RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Studies had previously identified three cardiogenic shock (CS) phenotypes (cardiac-only, cardiorenal, and cardiometabolic). Therefore, we aimed to understand better the hemodynamic profiles of these phenotypes in acute myocardial infarction-CS (AMI-CS) using pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) data to better understand the AMI-CS heterogeneity. METHODS: We analyzed the PAC data of 309 patients with AMI-CS. The patients were classified by SCAI shock stage, congestion profile, and phenotype. In addition, 24 h hemodynamic PAC data were obtained. RESULTS: We identified three AMI-CS phenotypes: cardiac-only (43.7%), cardiorenal (32.0%), and cardiometabolic (24.3%). The cardiometabolic phenotype had the highest mortality rate (70.7%), followed by the cardiorenal (52.5%) and cardiac-only (33.3%) phenotypes, with significant differences (p < 0.001). Right atrial pressure (p = 0.001) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (p = 0.01) were higher in the cardiometabolic and cardiorenal phenotypes. Cardiac output, index, power, power index, and cardiac power index normalized by right atrial pressure and left-ventricular stroke work index were lower in the cardiorenal and cardiometabolic than in the cardiac-only phenotypes. We found a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.1 for the cardiorenal and 3.3 for cardiometabolic versus the cardiac-only phenotypes (p < 0.001). Also, multi-organ failure, acute kidney injury, and ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation had a significant HR. Multivariate analysis revealed that CS phenotypes retained significance (p < 0.001) when adjusted for the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions score (p = 0.011) and ∆congestion (p = 0.028). These scores independently predicted mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate patient prognosis and treatment strategies are crucial, and phenotyping in AMI-CS can aid in this effort. PAC profiling can provide valuable prognostic information and help design new trials involving AMI-CS.
RESUMO
El uso del catéter de arteria pulmonar es un método eficaz para la monitorización de los pacientes críticos. Aunque ampliamente utilizado en las Unidades de Cuidados Críticos Cardiológicos, no se ha demostrado en estudios previos el beneficio de su uso. Registros recientes y numerosos en pacientes graves cursando shock cardiogénico muestran un beneficio en términos de mortalidad asociada, sobre todo relacionado con una adecuada interpretación. Además, nuevos parámetros relacionados con insuficiencia ventricular como son el poder cardíaco y el índice de pulsatilidad de arteria pulmonar, así como el conocimiento de las presiones de llenado ventriculares, tanto izquierdas, como derechas, ayudan en la toma de decisiones, las opciones de tratamiento y estimación del pronóstico. Complementando lo anterior, la modernización en la tecnología del catéter de arteria pulmonar permite la medición del gasto cardíaco de forma continua a través de un sistema termodilución integrada. Este sistema también permite la monitorización más precisa del ventrículo derecho por medio de la valoración continua de su fracción de eyección y volumen de fin de diástole. La información obtenida por medio del catéter de arteria pulmonar en shock cardiogénico ha llevado a que su uso comience a ser cada vez más frecuente en unidades de cuidados críticos cardiológicos y que se empleen estos valores por equipos de shock cardiogénico para la toma de decisiones complejas. La evidencia descrita sobre el valor pronóstico relacionada al uso del catéter de arteria pulmonar se resume en esta revisión.
The pulmonary artery catheter is an effective tool for monitoring critically ill patients; however, the evidence showed limited value and a posible increased risk. Recently, numerous registries in critical ill patients in cardiogenic shock have shown a benefit in mortality, especially related to an adequate interpretation of findings. In addition, new parameters related to ventricular failure, such as cardiac power output and pulmonary artery pulsatility index have shown to be useful for a better treatment and estimation of prognosis. Besides, determination of filling pressures (right and/or left side) have an important role in terms of prognosis and management. Advances in pulmonary artery catheter technology allows us to continuously measure cardiac output through an integrated thermodilution system. This system also allows the continuous assessment of right ventricular ejection fraction and end-diastolic volume. The information obtained has led to an increased use of the pulmonary artery catheter monitoring in cardiac Intensive Care Units allowing improvements in treatment and complex decision-making.
