RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Brainstem safe entry zones (EZs) are gates to access the intrinsic pathology of the brainstem. We performed a quantitative analysis of the intrinsic surgical corridor limits of the most commonly used EZs and illustrated these through an inside perspective using 2-dimensional photographs, 3-dimensional photographs, and interactive 3-dimensional model reconstructions. METHODS: A total of 26 human brainstems (52 sides) with the cerebellum attached were prepared using the Klingler method and dissected. The safe working areas and distances for each EZ were defined according to the eloquent fiber tracts and nuclei. RESULTS: The largest safe distance corresponded to the depth for the lateral mesencephalic sulcus (4.8 mm), supratrigeminal (10 mm), epitrigeminal (13.2 mm), peritrigeminal (13.3 mm), lateral transpeduncular (22.3 mm), and infracollicular (4.6 mm); the rostrocaudal axis for the perioculomotor (11.7 mm), suprafacial (12.6 mm), and transolivary (12.8 mm); and the mediolateral axis for the supracollicular (9.1 mm) and infracollicular (7 mm) EZs. The safe working areas were 46.7 mm2 for the perioculomotor, 21.3 mm2 for the supracollicular, 14.8 mm2 for the infracollicular, 33.1 mm2 for the supratrigeminal, 34.3 mm2 for the suprafacial, 21.9 mm2 for the infrafacial, and 51.7 mm2 for the transolivary EZs. CONCLUSIONS: The largest safe distance in most EZs corresponded to the depth, followed by the rostrocaudal axis and, finally, the mediolateral axis. The transolivary had the largest safe working area of all EZs. The supracollicular EZ had the largest safe area to access the midbrain tectum and the suprafacial EZ for the floor of the fourth ventricle.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The brainstem is a compact, delicate structure. The surgeon must have good anatomical knowledge of the safe entry points to safely resect intrinsic lesions. Lesions located at the lateral midbrain surface are better approached through the lateral mesencephalic sulcus (LMS). The goal of this study was to compare the surgical exposure to the LMS provided by the subtemporal (ST) approach and the paramedian and extreme-lateral variants of the supracerebellar infratentorial (SCIT) approach. METHODS: These 3 approaches were used in 10 cadaveric heads. The authors performed measurements of predetermined points by using a neuronavigation system. Areas of microsurgical exposure and angles of the approaches were determined. Statistical analysis was performed to identify significant differences in the respective exposures. RESULTS: The surgical exposure was similar for the different approaches-369.8 ± 70.1 mm2 for the ST; 341.2 ± 71.2 mm2 for the SCIT paramedian variant; and 312.0 ± 79.3 mm2 for the SCIT extreme-lateral variant (p = 0.13). However, the vertical angular exposure was 16.3° ± 3.6° for the ST, 19.4° ± 3.4° for the SCIT paramedian variant, and 25.1° ± 3.3° for the SCIT extreme-lateral variant craniotomy (p < 0.001). The horizontal angular exposure was 45.2° ± 6.3° for the ST, 35.6° ± 2.9° for the SCIT paramedian variant, and 45.5° ± 6.6° for the SCIT extreme-lateral variant opening, presenting no difference between the ST and extreme-lateral variant (p = 0.92), but both were superior to the paramedian variant (p < 0.001). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. CONCLUSIONS: The extreme-lateral SCIT approach had the smaller area of surgical exposure; however, these differences were not statistically significant. The extreme-lateral SCIT approach presented a wider vertical and horizontal angle to the LMS compared to the other craniotomies. Also, it provides a 90° trajectory to the sulcus that facilitates the intraoperative microsurgical technique.

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare surgical exposure through microsurgical cadaveric dissection of the intercollicular region afforded by the median, paramedian, and extreme-lateral supracerebellar infratentorial (SCIT) approaches. METHODS: Ten cadaveric heads were dissected using SCIT variant approaches. A neuronavigation system was used to determine tridimensional coordinates for the intercollicular zone in each route. The areas of surgical and angular exposure were evaluated and determined by software analysis for each specimen. RESULTS: The median surgical exposure was similar for the different craniotomies: 282.9 ± 72.4 mm2 for the median, 341.2 ± 71.2 mm2 for the paramedian, and 312.0 ± 79.3 mm2 for the extreme-lateral (P = 0.33). The vertical angular exposure to the center of the intercollicular safe entry zone was also similar between the approaches (P = 0.92). On the other hand, the horizontal angular exposure was significantly wider for the median approach (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: All the SCIT approaches warrant a safe route to the quadrigeminal plate. Among the different variants, the median approach had the smallest median surgical area exposure but presented superior results to access the intercollicular safe entry zone.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the latest developments in microsurgery, electrophysiological monitoring, and neuroimaging, the surgical management of intrinsic brainstem lesions remains challenging. Several safe entry points have been described to access the different surfaces of the brainstem. Knowledge of this entry zone anatomy is critical to performing a safe and less morbid approach. To access the anterior midbrain surface, a well-known entry point is the anterior mesencephalic (AM) zone. Our aim was to quantify surgical AM zone exposure through the orbitozygomatic (OZ) and subtemporal (ST) approaches. We also analyzed the angular exposure along the horizontal and vertical axis angles for the AM zone. METHODS: Ten cadaveric heads were dissected using the OZ and ST approaches for anterior midbrain surface exposure. A neuronavigation system was used to determine the 3-dimensional coordinates. The area of surgical exposure, angular exposure, and anatomical limits of each craniotomy were evaluated and determined using software analysis and compared for intersection areas and AM safe zone exposure. RESULTS: The median surgical exposure was 164.7 ± 43.6 mm2 for OZ and 369.8 ± 70.1 mm2 for ST (P = 0.001). The vertical angular exposure was 37.7° ± 9.92° for the OZ and 18.4° ± 2.8° for the ST opening (P < 0.001). The horizontal angular exposure to the AM zone was 37.9° ± 7.3° for the OZ and 47.0° ± 3.2° for the ST opening (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Although the OZ craniotomy offers reduced surgical exposure, it provides a better trajectory to the AM zone compared with the ST approach.

Assuntos