamos os anos de publicação, organismos estudados, países onde ocorreram as pesquisas, plantas que acumulam fitotelmata, revistas científicas que mais publicam sobre o tema e seus respectivos FIs (Fator de Impacto) e as palavras-chave de cada artigo. Fizemos um heatmap, utilizando as palavras-chave mais frequentes nos estudos, para investigar os tópicos estudados ao longo dos anos. Encontramos 293 publicações, com aumento ao longo dos anos. Os insetos, anuros e crustáceos foram os organismos mais estudados. As famílias de plantas mais estudadas foram Bromeliaceae, Poaceae e Apiaceae. As pesquisas foram realizadas, principalmente, no Brasil, na Argentina e no Peru. Os periódicos que mais publicam sobre o tema são: Zootaxa, Hydrobiologia, Biotropica e Journal of Natural History. Os resultados contribuem para o conhecimento sobre a biodiversidade acumulada em fitotelmata e tendências nas pesquisas.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The first systematic studies on insect galls in Brazil date to the early 20th century, after which research on insect galls remained dormant in the country, with interest not reviving until the 1980s. The aim of this study was is to document historical trends in publications about insect galls in Brazil over the last 30 years. Papers about insect galls and galling species in Brazil published in peer-reviewed journals from 1988 to 2017 were compiled. A total of 1,378 papers were analyzed, of which 182 addressed insect galls in Brazil. The results showed that the number of publications on the subject has been increasing over the last 30 years, and especially in the last decade. The diversity of journals that published on the subject has also been increasing. The studies were concentrated on the following topics: ecology (94 papers), inventory (29) and taxonomy (27). Most of the insect gall inventories in Brazil took place in the Southeast Region (29 papers), followed by the Central-West and Northeast regions, with eight papers each. This study documents a trend toward increasing scientific production on insect galls in Brazil, but with significant geographical bias: the researchers involved are concentrated in the Southeast Brazilian region.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The first systematic studies on insect galls in Brazil date to the early 20th century, after which research on insect galls remained dormant in the country, with interest not reviving until the 1980s. The aim of this study was is to document historical trends in publications about insect galls in Brazil over the last 30 years. Papers about insect galls and galling species in Brazil published in peer-reviewed journals from 1988 to 2017 were compiled. A total of 1,378 papers were analyzed, of which 182 addressed insect galls in Brazil. The results showed that the number of publications on the subject has been increasing over the last 30 years, and especially in the last decade. The diversity of journals that published on the subject has also been increasing. The studies were concentrated on the following topics: ecology (94 papers), inventory (29) and taxonomy (27). Most of the insect gall inventories in Brazil took place in the Southeast Region (29 papers), followed by the Central-West and Northeast regions, with eight papers each. This study documents a trend toward increasing scientific production on insect galls in Brazil, but with significant geographical bias: the researchers involved are concentrated in the Southeast Brazilian region.(AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract There has been a growth in the field of Ethnozoology throughout the years, especially in Brazil, where a considerable number of scientific articles pertaining to this subject has been published in recent decades. With this increase in publications comes the opportunity to assess the quality of these publications, as there are no known studies assessing the methodological risks in this area. Based on this observation, our objectives were to compile the papers published on the subject of ethnozoology and to answer the following questions: 1) Do the Brazilian ethnozoological studies use sound sampling methods?; 2) Is the sampling quality influenced by characteristics of the studies/publications? The studies found in databases and using web search engines were compiled to answer these questions. The studies were assessed based on their nature, sampling methods, use of hypotheses and tests, journals impact factor, and animal group studied. The majority of the studies analyzed exhibited problems associated with the samples, as 144 (66.98%) studies were classified as having a high risk of bias. With regard to the characteristics analyzed, we determined that a quantitative nature and the use of tests are essential components of good sampling. Most studies classified as moderate and low risk either did not provide these data or provided data that were not clear; therefore, these studies were classified as being of a quali-quantitative nature. Studies performed with vertebrate groups were of high risk. Most of the papers analyzed here focused on fish, insects, and/or mollusks, thus highlighting the difficulties associated with conducting interviews regarding tetrapod vertebrates. Such difficulties are largely related to the extremely strict Brazilian laws, justified by the decline and extinction of some species, related to the use of wild tetrapod vertebrates.