Assuntos
Humanos , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/métodos , Prognóstico , Débito Cardíaco/fisiologia , Função Ventricular Direita/fisiologia , Catéteres , Monitorização Hemodinâmica , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnósticoRESUMO
The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) measures hemodynamic parameters in real time, providing valuable data for the management of the critical patient. Nevertheless, its use is associated with several complications. Knot formation is a rare complication related to PAC insertion. A 51-year-old patient with complicated ethanolic liver cirrhosis underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring was performed using a Swan-Ganz pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) inserted through the right internal jugular vein. Chest X-ray in the immediate postoperative period showed the presence of a possible knot adjacent to the tip of the sheath in the internal jugular vein. The patient was then referred to the hemodynamics room, where, through fluoroscopy, a true knot was successfully removed after femoral vein dissection. The medical team should weigh the risk and benefit of using the PAC, taking into account the patient's clinical conditions, the benefits, and possible complications of the procedure.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary artery catheterization provides continuous monitoring of hemodynamic parameters that may aid in the perioperative management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, prior data suggest that pulmonary artery catheterization has limited benefit in intensive care and surgical settings. Thus, this study sought to determine the impact of pulmonary artery catheter insertion on short-term postoperative outcomes in a large, contemporaneous cohort of patients undergoing open cardiac surgery compared with standard central venous pressure monitoring. METHODS: This was an observational study of open cardiac surgeries from 2010 to 2018. Patients with pulmonary artery catheter insertion were identified and matched against patients without pulmonary artery catheter insertion via 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity matching. Multivariable analysis was performed to assess the impact of pulmonary artery catheterization on operative mortality in the overall cohort, as well as recent heart failure, mitral valve disease, and tricuspid insufficiency subgroups. RESULTS: Of the 11,820 patients undergoing (Society of Thoracic Surgeons indexed) coronary or valvular surgery, 4605 (39.0%) had pulmonary artery catheter insertion. Propensity score matching yielded 3519 evenly balanced pairs. Compared with central venous pressure monitoring, pulmonary artery catheter use was not associated with improved operative mortality in the overall cohort or in the recent heart failure, mitral valve disease, or tricuspid insufficiency subgroups. Intensive care unit length of stay was longer (P < .001), and there were more packed red blood cell transfusions in the pulmonary artery catheterization group (P < .001); however, postoperative outcomes were otherwise similar, including stroke, sepsis, and new renal failure (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that pulmonary artery catheterization may have limited benefit in cardiac surgery.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas , Insuficiência da Valva Tricúspide , Humanos , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/efeitos adversos , Artéria Pulmonar/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , CatéteresRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Arterial blood pressure is the most common variable used to assess the response to a fluid challenge in routine clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the change in the radial artery pulse pressure (rPP) to detect the change in cardiac output after a fluid challenge in patients with septic shock. METHODS: Prospective observational study including 35 patients with septic shock in which rPP and cardiac output were measured before and after a fluid challenge with 400 mL of crystalloid solution. Cardiac output was measured with intermittent thermodilution technique using a pulmonary artery catheter. Patients were divided between responders (increase >15% of cardiac output after fluid challenge) and nonresponders. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), Pearson correlation coefficient and paired Student t test were used in statistical analysis. RESULTS: Forty-three percent of the patients were fluid responders. The change in rPP could not neither discriminate between responders and nonresponders (AUROC = 0.52; [95% confidence interval: 0.31-0.72] P = .8) nor correlate (r = .21, P = .1) with the change in cardiac output after the fluid challenge. CONCLUSIONS: The change in rPP neither discriminated between fluid responders and nonresponders nor correlated with the change in cardiac output after a fluid challenge. The change in rPP cannot serve as a surrogate of the change in cardiac output to assess the response to a fluid challenge in patients with septic shock.
