RESUMO

Purpose: This study was conducted to investigate the safety of dental imaging in pregnant women with respect to fetal health. Materials and Methods: Searches were conducted of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in May 2023. The inclusion criteria encompassed cross-sectional and longitudinal studies that focused on the analysis of diagnostic dental imaging in pregnant women, as well as studies utilizing phantoms to simulate imaging examinations. The exclusion criteria consisted of reviews, letters to the editor, book chapters, and abstracts from scientific conferences and seminars. Results: A total of 3,913 articles were identified. Based on a review of the titles and abstracts, 3,892 articles were excluded, leaving 21 articles remaining for full-text review. Of these, 18 were excluded, and 4 additional articles were included as cross-references. Ultimately, 7 articles underwent quantitative-qualitative analysis. Three retrospective studies were focused on pregnant women who underwent dental imaging procedures. The remaining 4 studies utilized female phantoms to simulate imaging examinations and represent the radiation doses absorbed by the uterus or thyroid. Conclusion: Few dental radiology studies have been conducted to determine the safe radiation threshold for pregnant women. Additionally, the reviewed articles did not provide numbers of dental examinations, by type, corresponding to this dose. Dental imaging examinations of pregnant women should not be restricted if clinically indicated. Ultimately, practitioners must be able to justify the examination and should adhere to the "as low as diagnostically acceptable, being indication-oriented and patient-specific" (ALADAIP) principle of radioprotection.

RESUMO

In this work, an open beam-limiting device, consisting of a rectangular collimator to be coupled to an intraoral dental X-ray device, was made using recycled lead sheets as a radiation-absorbing element. The collimator was designed for 3D printing, and using Spektr 3.0 software, the number of lead sheets needed to absorb excess radiation was calculated. The rectangular collimator reduced the radiation dose to patients by 65% when using four layers of recycled lead sheets (saturating with a 70% reduction in radiation dose at the limit of eight or more sheets of lead). The rectangular collimator does not negatively impact the quality of the radiological image, is available as an open design for 3D printing, and can be built with materials that are easily accessible to the dentist, facilitating its use in clinical practice and reducing the patient's exposure to ionizing radiation.

Assuntos

RESUMO

We established a framework for collecting radiation doses for head, chest and abdomen-pelvis computed tomography (CT) in children scanned at multiple imaging sites across Latin America with an aim towards establishing diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) and achievable doses (ADs) in pediatric CT in Latin America. Our study included 12 Latin American sites (in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Honduras and Panama) contributing data on the four most common pediatric CT examinations (non-contrast head, non-contrast chest, post-contrast chest and post-contrast abdomen-pelvis). Sites contributed data on patients' age, sex and weight, scan factors (tube current and potential), volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP). Data were verified, leading to the exclusion of two sites with missing or incorrect data entries. We estimated overall and site-specific 50th (AD) and 75th (diagnostic reference level [DRL]) percentile CTDIvol and DLP for each CT protocol. Non-normal data were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Sites contributed data from 3,934 children (1,834 females) for different CT exams (head CT 1,568/3,934, 40%; non-contrast chest CT 945/3,934, 24%; post-contrast chest CT 581/3,934, 15%; abdomen-pelvis CT 840/3,934, 21%). There were significant statistical differences in 50th and 75th percentile CTDIvol and DLP values across the participating sites (P<0.001). The 50th and 75th percentile doses for most CT protocols were substantially higher than the corresponding doses reported from the United States of America. Our study demonstrates substantial disparities and variations in pediatric CT examinations performed in multiple sites in Latin America. We will use the collected data to improve scan protocols and perform a follow-up CT study to establish DRLs and ADs based on clinical indications.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción: Las radiografías dentales son una de las exposiciones médicas más frecuentes a la radiación ionizante. El uso de radiación ionizante está asociado a un riesgo probable de desencadenar efectos biológicos adversos y posibles daños a la salud del paciente. Para evitar que los pacientes reciban dosis innecesariamente altas durante estas exposiciones, la Comisión Internacional de Protección Radiológica recomienda la utilización de los niveles de referencia para diagnóstico, como una herramienta efectiva de ayuda a la optimización de la protección radiológica de los pacientes. Objetivo: Estimar los niveles de referencia para diagnóstico en radiografía dental intraoral y panorámica en la ciudad de Bogotá, D. C. Metodología: Se evaluaron los parámetros de exposición radiográficos de los equipos y la calidad de imagen en 68 equipos de radiografía dental periapical y 23 equipos de radiografía panorámica. Se estimaron las magnitudes dosimétricas de kerma incidente en aire (Kai) en equipos intraorales para la radiografía de un maxilar molar de un adulto y el producto kerma aire-área (PKA) en equipos de radiografía panorámica en un examen de un adulto estándar. Resultados: El tercer cuartil de la distribución de kerma incidente en aire para radiografía intraoral fue de 3,3 mGy y del producto kerma aire-área para radiografía panorámica fue de 103,9 mGycm2. En la distribución de frecuencias de kerma incidente en aire para radiografía intraoral, el porcentaje más alto de equipos estuvo en el rango de 2,0-3,0 mGy. En la distribución de frecuencias del producto kerma aire-área para los equipos de radiografía panorámica, el porcentaje más alto de equipos estuvo en el rango de 60 a 80 mGycm2. Discusión: Las instituciones consideradas para establecer los Niveles de Referencia para Diagnóstico en este estudio contaron con una adecuada calidad de la imagen evaluada con un maniquí dental, pero las variaciones en las dosis de radiación entre instituciones señalan la necesidad de implementar herramientas que contribuyan a la optimización de las prácticas. Conclusiones: Se recomienda usar los valores de los niveles de referencia para diagnóstico encontrados en esta investigación para optimizar la protección radiológica en las exposiciones radiológicas dentales, y se espera que este estudio sirva de base para nuevas investigaciones en las demás ciudades del país.

