RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the non-contact air-puff tonometer (NCT) is an appropriate alternative to the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) for measuring intraocular pressure (IOP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional, and comparative study with a quantitative approach was carried out. Two techniques for IOP measurements using the standard GAT and the NCT were compared. A total of 180 eyes from 90 patients were included in the study. RESULTS: The total mean IOP according to NCT measurements was 14.12 mmHg, and the total mean IOP according to the GAT was 12.98 mmHg; these values were significantly different (p=0.0018). When dividing the participants into three groups according to the measurement range obtained and comparing the mean NCT and GAT measurements in each group, in Group 1 (10-15 mmHg), no statistically significant difference was found between the means of the two tonometers (p=0.3100), a difference was observed between Group 2 (16-19 mmHg) and Group 3 (20 mmHg or more) (p<0.001). When dividing the participants by age group, the means obtained by the two tonometers also differed significantly between Group 4 (40-59 years) and Group 5 (60 years or more) (p<0.0001). In all groups, the mean measurements by the NCT were higher than those by the GAT. CONCLUSION: The NCT presented an approximate mean of the measures with the GAT in group 1 but was overestimated in the measurements of the groups 2 and 3.

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction: Intraocular pressure (IOP) measuring in children is a defiant challenge for ophthalmologists due to the unwillingness to collaborate of patient; therefore, it is necessary to perform these examinations under anesthesia (EUA) in order to facilitate the measuring. Among the anesthetic drugs, ketamine is safe in both children and adults and different studies have stated that it might have lower impact on IOP than other anesthetic drugs. Objective: To determine whether ketamine has any impact on IOP in pediatric patients. Also, defining if this drug can be recommended to perform EUA in children with glaucoma. Methods: Systematic review of literature was conducted including articles published in Ovid, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and LILACS from January 1970 to February 2019. The studies included were those with patients aged under 18 years to whom ocular tonometry had been performed. Intervention consisted on administering ketamine and the primary outcome to be assessed was changes in IOP after ketamine administration. Intra operative and postoperative complications were also assessed as secondary outcomes. Report is made according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. Results: Nine studies were selected for the systematic review. The administration of ketamine and its effects on intraocular pressure values were described in 293 children. Three studies found rising of intraocular pressure and 6 little or clinically not significant changes. Conclusion: In children, there is low-quality evidence that suggests a minimal impact of ketamine on IOP modification. Better quality studies (controlled clinical trials) are required to clearly recommend the use of ketamine to perform EUA in children with glaucoma.