Assuntos
Pressão Arterial , Hidratação/métodos , Artéria Radial/fisiopatologia , Choque Séptico/fisiopatologia , Termodiluição/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Débito Cardíaco , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz , Soluções Cristaloides , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Termodiluição/métodosRESUMO
RESUMEN Objetivo: Comparar las medidas de gasto cardiaco por ecocardiografía transtorácica y por catéter arterial pulmonar en pacientes en ventilación mecánica con presión positiva al final de la espiración elevada. Evaluar el efecto de la insuficiencia tricúspide. Métodos: Se estudiaron 16 pacientes en ventilación mecánica. El gasto cardiaco se midió con el catéter arterial pulmonar y por ecocardiografía transtorácica. Las medidas se realizaron en diferentes niveles de presión positiva al final de la espiración (10cmH2O, 15cmH2O, y 20cmH2O). Se evalúo el efecto de la insuficiencia tricúspide sobre la medida de gasto cardiaco. Se estudió el coeficiente de correlación intraclase; el error medio y los límites de concordancia se estudiaron con el diagrama de Bland-Altman. Se calculó el porcentaje de error. Resultados: Se obtuvieron 44 pares de medidas de gasto cardiaco. Se obtuvo un coeficiente de correlación intraclase de 0,908, p < 0,001; el error medio fue 0,44L/min para valores de gasto cardíaco entre 5 a 13L/min. Los límites de concordancia se encontraron entre 3,25L/min y -2,37L/min. Con insuficiencia tricúspide el coeficiente de correlación intraclase fue 0,791, sin insuficiencia tricúspide el coeficiente de correlación intraclase fue 0,935. La presencia de insuficiencia tricúspide aumentó el porcentaje de error de 32 % a 52%. Conclusiones: En pacientes con presión positiva al final de la espiración elevada la medida de gasto cardiaco por ecocardiografía transtorácica es comparable con catéter arterial pulmonar. La presencia de insuficiencia tricúspide influye en el coeficiente de correlación intraclase. En pacientes con presión positiva al final de la espiración elevada, el uso de ecocardiografía transtorácica para medir gasto cardiaco es comparable con las medidas invasivas.
ABSTRACT Objective: To compare cardiac output measurements by transthoracic echocardiography and a pulmonary artery catheter in mechanically ventilated patients with high positive end-expiratory pressure. To evaluate the effect of tricuspid regurgitation. Methods: Sixteen mechanically ventilated patients were studied. Cardiac output was measured by pulmonary artery catheterization and transthoracic echocardiography. Measurements were performed at different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (10cmH2O, 15cmH2O, and 20cmH2O). The effect of tricuspid regurgitation on cardiac output measurement was evaluated. The intraclass correlation coefficient was studied; the mean error and limits of agreement were studied with the Bland-Altman plot. The error rate was calculated. Results: Forty-four pairs of cardiac output measurements were obtained. An intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.908 was found (p < 0.001). The mean error was 0.44L/min for cardiac output values between 5 and 13L/min. The limits of agreement were 3.25L/min and -2.37L/min. With tricuspid insufficiency, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.791, and without tricuspid insufficiency, 0.935. Tricuspid insufficiency increased the error rate from 32% to 52%. Conclusions: In patients with high positive end-expiratory pressure, cardiac output measurement by transthoracic echocardiography is comparable to that with a pulmonary artery catheter. Tricuspid regurgitation influences the intraclass correlation coefficient. In patients with high positive end-expiratory pressure, the use of transthoracic echocardiography to measure cardiac output is comparable to invasive measures.
Assuntos
Humanos , Idoso , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/métodos , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Débito Cardíaco/fisiologia , Respiração com Pressão Positiva , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Abstract Background and objectives: Transthoracic echocardiography may potentially be useful to obtain a prompt, accurate and non-invasive estimation of cardiac output. We evaluated whether non-cardiologist intensivists may obtain accurate and reproducible cardiac output determination in hemodynamically unstable mechanically ventilated patients. Methods: We studied 25 hemodynamically unstable mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients with a pulmonary artery catheter in place. Cardiac output was calculated using the pulsed Doppler transthoracic echocardiography technique applied to the left ventricular outflow tract in apical 5 chamber view by two intensive care unit physicians who had received a basic Transthoracic Echocardiography training plus a specific training focused on Doppler, left ventricular outflow tract and velocity-time integral determination. Results: Cardiac output assessment by transthoracic echocardiography was feasible in 20 out of 25 enrolled patients (80%) and showed an excellent inter-operator reproducibility (Pearson correlation test r = 0.987; Cohen's K = 0.840). Overall, the mean bias was 0.03 L.min-1, with limits of agreement -0.52 and +0.57 L.min-1. The concordance correlation coefficient (ρc) was 0.986 (95% IC 0.966-0.995) and 0.995 (95% IC 0.986-0.998) for physician 1 and 2, respectively. The value of accuracy (Cb) of COTTE measurement was 0.999 for both observers. The value of precision (ρ) of COTTE measurement was 0.986 and 0.995 for observer 1 and 2, respectively. Conclusions: A specific training focused on Doppler and VTI determination added to the standard basic transthoracic echocardiography training allowed non-cardiologist intensive care unit physicians to achieve a quick, reproducible and accurate snapshot cardiac output assessment in the majority of mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients.
Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: A ecocardiografia transtorácica pode ser potencialmente útil para obter uma estimativa rápida, precisa e não invasiva do débito cardíaco. Avaliamos se os intensivistas não cardiologistas podem obter uma determinação precisa e reprodutível do débito cardíaco em pacientes mecanicamente ventilados e hemodinamicamente instáveis. Métodos: Avaliamos 25 pacientes em unidade de terapia intensiva, mecanicamente ventilados, hemodinamicamente instáveis, com cateteres de artéria pulmonar posicionados. O débito cardíaco foi calculado com a técnica de ecocardiografia transtorácica com Doppler pulsátil aplicada à via de saída do ventrículo esquerdo no corte apical (5-câmaras) por dois médicos intensivistas que receberam treinamento básico em ecocardiografia transtorácica e treinamento específico focado em Doppler, via de saída do ventrículo esquerdo e determinação da integral de tempo-velocidade. Resultados: A avaliação do débito cardíaco pelo ecocardiograma transtorácico foi factível em 20 dos 25 pacientes inscritos (80%) e mostrou excelente reprodutibilidade entre operadores (teste de correlação de Pearson r = 0,987; K de Cohen = 0,840). No geral, o viés médio foi de 0,03 L.min-1, com limites de concordância de -0,52 e +0,57 L.min-1. O coeficiente de correlação de concordância (ρc) foi 0,986 (95% IC 0,966-0,995) e 0,995 (95% IC 0,986-0,998) para os médicos 1 e 2, respectivamente. O valor de precisão (Cb) da mensuração de COTTE foi de 0,999 para ambos os observadores. O valor de precisão (ρ) da mensuração de COTTE foi de 0,986 e 0,995 para os observadores 1 e 2, respectivamente. Conclusões: Um treinamento específico focado na determinação do Doppler e VTI, adicionado ao treinamento padrão em ecocardiografia transtorácica básica, permitiu que médicos não cardiologistas da unidade de terapia intensiva obtivessem uma avaliação rápida, reprodutível e precisa do débito cardíaco instantâneo na maioria dos pacientes mecanicamente ventilados em unidade de terapia intensiva.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Idoso , Respiração Artificial , Padrões de Prática Médica , Débito Cardíaco , Ecocardiografia Doppler de Pulso , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Estado Terminal , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Transthoracic echocardiography may potentially be useful to obtain a prompt, accurate and non-invasive estimation of cardiac output. We evaluated whether non-cardiologist intensivists may obtain accurate and reproducible cardiac output determination in hemodynamically unstable mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: We studied 25 hemodynamically unstable mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients with a pulmonary artery catheter in place. Cardiac output was calculated using the pulsed Doppler transthoracic echocardiography technique applied to the left ventricular outflow tract in apical 5 chamber view by two intensive care unit physicians who had received a basic Transthoracic Echocardiography training plus a specific training focused on Doppler, left ventricular outflow tract and velocity-time integral determination. RESULTS: Cardiac output assessment by transthoracic echocardiography was feasible in 20 out of 25 enrolled patients (80%) and showed an excellent inter-operator reproducibility (Pearson correlation test r=0.987; Cohen's K=0.840). Overall, the mean bias was 0.03L.min-1, with limits of agreement -0.52 and +0.57L.min-1. The concordance correlation coefficient (ρc) was 0.986 (95% IC 0.966-0.995) and 0.995 (95% IC 0.986-0.998) for physician 1 and 2, respectively. The value of accuracy (Cb) of COTTE measurement was 0.999 for both observers. The value of precision (ρ) of COTTE measurement was 0.986 and 0.995 for observer 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A specific training focused on Doppler and VTI determination added to the standard basic transthoracic echocardiography training allowed non-cardiologist intensive care unit physicians to achieve a quick, reproducible and accurate snapshot cardiac output assessment in the majority of mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients.