Introduction: Dental X-rays are one of the most frequent medical exposures to ionizing radiation. The use of ionizing radiation is associated with a probable risk of triggering adverse biological effects and possible damage to the patient's health. To prevent patients from receiving unnecessarily high doses during these exposures, the International Commission on Radiological Protection recommends the use of diagnostic reference levels as an effective tool to help optimize radiological protection for patients. Objective: To estimate diagnostic reference levels in intraoral and panoramic dental radiography in the city of Bogotá, D.C. Methodology: In 68 periapical dental radiography equipment and 23 panoramic radiography equipment, the radiographic exposure parameters of the equipment and image quality were evaluated. The dosimetric magnitudes of incident air kerma (Ka,i) in intraoral equipment for the radiography of a maxillary molar of an adult and the air kerma-area product (PKA) in panoramic radiography equipment in a standard adult examination were estimated. Results: The third quartile of the incident air kerma distribution for intraoral radiography was 3,3 mGy and the air kerma-area product for panoramic radiography was 103,9 mGycm2. In the frequency distribution of incident air kerma for intraoral radiography, the highest percentage of equipment was in the range of 2,0-3,0 mGy, and in the frequency distribution of the air kerma-area product for equipment of panoramic radiography, the highest percentage of the equipment was in the range of 60 to 80 mGy cm2. Discussion: The institutions considered to establish the diagnostic reference levels in this study had an adequate quality of the image evaluated with a dental phantom, but the variations in radiation doses between institutions indicate the need to implement tools that contribute to the optimization of the practices. Conclusions: It is recommended to use the values of the diagnostic reference levels found in this research to optimize radiological protection in dental radiological exposures, and it is expected that this study will serve as a basis for further research in other cities of the country.

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the dosimetry between convex triangular fields of view (FOV) and similar dimension cylindrical FOVs of two cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) models. METHODS: Optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) were placed in fiducial anatomical locations in an anthropomorphic phantom representing an adult head male for dosimetry scans. Convex triangular FOVs (100 × 80 mm/maxilla-mandible; 100 × 50 mm mandible; 100 × 50 mm/maxilla) from Veraviewepocs 3D R100 (J. Morita, Kyoto, Japan) (R100) and Veraview® X800 (J. Morita, Kyoto, Japan) (X800) and cylindrical FOVs from R100 and X800 (80 × 80 mm/maxilla-mandible; 80 × 50 mm/mandible; 80 × 50 mm/maxilla) were obtained, resulting in 12 different scan protocols. Equivalent doses for each relevant organ/tissue and the effective dose for each protocol were calculated. Mean effective doses were compared by the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post hoc test to evaluate the effect of the FOV and device (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The effective doses ranged between 69 and 324 µSv for the convex triangular FOVs and 76 and 332 µSv for the cylindrical FOVs. Convex triangular FOVs from the R100 device had effective doses 2.3 to 15.3% lower than their corresponding cylindrical FOVs with similar height (p < 0.05), and that difference ranged between 8.8 and 11.8% for the X800 device (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Convex triangular fields of view delivered slightly lower effective doses than the cylindrical fields of view of similar dimensions in the R100 and X800 CBCT devices. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding the influence of the image geometry formation in effective dose allows optimization to reduce patient dose.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Purpose.To show the considerations followed for MR-linac in shielding design for the first MR-linac in Mexico following the national clinical necessities.Method.The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) 151 recommendations were followed for the shielding design for primary and secondary barriers and the door design. The calculations were made considering the clinical demands in the country, that is, intensity modulated (IMRT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DC-RT) in 80%-20% proportion.Results.The values obtained in the level survey fully comply with the limits established by the national regulatory authority and with those recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) for public and occupational exposures.Conclusion.It is remarkable that the workload may increase or that the doses per patient may increase considering occupancy factors, which would allow the introduction of hypofractionated techniques with the same number of patients considered in this work without the need to make modifications in the bunker design.

Assuntos

RESUMO

La endoscopía digestiva ha evolucionado de una técnica puramente diagnóstica a un procedimiento terapéutico. Esto es posible en muchos casos gracias al uso de fluoroscopía, lo cual conlleva la exposición a radiaciones ionizantes tanto de los pacientes como del personal actuante. La colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE), que requiere necesariamente de fluoroscopia, es catalogada por la Food and Drug Administration como un examen con potencial riesgo de desencadenar lesiones inducidas por radiación. El presente artículo de revisión repasa los efectos biológicos de las radiaciones, los tipos de equipos radiológicos utilizados en CPRE, así como las magnitudes y unidades dosimétricas, para finalmente abordar los elementos de radio protección en la sala de endoscopia. El objetivo es brindar al lector la informacion para poder realizar estos procedimientos con la mayor seguridad radiológica tanto para los pacientes como para el personal ocupacionalmente expuesto.