Resumo Ao longo dos anos a Etnozoologia vem crescendo, principalmente no Brasil, no qual se observa um expressivo número de publicações científicas nas últimas décadas. Com isto abriu-se a oportunidade para avaliar a qualidade das publicações, já que não existem pesquisas que avaliem os riscos metodológicos na área. Partindo desta premissa objetivamos compilar os artigos publicados na área e responder as seguintes questões: os trabalhos etnozoológicos brasileiros possuem boa qualidade amostral? A qualidade amostral é influenciada por características dos estudos/publicações? Para responder tais perguntas foi realizado levantamento das publicações em bases de dados e sites de busca. As características avaliadas foram relacionadas à natureza, amostragem, uso de hipóteses e testes, fator de impacto do periódico e grupo animal pesquisado. A maior parte dos artigos analisados apresentaram problemas amostrais, 144 (66,98%) foram classificados como sendo de alto risco de viés. Quanto às características analisadas percebemos que a natureza quantitativa e a utilização de testes, são essenciais para uma boa amostragem. A maioria das publicações classificada com moderado e baixo risco não apresentava ou não deixava claro esses dados, sendo classificadas como de natureza quali-quantitativa. Percebemos também que artigos desenvolvidos com grupos vertebrados apresentaram alto risco, levando a crer que as restrições da legislação brasileira limitam as informações mais precisas a respeito do tema.

RESUMO

There has been a growth in the field of Ethnozoology throughout the years, especially in Brazil, where a considerable number of scientific articles pertaining to this subject has been published in recent decades. With this increase in publications comes the opportunity to assess the quality of these publications, as there are no known studies assessing the methodological risks in this area. Based on this observation, our objectives were to compile the papers published on the subject of ethnozoology and to answer the following questions: 1) Do the Brazilian ethnozoological studies use sound sampling methods?; 2) Is the sampling quality influenced by characteristics of the studies/publications? The studies found in databases and using web search engines were compiled to answer these questions. The studies were assessed based on their nature, sampling methods, use of hypotheses and tests, journals impact factor, and animal group studied. The majority of the studies analyzed exhibited problems associated with the samples, as 144 (66.98%) studies were classified as having a high risk of bias. With regard to the characteristics analyzed, we determined that a quantitative nature and the use of tests are essential components of good sampling. Most studies classified as moderate and low risk either did not provide these data or provided data that were not clear; therefore, these studies were classified as being of a quali-quantitative nature. Studies performed with vertebrate groups were of high risk. Most of the papers analyzed here focused on fish, insects, and/or mollusks, thus highlighting the difficulties associated with conducting interviews regarding tetrapod vertebrates. Such difficulties are largely related to the extremely strict Brazilian laws, justified by the decline and extinction of some species, related to the use of wild tetrapod vertebrates.(AU)

Ao longo dos anos a Etnozoologia vem crescendo, principalmente no Brasil, no qual se observa um expressivo número de publicações científicas nas últimas décadas. Com isto abriu-se a oportunidade para avaliar a qualidade das publicações, já que não existem pesquisas que avaliem os riscos metodológicos na área. Partindo desta premissa objetivamos compilar os artigos publicados na área e responder as seguintes questões: os trabalhos etnozoológicos brasileiros possuem boa qualidade amostral? A qualidade amostral é influenciada por características dos estudos/publicações? Para responder tais perguntas foi realizado levantamento das publicações em bases de dados e sites de busca. As características avaliadas foram relacionadas à natureza, amostragem, uso de hipóteses e testes, fator de impacto do periódico e grupo animal pesquisado. A maior parte dos artigos analisados apresentaram problemas amostrais, 144 (66,98%) foram classificados como sendo de alto risco de viés. Quanto às características analisadas percebemos que a natureza quantitativa e a utilização de testes, são essenciais para uma boa amostragem. A maioria das publicações classificada com moderado e baixo risco não apresentava ou não deixava claro esses dados, sendo classificadas como de natureza quali-quantitativa. Percebemos também que artigos desenvolvidos com grupos vertebrados apresentaram alto risco, levando a crer que as restrições da legislação brasileira limitam as informações mais precisas a respeito do tema.(AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract There has been a growth in the field of Ethnozoology throughout the years, especially in Brazil, where a considerable number of scientific articles pertaining to this subject has been published in recent decades. With this increase in publications comes the opportunity to assess the quality of these publications, as there are no known studies assessing the methodological risks in this area. Based on this observation, our objectives were to compile the papers published on the subject of ethnozoology and to answer the following questions: 1) Do the Brazilian ethnozoological studies use sound sampling methods?; 2) Is the sampling quality influenced by characteristics of the studies/publications? The studies found in databases and using web search engines were compiled to answer these questions. The studies were assessed based on their nature, sampling methods, use of hypotheses and tests, journal’s impact factor, and animal group studied. The majority of the studies analyzed exhibited problems associated with the samples, as 144 (66.98%) studies were classified as having a high risk of bias. With regard to the characteristics analyzed, we determined that a quantitative nature and the use of tests are essential components of good sampling. Most studies classified as moderate and low risk either did not provide these data or provided data that were not clear; therefore, these studies were classified as being of a quali-quantitative nature. Studies performed with vertebrate groups were of high risk. Most of the papers analyzed here focused on fish, insects, and/or mollusks, thus highlighting the difficulties associated with conducting interviews regarding tetrapod vertebrates. Such difficulties are largely related to the extremely strict Brazilian laws, justified by the decline and extinction of some species, related to the use of wild tetrapod vertebrates.

