RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients are key stakeholders of clinical research, and their perspectives are relevant for researchers when planning and conducting clinical trials. Numerous aspects of trial process can influence participants' experiences. Their experiences within a trial can impact retention rates. Poor treatment adherence may bias treatment effect estimates. One way to improve recruitment and adherence is to design trials that are aligned with patients' needs and preferences. This study reports a process evaluation of the Otago MASTER feasibility trial. OBJECTIVES: Our aims were to investigate the patients' perceptions of the trial interventions through individual interviews. METHODS: Twenty-five participants were recruited for the feasibility trial and were allocated to two groups: tailored or standardised exercise. Sixteen participants agreed to take part in individual semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and all interviews were analysed thematically using an iterative approach. RESULTS: Our key findings suggest participants: (1) took part in the study to access healthcare services and contribute to research; (2) valued interventions received; (3) reported certain barriers and facilitators to participate in the trial; and (4) highlighted areas for improvement when designing the full trial. CONCLUSION: Participants volunteered to access healthcare and to contribute to research. Participants valued the personalised care, perceived that their engagement within the trial improved their self-management and self-efficacy behaviour, valued the time spent with clinicians, and the empathetic environment and education received. Facilitators and barriers will require careful consideration in the future as the barriers may impact reliability and validity of future trial results.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Food security interventions with people living with HIV (PLHIV) are needed to improve HIV outcomes. This process evaluation of a pilot intervention involving urban gardening and peer nutritional counselling with PLHIV assesses feasibility, acceptability and implementation challenges to inform scale-up. DESIGN: Mixed methods were used, including quantitative data on intervention participation and feasibility and acceptability among participants (n 45) and qualitative data from a purposive sample of participants (n 21). Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed and coded using a codebook developed iteratively. SETTING: An HIV clinic in the northwest-central part of the Dominican Republic. RESULTS: The intervention was feasible for most participants: 84 % attended a garden workshop and 71 % established an urban garden; 91 % received all three core nutritional counselling sessions; and 73 % attended the cooking workshop. The intervention was also highly acceptable: nearly, all participants (93-96 %) rated the gardening as 'helpful' or 'very helpful' for taking HIV medications, their mental/emotional well-being and staying healthy; similarly, high percentages (89-97 %) rated the nutrition counselling 'helpful' or 'very helpful' for following a healthy diet, reducing unhealthy foods and increasing fruit/vegetable intake. Garden barriers included lack of space and animals/pests. Transportation barriers impeded nutritional counselling. Harvested veggies were consumed by participants' households, shared with neighbours and family, and sold in the community. Many emphasised that comradery with other PLHIV helped them cope with HIV-related marginalisation. CONCLUSION: An urban gardens and peer nutritional counselling intervention with PLHIV was feasible and acceptable; however, addressing issues of transportation, pests and space is necessary for equitable participation and benefit.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objective: This study aimed to conduct a process evaluation of a salt substitute trial conducted in Peru. Methods: Through semi-structured interviews of intervention participants, we documented and analyzed process evaluation variables as defined by the Medical Research Council Framework. This study was a stepped wedge trial conducted in Tumbes, Peru in 2014. The intervention was a community-wide replacement of regular salt (100% sodium) with "Salt Liz" (75% sodium and 25% potassium) using social marketing strategies to promote the adoption and continued use of the salt substitute in daily life. The components of the social marketing campaign included entertainment educational activities and local product promoters ("Amigas de Liz"). Another component of the intervention was the Salt Liz spoon to help guide the amount of salt that families should consume. The process evaluation variables measured were the context, mechanism of action, and implementation outcomes (acceptability, fidelity and adoption, perceptions, and feedback). Results: In total, 60 women were interviewed, 20 with hypertension and 40 without hypertension. Regarding context, common characteristics across the four villages included residents who primarily ate their meals at home and women who were responsible for household food preparation. As the mechanism of action, most participants did not notice a difference in the flavor between regular salt and Salt Liz; those that did notice a difference took around 2 weeks to become accustomed to the taste of the salt substitute. In terms of implementation outcomes, the Salt Liz was accepted by villagers and factors explaining this acceptability included that it was perceived as a "high quality" salt and as having a positive effect on one's health. Participants recognized that the Salt Liz is healthier than regular salt and that it can help prevent or control hypertension. However, most participants could not accurately recall how the compositions of the Salt Liz and regular salt differed and the role they play in hypertension. Although the use of the Salt Liz was far-reaching at the community level, the use of the Salt Liz spoon was poor. Educational entertainment activities were well-received, and most participants enjoyed them despite not always being active participants but rather sideline observers. Conclusion: This process evaluation identifies key intervention components that enabled a successful trial. Seeking and incorporating feedback from the target population helps deepen the understanding of contextual factors that influence an intervention's success. Furthermore, feedback received can aid the development of the intervention product. Some factors that can be improved for future interventions are acknowledged. Clinical trial registration: NCT01960972.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introduction: High quality investments during early childhood allow children to achieve their full potential by setting developmental foundations. However, challenges in the scale-up of evidence-based interventions make across-the-board implementation a non-trivial matter. Moreover, extreme contextual conditions -such as community violence, forced displacement, and poverty- impose a double threat. First, by directly affecting early childhood development (ECD), forced displacement and exposure to violence during early childhood, coupled with deficits in nurturing relationships, can trigger toxic stress, affecting children's mental health and social and emotional learning. Second, contexts of extreme adversity exacerbate common implementation pitfalls in the scale-up of interventions. Recognizing and documenting "what it takes" to successfully implement "what works" can contribute to the expansion and effectiveness of evidence-based programs that promote ECD in these settings. Semillas de Apego (SA, onward), a community-based psychosocial support model for caregivers, materialized as a strategy to promote ECD in communities affected by violence and forced displacement. Methods: This article presents the results of the process evaluation of SA during the 2018-2019 implementation in Tumaco, a violence ridden municipality in the south-west border of Colombia, South America. In this phase, the program reached 714 families, 82% direct victims of violence and 57% were internally displaced. The process evaluation combined qualitative and quantitative methodological approaches to produce evidence of factors that promoted implementation quality. Results: Findings identified salient components of the program that promoted the program's acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, fidelity and sustainability: a rigorous cultural adaptation; well-structured team selection and training methodologies; and a team support and supervision protocol to provide continuous capacity building and prevent burn-out and other occupational hazards common among professionals in mental health and psychosocial support interventions. The statistical analysis using monitoring data identified key predictors of the dosage delivered (a measure of fidelity). Evidence suggests that initial attendance to the program and observable characteristics -such as educational attainment, violence victimization and employment status-predict a successful compliance (in terms of dosage to benefit from the program). Discussion: This study provides evidence for the development of structural, organizational, and procedural processes for the adoption, appropriate adaptation, and high-fidelity delivery of psychosocial support models delivered in territories affected by extreme adversity.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Depression in older adults is a challenge for health systems in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Digital strategies for the management of this condition have been emerging worldwide, but the effectiveness of most of them is still unclear, especially among older adults. Thus, we aim to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a digital psychosocial intervention to treat depression among older adults living in socioeconomically deprived areas in Guarulhos, Brazil. METHODS: We will conduct a two-arm individually randomised controlled trial with 1:1 allocation ratio. Five hundred older adults aged 60 years or over with depressive symptomatology (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire score, PHQ-9 ≥ 10) and registered with one of the primary care clinics will be recruited to participate in this study. A 6-week digital psychosocial programme, named Viva Vida, will be delivered via WhatsApp to participants allocated to the intervention arm. The Viva Vida will send psychoeducational and behavioural activation audio and visual messages 4 days a week for 6 weeks. The control arm will only receive a single message with general information about depression. The primary outcome will be the proportion of depression recovery (PHQ-9 < 10) assessed at 3 months. The cost-effectiveness of the intervention will be assessed at 5 months. A detailed process evaluation will be used to explore context and important implementation outcomes. DISCUSSION: This programme was based on the PROACTIVE intervention and designed to be delivered without face-to-face contact. If effective, it could be a simple treatment option, appropriate not only when social distancing is required, but it could also be included as a regular public health programme to initiate depression treatment, particularly in LMICs where resources allocated to mental health are scarce. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos (ReBEC), RBR-4c94dtn. Registered on 22 October 2021 (submitted on 03 August 2021).