Assuntos
Débito Cardíaco , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Ecocardiografia Doppler de Pulso , Padrões de Prática Médica , Respiração Artificial , Adulto , Idoso , Estado Terminal , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Resumen: El catéter en la arteria pulmonar (CAP) es un dispositivo utilizado en unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI) para medir las presiones en el corazón y los vasos sanguíneos pulmonares como parte del monitoreo hemodinámico, principalmente en pacientes de cirugía cardiaca. El dispositivo USCOM se trata de una técnica no invasiva que utiliza la tecnología Doppler para obtener las medidas de volumen sistólico y sus derivados. Se realiza la siguiente comparación de medición de GC entre estos dos dispositivos en pacientes con choque séptico. Se realizó un estudio tipo observacional, prospectivo, longitudinal y comparativo en pacientes con choque séptico entre 18 y 60 años de edad ingresados en la UTI en el periodo de mayo-junio del 2017. Ante la disminución del uso del catéter de la arteria pulmonar debido a la controversia de no mejorar la mortalidad en los pacientes de las unidades de terapia intensiva (UTI), la colocación de dicho catéter ha caído en desuso; sin embargo, el GC medido por el catéter de Swan-Ganz sigue siendo el «estándar de oro¼ para la medición en tiempo real del GC y las resistencias sistémicas y pulmonares. La medición del GC por CAP versus USCOM se correlaciona de tal forma que puede emplearse en la medición por USCOM en un paciente con choque séptico, al cual no se le pretenda invadir para determinar sus condiciones hemodinámicas.
Abstract: The pulmonary artery catheter (CAP) is a device used in intensive care units (ICUs) to measure pressures in the heart and pulmonary blood vessels as part of hemodynamic monitoring primarily in cardiac surgery patients. The USCOM device is a non-invasive technique that uses Doppler technology to obtain measurements of systolic volume and its derivatives. The following CO measurement comparison is performed between these two devices in patients with septic shock. An observational, prospective, longitudinal and comparative study was conducted in patients with septic shock aged between 18 and 60 years admitted to intensive care in the period May-June 2017. In view of the decrease in the use of the pulmonary artery catheter due to the controversy of not improving the mortality in the patients of the Intensive Care Units, the placement of this catheter has fallen into disuse; however, cardiac output measured by the Swan Ganz catheter remains the «gold standard¼ for real-time measurement of cardiac output and systemic and pulmonary resistance. The CO measurement by PAC versus USCOM correlates, in such a way, that USCOM measurement can be used in a patient with septic shock, who is not expected to invade to determine their hemodynamic conditions.
Resumo: O cateter de artéria pulmonar (CAP) é um dispositivo utilizado em unidades de terapia intensiva (UTI) para medir as pressões nos vasos sanguíneos cardíacos e pulmonares, como parte da monitorização hemodinâmica, principalmente em pacientes submetidos a cirurgia cardíaca. O dispositivo USCOM é uma técnica não invasiva que utiliza a tecnologia Doppler para obter medidas do volume sistólico e seus derivados. A seguinte comparação da medição do DC é feita entre esses dois dispositivos em pacientes com choque séptico. Foi realizado um estudo observacional, prospectivo, longitudinal e comparativo em pacientes com choque séptico com idade entre 18 e 60 anos internados na unidade de terapia intensiva no período de maio a junho de 2017. Dada a diminuição do uso do cateter de artéria pulmonar devido à controvérsia de não melhorar a mortalidade nos pacientes das Unidades de Terapia Intensiva, a colocação do referido cateter caiu em desuso; no entanto, o débito cardíaco medido pelo cateter de Swan Ganz continua sendo o «padrão ouro¼ para a medição em tempo real do débito cardíaco e resistências sistêmicas e pulmonares. A medida do DC por CAP vs USCOM está correlacionada, de tal forma que a medida por USCOM pode ser usada em um paciente com choque séptico, que não se destina a invadir para determinar suas condições hemodinâmicas.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Acute heart failure is associated with low cardiac output syndrome and renal dysfunction. However, it is not known whether a goal-directed protocol guided by tightly controlled hemodynamic variables, including pulmonary artery catheter, will safely improve clinical renal dysfunction markers in these patients when compared to a less invasive approach. METHODS: Pilot, randomized clinical trial aimed at patients with known heart failure, low cardiac output syndrome and renal dysfunction with less than 48 hours from onset. We randomized two groups: (a) goal-directed therapy monitored with pulmonary artery catheter and (b) conventional therapy with central venous catheter. Hemodynamic parameters, venous oxygen saturation, serum lactate, fluid repositions and vasoactive drugs were compared considering renal function improvement after 72 hours as the primary study endpoint. We included 15 goal-directed therapy and 16 conventional therapy patients. The study has assessed patients on baseline looking for significant improvement at 72 hours of the following parameters in the goal-directed therapy and conventional therapy groups: urine output, serum creatinine, venous oxygen saturation and serum lactate. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. In the first 24 hours there was a lower volume of fluid reposition in the goal-directed therapy group, although 72 hours later such reposition was equivalent. The use of inotropic agents was similar between groups. There was an improvement to the renal function and the hemodynamic parameter in both study groups. CONCLUSIONS: The option for the protocol with pulmonary artery catheter setting is justified only if there is clinical evidence of serious pulmonary congestion associated to low peripheral perfusion.
