RESUMO
Traceability in Nuclear Medicine Service (NMS) measurements was checked by the Institute of Radioprotection and Dosimetry (IRD) through the Institute of Energy and Nuclear Research (IPEN). In 2016, IRD ran an intercomparison program and invited Brazilian NMS authorized to administer 131I to patients. Sources of 131I were distributed to 33 NMSs. Three other sources from the same solution were sent to IRD, after measurement at IPEN. These sources were calibrated in the IRD reference system. A correction factor of 1.013 was obtained. Ninety percent of the NMS comparisons results are within ±10% of the National Laboratory of Metrology of Ionizing Radiation (LNMRI) value, the Brazilian legal requirement.
Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Radioisótopos do Iodo/análise , Serviço Hospitalar de Medicina Nuclear , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/análise , Brasil , Calibragem , Competência Profissional , Controle de Qualidade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Tempo , IncertezaRESUMO
The realization and dissemination of the 68Ga activity measurement unit in Cuba is presented. Firstly, the implementation of the Triple to Double Coincidence Ratio (TDCR) method is described for the calibration of the activity concentration of a 68Ga solution using a Hidex™ commercial liquid scintillation counter and a FORTRAN code developed for the calculation of the 68Ga counting efficiencies in the given measurement system. The relative expanded uncertainty (k = 2) associated with the 68Ga activity concentration obtained with the TDCR method is equal to 2%. With the aim to validate this measurement uncertainty estimate, the method is also applied to an Amersham standard solution of 22Na - a positron emitter with a similar decay mode to the 68Ga disintegration scheme from the point of view of type of emitted particles detected in the measurement system. The observed difference between the measured 22Na activity concentration by the TDCR method and the corresponding reference value traceable to NIST is equal to 0.16%. Outcomes of transferring the 68Ga activity standard, realized with the TDCR method, to the secondary standard radionuclide calibrator Capintec CRC™ 15R and to three radionuclide calibrators used for 68Ga PET applications in a hospital are also shown.
Assuntos
Radioisótopos de Gálio/análise , Serviço Hospitalar de Medicina Nuclear , Calibragem , Cuba , Radioisótopos de Gálio/normas , Padrões de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , IncertezaRESUMO
The Northeastern Regional Centre for Nuclear Sciences (CRCN-NE), National Nuclear Energy Commission, has organized for the first time in nuclear medicine services (NMSs) in the Brazilian northeast region a comparison of activity measurements for (99m)Tc, (131)I, (67)Ga, (201)Tl and (57)Co. This tool is widely utilized to evaluate not only the accuracy of radionuclide calibrators, but also the competence of NMSs to measure the activity of the radiopharmaceuticals and the performance of the personnel involved in these measurements. The comparison results showed that 90% of the results received from participants are within the ±10% limit established by the Brazilian Norm.
Assuntos
Radioisótopos/análise , Radiometria/normas , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/análise , Brasil , Calibragem , Humanos , Medicina Nuclear/normas , Controle de Qualidade , Radiometria/instrumentaçãoRESUMO
OBJETIVO: Avaliar o desempenho dos calibradores de radionuclídeos de 55 serviços de medicina nuclear brasileiros em medição de atividade de radiofármaco contendo 99Tc m. Testes de proficiência foram aplicados em 63 resultados originados do programa de comparação promovido pelo Laboratório Nacional de Metrologia das Radiações Ionizantes do Instituto de Radioproteção e Dosimetria. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: O desempenho foi avaliado em relação ao critério de aceitação de ±10 por cento de exatidão exigido pela norma brasileira e também aos critérios estabelecidos pela ISO/IEC Guide 43-1, e classificado como "aceitável" ou "não aceitável". Amostras de 99Tc m usadas nas comparações foram fornecidas por alguns dos participantes e calibradas no Laboratório Nacional de Metrologia das Radiações Ionizantes para determinar o valor de referência da atividade. RESULTADOS: Esta comparação com o 99Tc m mostrou que o desempenho aceitável atendendo à exigência da norma regulatória foi de 82,5 por cento, enquanto pelos critérios estabelecidos pela norma ISO/IEC 43-1 foi de 81,0 por cento. Por outro lado, calibradores de radionuclídeos com detector Geiger-Müller apresentaram desempenho inferior quando comparados com os dotados com câmara de ionização. CONCLU-SÃO: Nesta comparação, a avaliação do desempenho baseada nos critérios da ISO/IEC 43-1, os quais são aplicados a laboratórios analíticos, apesar de serem mais restritivas, foi bastante consistente com o critério de exatidão exigido pela norma nacional.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of radionuclide calibrators in 55 Brazilian nuclear medicine services in the measurement of 99Tc m radiopharmaceutical activity. Proficiency tests were applied to data sets with 63 results originated from the comparison program developed by Laboratório Nacional de Metrologia das Radiações Ionizantes of Instituto de Radioproteção e Dosimetria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The calibrators' performance was evaluated in compliance with the acceptance criterion of ±10 percent accuracy required by the Brazilian standards and also the criteria established by the ISO/IEC Guide 43-1, and classified as either "acceptable" or "non-acceptable". The samples of 99Tc m utilized in the comparison were supplied by some of the participants and calibrated at Laboratório Nacional de Metrologia das Radiações Ionizantes for determining the activity reference value. RESULTS: The present study utilizing 99Tc m has shown that 82.5 percent of the calibrators were considered as acceptable according to the Brazilian standards, while by the criteria established by ISO/IEC 43-1, 81.0 percent were considered as acceptable. On the other hand, radionuclide calibrators with Geiger-Müller detectors presented unsatisfactory performance when compared with calibrators with ionization chambers. CONCLUSION: The performance evaluation based on the ISO/IEC 43-1 criteria, which are applied to analytical laboratories, in spite of being more restrictive, has demonstrated to be quite consistent with the accuracy criterion established by the Brazilian standard.