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The translation of evidence-based practices and rapid uptake of innovations into global health practice is challenging. Design thinking is a consultative process involving multiple stakeholders and has been identified as a promising solution to create and apply implementation strategies in complex environments like health systems. METHODS: We conducted a process evaluation of a real-world example, namely an initiative to innovate hypertension screening, diagnosis and care in São Paulo, Brazil. The parameters of the evaluation were informed by a specification rubric and categorization system, recommended for the investigation of implementation strategies, and the double-diamond conceptual framework to describe and examine the strategic architecture and nature of the design thinking approach, with particular emphasis on identifying potential areas of "value-add" particular to the approach. The retrospective evaluation was performed by an independent partner who had not been involved in the setting up and implementation of the design thinking process. RESULTS: The evaluation unveiled a dense catalogue of strategically driven, mostly theoretically based, activities involving all identified health system stakeholders including patients. Narrative reconstruction illuminated the systematic and coherent nature of this approach, with different resulting actions progressively accounting for all relevant layers of the health system to engineer a broad selection of specific implementation solutions. The relevance of the identified features and the mechanics used to promote more successful implementation practices was manifested in several distinct ways: design thinking offered a clear direction on which innovations really mattered and when, as well as several new dimensions for consideration in the development of an innovation mindset amongst stakeholders. It thereby promoted relationship quality in terms of familiarity and trust, and commitment to evidence-based enquiry and action. Design thinking was also able to navigate the territory between the need for intervention "fidelity" versus "adaptation" and provide the operational know-how to face familiar implementation hurdles. Lastly, it brought a new kind of skill set to the public health stakeholders that incorporated diplomacy, multidisciplinary approaches and management sciences-skills that are considered necessary but not yet widely taught as part of public health training. CONCLUSIONS: Design thinking is a sound and viable tool to use as part of an implementation strategy for engaging with health system stakeholders and successfully translating evidence-based practices and new innovations into routine practice, thereby addressing an important knowledge-practice gap and, more broadly, contributing to the strategic repertoire available to implementation science.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: relatar desafios enfrentados por enfermeiros na gestão de leitos em uma unidade de internação hospitalar durante a pandemia pela COVID-19. Método: trata-se de estudo descritivo, do tipo relato de experiência. As experiências advêm de enfermeiros que atuam em um hospital público de grande porte, localizado no município de Belo Horizonte-MG. As experiências foram coletadas entre março de 2020 a março de 2022 e organizadas em polos temáticos, fundamentados nos pressupostos da análise de qualidade proposta por Donabedian. Resultados: os desafios enfrentados residem na manutenção do distanciamento entre os leitos, compartilhamento de banheiros, adaptações elétricas, criação de leitos de retaguarda, mudança no perfil dos leitos e na comunicação entre profissionais. Conclusão: os resultados convergem com os desafios previamente encontrados na literatura. Entretanto, apresentam de forma minuciosa e estruturada a realidade de uma unidade de internação, a qual tem potencial para auxiliar em situações de crise, sem previsibilidade e arcabouço científico.(AU)

