RESUMO

PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of physiotherapeutic interventions in individuals with thumb primary CMC OA on the outcomes of pain, hand function, grip or pinch strength. METHODS: RCTs that used some type of physiotherapeutic intervention compared to a passive or active control group were included. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach and, for the calculation of the meta-analysis, the standardized difference of means (SMD) was used. RESULTS: Nineteen studies (n = 1477) were included and eight studies (n = 568) underwent meta-analysis. Orthosis intervention was superior to passive control group for pain improvement (SMD = -1.02, p = 0.03, very low evidence), grip strength (SMD = 0.45, p = 0.02, very low evidence) and pinch strength (SMD = 1.78, p = 0.01, very low evidence), but there was no improvement in hand function (p = 0.54). The use of a neoprene orthosis was similar to the use of a thermoplastic orthosis in improving pain (p = 0.38), hand function (p = 0.50), grip strength (p = 0.42) and pinch strength (p = 0.14). The use of short thermoplastic orthosis was also similar to long thermoplastic orthosis in improving pain (p = 0.88) and hand function (p = 0.58). CONCLUSION: The use of orthoses is superior to no intervention in all outcomes, exception hand function.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe use of orthosis is recommended for the treatment of patients with rhizoarthrosisUse of orthosis is better than no intervention in improving pain, grip and pinch strength.The type of orthosis (neoprene or thermoplastic, short or long thermoplastic) does not affect the clinical improvement of the individual to the outcomes of pain, hand physical function, grip and pinch strength.

RESUMO

SUMMARY: Health professionals especially nurses have ongoing contact with patients and they may have a high incidence of musculoskeletal problems. For this reason, grip strength and carrying angle are important parameters for all health professionals to succeed in their job and avoid injuries. It was aimed to determine the effects of the hand grip, and pinch strength, carrying angle of dominant, and non-dominant hands as well as the association of the hand functional index with morphometric measurements in 193 nursing students. The means of the carrying angle of dominant and non-dominant sides were 169.11±4.21° and 168.16±4.30°, respectively. The means of the dominant and, non-dominant sides of hand grip strength were 45.99±11.24 kg and 45.89±11.34 kg, respectively. The lateral pinch strength means were measured as 19.55±3.75 kg and 19.31±3.45 kg, respectively. This paper's findings may be important for some experts such as anatomists, clinicians, surgeons, forensic scientists, anthropologists, and nurses- healthcare professionals keep in touch with patients. Also, we believe that appropriate and effective knowledge of carrying angle, hand grip and lateral pinch strength has created an opportunity to research in terms of reducing work-related risk factors.