Endoscopy has evolved from a purely diagnostic technique to a therapeutic procedure. This is possible in many cases thanks to the use of fluoroscopy, which entails exposure to ionizing radiation for both patients and the personnel involved. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), which necessarily requires fluoroscopy, is classified by the Food and Drug Administration as an examination with a potential risk of triggering radiation induced injuries. This article reviews the biological effects of radiation, the types of radiological equipment used in ERCP, as well as the magnitudes and dosimetric units, to finally address the radio protection elements in the endoscopy room. The objective is to provide the reader with the information to be able to perform these procedures with the greatest radiological safety for both patients and occupationally exposed personnel.

RESUMO

Introducción: el diseño de los búnkeres de radioterapia es de vital importancia no solo por la seguridad radiológica, sino también por el costo que implican. Los cálculos de blindaje de las paredes primarias de los búnkeres de los aceleradores lineales de radioterapia se determinan a partir del factor de uso de estas paredes. Los documentos internacionales como el NCRP 151 utilizan para el cálculo de estas barreras un factor de uso igual a 0.25. Objetivo: estudiar la distribución del uso de las barreras primarias en función de los tratamientos realizados buscando contrastar la homogeneidad en el uso de las barreras. Material y Métodos: con los datos de pacientes realizados durante un año (2021) en dos aceleradores lineales, uno dual y otro monoenergético, se generó una base de datos con la que se calculó la frecuencia de uso de las paredes primarias. En el presente trabajo se evalúa la diferencia entre el uso dado de las barreras y las estimaciones de uso internacional. Resultados: se encuentra que en el acelerador dual en la energía de 15X los campos más usados tienen ángulos de gantry 0º, 90º, 180º, 270º, teniendo un peso acumulado aproximado al 65% al igual que la carga de trabajo para esos ángulos, esto implica que los ángulos diferentes a estos tienen un uso muy inferior al previsto por el cálculo inicial. En el acelerador dual en la energía de 6X el campo más usado es a 0º teniendo un peso aproximado al 14%, pero la carga de trabajo a 0º no se diferencia apreciablemente del resto de los ángulos ya que la distribución no tiene direcciones preferenciales, ninguno de los valores llega a 10% que concuerda con el uso homogéneo de la barrera. En el acelerador monoenergético el peso relativo de los ángulos de 90º y 270º en el uso de las barreras es aproximadamente 34% para cada una, superior al 25% estimado inicialmente. Conclusiones: las barreras primarias de los búnkeres de radioterapia tienen espesores marcados por el cálculo de blindaje, los cuales se pueden hacer basados en documentos internacionales que son referencia del tema. Se considera en las referencias para la barrera primaria un factor de uso igual para las mismas, sin embargo en la práctica clínica se pueden tener un factor de uso no uniforme respondiendo a los tipos de tratamientos que se designen realizar en el equipo. Esta realidad abre la puerta para plantear blindajes optimizados que podrían generar búnkeres más económicos y mejor utilización del espacio de acuerdo a las condiciones dadas para cada caso en particular.

Introduction: The design of radiotherapy bunkers is of vital importance not only for radiation safety, but also for the cost involved. The shielding calculations of the primary walls of radiotherapy linear accelerator bunkers are determined from the use factor of these walls. International documents such as NCRP 151 use for the calculation of these barriers a usage factor equal to 0.25. Objective: to study the distribution of the use of primary barriers according to the treatments performed, seeking to contrast the homogeneity in the use of the barriers. Material and Methods: with the data of patients performed during one year (2021) in two linear accelerators, one dual and the other monoenergetic, a database was generated with which the frequency of use of the primary walls was calculated. The present work evaluates the difference between the given use of the barriers and the estimates of international use. Results: it is found that in the dual accelerator at 15X energy the most used fields have gantry angles 0º, 90º, 180º, 270º, having an accumulated weight of approximately 65% as well as the workload for those angles, this implies that the angles different from these have a use much lower than the one foreseen by the initial calculation. In the dual accelerator at 6X energy the most used field is at 0º having an approximate weight of 14%, but the workload at 0º is not appreciably different from the rest of the angles since the distribution does not have preferential directions, none of the values reaches 10% which is consistent with the homogeneous use of the barrier. In the monoenergetic accelerator, the relative weight of the 90º and 270º angles in the use of the barriers is approximately 34% for each one, higher than the 25% initially estimated. Conclusions: the primary barriers of radiotherapy bunkers have thicknesses marked by the shielding calculation, which can be made based on international documents that are a reference on the subject. It is considered in the references for the primary barrier an equal use factor for them, however in clinical practice they can have a non-uniform use factor responding to the types of treatments that are designed to be performed in the equipment. This reality opens the door to propose optimized shielding that could generate more economical bunkers and better use of space according to the conditions given for each particular case.