Resumen Introducción: La medición de la presión intraocular (PIO) en niños es desafiante para el oftalmólogo debido a la falta de colaboración por parte del paciente; esto hace necesario llevar a cabo estos exámenes bajo anestesia (EBA) para facilitar la medición. Entre los medicamentos anestésicos generales, la ketamina es segura tanto en adultos como en niños, y se ha planteado en varios estudios que puede tener menor efecto sobre la PIO que otros fármacos anestésicos. Objetivo: Determinar si la ketamina tiene un efecto sobre la presión intraocular en población pediátrica. De esta manera, definir si es recomendable utilizar este medicamento para realizar los exámenes bajo anestesia general en niños con diagnóstico de glaucoma. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura de los artículos publicados en Ovid, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane y LILACS desde enero de 1970 hasta febrero de 2019. Se incluyeron aquellos estudios con pacientes menores de 18 años en quienes se realizó tonometría ocular. La intervención fue la administración de ketamina y se evaluó como desenlace primario los cambios en la PIO después de su administración. También se evaluaron las complicaciones intra y posoperatorias como desenlaces secundarios. Se reporta de acuerdo con los lineamientos PRISMA. Resultados: Un total de nueve artículos se incluyeron para la revisión sistemática; en 293 niños se describió la administración de ketamina y medición de presión intraocular después de la misma. Tres estudios encontraron elevación de la PIO y seis refieren cambios mínimos o sin significancia clínica. Conclusiones: En niños existe evidencia de baja calidad que sugiere un impacto mínimo de la ketamina sobre la modificación en la PIO. Se requieren estudios de mejor calidad (ensayos clínicos controlados) que permitan crear una recomendación clara sobre el uso de este medicamento para realizar EBA en niños con glaucoma.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intraocular pressure variation before and after phacoemulsification through pneumatic tonometry in addition to correlating it with the age, gender, and preoperative intraocular pressure of the patients evaluated. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional observational study. Inclusion criteria were older than 18 years, deep anterior chamber visualized by the slit lamp and estimation of open angle using the Van Herick technique, intraocular pressure less than 21 mmHg, without surgical complications, and without any ocular disease. The intraocular pressure was measured by the pneumatic tonometer. The intraocular pressure assessment was performed at the last consultation before phacoemulsification surgery and 30 days after. RESULTS: A sample of 182 eyes was used. The mean age was 68.41 ± 10.84 years. Of the patient, 65% were females and 35% were males. The mean intraocular pressure in the preoperative period was 16.0 mmHg (±3.3 mmHg) and the mean intraocular pressure in the postoperative period was 13.44 mmHg (±3.31 mmHg). There was no correlation between intraocular pressure variations in both eyes (age-matched open angle) and age. There was a statistically significant correlation between the preoperative intraocular pressure value and the intraocular pressure changes in the postoperative period. In the comparison of the intraocular pressure variation between the genders, the female gender presented a statistically significant negative variation. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the cataract surgery is related to the reduction of intraocular pressure in the postoperative period and this reduction is more influenced by its preoperative value. Other studies of high epidemiological impact are needed, which may corroborate that the cataract surgery could directly influence intraocular pressure variation.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción: el glaucoma es la principal causa de ceguera irreversible en el mundo, siendo la presión intraocular alta el factor de riesgo más importante para desarrollarlo, por eso la importancia de realizar una adecuada medición de la presión intraocular (PIO) durante el examen oftalmológico. Objetivo: evaluar la concordancia de la medida de la presión intraocular tomada con los tonómetros de Goldmann, Pascal® y ORA, en pacientes con glaucoma de la consulta externa del servicio de oftalmología del Hospital de San José. Diseño: estudio descriptivo, de corte transversal y concordancia. Métodos: se compararon las medidas de Goldmann corregido, Pascal® y ORA corregido en 90 pacientes (167 ojos) con diagnóstico de glaucoma que asisten a consulta de oftalmología del Hospital de San José. Resultados: el coeficiente de correlación y concordancia de Lin entre Goldmann corregido y Pascal® es de 0.61; entre Goldmann corregido y ORA corregido de 0.64 y entre Pascal® y ORA corregido de 0.81. Conclusiones: se encontró una concordancia moderada para los tres tonómetros en la medición de la PIO en los ojos con glaucoma del servicio de oftalmología del Hospital de San José. Los tres métodos no son reemplazables, por lo tanto el seguimiento de los pacientes siempre debe ser tomado con un mismo método.