Objective: to report challenges faced by nurses in managing beds in a hospital inpatient unit during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: this is a descriptive study, of the experience report type. The experiences come from nurses who work in a large public hospital, located in the city of Belo Horizonte-MG. The experiences were collected between March 2020 and March 2022 and organized into thematic poles, based on the assumptions of the quality analysis proposed by Donabedian. Results: the challenges faced lie in maintaining the distance between beds, sharing bathrooms, electrical adaptations, creating backup beds, changing the profile of beds and communication between professionals. Conclusion: the results converge with the challenges previously found in the literature. However, they present in a detailed and structured way the reality of an inpatient unit, which has the potential to help in crisis situations, without predictability and scientific framework(AU)

Objetivo: relatar los desafíos enfrentados por los enfermeros en la gestión de camas en una unidad de hospitalización durante la pandemia de COVID-19. Método: se trata de un estudio descriptivo, del tipo relato de experiencia. Las experiencias provienen de enfermeros que actúan en un gran hospital público, ubicado en la ciudad de Belo Horizonte-MG. Las experiencias fueron recolectadas entre marzo de 2020 y marzo de 2022 y organizadas en polos temáticos, a partir de los supuestos del análisis de calidad propuesto por Donabedian. Resultados: los desafíos enfrentados radican en mantener la distancia entre camas, compartir baños, adaptaciones eléctricas, crear camas de respaldo, cambiar el perfil de las camas y la comunicación entre profesionales. Conclusión: los resultados convergen con los desafíos previamente encontrados en la literatura. Sin embargo, presentan de forma detallada y estructurada la realidad de una unidad de hospitalización, que tiene el potencial de ayudar en situaciones de crisis, sin previsibilidad y marco científico.(AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background: Initial results from the SCALA study demonstrated that training primary health care providers is an effective implementation strategy to increase alcohol screening in Colombia, Mexico and Peru, but did not show evidence of superior performance for the standard compared to the shorter training arm. This paper elaborates on those outcomes by examining the relationship of training-related process evaluation indicators with the alcohol screening practice. Methods: A mix of convergent and exploratory mixed-methods design was employed. Data sources included training documentation, post-training questionnaires, observation forms, self-report forms and interviews. Available quantitative data were compared on outcome measure - providers' alcohol screening. Results: Training reach was high: three hundred fifty-two providers (72.3% of all eligible) participated in one or more training or booster sessions. Country differences in session length reflected adaptation to previous topic knowledge and experience of the providers. Overall, 49% of attendees conducted alcohol screening in practice. A higher dose received was positively associated with screening, but there was no difference between standard and short training arms. Although the training sessions were well received by participants, satisfaction with training and perceived utility for practice were not associated with screening. Profession, but not age or gender, was associated with screening: in Colombia and Mexico, doctors and psychologists were more likely to screen (although the latter represented only a small proportion of the sample) and in Peru, only psychologists. Conclusions: The SCALA training programme was well received by the participants and led to half of the participating providers conducting alcohol screening in their primary health care practice. The dose received and the professional role were the key factors associated with conducting the alcohol screening in practice.Plain Language Summary: Primary health care providers can play an important role in detecting heavy drinkers among their consulting patients, and training can be an effective implementation strategy to increase alcohol screening and detection. Existing training literature predominantly focuses on evaluating trainings in high-income countries, or evaluating their effectiveness rather than implementation. As part of SCALA (Scale-up of Prevention and Management of Alcohol Use Disorders in Latin America) study, we evaluated training as implementation strategy to increase alcohol screening in primary health care in a middle-income context. Overall, 72.3% of eligible providers attended the training and 49% of training attendees conducted alcohol screening in practice after attending the training. Our process evaluation suggests that simple intervention with sufficient time to practice, adapted to limited provider availability, is optimal to balance training feasibility and effectiveness; that booster sessions are especially important in context with lower organizational or structural support; and that ongoing training refinement during the implementation period is necessary.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Process evaluation within clinical trials provides an assessment of the study implementation's accuracy and quality to explain causal mechanisms and highlight contextual factors associated with variation in outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators of implementing early mobilisation (EM) within a trial. METHODS: This is a qualitative process evaluation study within the Trial of Early Activity and Mobilisation (TEAM) phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Semistructured interviews were conducted remotely with multiprofessional clinicians (physiotherapists, medical staff, and nursing staff) involved in the delivery of the TEAM intervention at Australian hospitals participating in the TEAM study. Inductive coding was used to establish themes which were categorised into the Behaviour system involving domains of Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation (COM-B), which allowed barriers and enablers affecting EM to be identified. FINDINGS: Semistructured interviews were conducted in three different states of Australia. There were 16 participants, including 10 physiotherapists, five physicians, and one nurse. The key themes that facilitated EM were mentoring, champions, additional staff, organisation of the environment, cultural changes, communication, and documented safety criteria. In contrast, the main factors that hindered EM were lack of expertise and confidence in delivering EM, heavy sedation, interdisciplinary conflicts, and perceived risks related to EM. CONCLUSION: A wide range of barriers and facilitators that influenced EM within the TEAM study were identified using the COM-B framework. Many of these have been previously identified in the literature; however, participation in the study was viewed positively by multidisciplinary team members.