Introdução: O projeto de bunkers de radioterapia é de vital importância não apenas para a segurança da radiação, mas também para o custo envolvido. Os cálculos de blindagem para as paredes primárias dos bunkers de aceleradores lineares de radioterapia são determinados com base no fator de uso dessas paredes. Documentos internacionais, como o NCRP 151, usam um fator de uso igual a 0,25 para o cálculo dessas barreiras. Objetivo: estudar a distribuição do uso de barreiras primárias de acordo com os tratamentos realizados, buscando contrastar a homogeneidade no uso das barreiras. Material e métodos: com os dados de pacientes tratados durante um ano (2021) em dois aceleradores lineares, um dual e outro monoenergético, foi gerado um banco de dados com o qual foi calculada a frequência de uso das paredes primárias. Este artigo avalia a diferença entre o uso determinado de barreiras e as estimativas internacionais de uso. Resultados: verifica-se que no acelerador duplo com energia de 15X os campos mais utilizados são os ângulos de pórtico 0º, 90º, 180º, 270º, com um peso acumulado de aproximadamente 65%, assim como a carga de trabalho para esses ângulos, o que implica que os ângulos diferentes desses têm um uso muito menor do que o previsto pelo cálculo inicial. No acelerador duplo a 6X de energia, o campo mais utilizado é o de 0º com um peso aproximado de 14%, mas a carga de trabalho em 0º não é sensivelmente diferente do resto dos ângulos, já que a distribuição não tem direções preferenciais, nenhum dos valores chega a 10%, o que é consistente com o uso homogêneo da barreira. No acelerador de monoenergia, o peso relativo dos ângulos de 90º e 270º no uso das barreiras é de aproximadamente 34% para cada um, superior aos 25% estimados inicialmente. Conclusões: as barreiras primárias dos bunkers de radioterapia têm espessuras balizadas pelo cálculo de blindagem, que pode ser feito com base em documentos internacionais que são referência no assunto. As referências para a barreira primária consideram um fator de uso igual para elas, mas na prática clínica elas podem ter um fator de uso não uniforme, dependendo do tipo de tratamento que o equipamento foi projetado para realizar. Essa realidade abre as portas para uma blindagem otimizada que poderia gerar bunkers mais econômicos e melhor uso do espaço de acordo com as condições dadas para cada caso específico.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objective: To measure the potential radiation dose emitted by patients who have recently undergone diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures, in order to establish optimal radiation safety measures for such procedures. Materials and Methods: We evaluated the radiation doses emitted by 175 adult patients in whom technetium-99m, iodine-131, and fluorine-18 radionuclides were administered for bone, kidney, heart, brain, and whole-body scans, as measured with a radiation detector. Those values served as the basis for evaluating whole-body radiopharmaceutical clearance, as well as the risk for the exposure of others to radiation, depending on the time elapsed since administration of the radiopharmaceutical. Results: The mean time to clearance of the radiopharmaceuticals administered, expressed as the effective half-life, ranged from 1.18 ± 0.30 h to 11.41 ± 0.02 h, and the mean maximum cumulative radiation dose at 1.0 m from the patients was 149.74 ± 56.72 µSv. Even at a distance of 0.5 m, the cumulative dose was found to be only half and one tenth of the limits established for exposure of the general public and family members/caregivers (1.0 mSv and 5.0 mSv per episode, respectively). Conclusion: Cumulative radiation doses emitted by patients immediately after diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures are considerably lower than the limits established by the International Commission on Radiological Protection and the International Atomic Energy Agency, and precautionary measures to avoid radiation exposure are therefore not required after such procedures.

Objetivo: O objetivo deste trabalho foi levantar o potencial de dose de radiação emitida por pacientes em procedimentos diagnósticos, visando a estabelecer cuidados de radioproteção mais otimizados. Materiais e Métodos: Taxas de dose de radiação emitidas por 175 pacientes administrados com os radionuclídeos 99mTc, 131I e 18F para cintilografias óssea, renal, cardíaca, cerebral e corpo inteiro, foram mensuradas com um detector de radiação, servindo para avaliar o clareamento do radiofármaco no organismo e risco de exposição após administração dos radiofármacos. Resultados: O clareamento, representado pela meia-vida efetiva, variou de 1,18 ± 0,30 h até 11,41 ± 0,02 h e a dose de radiação máxima acumulada oferecida pelos pacientes a 1,0 m foi de 149,74 ± 56,72 µSv. Mesmo para distâncias de 0,5 m, as doses estimadas foram, respectivamente, duas e dez vezes inferiores ao nível de restrição para o público geral (1,0 mSv) e exposição médica (5,0 mSv/episódio). Conclusão: Doses de radiação oferecidas por pacientes em procedimentos diagnósticos são inferiores aos níveis de restrição recomendados pela International Commission on Radiological Protection e International Atomic Energy Agency, e assim, cuidados de radioproteção são geralmente desnecessários.