Introduction: glaucoma is the leading cause of worldwide irreversible blindness, high intraocular pressure remains the most important risk factor; because of that, it is essential to measure accurately the intraocular pressure (IOP). Objective: to evaluate the intraocular pressure correspondence of Goldmann-correlated IOP, Pascal® dynamic contour tonometer and Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer ORA tonometers in patients with glaucoma diagnosis at Ophthalmology Service, Hospital de San José. Design: a descriptive, cross-sectional and matching. Methods: measurements of Goldmann correlated IOP, Pascal® and ORA corneal compensated IOP were compared, in patients (167 eyes) diagnosed with glaucoma attending at ophthalmology Hospital San José. Results: the correlation coeffi cient and concordance Lin between Goldmann correlated IOP and Pascal® is 0.61; between ORA and Goldmann correlated IOP is 0.64 and between Pascal® and ORA is 0.81. Conclusions: we found a moderate agreement for the three tonometers for measuring IOP in eyes glaucoma attending at ophthalmology Hospital San José. The three methods are not replaceable, therefore monitoring of patients should always be taken with the same method.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: Determinar se existe variação da PIO em doentes com glaucoma submetidos à cirurgia de catarata. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo de 101 olhos, de 75 doentes com média de idade de 78,91 ± 7,9 anos submetidos à cirurgia de catarata por facoemulsificação por dois cirurgiões, sem complicações associadas e com follow-up superior a 6 meses. Os olhos foram subdivididos em dois grupos: olhos com glaucoma (G) e olhos sem glaucoma (SG). A PIO foi avaliada por tonometria de Goldmann. Resultados: Analisaram-se 51 olhos do grupo (SG) e 50 olhos do grupo (G). A PIO média nos dois grupos era no pré-operatório 16,08 ± 3,04, sendo aos 12 meses 14,69 ± 2,7 e aos 24 meses 14,21 ± 3,56. A diminuição média de PIO do pré-operatório para os 12 meses foi de 1,49 ± 2,98. A PIO pré-operatória apresentou uma diferença com significado estatístico da PIO aos 12 e 24 meses (p<0,001 e p=0,001, respectivamente T. t pares) na amostra global. Não se detectou uma diferença com significado estatístico na variação de PIO entre estes 2 grupos de olhos (p>0,05, teste T Student). Determinou-se um modelo de regressão linear stepwise para a variação de PIO do pré-operatório para os 12m. As variáveis com valor preditivo eram a PIO pré-operatória (R2=0,249, p=0,03), e a idade (R2=0,18, p=0,01). Conclusão: O nosso estudo revela que a cirurgia de catarata por facoemulsificação leva a uma diminuição significativa da PIO, que se mantém aos 12 e 24m. .

Objective: To describe the variation of intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with glaucoma submitted to cataract surgery. Methods: Retrospective study of 101 eyes of 75 patients with medium age of 78.91 ± 7.9 submitted to cataract surgery by facoemulsification by two surgeons, without complications and with at least 6 months of follow-up. The eyes were divided in two groups: eyes with glaucoma (G) and eyes without glaucoma (NG). The IOP was evaluated with Goldmann tonometry. Results: 51 eyes without glaucoma and 50 eyes with glaucoma. The medium IOP was 16.08 ± 3.04 before surgery, 14.69 ± 2.7 at 12 months and 14.21 ± 3.56 at 24 months. The medium value of IOP reduction before surgery to 12 months was 1.49 ± 2.98. IOP measured before surgery differed statistically from IOP at 12 and 24 months (p<0.001 e p=0.001 respectively, T. Student). Between the two groups of eyes there wasn’t a statistically significant difference in the variation of IOP (p>0.05, T Student). A model of linear regression stepwise was calculated for the variation of the IOP from before surgery to 12 months. The variables with more predictive value were IOP before surgery (R2=0.249, p=0.03) and age (R2=0.18, p=0.01). Conclusion: In our study cataract surgery results in IOP reduction, that is maintained at 12 months. .

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Avaliar comparativamente a pressão intraocular (PIO) antes e após 1 dia, 3 dias, 1 semana, 1 mês, 3 meses, 6 meses e 1 ano, em olhos normais submetidos à facoemulsificação. MÉTODOS: Análise retrospectiva da pressão intraocular (medida pelo tonômetro de aplanação de Goldmann) de 221 olhos normais de 133 pacientes submetidos à facoemulsificação sem intercorrências. A PIO foi avaliada antes e após a facoemulsificação (1dia, 3 dias, 1 semana, 1 mês, 3 meses, 6 meses e 1 ano), e os valores encontrados nestes períodos foram submetidos a uma análise comparativa. RESULTADOS: A PIO média foi de 16,06±2,69 mmHg no pré-operatório; 18,76±5,96 mmHg após 1 dia; 14,82±4,08 mmHg após 3 dias; 14,03±3,06 mmHg após 1 semana; 13,88±3,26 mmHg após 1 mês; 12,74±2,45 mmHg após 3 meses; 12,74±2,01 mmHg após 6 meses; e 13,24±2,77 mmHg após 1 ano. A PIO aumentou 18,9 por cento após 1 dia; diminuiu 6,9 por cento após 3 dias; 12,3 por cento após 1 semana; 12,5 por cento após 1 mês; 19,3 por cento após 3 meses; 20,1 por cento após 6 meses; e 19,9 por cento após 1 ano. CONCLUSÃO: A cirurgia de facoemulsificação sem intercorrências leva a uma redução significativa da PIO em olhos normais. A diminuição da PIO é mais acentuada naqueles pacientes que apresentam PIO mais alta no pré-operatório.

