RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical applicability of the current definitions of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and their ability to predict subsequent respiratory outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study, data were collected from 104 preterm infants (mean gestational age, 25.8 weeks) diagnosed with BPD between 2010 and 2018 at a single tertiary care center. The infants were classified according to the following definitions: 2001 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), 2017 Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN), 2018 NICHD, and 2019 Neonatal Research Network (NRN). Logistic regression and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to assess the predictive ability of each definition on mortality or severe respiratory morbidity at 18-24 months of age. RESULTS: All patients could be adequately classified by each definition, except for the 2001 NICHD definition, in which 11.4% were unclassifiable. The prevalence of BPD was 49% by the 2017 CNN definition and 70% by the 2018 NICHD and 2019 NRN definitions. The best regression model was the one that included the 2018 NICHD definition, which had an accuracy of 85.6% and a significantly higher AUC compared with the 2001 NICHD (0.891 vs 0.824; P = .015) and 2017 CNN (0.891 vs 0.811; P = .036) definitions, but not compared with the 2019 NRN definition (0.891 vs 0.833; P = .09). CONCLUSIONS: The current definitions of BPD showed a good predictive ability for mid-term respiratory outcomes, with the highest ability for the 2018 NICHD definition. Further studies are needed to establish the most appropriate definition of BPD.
Assuntos
Displasia Broncopulmonar , Lactente , Criança , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Displasia Broncopulmonar/diagnóstico , Displasia Broncopulmonar/epidemiologia , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Estudos Retrospectivos , Canadá/epidemiologia , Idade GestacionalRESUMO
Over the past decade, Brazil has experienced and continues to be impacted by extreme climate events. This study aims to evaluate the association between daily average temperature and mortality from respiratory disease among Brazilian elderlies. A daily time-series study between 2000 and 2017 in 27 Brazilian cities was conducted. Data outcomes were daily counts of deaths due to respiratory diseases in the elderly aged 60 or more. The exposure variable was the daily mean temperature from Copernicus ERA5-Land reanalysis. The association was estimated from a two-stage time series analysis method. We also calculated deaths attributable to heat and cold. The pooled exposure-response curve presented a J-shaped format. The exposure to extreme heat increased the risk of mortality by 27% (95% CI: 15-39%), while the exposure to extreme cold increased the risk of mortality by 16% (95% CI: 8-24%). The heterogeneity between cities was explained by city-specific mean temperature and temperature range. The fractions of deaths attributable to cold and heat were 4.7% (95% CI: 2.94-6.17%) and 2.8% (95% CI: 1.45-3.95%), respectively. Our results show a significant impact of non-optimal temperature on the respiratory health of elderlies living in Brazil. It may support proactive action implementation in cities that have critical temperature variations.
Assuntos
Temperatura Baixa , Temperatura Alta , Idoso , Brasil/epidemiologia , Cidades , Humanos , Mortalidade , TemperaturaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Among high-risk, underserved populations, such as children living along the US-México border, suffering from asthma-like symptoms without an asthma diagnosis can result in a high burden of illness. We estimated the prevalence of physician-diagnosed and possible undiagnosed asthma among students with histories of wheezing in the US-México border community of El Paso, Texas, and evaluated their burden of illness, primary care use, and medication utilization. METHODS: We analyzed cross-sectional survey data collected in May 2012. The survey included validated International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) items. We performed bivariate and logistic regression analyses on data from 307 students who wheezed. RESULTS: Forty-two percent of students had possible undiagnosed asthma and 58% had physician-diagnosed asthma based on primary caretaker reports. Children of Mexican origin were more likely to report undiagnosed vs. diagnosed asthma (p < 0.05). Children with an asthma diagnosis were more likely to report any medication use for wheezing/asthma and to experience a higher burden of illness in the last year compared to students with possible undiagnosed asthma (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The burden of illness among these children was high; however, children with asthma-like symptoms were not faring worse than children with asthma symptoms and a diagnosis. Undiagnosed children were being evaluated and receiving treatment for their symptoms; however, by not receiving a diagnosis, they were eliciting an ameliorative rather than preventive treatment strategy.
Assuntos
Asma/epidemiologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Sons Respiratórios/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Asma/terapia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , México , Prevalência , Texas/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pesticide use is increasing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) including Costa Rica. This increase poses health risks to farm owners, farm workers, and communities living near agricultural farms. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the health effects associated with occupational pesticide exposure in farm owners and workers from conventional and organic smallholder farms in Costa Rica. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 300 owners and workers from organic and conventional horticultural smallholder farms in Zarcero County, Costa Rica. During the baseline study visit, we administered a structured, tablet-based questionnaire to collect data on sociodemographic characteristics, pesticide exposure, and health conditions (eg, respiratory and allergic outcomes and acute pesticide intoxication symptoms) and administered a neurobehavioral test battery (eg, Finger Tapping Test and Purdue Pegboard); we measured blood pressure, anthropometry (height, weight, and waist circumference), and erythrocytic acetylcholinesterase activity and also collected urine samples. In addition, a functional neuroimaging assessment using near-infrared spectroscopy was conducted with a subset of 50 study participants. During the follow-up study visit (~2-4 weeks after the baseline), we administered participants a short questionnaire on recent pesticide exposure and farming practices and collected hair, toenail, and urine samples. Urine samples will be analyzed for various pesticide metabolites, whereas toenails and hair will be analyzed for manganese (Mn), a biomarker of exposure to Mn-containing fungicides. Self-reported pesticide exposure data will be used to develop exposure intensity scores using an exposure algorithm. Furthermore, exposure-outcome associations will be examined using linear and logistic mixed-effects regression models. RESULTS: Fieldwork for our study was conducted between May 2016 and August 2016. In total, 113 farm owners and 187 workers from 9 organic and 83 conventional horticultural smallholder farms were enrolled. Data analyses are ongoing and expected to be published between 2019 and 2020. CONCLUSIONS: This study is one of the first to examine differences in health effects due to pesticide exposure between farm owners and workers from organic and conventional smallholder farms in an LMIC. We expect that this study will provide critical data on farming practices, exposure pathways, and how occupational exposure to pesticides may affect farm owners and workers' health. Finally, we hope that this study will allow us to identify strategies to reduce pesticide exposure in farm owners and workers and will potentially lay the groundwork for a future longitudinal study of health outcomes in farm owners and workers exposed to pesticides. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/10914.