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: complex fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures in cardiology are known to result in higher radiation doses for patients and staff. PURPOSE: to estimate the equivalent dose received in different regions of the cardiologist's body in catheterism (CATH) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures, as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of monitoring the doses in the catheritization laboratory (cath lab) using a direct ion storage dosimeter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: the InstadoseTMand the thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD-100) were fixed simultaneously in the following regions of the cardiologist's body: near the eyes (left and right), the trunk region (over the lead apron) and the left ankle. Occupational doses were recorded during 86 procedures (60% CATH). RESULTS: catheterization procedures showed third quartile dose values near to the left eye region equal to 0.10 mSv (TLD-100) and 0.12 (InstadoseTM) and for intervention 0.15 mSv (TLD-100 and InstadoseTM). The doses measured in the trunk region, over the lead apron, were about 13% higher for catheterization procedures and 20% higher for intervention procedures compared to left eye region measurements. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was applied for unpaired data for all body regions, comparing the data obtained between the TLD-100 and InstadoseTMdosimeters. For CATH and PCI, the responses of the TLD-100 and InstadoseTMdosimeters are considered equal for all analysed regions (p> 0.05) with the exception of the right eye region. CONCLUSION: the InstadoseTMpassive dosimeter can be useful as a complementary assessment in the monitoring of a cardiologist's personal occupational doses in the cath lab.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To present patient dose levels for different CBCT scanners, acquired by a dose monitoring tool in a University Hospital, as a function of field of view (FOV), operation mode, and patient age. METHODS: An integrated dose monitoring tool was used to collect radiation exposure data [type of CBCT unit, dose-area product (DAP), FOV size, and operation mode] and patient demographic information (age, referral department) performed on a 3D Accuitomo 170 and a Newtom VGI EVO unit. Effective dose conversion factors were calculated and implemented into the dose monitoring system. For each CBCT unit, the frequency of examinations, clinical indications, and effective dose levels were obtained for different age and FOV groups, and operation modes. RESULTS: A total of 5163 CBCT examinations were analyzed. Surgical planning and follow-up were the most frequent clinical indications. For the standard operation mode, effective doses ranged from 35.1 to 300 µSv and 9.26-117 µSv using 3D Accuitomo 170 and Newtom VGI EVO, respectively. In general, effective doses decreased with increasing age and FOV size reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Effective dose levels varied notably between systems and operation modes.Operation mode selection and FOV size were indication-oriented, with larger FOV sizes election serving surgical planning and follow-up. Seeing the influence of FOV size on effective dose levels, manufacturers could be advised to move toward patient-specific collimation and dynamic FOV selection. Systematically monitoring patient doses could be recommended for steering future CBCT optimization.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Objective: To measure the potential radiation dose emitted by patients who have recently undergone diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures, in order to establish optimal radiation safety measures for such procedures. Materials and Methods: We evaluated the radiation doses emitted by 175 adult patients in whom technetium-99m, iodine-131, and fluorine-18 radionuclides were administered for bone, kidney, heart, brain, and whole-body scans, as measured with a radiation detector. Those values served as the basis for evaluating whole-body radiopharmaceutical clearance, as well as the risk for the exposure of others to radiation, depending on the time elapsed since administration of the radiopharmaceutical. Results: The mean time to clearance of the radiopharmaceuticals administered, expressed as the effective half-life, ranged from 1.18 ± 0.30 h to 11.41 ± 0.02 h, and the mean maximum cumulative radiation dose at 1.0 m from the patients was 149.74 ± 56.72 µSv. Even at a distance of 0.5 m, the cumulative dose was found to be only half and one tenth of the limits established for exposure of the general public and family members/caregivers (1.0 mSv and 5.0 mSv per episode, respectively). Conclusion: Cumulative radiation doses emitted by patients immediately after diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures are considerably lower than the limits established by the International Commission on Radiological Protection and the International Atomic Energy Agency, and precautionary measures to avoid radiation exposure are therefore not required after such procedures.

Resumo Objetivo: O objetivo deste trabalho foi levantar o potencial de dose de radiação emitida por pacientes em procedimentos diagnósticos, visando a estabelecer cuidados de radioproteção mais otimizados. Materiais e Métodos: Taxas de dose de radiação emitidas por 175 pacientes administrados com os radionuclídeos 99mTc, 131I e 18F para cintilografias óssea, renal, cardíaca, cerebral e corpo inteiro, foram mensuradas com um detector de radiação, servindo para avaliar o clareamento do radiofármaco no organismo e risco de exposição após administração dos radiofármacos. Resultados: O clareamento, representado pela meia-vida efetiva, variou de 1,18 ± 0,30 h até 11,41 ± 0,02 h e a dose de radiação máxima acumulada oferecida pelos pacientes a 1,0 m foi de 149,74 ± 56,72 µSv. Mesmo para distâncias de 0,5 m, as doses estimadas foram, respectivamente, duas e dez vezes inferiores ao nível de restrição para o público geral (1,0 mSv) e exposição médica (5,0 mSv/episódio). Conclusão: Doses de radiação oferecidas por pacientes em procedimentos diagnósticos são inferiores aos níveis de restrição recomendados pela International Commission on Radiological Protection e International Atomic Energy Agency, e assim, cuidados de radioproteção são geralmente desnecessários.

RESUMO

This integrative review analyzed scientific production on musculoskeletal disorders related to personal protective equipment used by interventional radiology teams. The PubMed, Embase, and SciELO databases were searched using a strategy developed with the help of a librarian. The double-blind selection process involved the Rayyan online tool. A total of 12 articles were included, which were organized according to year of publication, country research subjects, study type, and main outcomes. Five thematic categories emerged from the analysis: "personal protective equipment"; "ergonomics in the interventional radiology environment"; "the composition of personal protective equipment"; "radiation protection for interventional teams" and "the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in interventional teams". Outcomes associated with musculoskeletal disorders among interventional teams predominated in the studies, and advances in radiological protection were reported, especially in shielding technologies, as well as continuing efforts toward more ergonomic protective equipment to reduce the risk of musculoskeletal disorders.

