RESUMO
Introduction: This report aimed to compare ventral extended vision extraperitoneal (ETEP) and preaponeurotic repair (REPA) techniques in terms of surgical procedure, outcomes, and patient evolution. Methods: This was a retrospective study performed at a tertiary care academic center between 2017 and 2022. All consecutive patients operated on for midline hernias and rectus diastasis using REPA and ETEP were included. Follow-up visits were at 15 days, 30 days, and 6 months postoperative. Age, sex, BMI, American Surgical Anesthesiologic Classification (ASA), surgical time, need for conversion to open surgery, time of stay, seroma, hematoma, surgical site infection (SSI), recurrence, and re-interventions were assessed. Results: For the present study, 148 patients were included. From them, 62 patients received the REPA procedure and 86 were operated on using the ETEP technique. REPA average time was 105 minutes (interquartile range [IR] 80-130), and ETEP average time was 120 minutes (RIC 95-285) (p = 0.03). Ambulatory procedures were 32.3% (n = 20) REPA and 20.9% (n = 18) ETEP (p = 0.23). In REPA, the mean time for drain extraction was 11.92 days and 8 days in ETEP (p < 0.001). Seroma incidence was identified in 40.3% (n = 25) of the REPA cases and 5.8% (n = 5) of the ETEP procedures (p = 0.001). In a multivariate analysis for seroma incidence REPA technique was associated with a significant risk of its incidence [odds ratio (OR) 16, 67 95% confidence interval ((CI95) 4.67-59.52), p < 0.001]. Conclusion: REPA and ETEP are safe and reproducible. Both approaches reported short hospitalization times and almost no major complications. We found a longer surgical time in ETEP and a higher incidence of seroma in REPA.
Assuntos
Herniorrafia , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Herniorrafia/métodos , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Duração da Cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of REPA and establish if any differences in complications and evolution are present between males and females. METHODS: A retrospective study including consecutive patients operated by REPA approach between November 2017 and April 2019 was conducted. Demographic data, operative times, postoperative complications, and hospital stay were analyzed. The EuraHS-QoL score was used to assess postoperative pain, daily activity constraints, and aesthetic discomfort. The results were compared between sexes. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were included and 53.7% were male. Patients had a mean age of 50.7 years and a mean BMI of 28.7. The average RAD (Rectus Abdominis Diastasis) size was 2.6 cm (range of 2-5 cm). Seroma was significantly more frequent in males, with an incidence of 55.2 and 24% for females (p = 0.02). Three cases required reintervention (5.5% of total cases), which corresponded to a cystic seroma, an abdominal wall hematoma, and a hernia recurrence. The three cases were males and a p value of 0.04 was obtained when comparing reintervention rates between males and females. No cases of surgical wound infection nor cutaneous necrosis were recorded. No conversions were needed. The mean postoperative pain was 2.25, the mean daily activity constraints score was 2.63, and the degree of aesthetic discomfort was 1.23 with no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION: The correction of small midline defect associated with minor RAD using REPA seems feasible and reproducible. REPA had achieved good results in females, but in males, the outcomes were poorer.