RESUMO
MOTIVATION: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies are decisive for discovering disease-causing variants, although their cost limits their utility in a clinical setting. A cost-mitigating alternative is an extremely low coverage whole-genome sequencing (XLC-WGS). We investigated its use to identify causal variants within a multi-generational pedigree of individuals with retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Causing progressive vision loss, RP is a group of genetically heterogeneous eye disorders with approximately 60 known causal genes. RESULTS: We performed XLC-WGS in seventeen members of this pedigree, including three individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of RP. Sequencing data were processed using Illumina's DRAGEN pipeline and filtered using Illumina's genotype quality score metric (GQX). The resulting variants were analyzed using Expert Variant Interpreter (eVai) from enGenome as a prioritization tool. A nonsense known mutation (c.1625C > G; p.Ser542*) in exon 4 of the RP1 gene emerged as the most likely causal variant. We identified two homozygous carriers of this variant among the three sequenced RP cases and three heterozygous individuals with sufficient coverage of the RP1 locus. Our data show the utility of combining pedigree information with XLC-WGS as a cost-effective approach to identify disease-causing variants.
Assuntos
Proteínas do Olho , Retinose Pigmentar , Humanos , Códon sem Sentido , Análise Mutacional de DNA , Proteínas do Olho/genética , Proteínas Associadas aos Microtúbulos/genética , Mutação , Linhagem , Retinose Pigmentar/genética , Retinose Pigmentar/diagnóstico , Sequenciamento Completo do GenomaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) represent a genetically diverse group of progressive, visually debilitating diseases. Adult and paediatric patients with vision loss due to IRD caused by biallelic mutations in the 65-kDa retinal pigment epithelium (RPE65) gene are often clinically diagnosed as retinitis pigmentosa (RP), and Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA). This study aimed to understand the epidemiological landscape of RPE65 gene-mediated IRD through a systematic review of the literature, as the current evidence base for its epidemiology is very limited. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and other databases were searched for articles on the epidemiology of RPE65 gene-mediated IRDs from inception until June 2021. Studies were included if they were original research articles reporting the epidemiology of RP and LCA and/or proportion of RPE65 gene mutations in these clinically diagnosed or molecularly confirmed IRDs patients. RESULTS: A total of 100 studies with relevant data were included in this systematic review. The range for prevalence of LCA and RP in the literature was 1.20-2.37 and 11.09-26.43 per 100,000, respectively. The proportion of RPE65 mutations in clinically diagnosed patients with LCA was found to be between ~ 2-16% within the US and major European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK). This range was also comparable to our findings in the Asian region for RPE65-LCA (1.26-16.67%). Similarly, for these European countries, RPE65-RP was estimated between 0.23 and 1.94%, and RPE65-IRD range was 1.2-14%. Further, in the Americas region, mutations in RPE65 were reported to cause 1-3% of RP and 0.8-3.7% of IRD cases. Lastly, the RPE65-IRD range was 4.81-8% in the Middle East region. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant variations in reporting of RPE65 proportions within countries as well as regions. Generating robust epidemiological evidence on RPE65 gene-mediated IRDs would be fundamental to support rare disease awareness, timely therapeutic intervention, and public health decision-making.