O presente estudo teve como objetivo analisar a produção científica acerca dos distúrbios musculoesqueléticos relacionados ao uso de equipamentos de proteção individual por profissionais da equipe de radiologia intervencionista. Tratou-se de uma revisão integrativa realizada nas bases de dados PubMed, Embase e SciELO. A estratégia de busca foi definida com o auxílio de uma bibliotecária. Os artigos que compuseram a amostra foram selecionados por meio de seleção duplo-cega, utilizando a ferramenta on-line Rayyan. Após a aplicação dos critérios de inclusão e exclusão determinados, 12 artigos foram selecionados para o desenvolvimento da presente revisão. Os artigos foram organizados por ano e país de origem, sujeitos da pesquisa, tipo de estudo e principais desfechos. Da análise dos estudos selecionados, emergiram cinco categorias temáticas: "dispositivos de proteção radiológica"; "ergonomia no ambiente de radiologia intervencionista"; "composição dos dispositivos de proteção radiológica"; "proteção radiológica da equipe intervencionista"; e "prevalência de sintomas musculoesqueléticos na equipe intervencionista". A partir da presente revisão integrativa, foi possível identificar um predomínio de desfechos relacionando o trabalho na área intervencionista com o desenvolvimento de distúrbios musculoesqueléticos, bem como de avanços no campo da proteção radiológica, principalmente em tecnologias de blindagem, tornando-as antropometricamente adequadas para diminuir o risco de distúrbios musculoesqueléticos.

RESUMO

Introduction: Increasing use of ionizing radiation in hospitals exposes healthcare workers to health risks, therefore dosimetric surveillance and anti-radiation personal protective equipment are essential. However, low perception of risk has a negative impact on compliance. Objectives: To qualitatively characterize exposure to ionizing radiation and the compliance with anti-radiation personal protective equipment and personal dosimeters by workers, at a university hospital in Portugal. To investigate the impact of attending health examinations or participating in training activities on this compliance. Methods: Cross-sectional study design administering a questionnaire constructed by the authors to all healthcare workers exposed to ionizing radiation (n = 708). Results: A total of 295 workers completed the questionnaire. They worked in 16 different services using eight different types of ionizing radiation-emitting equipment, the most common of which were fluoroscopes. Lead aprons and thyroid protectors were the anti-radiation personal protective equipment with greatest compliance (61.7 and 55.6%, respectively), while fewer respondents used protective glasses (8.1%) and lead gloves (0.7%). Regular use of a dosimeter was reported by 78.3% of workers and use was associated with participation in training and with attending health examinations. The most frequent reasons given for not wearing anti-radiation personal protective equipment were unavailability (glasses and gloves), presence of a protective barrier, and discomfort. The most common reason for not using a dosimeter was forgetting to do so. Conclusions: Workers who attended training and those who attended health examinations were more compliant with use of dosimeters, indicating that these are useful strategies for improving workers' compliance with radiation protection measures.

RESUMO

Introducción: la técnica de imagen híbrida de SPECT-CT combina la imagen de la tomografía por emisión de fotón único (SPECT) con el estudio de tomografía computada (TC), obteniendo información funcional y anatómica en un mismo estudio. La dosis efectiva total de radiación ionizante recibida en los estudios SPECT-CT puede ser estimada a partir de la dosis efectiva atribuible a la actividad administrada del radiofármaco y la dosis efectiva del componente de tomografía computada (TC). Objetivos: estimar la dosis efectiva total en los protocolos SPECT-CT utilizados en población adulta y determinar el aporte adicional del estudio TC sobre la dosis efectiva total. Método: se evaluaron 258 estudios SPECT-CT para estimar la dosis efectiva total aportada por la administración de los radiofármacos y los estudios de TC de baja dosis. Para estimar el aporte de ambos componentes se utilizaron factores de conversión específicos de cada radiofármaco y región explorada mediante TC. Resultados: la dosis efectiva total (media ± DS) en los estudios SPECT-CT fueron: 12,4 ± 1,44 mSv en el estudio de perfusión miocárdica, 1,14 ± 0,25 mSv en ganglio centinela de mama, 8,6 ± 0,6 mSv paratiroides, 1,48 ± 1,02 mSv tiroides y los estudios óseos de las regiones de cuello 4,5 ± 0,3, tórax 6,07 ± 0,3 mSv, abdomen y pelvis 6,1 ± 0,3 mSv. La dosis de radiación aportada por el estudio TC se encuentra entre 0,46 mSv para la región del tórax en el estudio de ganglio centinela de mama y 2,3 mSv para el SPECT-CT óseo en la región de abdomen y pelvis. Conclusión: se logró estimar la dosis efectiva en los protocolos SPECT-CT de uso clínico más frecuente en población adulta y el aporte de los estudios TC a la dosis efectiva total siendo relativamente baja comparado con la dosis aportada por los radiofármacos administrados con la excepción del estudio de ganglio centinela donde la contribución del componente TC es aproximadamente la mitad de la dosis efectiva total.