Resumo Ao longo dos anos a Etnozoologia vem crescendo, principalmente no Brasil, no qual se observa um expressivo número de publicações científicas nas últimas décadas. Com isto abriu-se a oportunidade para avaliar a qualidade das publicações, já que não existem pesquisas que avaliem os riscos metodológicos na área. Partindo desta premissa objetivamos compilar os artigos publicados na área e responder as seguintes questões: os trabalhos etnozoológicos brasileiros possuem boa qualidade amostral? A qualidade amostral é influenciada por características dos estudos/publicações? Para responder tais perguntas foi realizado levantamento das publicações em bases de dados e sites de busca. As características avaliadas foram relacionadas à natureza, amostragem, uso de hipóteses e testes, fator de impacto do periódico e grupo animal pesquisado. A maior parte dos artigos analisados apresentaram problemas amostrais, 144 (66,98%) foram classificados como sendo de alto risco de viés. Quanto às características analisadas percebemos que a natureza quantitativa e a utilização de testes, são essenciais para uma boa amostragem. A maioria das publicações classificada com moderado e baixo risco não apresentava ou não deixava claro esses dados, sendo classificadas como de natureza quali-quantitativa. Percebemos também que artigos desenvolvidos com grupos vertebrados apresentaram alto risco, levando a crer que as restrições da legislação brasileira limitam as informações mais precisas a respeito do tema.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The present contribution explores the impact of the QUALIS metric system for academic evaluation implemented by CAPES (Coordination for the Development of Personnel in Higher Education) upon Brazilian Zoological research. The QUALIS system is based on the grouping and ranking of scientific journals according to their Impact Factor (IF). We examined two main points implied by this system, namely: 1) its reliability as a guideline for authors; 2) if Zoology possesses the same publication profile as Botany and Oceanography, three fields of knowledge grouped by CAPES under the subarea "BOZ" for purposes of evaluation. Additionally, we tested CAPES' recent suggestion that the area of Ecology would represent a fourth field of research compatible with the former three. Our results indicate that this system of classification is inappropriate as a guideline for publication improvement, with approximately one third of the journals changing their strata between years. We also demonstrate that the citation profile of Zoology is distinct from those of Botany and Oceanography. Finally, we show that Ecology shows an IF that is significantly different from those of Botany, Oceanography, and Zoology, and that grouping these fields together would be particularly detrimental to Zoology. We conclude that the use of only one parameter of analysis for the stratification of journals, i.e., the Impact Factor calculated for a comparatively small number of journals, fails to evaluate with accuracy the pattern of publication present in Zoology, Botany, and Oceanography. While such simplified procedure might appeals to our sense of objectivity, it dismisses any real attempt to evaluate with clarity the merit embedded in at least three very distinct aspects of scientific practice, namely: productivity, quality, and specificity.

RESUMO

The present contribution explores the impact of the QUALIS metric system for academic evaluation implemented by CAPES (Coordination for the Development of Personnel in Higher Education) upon Brazilian Zoological research. The QUALIS system is based on the grouping and ranking of scientific journals according to their Impact Factor (IF). We examined two main points implied by this system, namely: 1) its reliability as a guideline for authors; 2) if Zoology possesses the same publication profile as Botany and Oceanography, three fields of knowledge grouped by CAPES under the subarea "BOZ" for purposes of evaluation. Additionally, we tested CAPES' recent suggestion that the area of Ecology would represent a fourth field of research compatible with the former three. Our results indicate that this system of classification is inappropriate as a guideline for publication improvement, with approximately one third of the journals changing their strata between years. We also demonstrate that the citation profile of Zoology is distinct from those of Botany and Oceanography. Finally, we show that Ecology shows an IF that is significantly different from those of Botany, Oceanography, and Zoology, and that grouping these fields together would be particularly detrimental to Zoology. We conclude that the use of only one parameter of analysis for the stratification of journals, i.e., the Impact Factor calculated for a comparatively small number of journals, fails to evaluate with accuracy the pattern of publication present in Zoology, Botany, and Oceanography. While such simplified procedure might appeals to our sense of objectivity, it dismisses any real attempt to evaluate with clarity the merit embedded in at least three very distinct aspects of scientific practice, namely: productivity, quality, and specificity.