Assuntos

RESUMO

RESUMO Desde a redemocratização no Brasil, o tema da subjetividade tem sido um componente importante na discussão e na formulação das políticas públicas no país. Existe um grande embate na literatura em torno dos méritos e dos prejuízos decorrentes dos processos de avaliação. O objetivo desta pesquisa é investigar os efeitos das práticas avaliativas nos processos de subjetivação vividos por profissionais das equipes de Saúde da Família na Atenção Básica, em um distrito sanitário do município de Belo Horizonte. Buscamos também compreender os efeitos da avaliação na subjetividade dos profissionais envolvidos. Realizamos 16 entrevistas semiestruturadas com os profissionais e gestores de duas Unidades Básicas de Saúde. Fizemos uma análise temática das entrevistas em três eixos: os ganhos desencadeados pelas práticas de avaliação, os seus aspectos problemáticos e os processos de subjetivação decorrentes das avaliações. Os ganhos que as avaliações permitiram foram: detectar as falhas no trabalho e redirecionar as atividades; melhorar o atendimento à população e modificar o comportamento com os colegas e em relação ao trabalho. As críticas se direcionaram aos indicadores dos instrumentos, aos processos de avaliação, à dificuldade de colocar em prática os resultados obtidos e ao não cumprimento dos acordos por parte dos gestores municipais. Os processos de subjetivação promovidos pelas avaliações foram por um lado a reflexão em relação ao trabalho e aos colegas, produzindo mudanças de atitudes, e por outro os sentimentos de medo, culpa e frustração em relação ao processo de avaliação, seus resultados e consequências.

RESUMEN Hay un embate en la literatura en torno a los méritos y los perjuicios derivados de los procesos de evaluación. Esta pesquisa investiga los efectos de las prácticas evaluativas en los procesos de subjetivación vividos por los profesionales de los Equipos de Salud de la Familia en la Atención Básica, en un distrito sanitario del municipio de Belo Horizonte. También buscamos comprender los efectos de la evaluación sobre la subjetividad de los profesionales involucrados. Realizamos 16 entrevistas semiestructuradas con los profesionales y gestores de dos Unidades Básicas de Salud. Hicimos un análisis temático de las entrevistas en tres ejes: las ganancias desencadenadas por las prácticas de evaluación, sus aspectos problemáticos y los procesos de subjetivación derivados de las evaluaciones. Las ganancias fueron: detectar los fallos en el trabajo y reorientar las actividades; mejorar la atención a la población y modificar el comportamiento con los colegas y con relación al trabajo. Las críticas se dirigieron a los indicadores de los instrumentos, a los procesos de evaluación, a la dificultad de poner en práctica los resultados obtenidos y al incumplimiento de los acuerdos por parte de los gestores municipales. Los procesos de subjetivación promovidos por las evaluaciones fueron, por un lado, la reflexión con relación al trabajo y a los colegas, lo que produjo cambios de actitudes, y, por otro lado, los sentimientos de miedo, culpa y frustración con relación al proceso de evaluación, sus resultados y consecuencias.