Introduction: SPECT-CT Hybrid image technique combines the SPECT (single-photon emission computed tomography) image with the CT (computerized tomography) image to obtain both functional and anatomical images in the same study. The total effective ionizing radiation dose received in SPECT-CT studies may be estimated based on the effective dose from the radiopharmaceutical administered and the effective dose from the CT (computerized tomography) component. Objectives: the study aims to estimate the total effective dose in SPECT-CT protocols applied for the adult population, and to determine the additional contribution from the CT component to the total effective dose. Method: 258 SPECT-CT studies were evaluated to estimate the total effective dose from the administration of radiopharmaceuticals and low dose CT studies. Specific conversion factors for each radiopharmaceutical and area of the body explored with the CT were used to estimate radiation doses from both components. Results: total effective dose (average ± SD) in the SPECT-CT studies was: 12.4 ± 1.44 mSv in the myocardial perfusion study, 1.14 ± 0.25 mSv in the breast sentinel lymph node study, 8.6 ± 0.6 mSv in the parathyroid study, 1.48 ± 1.02 mSv in the thyroid study. As to bone studies, doses found were: 4.5 ± 0.3, in neck studies, 6.07 ± 0.3 mSv in thoracic studies and 6.1 ± 0.3 mSv in abdominal and pelvic studies. The radiation dose from the CT study ranges from 0.46 mSv for the thoracic region on the breast sentinel lymph node study to 2.3 mSv for the bone SPECT-CT study of the abdominal and pelvic region. Conclusions: we managed to estimate the effective dose in the the most frequently used SPECT-CT protocols for the adult population and the contribution of CT studies to the total effective dose. It was found to be relatively low when compared to the dose contributed by the radiopharmaceuticals administered, with the exception of the sentinel lymph node study for which the contribution from the CT study is approximately half the total effective dose.

Introdução: a técnica de imagem híbrida SPECT-CT combina a imagem de tomografia por emissão de fóton único (SPECT) com o estudo de tomografia computadorizada (TC), obtendo informações funcionais e anatômicas no mesmo estudo. A dose efetiva total de radiação ionizante recebida em estudos SPECT-CT pode ser estimada a partir da dose efetiva atribuível à atividade administrada do radiofármaco e da dose efetiva do componente de tomografia computadorizada (TC). Objetivos: estimar a dose efetiva total nos protocolos SPECT-CT utilizados na população adulta e determinar a contribuição adicional do estudo de TC na dose efetiva total. Método : 258 estudos SPECT-CT foram avaliados para estimar a dose efetiva total fornecida pela administração de radiofármacos e estudos de TC de baixa dose. Para estimar a contribuição de ambos os componentes, foram utilizados fatores de conversão específicos para cada radiofármaco e região explorada pela TC. ⁠ Resultados: a dose efetiva total (média ± DP) nos estudos SPECT-CT foi: 12,4 ± 1,44 mSv no estudo de perfusão miocárdica, 1,14 ± 0,25 mSv no linfonodo sentinela mamário, 8,6 ± 0,6 mSv paratireoide, 1,48 ± 1,02 mSv estudos de tireoide e ossos das regiões do pescoço 4,5 ± 0,3, tórax 6,07 ± 0,3 mSv, abdômen e pelve 6,1 ±0,3mSv. A dose de radiação fornecida pelo estudo de TC está entre 0,46 mSv para a região do tórax no estudo do linfonodo sentinela da mama e 2,3 mSv para o SPECT-CT ósseo na região do abdome e pelve. Conclusão: foi possível estimar a dose efetiva nos protocolos de SPECT-CT mais utilizados clinicamente na população adulta e a contribuição dos estudos de TC para a dose efetiva total, sendo relativamente baixa em relação à dose fornecida pelos radiofármacos administrados com a exceção do estudo do linfonodo sentinela onde a contribuição do componente TC é aproximadamente metade da dose efetiva total.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Resumen En las últimas dos décadas ha aumentado el uso de equipos portátiles de rayos X intraorales, los cuales son estabilizados por el operador. Si bien todos los equipos radiográficos presentan un riesgo inherente por el uso de radiación ionizante, el uso indebido de los equipos portátiles puede aumentar la exposición del operador. Se recomienda el uso de los equipos portátiles en un trípode o activados desde un área protegida. Sin embargo, en casos altamente justificados para su uso sin estos aditamentos, se debe seguir recomendaciones para disminuir la exposición del operador. Debido a que la radioprotección es fundamental al trabajar con rayos X, se debe favorecer el uso de equipos radiográficos dentales fijos sobre los equipos portátiles, ya que estos proporcionan una menor dosis de radiación al operador.

Abstract In the last two decades, the use of portable intraoral X-ray devices, stabilized by the operator, has increased. While all radiographic devices present an inherent risk from ionizing radiation, improper use of portable devices can increase operator exposure. Use of portable devices on a tripod or powered from a protected area is recommended. However, in highly justified cases, for using without these accessories, recommendations should be followed to reduce operator exposure. Because radioprotection is essential when using X-rays, fixed dental radiographic devices should be favored over portable equipment since the first provides a lower radiation dose to the operator.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Las radiografías dentales son necesarias para diagnosticar y hacer seguimiento de múltiples enfermedades orales. Sin embargo, debido a los conocidos efectos estocásticos de los rayos X dentales es imprescindible garantizar protección a los pacientes. Especial atención merecen las mujeres embarazadas por cuanto el feto es altamente vulnerable a la radiación, sobre todo enlas primeras semanas. Algunas recomendaciones de protección radiológica en esta población son: El uso de radiografías ha sido justificado; realizar el estudio 10 días después del inicio de la menstruación; informar del procedimiento a la embarazada a fin de evitar el miedo; optimizar el procedimiento (haz colimado, alto kVp, control manual de disparo, calibración regular etc.) y usar delantal plomado solo si las condiciones de optimización son insuficientes

Dental x-rays are necessary to diagnose and monitor multiple oral diseases. However, due to the well-known stochastic effects of dental X-rays, it is essential to guarantee patient protection. Pregnant women deserve special attention because the fetus is highly vulnerable to radiation, especially in the first weeks. Some recommendations for radiological protection in this population are the use of radiographs has been justified; conduct the study 10 days after the onset of menstruation; inform the pregnant woman about the procedure to avoid fear; optimize the procedure (collimated beam, high kVp, manual trip control, regular calibration etc.) and use a lead apron only if the optimization conditions are insufficient.