PURPOSE: To assess intraocular pressure (IOP) before and after 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year in normal eyes submitted to a phacoemulsification. METHODS: Intraocular pressure retrospective analyses (measured by Goldmann applanation tonometer) of 221 normal eyes of 133 patients submitted to an uneventful phacoemulsification. The IOP was evaluated before and after phacoemulsification ( 1day, 3 days, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year), and these values were submitted to a comparative analyses. RESULTS: The mean preoperative IOP of 16,06±2,69 mmHg rose postoperatively to 18,76±5,96 mmHg at 1 day; dropped to 14,82±4,08 mmHg at 3 days; 14,03±3,06 mmHg at 1 week; 13,88±3,26 mmHg at 1 month; 12,74±2,45 mmHg at 3 months; 12,74±2,01 mmHg at 6 months; and 13,24±2,77 mmHg at 1 year. The IOP rise was 18,9 percent at 1 day; fall of 6,9 percent at 3 days; 12,3 percent at 1 week; 12,5 percent at 1 month; 19,3 percent at 3 months; 20,1 percent at 6 months; and 19,9 percent at 1 year. CONCLUSION: In normal eyes, uneventful phacoemulsification reduced IOP. The greatest IOP decreases were in patients with a higher preoperative IOP.

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a influência do peso corporal e do índice de massa corporal (IMC) nos picos e na flutuação da pressão intra-ocular (PIO) no teste de sobrecarga hídrica (TSH) em pacientes com glaucoma primário de ângulo aberto (GPAA), glaucoma de pressão normal (GPN) e olhos normais (ON). MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal em que foram avaliados 32 olhos de 32 pacientes com GPAA, 30 olhos de 30 pacientes com GPN e 20 olhos de 20 ON. Nenhum dos pacientes glaucomatosos havia iniciado o tratamento da doença. O TSH foi realizado às 17h, sendo avaliada a correlação entre o peso corporal e o IMC e os picos e a flutuação da PIO durante o TSH. Os resultados foram analisados através dos testes de Anova-fator único com teste de Bonferroni e correlação linear de Pearson. Foi considerado significativo valor de p menor que 0,05. RESULTADOS: Não houve diferença significativa na idade (p=0,13), no peso corporal (p=0,13) e no IMC (p=0,83) entre os três grupos. Foi encontrada correlação estatisticamente significativa no grupo GPAA entre o peso corporal e a flutuação da PIO no TSH (p=0,02; r=-0,42) e entre o IMC e a flutuação da PIO no TSH (p=0,02; r=-0,41). Não houve correlação significativa entre o peso corporal e o IMC e os picos de PIO nos três grupos e entre o peso corporal e o IMC e a flutuação da PIO nos grupos GPN e ON.. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados do presente estudo sugerem que o peso corporal e o IMC devem ser considerados ao se avaliar os resultados do TSH em portadores de GPAA e que pacientes portadores de GPAA com maior IMC e maior peso corporal podem apresentar menor flutuação da PIO no TSH.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the body weight and body mass index (BMI) on the intraocular pressure (IOP) peaks and fluctuation in the water-drinking test (WDT) in primary open angle (POAG) and normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients, as well as normal eyes (NE). METHODS: Thirty-two eyes of 32 POAG patients, 30 eyes of 30 NTG patients and 20 eyes of 20 normal patients were evaluated in this transversal study. None of the patients were using antiglaucomatous drugs at the beginning of the study. The WDT was performed at 5:00 pm for further correlation between body weight, BMI and intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation. Analysis of variance, Bonferroni test and Pearson correlation coefficient were used for statistical analysis. Inherent to the methods used, p-values below 0,05 were considered to ensure statistical relevance. RESULTS: There was no statically significant difference between age (p=0,13), body weight (p=0,13) and BMI (0,83) in the three groups studied. There was significant correlation between body weight and IOP fluctuations (p=0,02; r=-0,42) and between BMI and IOP fluctuations (p=0,02; r=-0,41) in POAG patients. Body weight and BMI were not significantly associated with IOP peaks in the three groups. There was no statistically significant correlation between body weight, BMI and IOP fluctuations in NTG patients and in NE. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that knowledge of body weight and BMI is advisable before interpreting the WDT outcomes in POAG patients. POAG patients with higher body weight and BMI may present lower fluctuation in the WDT.

