RESUMO

Antibody-drug conjugates consist of a monoclonal antibody attached to a cytotoxic therapeutic molecule by a connector. This association allows a highly specific therapy, which increases their effectiveness and decreases their potential toxicity. This new therapy emerged approximately 20 years ago; since then, numerous combinations have appeared in the field of treatment-related neoplasms as an alternative for patients who do not achieve good results with conventional treatment options. Adverse effects of these drugs on the ocular surface are frequent and varied. Their prevalence ranges from 20 to 90% depending on the drug and administration condition, probably due to multiple receptor-mediated factors or mechanisms not mediated by specific receptors, such as macropinocytosis. These adverse events can greatly limit patients' comfort; thus, the objectives of this article were, in the first place, to compile the information currently available on different types of adverse effects of antibody-drug conjugates on the ocular surface, including pathophysiology, prevalence, and treatment, and in second place, to contribute to the correct identification and management of these events, which will result in a lower rate of cessation of treatment, which is necessary for the survival of candidate patients.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate ocular safety of intravitreal metoprolol in eyes with central serous chorioretinopathy. METHODS: Five eyes of five patients diagnosed with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC) previously treated unsuccessfully with oral spironolactone, micropulse laser and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents were enrolled and received off-label intravitreal metoprolol (50 µg/0.05 ml). Baseline and follow-up examinations included measurement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, anterior chamber cellular/flare scores, vitritis classification, fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography, spectral domain optical coherence tomography and electroretinography (ERG), recorded by means of DTL electrodes and following the standard suggested by the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV). The total follow-up period was 4 weeks. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between baseline and follow-up ERG parameters: scotopic or photopic, a- and b-wave amplitude and implicit time, nor oscillatory potentials amplitude, or whatsoever. No intraocular inflammation sign was observed. In addition, BCVA showed small improvement in 4 or kept baseline values in 1 patient. The subretinal and/or intraretinal fluid volume reduced in all patients at 1 month after treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients with refractory cCSC treated with intravitreal 50 µg/0.05 ml metoprolol showed no signs of acute ocular toxicity, along with intraretinal fluid reduction and slight BCVA improvement 1 month after injection. This data suggest that intravitreal metoprolol may be a safe alternative for cCSC.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Choroidal hemangioma is a visual threatening condition for which treatments is neither uniform nor widely available. New management options are necessary. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and early outcome of intravitreal metoprolol tartrate in five patients with CCH. METHODS: Five eyes of five patients diagnosed with subfoveal or peripapillary CCH and unsuccessfully treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents were enrolled and received off-label intravitreal injections of metoprolol (50µg/0.05 ml). Baseline and follow-up evaluations included best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure measurement, assessment of anterior chamber cellular score/flare and vitritis, retinography, fundus autofluorescence, and ERG. Patients were followed for a period of 30 days. Statistical analysis involved comparison of pre- and post-treatment findings using a paired t-test. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in all ERG parameters regarding a- and b-wave amplitude and implicit time, and oscillatory potentials' maximal amplitude. There were no significant changes in visual acuity. None of the patients developed clinical signs of intraocular inflammation. The subretinal and/or intraretinal fluid improved in 3 out of 5 patients 4 weeks after the metoprolol injection. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CCH treated with a single injection of 50µg/0.05ml intravitreal metoprolol injections showed no signs of acute ocular toxicity. This pilot study did not assess long-term retinal toxicity, different concentrations, drug resistance, and complications from repeated-intravitreal injections.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) are old drugs used against malaria, rheumatism, inflammation in the joints, lupus, among others. These drugs showed positive results in preliminary scientific research for treatment of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Since the studies with CQ and HCQ are initial with small patient populations, it is not yet known whether there are adverse effects from the use of CQ and HCQ for patients infected with the coronavirus. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of CQ and HCQ used against viral infection caused by SARS-CoV-2. STUDY DESIGN: This is a narrative review of the traditional prescriptions of CQ and HCQ efficacy and adverse effects as well as their employment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). SETTING: In vitro and clinical studies comparing the antiviral efficacy and adverse effect profile of CQ and HCQ against COVID-19 in adult patients were evaluated. METHODS: A systemic search of reviews, including in vitro and clinical trial studies in English focusing on CQ and HCQ effects and adverse effects against COVID-19 in the adult patient population from PubMed was performed. It included studies reporting chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine effects and adverse effects against COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 42 articles published between 2004 and April 2020 were reviewed for therapeutic use of CQ and HCQ. Both these drugs showed a significant in vitro potential against coronavirus. Many studies for clinical use of CQ and HCQ showed that patients presented adverse reactions on high doses. LIMITATIONS: Clinical studies have some methodology shortcomings, such as lack of information about the treatment and small number of experimental patients, leading to a misinterpretation of the data. Besides, there are few clinical studies with a limited sample size. Moreover, most of them did not present control groups, and some patients had died during these protocols. DISCUSSION: Despite both CQ and HCQ in vitro antiviral evidence, clinically, both drugs, either alone or combined with other medications, may increase the risk of cardiac arrhythmias, leading to cardiac arrest and sudden death. Besides, a lot of uncertainty still remains, such as starting administration period, dose prescribed, length of treatment, patients' condition, concomitant drug use, among others. CONCLUSION: From the studies reviewed, it is not possible to state the precise efficacy and safety of CQ and HCQ use in the treatment of COVID-19 at any time in the course of the disease. Future studies are warranted.

Assuntos

RESUMO

El 4.3% de las reacciones adversas a medicamentos de uso sistémico se presentan como trastornos oculares. Aunque el síndrome del ojo seco es el efecto adverso más común y probablemente el más benigno, los fármacos de uso sistémico pueden provocar trastornos oculares graves e irreversibles. Este artículo presenta una revisión de los fármacos más relevantes capaces de producir trastornos oculares...

4.3% of all adverse reactions to drugs are ocular disorders. Although the dry-eye syndrome is the most comun and probably the most benign, systemic use drugs can produce serious and irreversible eye disorders. This article presents an overview of the most relevant drugs that can cause disorders in the eye...

Assuntos