RESUMO
There is limited literature investigating the association between chronic back pain (CBP) and depression in Brazil. This study evaluates the association between CBP, CBP-related physical limitations (CBP-RPL), and self-reported current depression (SRCD), in a nationally representative sample of Brazilian adults. The data for this cross-sectional study came from the 2019 Brazilian National Health Survey (n = 71,535). The Personal Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8) was used to measure the SRCD outcome. The exposures of interest were self-reported CBP and CBP-RPL (none, slight, moderate, and high limitation). Multivariable weighted and adjusted logistic regression models were used to investigate these associations. The weighted prevalence of SRCD among CBP was 39.5%. There was a significant weighted and adjusted association between CBP and SRCD (weighted and adjusted odds ratio (WAOR) 2.69 (95% CI: 2.45-2.94). The WAOR of SRCD among individuals with high, moderate, and slight levels of physical limitation was significantly greater than for those without physical limitation due to CBP. Among Brazilian adults with high levels of CBP-RPL, there was over a five-fold increased risk of SRCD compared to those without CBP-RPL. These results are important for increasing awareness of the link between CBP and SRCD and for informing health services policies.
Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Depressão , Adulto , Humanos , Brasil/epidemiologia , Autorrelato , Depressão/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Dor nas Costas/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Prevalência , Dor Crônica/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Resumo A disponibilidade de informações a respeito das minorias populacionais, nesse caso, da população LGBTQIA+ (Lésbicas, Gays, Bissexuais, Travestis e Transexuais, Queers, Intersexuais e Assexuais) e a possibilidade de cruzamentos com demais variáveis em bases populacionais é imprescindível para a compreensão das similaridades e especificidades da realidade vivenciada por estes grupos, bem como para a criação de políticas públicas focalizadas. Nesse sentido, buscamos refletir nesse artigo sobre os problemas relativos à investigação sobre as orientações/performances de sexo e gênero e, por consequência, a falta de informação sobre tal temática disponível nas bases de dados populacionais. A partir da inclusão da pergunta sobre orientação sexual na base de dados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde (PNS), de 2019, apesar das limitações, apresentamos algumas das possíveis oportunidades de investigações sobre o tema a partir de diferentes óticas.
Abstract The availability of information about population minorities, in this case, the LGBTQIA+ population (Lesbians, Gays, Bisexual, Transvestite/Transsexual, Queer, Intersex, and Asexual), and the possible intersections with other variables on population bases is essential for understanding the similarities and specificities of the reality experienced by these groups, and the establishment of focused public policies. In this sense, this paper aims to reflect on the problems related to research about the sex and gender orientations/performances and, consequently, the lack of information on this topic available in population databases. From the inclusion of the question about sexual orientation in the 2019 National Health Survey database, despite the limitations, this paper presents possible opportunities for investigations on the topic from different perspectives.