ABSTRACT This study aimed to investigate the effects of evaluation practices in the processes of subjectivation experienced by professionals from Family Health Teams in Primary Health Care, in a health district in the municipality of Belo Horizonte, state of Minas Gerais. We also sought to understand the effects of evaluation on the subjectivity of the professionals involved. We conducted 16 semi-structured interviews with professionals and managers of two Basic Health Units. A thematic analysis of the interviews was carried out in three axes: the gains triggered by the evaluation practices, their problematic aspects and the subjectivation processes resulting from the assessments. The gains that the evaluations allowed were: detecting work failures and redirecting activities; improve service to the population and change behavior with coworkers and in relation to work. Criticism was directed towards the instruments' indicators, the evaluation processes, the difficulty of putting into practice the results obtained and the non-compliance with the agreements by the municipal managers. The subjectivation processes promoted by the evaluations were, on the one hand, the self-reflection in relation to work and coworkers, producing changes in attitudes, and, on the other, the feelings of fear, guilt and frustration regarding evaluation process, its results and consequences.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJETIVO:O objetivo deste estudo é compreender o processo de trabalho de um Centro de Atenção Psicossocial em Minas Gerais durante a pandemia de Covid-19. MÉTODO: Trata-se de um estudo de caso, interpretativo, de natureza qualitativa. RESULTADOS: A análise das entrevistas resultou em quatro categorias temáticas: impactos no processo de trabalho gerados pela pandemia de Covid-19; adaptações no processo de trabalho durante a pandemia; dificuldades enfrentadas durante a pandemia; e preparação para o retorno das atividades presenciais. CONCLUSÃO: A pandemia de Covid-19 impulsionou diversas mudanças no cenário dos serviços de saúde, que precisaram se adaptar, de forma rápida e efetiva, para garantir a continuidade dos tratamentos.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to understand the work process of a Psychosocial Care Center in Minas Gerais during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: This is an interpretive case study of a qualitative nature. RESULTS: The analysis of the interviews resulted in four thematic categories: impacts on the work process generated by the COVID-19 pandemic; adaptations in the work process during the pandemic; difficulties faced during the pandemic; and preparation for the resumption of in-person activities. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted several changes in the scenario of the health services, which needed to adapt, quickly and effectively to ensure continuity of the treatments.

OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este estudio es comprender el proceso de trabajo de un Centro de Atención Psicosocial en Minas Gerais durante la pandemia de Covid-19. MÉTODO: Estudio de caso interpretativo, de carácter cualitativo. RESULTADOS: El análisis de las entrevistas dio como resultado cuatro categorías temáticas: impactos en el proceso de trabajo generados por la pandemia de Covid-19; adaptaciones en el proceso de trabajo durante la pandemia; dificultades enfrentadas durante la pandemia; y preparación para el regreso a las actividades presenciales. CONCLUSIÓN: La pandemia de Covid-19 generó varios cambios en el escenario de los servicios de salud, que debieron adaptarse de manera rápida y efectiva para asegurar la continuidad de los tratamientos.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Church-based stroke prevention programs for Hispanics are underutilized. The Stroke Health and Risk Education (SHARE) project, a multicomponent cluster-randomized trial, addressed key stroke risk factors among predominantly Mexican Americans in a Catholic Church setting. Process evaluation components (implementation, mechanisms of impact, and context) are described. Partner support promoted positive health behavior change. Motivational interviewing calls were perceived as helpful, however, barriers with telephone delivery were encountered. Intervention exposure was associated with theory constructs for targeted behaviors. We conclude that health behavior interventions to prevent stroke can be successfully implemented for Mexican Americans within a Catholic Church setting, with parish priest support.

Assuntos

RESUMO

El Perfil de egreso constituye un modelo teórico y la imagen del profesional que la institución de educación superior aspira formar. Es un conjunto de atributos que son certificados y le permiten a una persona ser reconocida y aceptada por la sociedad como profesional. La emergencia de estándares de calidad, utilizados por las agencias de acreditación de carreras universitarias, hoy exigen la necesidad de evaluar y rendir cuentas acerca del logro de las competencias establecidas y declaradas en el perfil de egreso, sin embargo, hay escasa evidencia concreta que demuestre modelos operativos de cómo abordar ese proceso de evaluación en distintos programas. Dada la relevancia del Perfil de Egreso de una carrera de pregrado y considerando que constituye el eje fundamental para el desarrollo curricular de los programas educativos, para realizar el proceso de autoevaluación y la posterior acreditación de las carreras, diseñamos e implementamos un modelo de seguimiento del cumplimiento del perfil de egreso en el plan de estudios de las carreras de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Finis Terrae.