OBJETIVOS: A Insuficiência cardíaca aguda está associada à síndrome de baixo débito cardíaco e disfunção renal. No entanto, não se sabe se o protocolo meta-dirigido guiado por variáveis hemodinâmicas rigorosamente controladas, incluindo cateter de artéria pulmonar, irá melhorar de forma segura os marcadores de disfunção renal clínica nestes pacientes, quando comparados a uma abordagem menos invasiva. MÉTODOS: Ensaio clínico piloto randomizado incluindo pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca conhecida, síndrome de baixo débito cardíaco e disfunção renal com menos de 48 horas de evolução. Foram randomizados dois grupos: terapia alvo-dirigida monitorada com cateter de artéria pulmonar e terapia convencional com cateter venoso central. Os parâmetros hemodinâmicos, a saturação venosa, o lactato sérico, o volume de reposição de fluidos e as doses de drogas vasoativas foram comparados, considerando a melhora da função renal após 72 horas como o desfecho primário do estudo. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 15 pacientes no grupo de terapia alvo-dirigida e 16 pacientes em terapia convencional. As características basais foram semelhantes em ambos os grupos. O estudo avaliou os seguintes parâmetros dos pacientes na linha de base e após 72 horas para os dois grupos: excreção urinária, creatinina sérica, saturação venosa de oxigênio e lactato. Nas primeiras 24 horas houve menor reposição de fluido no grupo de terapia dirigida mas, ao fim de 72 horas, a reposição tornou-se equivalente. O uso de agentes inotrópicos foi semelhante entre os grupos. CONCLUSÕES: Houve uma melhora da função renal e dos parâmetros hemodinâmicos em ambos os grupos de estudo. A opção para o protocolo com cateter de artéria pulmonar só se justifica se houver evidência clínica de congestão pulmonar grave associada à baixa perfusão periférica.
Assuntos
Humanos , Choque Cardiogênico , Injúria Renal Aguda , Catéteres , Monitorização Hemodinâmica , Insuficiência CardíacaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the changes over time (trend) in sign and magnitude for SSVO2 and SVO2 during and after cardiac surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective and observational study was conducted on 34 cardiac surgery patients. Venous blood samples were taken simultaneously from the introductor (SVCO2) and distal (SVO2) port of the pulmonary artery catheter at predefined intervals. Systemic and pulmonary hemodynamic variables were measured at the same time. The trend was calculated as the difference between 2 consecutive measurements (tSO2). Data were processed with ANOVA for multiple comparisons, Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between SVCO2 and tSVO2 (R(2)=0.55), the mean of the differences was 0.36±7.75%, and the limits of agreement ranged from -15.1 to 15.9%. The sign of the trend was similar in 85.1% of the paired data. However, the magnitude of the changes in tSVCO2 and tSVO2 were not always equivalent. Between 0 and 5% of the change in the tSVCO2 was coincident with only 44.7% of the tSVO2. A wide variation was found between both trends when the signs and magnitudes of the changes were taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: When considering the sign and magnitude, the change over time of central venous O2 saturations were not interchangeable in cardiac surgery patients. Clinical decisions based exclusively on tSVCO2 monitoring should be taken with caution.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Oxigênio/metabolismo , Artéria Pulmonar , Veia Cava Superior , Feminino , Humanos , Período Intraoperatório , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Intraoperatória , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Pulmonary artery catheter is an invasive monitor usually placed in high-risk cardiac surgical patients to optimize the cardiac functions. We present this case of blood oozing from the oximetry connection port of the pulmonary artery catheter that resulted in the inability to monitor continuous cardiac output requiring replacement of the catheter. The cause of this abnormal bleeding was later confirmed to be due to a manufacturing defect.