RESUMO

The present contribution explores the impact of the QUALIS metric system for academic evaluation implemented by CAPES (Coordination for the Development of Personnel in Higher Education) upon Brazilian Zoological research. The QUALIS system is based on the grouping and ranking of scientific journals according to their Impact Factor (IF). We examined two main points implied by this system, namely: 1) its reliability as a guideline for authors; 2) if Zoology possesses the same publication profile as Botany and Oceanography, three fields of knowledge grouped by CAPES under the subarea "BOZ" for purposes of evaluation. Additionally, we tested CAPES' recent suggestion that the area of Ecology would represent a fourth field of research compatible with the former three. Our results indicate that this system of classification is inappropriate as a guideline for publication improvement, with approximately one third of the journals changing their strata between years. We also demonstrate that the citation profile of Zoology is distinct from those of Botany and Oceanography. Finally, we show that Ecology shows an IF that is significantly different from those of Botany, Oceanography, and Zoology, and that grouping these fields together would be particularly detrimental to Zoology. We conclude that the use of only one parameter of analysis for the stratification of journals, i.e., the Impact Factor calculated for a comparatively small number of journals, fails to evaluate with accuracy the pattern of publication present in Zoology, Botany, and Oceanography. While such simplified procedure might appeals to our sense of objectivity, it dismisses any real attempt to evaluate with clarity the merit embedded in at least three very distinct aspects of scientific practice, namely: productivity, quality, and specificity.

RESUMO

Este artigo é derivado de uma conferência que apresentou dois conceitos de saúde e algumas de suas implicações para a pesquisa e o trabalho de equipes de profissionais. Como exemplo, apresenta dados originais indicativos de que psicologia da saúde é uma área de pesquisa que apresenta bons indicadores de desenvolvimento nos estudos publicados, como título, autoria e volume de publicações em periódicos. Internacionalmente, não foram encontradas diferenças significativas entre estudos sobre saúde e sobre doença em uma amostra de 300 trabalhos publicados em revistas, livros e teses. No Brasil, a doença tende a ser o foco dos estudos. São também apresentadas considerações concernentes ao desenvolvimento da área e sobre a formação do psicólogo para atuar na área da saúde.

This paper derives from a conference that examined two concepts of health and some of its implications for research and the work of teams of professionals. As an example, it presents original data indicative of the fact that Health Psychology is an area of research that presents good indicators of development with the published studies, such as title, authorship, volume of publications in journals. Internationally, no significant differences between studies on health and disease were present in a sample of 300 papers published in journals, books and dissertations. In Brazil, the disease does tend to be the focus of studies. Considerations are also presented concerning the development of the area and about the professional training enabling the psychologist to work in the health area.

Assuntos

RESUMO

A avaliação da produção científica é uma atividade que apresenta muitas utilidades em cientometria e em política educacional e científica. O artigo apresenta uma avaliação quantitativa da produção de dissertações e teses defendidas na Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, de 1975 até 2004, isto é, por 30 anos. Os resultados mostraram 577 trabalhos no nível de mestrado e 93 no de doutorado, totalizando 670 produtos científicos. A primeira dissertação de mestrado foi defendida em 1975 e a primeira tese em 1997. Predomina a autoria feminina (81,79 por cento). Alguns orientadores tiveram uma maior participação total possivelmente em decorrência do número de anos vinculados ao programa e do regime de trabalho assumido na Universidade.

The evaluation of scientific production is an important activity to the scientific and educational politics and patterns. This paper presents a quantitative evaluation about the theses and dissertations that had been presented at the Pontificia Universidade Católica de Campinas, from 1975 to 2004, that is, 30 years. The results shows 577 papers from master degree and 93 dissertations (PhD), which amounts to 670 scientific productions. The first master thesis was defended in 1975, and only in 1997 the PhD first thesis was defended. The feminine authorship has been the most common (81,79 percent). Some advisers' total participation have been more intense than the others, according to these professionals' career as a member of this program.

Assuntos