The Graduate Profile constitutes the theoretical model and the professional image that higher education aspires to form. It is a set of certified attributes and allows a person to be recognized and accepted by society as a professional. The emergence of quality standards, used by university careers' accreditation agencies, demands the need to evaluate and be accountable for achieving the competencies established and declared in the Graduate Profile. However, the is limited concrete evidence to demonstrate operational models of how to approach this evaluation process in different programs. Given the relevance of the Graduate Profile of an undergraduate career and considering that it constitutes the fundamental axis for the curricular development of educational programs, to carry out the self-evaluation process and the subsequent accreditation of the degrees, we design and implement a model for monitoring the compliance with the graduation profile in the study plan of the Faculty of Medicine of Universidad Finis Terrae.

Assuntos

RESUMO

This study analyzed contextual barriers and facilitators in the implementation of Strengthening Families Program (SFP 10-14), Brazilian version, a family-based preventive program focused on the prevention of risk behaviors for adolescent health. SFP 10-14 was implemented between 2016 and 2017 for socioeconomically vulnerable families in four Northeast Brazilian states as a tool of the National Drug Policy. A retrospective qualitative study was carried out in which 26 implementation agents participated. Data from 16 individual interviews and two group interviews were analyzed through content analysis. The most recurrent barriers were the group facilitators' working conditions, weak municipal administration, precarious infrastructure, inadequate group facilitator training methodologies, low adherence of managers and professionals, and funding scarcity. The conditions highlighted as favorable to the implementation were proper intersectoral coordination, engagement of involved actors, awareness of public agency administrators, municipal management efficacy, and efficient family recruitment strategies. Favorable political contexts, engagement of implementation agents, and intersectoral implementation strategies were identified as central to the success of the implementation of SFP 10-14, especially in the adoption of the intervention, community mobilization, and intervention delivery stages. Further studies should combine contexts, mechanisms, and results for a broad understanding of the effectiveness of this intervention in the public sector.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The study aims to describe process evaluation measures of the three-year Health Promoting Schools' obesity prevention program in Lima and Callao, Peru, and to assess factors that influenced the implementation of the intervention leading to the mentioned process outcomes results. The program was implemented in four public high schools located in low-income areas of Lima and Callao. Embedded in a Health Promoting School Intervention, the program consisted of two main components-an education program and several environmental activities. Quantitative data were collected and analyzed based on dose delivered and reach for each specific activity. Dose received was analyzed by satisfaction scores related to six specific activities. Furthermore, qualitative data including documentation of activities and transcriptions from individual in-depth interviews were qualitatively analyzed to identify factors influencing the implementation. The education component of the Health Promoting Schools' program achieved a 78.4% average nutrition sessions delivery in 2015 and 88.0% in 2017; while for PA sessions, the average delivery in 2015 was of 79.7% and 93.8% in 2017. In the case of reach, at least 75% of total students participated in all sessions per year. Nevertheless, there were differences in terms of delivery and participation in a number of environmental activities within and between schools during the program period. Differences in delivery included education sessions for parents, teachers, Junior Health Promoters, and school food kiosk staff, besides execution of physical activity events every year. Impeding factors included the complexity of the overall intervention, limited strategies to facilitate program implementation and those to maintain the participation of subjects, and related contextual factors.

Assuntos

RESUMO

RESUMO Objetivo: descrever os indicadores operacionais do controle da tuberculose no município de Belém no período 2013-2017. Método: estudo quantitativo, descritivo, cujos dados foram oriundos do Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação do município de Belém, obtidos junto à Secretaria Municipal de Saúde em junho de 2019 e dizem respeito aos indicadores operacionais do Programa Nacional de Controle da Tuberculose. A análise se deu por meio de estatística descritiva. Resultados: identificou-se fragilidades no controle da doença no município de Belém. Todos os indicadores, sejam os referentes ao diagnóstico precoce, tratamento e desfecho, mostraram baixa capacidade para o controle da doença no município. Conclusão: o não cumprimento das metas previstas implica na manutenção da doença na comunidade e favorecimento de casos de resistência às drogas, aumentando custos e sofrimento humano. Os resultados possibilitam reflexão acerca da necessidade do monitoramento das ações de controle.

