RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Brain metastasis (BM) in gastric cancer (GC) is underestimated, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression is a durable poor prognostic factor. We explored the relationship between the two and made a survival analysis. METHODS: HER2 expression and BM status were collected from GC patients who were diagnosed between December 2009 and May 2021. We collected GC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 from the SEER database. The primary endpoint was survival from the diagnosis of BM. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine potential risk factors of BM at diagnosis in SEER database. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULT: There were 513 HER2-positive GC patients, including 16 (3.1%) with BM. Among 38 brain metastasis GC patients we collected, 16 (42.1%) patients were HER2 positive. We collected 34,199 GC patients from the SEER database and there were 260 (0.76%) patients with BM at diagnosis. GC patients that are male, white, of younger age, with primary lesions located in the proximal stomach or with distant lymph nodes, liver, bone, or lung metastasis are more likely to develop BM. The median overall survival time from diagnosis of BM was 12.73 months, and the survival time from brain metastasis of HER2-positive patients was numerically shorter, though the difference was not significant (5.30 months vs.16.13 months, P = 0.28.) CONCLUSION: The incidence of BM in patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer is 4.08 times higher than that in general patients. The median overall survival time from BM is shorter for HER2-positive patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Prognóstico , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Primary bone and joint sarcomas of the long bone are relatively rare neoplasms with poor prognosis. An efficient clinical tool that can accurately predict patient prognosis is not available. The current study aimed to use deep learning algorithms to develop a prediction model for the prognosis of patients with long bone sarcoma. METHODS: Data of patients with long bone sarcoma in the extremities was collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database from 2004 to 2014. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to select possible prediction features. DeepSurv, a deep learning model, was constructed for predicting cancer-specific survival rates. In addition, the classical cox proportional hazards model was established for comparison. The predictive accuracy of our models was assessed using the C-index, Integrated Brier Score, receiver operating characteristic curve, and calibration curve. RESULTS: Age, tumor extension, histological grade, tumor size, surgery, and distant metastasis were associated with cancer-specific survival in patients with long bone sarcoma. According to loss function values, our models converged successfully and effectively learned the survival data of the training cohort. Based on the C-index, area under the curve, calibration curve, and Integrated Brier Score, the deep learning model was more accurate and flexible in predicting survival rates than the cox proportional hazards model. CONCLUSION: A deep learning model for predicting the survival probability of patients with long bone sarcoma was constructed and validated. It is more accurate and flexible in predicting prognosis than the classical CoxPH model.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas , Aprendizado Profundo , Osteossarcoma , Sarcoma , Humanos , Sarcoma/patologia , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Prognóstico , Osteossarcoma/terapia , Osteossarcoma/patologia , Extremidades/patologia , NomogramasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) is an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for breast cancer surgery. But the criteria of SLND only for patients with limited disease in the sentinel node is disputed. METHODS: From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 2000-2015, we identified 97,296 early breast cancer females with 1-3 axillary lymph nodes macro-metastasis. Of them, 1-5 (axillary conservation group), 6-9, and ≥ 10 (ALND group) axillary lymph nodes were dissected in 28,639, 16,838, and 51,819 patients, respectively. According to the criteria of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial, two historical cohort studies of patients who underwent lumpectomy or mastectomy were conducted and the survival outcomes between ALND and axillary conservation were compared. RESULTS: Overall, dissection of 6-9 regional lymph nodes resulted in the worst prognosis. After propensity-matched analysis, it was found that patients in the axillary conservation group had worse survival than the ALND group in overall survival. No significant difference in prognosis between the group undergoing lumpectomy was found both in OS and BCSS. Subgroup analysis revealed that Grade 3, T2, two lymph nodes positive, or Her2 positive were the main causes of worse survival in the axillary conservation group. CONCLUSION: Not all patients with N1 early breast cancer suit axillary conservation. Axillary conservation was sufficient in patients who were treated with lumpectomy. ALND cannot be omitted in patients who were ineligible for the Z0011 and undergoing mastectomy with the following characteristics: T2, Grade 3, two positive lymph nodes, and Her2 positive, which may be better complemented to the Z0011 trial. Hence, under different surgical methods, the clinical precision treatment of ALND or axillary preservation is essential.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Mastectomia , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Seguimentos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Linfonodos/patologia , AxilaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Patients with advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (HSCCs) have poor prognoses. The use of surgical or non-surgical treatments for these patients remains a topic of debate. This study compared survival following surgical and non-surgical treatments of patients with advanced HSCC based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with hypopharyngeal cancer from 2004 to 2018 were identified from the SEER database. Patients were divided into non-surgical group and surgical group, and patients in the surgical group were further divided into three groups: surgery-only, surgery with adjuvant radiation therapy and surgery with adjuvant chemoradiation therapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcome was cancer-specific survival (CSS). Outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was also used to identify independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: The records of 1568 eligible patients with stage III or IV HSCC were examined. Receipt of surgery was associated with a longer OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4-0.56] and a longer CSS (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.38-0.57) after adjusting for age, sex, race, tumor site, tumor size, tumor grade, TNM stage, AJCC stage, number of carcinomas, prior cancer, receipt of radiotherapy, and receipt of chemotherapy. The results for OS were similar in an exploratory analysis of different patient subgroups. CONCLUSION: Among patients with advanced HSCC in the SEER database, treatment with surgery was associated with longer OS and CSS than treatment with a non-surgical modality.
Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante , Humanos , Programa de SEER , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Currently, the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in the treatment of patients with intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma (IGA) has not been well established. This study aimed to elucidate the survival impact of RT on such patients. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was utilized to select eligible patients. The recruited patients were dichotomized into those not received RT versus those received RT. The 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to balance the confounding factors between the two comparison groups. The categorical variables were assessed by Chi-square test. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) of the patients were compared by Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify prognostic factors associated with CSS. RESULTS: A total of 3572 eligible patients were enrolled for our analysis, of which, 2896(81.1%) patients did not receive RT and 676(18.9%) patients received RT. Before PSM, except race and tumor size, significant differences in patients' baseline characteristics were observed in no RT versus RT group. The KM plots before PSM indicated that RT exerted significant survival benefits for the recruited patients (p < 0.001). After PSM, most confounders were well balanced between the two comparison groups. The KM plots showed significantly superior CSS and OS in the RT group (p < 0.05). Grade IV, stage II-IV, and N3 were identified as independent risk factors, while LN examined > 15 and RT were independent protective factors for favorable prognosis. Subgroup survival analysis revealed that RT brought a significant CSS advantage for the stage IV patients. CONCLUSION: Based on PSM analysis of the cohort from SEER database, RT showed significant survival benefits for patients with IGA. Our study supports adjuvant RT for this specific cohort.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/radioterapia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Radioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Programa de SEER , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We compared upgrading and upstaging rates in low risk and favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer (CaP) patients according to racial and/or ethnic group: Mexican-Americans and Caucasians. METHODS: Within Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (2010-2015), we identified low risk and favorable intermediate risk CaP patients according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Descriptives and logistic regression models were used. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis was performed to test the association between Mexican-American vs. Caucasian racial and/or ethnic groups and upgrading either to Gleason-Grade Group (GGG II) or to GGG III, IV or V, in low risk or favorable intermediate risk CaP patients, respectively. RESULTS: We identified 673 (2.6%) Mexican-American and 24,959 (97.4%) Caucasian CaP patients. Of those, 14,789 were low risk (434 [2.9%] Mexican-Americans vs. 14,355 [97.1%] Caucasians) and 10,834 were favorable intermediate risk (239 [2.2%] Mexican-Americans vs. 10,604 [97.8%] Caucasians). In low risk CaP patients, Mexican-American vs. Caucasian racial and/or ethnic group did not result in either upgrading or upstaging differences. However, in favorable intermediate risk CaP patients, upgrading rate was higher in Mexican-Americans than in Caucasians (31.4 vs. 25.5%, OR 1.33, Pâ¯=â¯0.044), but no difference was recorded for upstaging. When comparisons focused on upgrading to GGG III, IV or V, higher rate was recorded in Mexican-American relative to Caucasian favorable intermediate risk CaP patients (20.4 vs. 15.4%, OR 1.41, Pâ¯=â¯0.034). CONCLUSION: Low risk Mexican-American CaP patients do not differ from low risk Caucasian CaP patients. However, favorable intermediate risk Mexican-American CaP patients exhibit higher rates of upgrading than their Caucasian counterparts. This information should be considered at treatment decision making.