RESUMO

Resumen La pandemia COVID-19 produjo un impacto en la salud pública y la economía mundial. El objetivo de este documento fue actualizar según la evidencia disponible, el manejo de algunos elementos básicos en los Programas de Control de Infecciones (PCI) y la atención diaria de los pacientes. Como resultado: 1. No se recomienda el uso rutinario de barbijo N95 para la atención de pacientes sospechosos o confirmados de COVID-19. Datos disponibles indican que el SARS-CoV-2 se ha propagado principalmente a través de la transmisión por gotas y contacto. En ciertas situaciones se describen contagios de persona a persona a través de la vía respiratoria aérea observadas en ambientes poco ventilados, y mientras el individuo realizaba acciones de mayor potencialidad de transmisión. 2. Se acepta el reúso limitado y métodos de decontaminación de máscaras/ barbijos N95 bajo protocolos seguros y eficaces en el contexto de recursos limitados. 3. Se puede levantar el aislamiento de pacientes confirmados de COVID-19 bajo una estrategia basada en la clínica, factores de riesgo individuales y tiempo de evolución de la enfermedad. 4. No se requiere PCR control en casos confirmados para determinar el alta epidemiológica. 5. La evidencia actual demuestra que existe la posibilidad de reinfección, aunque su diagnóstico es dificultoso. 6. La medición de anticuerpos tiene un rol específico en estudios de prevalencia, diagnóstico de síndrome inflamatorio multisistémico y cuadro compatible con PCR negativa después del 7° día.

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on public health and the global economy. The objective of this document was to update, according to the available evidence, the management of some basic elements in the Infection Control Programs (PCI) and the daily care of patients. As a result: 1. The routine use of the N95 masks is not recommended for the care of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients. Available data indicates that SARS-CoV-2 has spread primarily like most other common respiratory viruses, through droplet and contact transmission. In certain situations, person-to-person transmission is described through the airway, observed in poorly ventilated environments, and while the individual carried out actions of greater potential transmission 2. The limited reuse and decontamination methods of N95 masks are accepted under safe and effective prot ocols in the context of limited resources. 3. The isolation of patients with COVID-19 can be lifted under a strategy based on the clinic, individual risk factors and time of evolution of the disease. 4. PCR control is not required in confirmed cases to determine epidemiological discharge. 5. Current evidence shows that there is a possibility of reinfection although its diagnosis is difficult. 6. The measurement of antibodies has a specific role in prevalence studies, diagnosis of multisystemic inflammatory syndrome and a picture compatible with negative PCR after the 7th. day.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on public health and the global economy. The objective of this document was to update, according to the available evidence, the management of some basic elements in the Infection Control Programs (PCI) and the daily care of patients. As a result: 1. The routine use of the N95 masks is not recommended for the care of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients. Available data indicates that SARS-CoV-2 has spread primarily like most other common respiratory viruses, through droplet and contact transmission. In certain situations, personto-person transmission is described through the airway, observed in poorly ventilated environments, and while the individual carried out actions of greater potential transmission 2. The limited reuse and decontamination methods of N95 masks are accepted under safe and effective prot ocols in the context of limited resources. 3. The isolation of patients with COVID-19 can be lifted under a strategy based on the clinic, individual risk factors and time of evolution of the disease. 4. PCR control is not required in confirmed cases to determine epidemiological discharge. 5. Current evidence shows that there is a possibility of reinfection although its diagnosis is difficult. 6. The measurement of antibodies has a specific role in prevalence studies, diagnosis of multisystemic inflammatory syndrome and a picture compatible with negative PCR after the 7th. day.

La pandemia COVID-19 produjo un impacto en la salud pública y la economía mundial. El objetivo de este documento fue actualizar según la evidencia disponible, el manejo de algunos elementos básicos en los Programas de Control de Infecciones (PCI) y la atención diaria de los pacientes. Como resultado: 1. No se recomienda el uso rutinario de barbijo N95 para la atención de pacientes sospechosos o confirmados de COVID-19. Datos disponibles indican que el SARS-CoV-2 se ha propagado principalmente a través de la transmisión por gotas y contacto. En ciertas situaciones se describen contagios de persona a persona a través de la vía respiratoria aérea observadas en ambientes poco ventilados, y mientras el individuo realizaba acciones de mayor potencialidad de transmisión. 2. Se acepta el reúso limitado y métodos de decontaminación de máscaras/barbijos N95 bajo protocolos seguros y eficaces en el contexto de recursos limitados. 3. Se puede levantar el aislamiento de pacientes confirmados de COVID-19 bajo una estrategia basada en la clínica, factores de riesgo individuales y tiempo de evolución de la enfermedad. 4. No se requiere PCR control en casos confirmados para determinar el alta epidemiológica. 5. La evidencia actual demuestra que existe la posibilidad de reinfección, aunque su diagnóstico es dificultoso. 6. La medición de anticuerpos tiene un rol específico en estudios de prevalencia, diagnóstico de síndrome inflamatorio multisistémico y cuadro compatible con PCR negativa después del 7° día.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This scoping review aimed to map and compile the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of decontaminating N95 respirators against the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). DATA: We selected studies written in English assessing or discussing the decontamination strategies of N95 respirators against SARS-CoV-2. Two independent researchers performed the search and study screening. A descriptive analysis was carried out considering the study design of the included studies. SOURCES: PubMed, SCOPUS, and Preprint platforms (bioRxiv and medRxiv). STUDY SELECTION: We included 55 reports from PubMed and SCOPUS. Nine articles were letters to the editors, 21 were in vitro studies, 16 were literature reviews, and 9 were classified as other study designs. We included 37 preprints. Two articles were letters to the editors, 24 were in vitro studies, 3 were literature reviews, and 8 were classified as other study designs. In general, vaporized hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet irradiation were the strategies most cited and most promising. However, there is a lack of evidence and consensus related to the best method of N95 respirator decontamination. CONCLUSION: The evidence regarding decontamination strategies of N95 respirators against SARS-CoV-2 remains scarce. Vaporized hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet irradiation seem to be the current standard for N95 respirator decontamination. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Vaporized hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet irradiation appear to be the most promising methods for N95 respirator decontamination.

Assuntos