RESUMO
Our aims were to describe the prevalence of pulmonary hypertension in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), to characterize their hemodynamic cardiopulmonary profiles, and to correlate these parameters with outcome. All consecutive patients over 16 years of age who were in the intensive care unit with a diagnosis of ARDS and an in situ pulmonary artery catheter for hemodynamic monitoring were studied. Pulmonary hypertension was diagnosed when the mean pulmonary artery pressure was >25 mmHg at rest with a pulmonary artery occlusion pressure or left atrial pressure <15 mmHg. During the study period, 30 of 402 critically ill patients (7.46%) who were admitted to the ICU fulfilled the criteria for ARDS. Of the 30 patients with ARDS, 14 met the criteria for pulmonary hypertension, a prevalence of 46.6% (95% CI; 28-66%). The most common cause of ARDS was pneumonia (56.3%). The overall mortality was 36.6% and was similar in patients with and without pulmonary hypertension. Differences in patients' hemodynamic profiles were influenced by the presence of pulmonary hypertension. The levels of positive end-expiratory pressure and peak pressure were higher in patients with pulmonary hypertension, and the PaCO2 was higher in those who died. The level of airway pressure seemed to influence the onset of pulmonary hypertension. Survival was determined by the severity of organ failure at admission to the intensive care unit.
Assuntos
Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hipertensão Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/epidemiologia , Pressão Atrial , Estudos de Coortes , Frequência Cardíaca , Hipertensão Pulmonar/etiologia , Hipertensão Pulmonar/mortalidade , Hipertensão Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Prevalência , Respiração com Pressão Positiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Artéria Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/complicações , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/fisiopatologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Volume de Ventilação Pulmonar , Resistência Vascular , Função Ventricular , Função Ventricular DireitaRESUMO
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A utilização do cateter de artéria pulmonar (CAP) é ainda fonte de debates, devido aos questionamentos sobre sua segurança e eficácia. Este estudo reproduz, entre uma amostra de médicos brasileiros, outra pesquisa, na qual foi evidenciada a heterogeneidade de condutas guiadas através dos dados fornecidos pelo CAP entre médicos norte-americanos. MÉTODO: Durante o Congresso Brasileiro de Medicina Intensiva (Curitiba, 2004), foram distribuídos formulários nos quais constavam três casos com dados de CAP e, na metade deles, de ecocardiografia. Foi solicitado aos médicos que assinalassem uma entre seis opções terapêuticas. Determinou-se que uma resposta homogênea resultaria em uma escolha selecionada por pelo menos 80 por cento dos respondedores. RESULTADOS: Duzentos e trinta e sete médicos responderam os formulários. Em todos os três casos foram observadas escolhas de intervenção terapêutica completamente distintas, nenhuma delas obtendo mais de 80 por cento de concordância. Quando se comparam as escolhas direcionadas pelos resultados da ecocardiografia, observou-se a persistência da variação de escolhas e que nenhuma delas alcançou número suficiente para ser considerada homogênea. CONCLUSÕES: Semelhantemente ao estudo original, observou-se total heterogeneidade nas condutas dirigidas pelo CAP, o que, em última instância, pode indicar conhecimento inadequado de conceitos fisiopatológicos básicos, e que o ensino nos cursos médicos precisa ser revisto e aprimorado.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Use of Pulmonary Artery Catheter (PAC) is still a debatable issue, mainly due to questions raised about its security and efficacy. This study reproduced in a sample of Brazilian physicians, another one conducted amidst American doctors, in which was pointed out the heterogeneity of clinical decisions guided by data obtained from PAC. METHODS: During the Brazilian Congress of Intensive Care Medicine (Curitiba 2004), doctors were asked to answer a survey form with three vignettes. Each of them contained PAC data and one half of the surveys contained echocardiographic information. Every doctor was asked to select one of six interventions for each vignette. A homogeneous answer was considered when it was selected by at least 80 percent of the respondents. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty seven doctors answered the questionnaires. They selected completely different therapeutic interventions in all three vignettes and none of the interventions achieved more than 80 percent agreement. Variability persisted with the choices guided by echocardiography. CONCLUSIONS: As in the original study, we observed total heterogeneity of therapeutic interventions guided by CAP and echocardiography. These results could be caused by lack of knowledge about basic pathophysiologic concepts and maybe we had to improve its teaching at the medical school benches.