RESUMEN: Objetivo: describir los indicadores operativos del control de la tuberculosis en el municipio de Belém durante el período 2013-2017. Método: estudio cuantitativo y descriptivo, cuyos datos fueron extraídos del Sistema de Información de Enfermedades de Notificación Obligatoria del municipio de Belém, obtenidos con la intervención de la Secretaría Municipal de Salud en junio de 2019, relacionados con los indicadores operativos del Programa Nacional de Control de la Tuberculosis. El análisis se realizó por medio de estadística descriptiva. Resultados: se identificaron debilidades en el control de la enfermedad en el municipio de Belém. Todos los indicadores, ya sea referidos al diagnóstico precoz, tratamiento o resultado, presentaron escasa capacidad para controlar la enfermedad en el municipio. Conclusión: la falta de cumplimiento de las metas previstas implica la permanencia de la enfermedad en la comunidad, el favorecimiento de los casos de resistencia a los fármacos, con el consiguiente aumento de costos y sufrimiento humano. Los resultados permiten reflexionar acerca de la necesidad de monitorear las acciones de control.

ABSTRACT Objective: to describe the operational indicators of tuberculosis control in the municipality of Belém in the 2013-2017 period. Method: a quantitative and descriptive study, whose data came from the Notifiable Diseases Information System in the municipality of Belém, obtained together with the Municipal Health Secretariat in June 2019 and relating to the operational indicators of the National Program for Tuberculosis Control. The analysis was performed using descriptive statistics. Results: weaknesses in the control of the disease were identified in the municipality of Belém. All the indicators, whether referring to early diagnosis, treatment or outcome, showed low capacity for disease control in the municipality. Conclusion: failure to meet the targets set implies maintaining the disease in the community and favoring cases of drug resistance, increasing costs, and human suffering. The results make it possible to reflect on the need to monitor the control actions.

RESUMO

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To present the methodological approach used in a research that analyzed the use and performance of specialized health care, from primary care access, in four major Brazilian cities: Fortaleza (CE), Campinas (SP), São Paulo (SP) and Porto Alegre (RS). METHODS Presentation and discussion of the quantitative-qualitative components of the proposed research strategy. RESULTS Four tracing conditions were studied: systemic arterial hypertension, high-risk pregnancy, breast cancer and severe mental disorder. For each health condition, indicators were constructed based on health information systems data, pointing out frequencies, temporal trends and local differences. This initial contextualization was enriched with a descriptive-qualitative study of the performance of each municipal health service network. Next, a cross-sectional study was conducted through a survey of 7,053 users of specialized services for each health condition. Finally, in-depth interviews were conducted with key actors to complement selected operational aspects of each municipality's network. The results of all these data sources were triangulated, allowing us to explore the variability of SUS implementations in different regional scenarios. CONCLUSIONS The multifaceted analytical model presented allows us to understand relevant aspects of the Unified Health System performance, paying attention to the singularities, heterogeneities and inequalities that characterize its implementation in Brazil and emphasizing the performance of local networks for the addressed health conditions.

RESUMO OBJETIVO Apresentar a abordagem metodológica utilizada em pesquisa que analisou a utilização e o funcionamento da atenção especializada, partindo do acesso via atenção básica, em quatro grandes cidades brasileiras: Fortaleza (CE), Campinas (SP), São Paulo (SP) e Porto Alegre (RS). MÉTODOS Apresentação e discussão dos componentes quanti-qualitativos da estratégia de pesquisa proposta. RESULTADOS Foram estudadas quatro condições traçadoras: hipertensão arterial grave, gravidez de alto risco, câncer de mama e transtorno mental grave. Para cada agravo foram construídos indicadores a partir de dados dos sistemas de informação de saúde destacando frequências, tendência temporal e diferenças por localidade. Essa contextualização inicial foi enriquecida com um estudo descritivo-qualitativo do funcionamento de cada rede municipal de serviços. A seguir, realizou-se um estudo transversal por meio de inquérito com 7.053 usuários dos serviços especializados para cada agravo. Por fim, foram realizadas entrevistas em profundidade com atores-chave para complementar aspectos operacionais selecionados da rede de cada município. Os resultados de todas essas fontes de dados foram triangulados, permitindo explorar a variabilidade das implantações do SUS em diferentes cenários regionais. CONCLUSÕES O modelo analítico multifacetado apresentado permite compreender aspectos relevantes do funcionamento do Sistema Único de Saúde, atentando para as singularidades, heterogeneidades e desigualdades que caracterizam sua implantação no Brasil e destacando o funcionamento das redes locais para os agravos estudados.