Los profesionales de la salud, especialmente las enfermeras, se mantienen en contacto con los pacientes y pueden tener una alta incidencia de problemas musculo-esqueléticos. En consecuencia, la fuerza de agarre y el ángulo de carga son parámetros importantes para que todos los profesionales de la salud tengan éxito en su trabajo y eviten las lesiones. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar los efectos de la fuerza de prensión y pinzamiento de la mano, el ángulo de carga de las manos dominantes y no dominantes, así como la asociación del índice funcional de la mano con medidas morfométricas en 193 estudiantes de enfermería. Las medias del ángulo de carga de los lados dominante y no dominante fueron 169,11±4,21° y 168,16±4,30°, respectivamente. Las medias de los lados dominante y no dominante de la fuerza de prensión manual fueron 45,99 ± 11,24 kg y 45,89 ± 11,34 kg, respectivamente. La media de la fuerza de pellizco lateral se midió como 19,55 ± 3,75 kg y 19,31 ± 3,45 kg, respectivamente. Los hallazgos de este artículo pueden ser importantes para algunos expertos, como anatomistas, médicos clínicos, cirujanos, científicos forenses, antropólogos y enfermeras y profesionales de la salud que se mantienen en contacto con los pacientes. Además, creemos que el conocimiento apropiado y efectivo del ángulo de carga, el agarre de la mano y la fuerza de pellizco lateral ha creado una oportunidad para investigar en términos de reducción de los factores de riesgo relacionados con el trabajo.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The tip pinch is one of the most delicate and precise movement of the hand, and it is used to manipulate small objects, commonly observed in the activities of daily living of any individuals. Individuals with Parkinson Disease (PD) with impaired manual dexterity, manipulative skills, and hand weakness have an important barrier for activities of daily life. However, the dynamometer usually used for measuring the tip pinch have a high cost, so, validate a sphygmomanometer can make this assessment more accessible. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity of the modified sphygmomanometer test in the evaluation of tip pinch strength when compared to the gold standard. METHODS: 50 individuals with idiopathic PD took part in the study. The muscle strength of tip pinch on the dominant and non-dominant side was measured by the modified sphygmomanometer test and the gold standard, the dynamometer. Concurrent validity was analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: 50 individuals diagnosed with idiopathic PD, mean age of 67 ± 8.0 years, 68% male, mean time of diagnosis in months of 84 ± 66 and Hoehn and Yahr mean of 2.5 ± 0.6. There was a significant correlation of moderate magnitude between the modified sphygmomanometer test and the dynamometer in dominant side (r = 0.44; p < 0.01) and non-dominant side (r = 0.48; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The modified sphygmomanometer test showed adequate validity for assessing the muscle strength of the tip pinch in individuals with PD.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by chronic inflammation of the joints, especially of the hands. The evaluation of handgrip strength (HS) and pinch strength can be useful to detect reduction in hand function in RA patients. The aim of the study was to compare HS and pinch strength between RA patients (RA Group - RAG) and a non-RA control group (CG) and to relate HS and pinch strength to functional capacity, duration and disease activity in the RAG. METHODS: A cross-sectional case control study. The RAG was assessed for disease activity by the Disease Activity Score (DAS-28); for functional capacity by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), the Cochin Hand Functional Scale (CHFS) questionnaire, and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire; and for HS and pinch strength (2-point tip-to-tip, lateral or key, and 3-point) using Jamar® and pinch gauge dynamometers, respectively. Associations were analyzed by Pearson and Spearman tests, and groups were compared by the independent samples t test, with a significance level of P <  0.05. RESULTS: The convenience sample included 121 rheumatoid patients and a control group matched by age, sex, and body mass index. The RAG showed lower strength values compared with the CG in all measurements (P <  0.01, 95% CI) and these values were associated with worse performance in the functional questionnaires and greater disease activity and duration. There was a strong correlation among the functional assessment instruments. CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in grip and pinch strength, easily measured by portable dynamometers, is a strong indicator of functional disability in RA patients.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Determinar e comparar os valores das forças isométricas de preensão palmar e pinças em indivíduos sadios de 6 a 19 anos através da dinamometria, considerando as variáveis sexo, dominância e faixa etária. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 199 indivíduos utilizando os dinamômetro Jamar® para a mensuração da preensão palmar e Preston Pinch Gauge® para as pinças, realizando três mensurações consecutivas,, utilizando a média. A análise estatística foi realizada pela regressão linear com efeitos mistos. RESULTADOS: Os valores em kgf encontrados foram 24,51, 3,64, 5,37 e 6,78, respectivamente para preensão palmar, pinça polpa-a-polpa, trípode e lateral, independente das variáveis. Houve diferença significativa em todas as forças mensuradas analisando sexo e dominância independentemente, sendo a mão dominante e o sexo masculino os que obtiveram valores maiores. Entre as faixas etárias foi verificado que as forças variaram conforme a idade, com diferença significativa na maioria das comparações. CONCLUSÃO: Concluímos que a força de preensão palmar e das pinças apresentou diferença significativa no sexo, na dominância e na maioria dos subgrupos etários estudados, devendo ser considerados na dinamometria. Este estudo se mostrou relevante como referência de normalidade para avaliações das forças de preensão e pinças das mãos em crianças e jovens.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine and compare the values of maximum isometric palmar grip and pinch forces in healthy children between 6 and 19 years old using dynamometry, considering gender, dominance and age. METHODS: 199 subjects were evaluated using Jamar® dynamometer to measure palmar grip strength and Preston Pinch Gauge® dynamometer to evaluate pulp to pulp, lateral and three points pinch strength in a standardization testing protocol. The mean of three consecutive grip tests was recorded. Linear regression with mixed effects was used to statistically analyze the differences between data. RESULTS: Mean values found for palmar grip, pulp to pulp, three points and lateral pinch were 24,51kgf, 3,64kgf, 5,37kgf and 6,78kgf, respectively, regardless of the variables. There was statistical difference in all measures by gender and dominance, and the dominant hand and the males had higher grip forces. It was verified that mean values varied with age, with significant difference in most of comparisons between the age groups. CONCLUSION: We concluded that pinch and palmar grip strength demonstrated significant differences in gender, dominance and in most of age subgroups studied, being important to consider them on dynamometry. This study was relevant as reference of normality of hand strength in children and adolescents.

Assuntos