Assuntos
Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/instrumentação , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/métodos , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/normas , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz , Educação de Graduação em Medicina , BrasilRESUMO
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A monitorização de funções vitais é uma das mais importantes e essenciais ferramentas no manuseio de pacientes críticos na UTI. Hoje é possível detectar e analisar uma grande variedade de sinais fisiológicos através de diferentes técnicas, invasivas e não-invasivas. O intensivista deve ser capaz de selecionar e executar o método de monitorização mais apropriado de acordo com as necessidades individuais do paciente, considerando a relação risco-benefício da técnica. Apesar do rápido desenvolvimento de técnicas de monitorização não-invasiva, a monitorização hemodinâmica invasiva com o uso do cateter de artéria pulmonar (CAP) ainda é um dos procedimentos fundamentais em UTI. O objetivo destas recomendações é estabelecer diretrizes para o uso adequado dos métodos básicos de monitorização hemodinâmica e CAP. MÉTODO: O processo de desenvolvimento de recomendações utilizou o método Delphi modificado para criar e quantificar o consenso entre os participantes. A AMIB determinou um coordenador para o consenso, o qual escolheu seis especialistas para comporem o comitê consultivo. Outros 18 peritos de diferentes regiões do país foram selecionados para completar o painel de 25 especialistas, médicos e enfermeiros. Um levantamento bibliográfico na MedLine de artigos na língua inglesa foi realizado no período de 1966 a 2004. RESULTADOS: Foram apresentadas recomendações referentes a 55 questões sobre monitorização da pressão venosa central, pressão arterial invasiva e cateter de artéria pulmonar. Com relação ao CAP, além de recomendações quanto ao uso correto foram discutidas as indicações em diferentes situações clínicas. CONCLUSÕES: A avaliação da pressão venosa central e da pressão arterial, além das variáveis obtidas com o CAP permite o entendimento da fisiologia indispensável para o cuidado de pacientes graves. Entretanto, a correta utilização dessas ferramentas é fundamental para os possíveis benefícios decorrentes do uso.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Monitoring of vital functions is one of the most important tools in the management of critically ill patients. Nowadays is possible to detect and analyze a great deal of physiologic data using a lot of invasive and non-invasive methods. The intensivist must be able to select and carry out the most appropriate monitoring technique according to the patient requirements and taking into account the benefit/risk ratio. Despite the fast development of non invasive monitoring techniques, invasive hemodynamic monitoring using Pulmonary Artery Catheter still is one of the basic procedures in Critical Care. The aim was to define recommendations about clinical utility of basic hemodynamic monitoring methods and the Use of Pulmonary Artery Catheter. METHODS: Modified Delphi methodology was used to create and quantify the consensus between the participants. AMIB indicated a coordinator who invited more six experts in the area of monitoring and hemodynamic support to constitute the Consensus Advisory Board. Twenty-five physicians and nurses selected from different regions of the country completed the expert panel, which reviewed the pertinent bibliography listed at the MEDLINE in the period from 1996 to 2004. RESULTS: Recommendations were made based on 55 questions about the use of central venous pressure, invasive arterial pressure, pulmonary artery catheter and its indications in different settings. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of central venous pressure and invasive arterial pressure, besides variables obtained by the PAC allow the understanding of cardiovascular physiology that is of great value to the care of critically ill patients. However, the correct use of these tools is fundamental to achieve the benefits due to its use.