RESUMO

Las radiaciones ionizantes tienen el potencial de generar efectos adversos a la salud de las personas. Para hacer un uso más seguro y eficiente de estas radiaciones, la Comisión Internacional de Protección Radiológica fundamentalmente ha implementado un sistema de protección radiológica (SPR) que se basa en tres principios: justificación, optimización y límites. A su vez, estos principios se sustentan en cuatro valores éticos (beneficencia, prudencia, justicia y dignidad). Se sabe que en Chile el profesional que esta mandatado para realizar la toma de los exámenes que utilizan radiaciones ionizantes es el/la Tecnólogo Médico en Imagenología. Por lo tanto, resulta interesante valorar el grado de conocimiento adquirido y posteriormente aplicado en torno a los valores éticos del SPR por parte de dichos profesionales. De esta manera el objetivo del este artículo de tipo Punto de Vista fue realizar una serie de reflexiones en torno a esta temática. Cuando se realiza un procedimientos médico u odontológico con radiaciones ionizantes, el/la Tecnólogo Médico en Imagenología participa esencialmente en la realización del mismo, por lo que no debería ser su responsabilidad el cautelar que se cumplan los 4 valores éticos descritos dentro del SPR. A juicio nuestro, el principio de optimización, sería el único principio o pilar del SPR donde tiene real obligación de participar, utilizando las restricciones a las exposiciones individuales y los niveles de referencia para diagnóstico para reducir las desigualdades en la distribución de las exposiciones entre los grupos expuestos. Finalmente, resulta vital investigar si en su formación de especialidad se tocan estas temáticas

Ionizing radiation has the potential to generate adverse effects on people's health. To make safer and more efficient use of these radiations, the International Commission on Radiological Protection has fundamentally implemented a radiological protection system (RPS) based on three principles: justification, optimization and limits. In turn, these principles are based on four ethical values (beneficence, prudence, justice and dignity). It is known that in Chile the professional who is mandated to perform the exams that use ionizing radiation is the Medical Imaging Technologist. Therefore, it is interesting to assess the degree of knowledge acquired and subsequently applied around the ethical values of the RPS by these professionals. In this way, the objective of this Point of View article was to make a series of reflections on this subject. When a medical or dental procedure is performed with ionizing radiation, the Medical Imaging Technologist essentially participates in its performance, so it should not be their responsibility to ensure that the 4 ethical values described in the RPS are met. In our opinion, the principle of optimization would be the only principle or pillar of the RPS where it has a real obligation to participate, using the restrictions on individual exposures and the diagnostic reference levels to reduce inequalities in the distribution of exposures between exposed groups. Finally, it is vital to investigate whether these topics are addressed in his specialty training.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción: En el ámbito odontológico es muy común el uso de radiografías intraorales, extraorales e incluso de tomografías computarizadas volumétricas. Las radiografías intraorales presentan una baja dosis de radiación en comparación con las tomografías computarizadas volumétricas que pueden emitir una mayor dosis de radiación con cierto grado de riesgo para los pacientes. A pesar de que se conoce sobre la importancia del uso del consentimiento informado y los riesgos durante estos procedimientos, muy poco se ha reportado sobre la utilización del consentimiento informado en radiología oral y maxilofacial. Objetivo: Analizar los beneficios y los retos de usar el consentimiento informado en radiología odontológica. Comentarios principales: Actualmente, no existe un consenso claro en la comunidad odontológica sobre si se debe obtener el consentimiento informado del paciente antes de que se someta a un examen de imagen con radiación ionizante. Su aplicación de manera repetitiva o prolongada podría afectar al paciente a largo plazo. Consideraciones globales: Existe un consenso universal en resaltar la importancia del consentimiento informado en todo el ámbito de la salud. Sin embargo, en la práctica, su realización puede conllevar ciertas dificultades, tales como la identificación del responsable de su realización, el tiempo que lleva ejecutarla y la preocupación por causar un miedo innecesario en el paciente. Si estas dificultades logran ser superadas, podremos ver los beneficios de tener un consenso claro para la utilización de un consentimiento informado en el área odontológica(AU)

Introduction: In the dental field, the use of intraoral, extraoral and even volumetric computed tomography is very common. Intraoral X-rays have a low dose of radiation compared to volumetric CT scans that can emit a higher dose of radiation with some degree of risk to patients. Although the importance of the use of informed consent and the risks during these procedures are known, very little has been reported about the use of informed consent in oral and maxillofacial radiology. Objective: Analyze the benefits and challenges of using informed consent in dental radiology. Main Comments: Currently, there is no clear consensus in the dental community on whether the patient's informed consent should be obtained before they undergo an imaging examination with ionizing radiation. Its application repetitively or prolongedly could affect the patient in the long term. Global considerations: There is a universal consensus to highlight the importance of informed consent in the entire field of health. However, in practice, its realization can lead to certain difficulties, such as the identification of the person responsible for its implementation, the time it takes to execute it and the concern to cause unnecessary fear in the patient. If these difficulties can be overcome, we can see the benefits of having a clear consensus for the use of informed consent in the dental area(AU)

Assuntos