Assuntos

RESUMO

RESUMO Este estudo objetivou avaliar a implementação de um programa de intervenção para promoção do estilo de vida ativo e saudável em estudantes. Estudo avaliativo, realizado durante a intervenção, que incluiu como amostra a comunidade escolar envolvida nas atividades (estudantes, professores, coordenadores e pais), por meio de entrevista ou por observação externa. A matriz avaliativa foi construída e validada contendo 32 medidas em oito indicadores: capacitação dos professores, modificação nas aulas de Educação Física, modificação nas aulas regulares, distribuição de panfletos, distribuição de material, ginástica na escola, visibilidade do programa e conhecimento e distribuição de material. A análise descritiva (quantitativas) ou de conteúdo (qualitativas) foi utilizada. Temas de saúde em sala de aula foram abordados por 94% dos professores durante a intervenção. Metade dos alunos reportou terem participado de, pelo menos, uma aula de ginástica e utilizado os jogos durante a intervenção, mas dificuldades para armazenar material e falta de organização e de espaço foram relatadas. O conhecimento sobre o programa foi frequente entre professores, gestores e estudantes, mas não entre os pais. Em conclusão, a maioria das ações do programa tiveram uma implementação conforme planejada, contudo, dificuldades foram reportadas e devem ser consideradas em futuras propostas de um ambiente escolar que almeje promover atividade física e saúde.

ABSTRACT This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of an intervention program to promote active and healthy lifestyle in students. This was a evaluation study performed during the intervention, which included the school community (students, teachers, coordinators and parents), through interview or external observation. The evaluation matrix was constructed and validated with 32 measures in eight indicators: teacher training, modification in Physical Education classes, modification in regular classes, distribution of pamphlets, distribution of material, gymnastics in the school, visibility of the program and knowledge and distribution of material. Descriptive (quantitative) or content (qualitative) analysis was used. Health issues in the classroom were addressed by 94% of teachers during the intervention. Half of the students reported that they participated in at least one gym class and used the games during the intervention, but difficulties in storage of sports equipments and organization of places were reported. Knowledge about the program was frequent among teachers, managers and students, but not between parents. In conclusion, most of the program actions had an implementation as planned, however, difficulties were reported and should be considered in future proposals of a school environment that aims to promote physical activity and health.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The Progresa Conditional Cash Transfer program in Mexico began in 1997, with a strong evidence-based design. The program's ultimate objective was to foster the development of human capital through 3 components-education, health, and food. Rigorous impact evaluation generated evidence of impact on several outcomes, including child growth, but also aspects of program design and implementation challenges that may have limited impact. The objective of this supplement is to present research that led to the redesign of the health component, its implementation and evaluation at pilot scale, and its scale-up to national level, representing >15 y of collaboration among evaluators, program implementers, and funders. The studies used various methodologies, including process evaluation, cohort studies, ethnographic assessments, and a cluster-randomized trial, among others. The articles report previously unpublished results and citations of published literature. Article 1 uses an impact pathway to highlight gaps and bottlenecks that limited potential for greater impact, the original recognition of which was the impetus for this long collaboration. Article 2 explores the social and cultural factors that influence decisions to participate in programs and to adopt the actions proposed by them. Article 3 presents a cluster-randomized trial implemented to inform the choice of nutritional supplements for pregnant and lactating women and children 6-59 mo of age and how this and other evidence from the studies were used to redesign the health component of the program. Articles 4 and 5 present results of the development and pilot testing of the modified health component, the Integrated Strategy for Attention to Nutrition (abbreviated to EsIAN from its name in Spanish) (article 4), and the process and challenges of training and supervision in taking the EsIAN to scale (article 5). The final article provides reflections on the relevance of this body of work for implementation research in nutrition.

Assuntos

RESUMO

RESUMEN Fundamento: El perfeccionamiento de la extensión universitaria, como proceso sustantivo de la educación superior cubana, carece de mecanismos que evalúen su desarrollo como proceso. Objetivo: Proponer indicadores que faciliten la evaluación del proceso de extensión universitaria a partir de la gestión de comunicación educativa. Metodología: Se utilizaron métodos teóricos y empíricos, los que, combinados desde un enfoque dialéctico materialista permitieron la recogida y el procesamiento de la información en una muestra seleccionada de estudiantes y profesores de la Facultad de Humanidades de la Universidad José Martí, así como miembros de otras instituciones y vecinos de la comunidad cercana a la universidad. Resultados: Se aportaron indicadores que facilitan la evaluación de la extensión universitaria como proceso. Conclusiones: La propuesta constituye una útil herramienta, enfocada en alcanzar la complementariedad de las acciones y la articulación de cada uno de los elementos que componen el proceso extensionista.

ABSTRACT Background: The improvement of university extension, as a substantive process of Cuban higher education lacks mechanisms to evaluate its development as a process. Objective: To propose indicators those facilitate the evaluation of the university extension process from the management of educational communication. Methodology: Theoretical and empirical methods were used which combined from a dialectical materialist approach allowed the collection and processing of information in a selected sample of students and professors from the Faculty of Humanities at José Martí Pérez University of Sancti Spíritus (UNISS), as well as members of some other institutions and neighbors from the community near the university. Results: The Indicators that facilitate the evaluation of the university extension as a process were provided. Conclusions: This proposal constitutes a useful tool, focused on achieving the complementarity of actions and the articulation of each of the elements that compose the extension process.

Assuntos