RESUMO

OBJETIVO:Avaliar a variação da pressão intra-ocular (PIO) na mudança de posição em pacientes com glaucoma primário de ângulo aberto (GPAA), glaucoma de pressão normal (GPN) e olhos normais (ON), e correlacionar esta variação à gravidade do defeito de campo visual. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 32 olhos de 32 pacientes com GPAA, 30 olhos de 30 pacientes com GPN e 20 olhos de 20 ON. A PIO foi aferida às 6h da manhã na posição supina e 5min após com o paciente sentado. Foi avaliada a correlação entre variação da pressão decorrente da mudança de posição e os defeitos de campo visual. Foram utilizados os testes estatísticos não paramétricos de Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney e o teste de correlação linear de Spearman. Foi considerado significativo valor de p < 0,05. RESULTADOS: Foi encontrada diferença significativa entre as pressões intra-oculares na posição supina e assentada nos três grupos (p<0,001). Não houve diferença significativa na variação da PIO com a mudança de posição entre os três grupos (p=0,17). Não houve correlação significativa entre a variação da PIO nas duas posições e o índice MD do campo visual nos grupos GPAA (p=0,81) e GPN (p=0,89). CONCLUSÃO:Os resultados sugerem que existe aumento significativo da PIO com a mudança da posição assentada para supina em pacientes com GPAA, GPN e ON, não havendo, porém, diferença significativa desta variação entre os três grupos. Não foi encontrada correlação significativa entre a variação da PIO e a severidade do campo visual.

PURPOSE: To evaluate intraocular pressure variation due to postural changing of supine to sitting position and, to correlate this variation with visual field defects in primary open angle and normal tension glaucoma patients, as well as normal eyes. METHODS: Thirty-two eyes of 32 POAG patients, 30 eyes of 30 NTG patients and 20 eyes of 20 normal patients were evaluated in the study. Intraocular pressure was measured at 6 o'clock in supine position and 5 minutes after in sitting position for further correlation between intraocular pressure behavior after postural changing and visual field defects Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney and Spearman linear correlation non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis. Inherent to the methods used, p<0,05 were considered to ensure statistical relevance. RESULTS: Relevant results were observed between intraocular pressure measured in supine and sitting position in all groups, disclosing statistical significance (p<0,001). However, this statistical relevance was not seen when compared among the 3 groups studied (p=0,17). Moreover, visual field defects, expressed by MD index, did not point to have statistical correlation to intraocular pressure variation after postural changing in POAG (P=0,81) and NTG (p=0,89). CONCLUSION: The results suggest there is a significant increase in intraocular pressure due to postural changing in primary open angle and normal tension glaucoma patients, as well as in normal eyes. However, the raise in intraocular pressure neither was significant when compared among the 3 groups nor was consistent with visual field defects.

Assuntos