RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization considers falls the second leading cause of death by accidental injury worldwide and one of the most frequent complications in older adults during activities of daily living. Several tasks related to fall risk have been individually assessed describing kinematic changes in older adults. The study proposal was to identify which functional task differentiates faller and non-faller older adults using the movement deviation profile (MDP). METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited 68 older adults aged ≥60 years by convenience sampling. Older adults were divided into 2 groups: with and without a history of falls (34 older adults in each group). The MDP analyzed the 3-dimensional angular kinematics data of tasks (ie, gait, walking turn, stair ascent and descent, sit-to-stand, and stand-to-sit), and the Z score of the mean MDP identified which task presented the greatest difference between fallers and non-fallers. A multivariate analysis with Bonferroni post hoc verified the interaction between groups considering angular kinematic data and the cycle time of the task. Statistical significance was set at 5% (p < .05). RESULTS: Z score of the MDPmean showed an interaction between groups (λ = 0.67, F = 5.085, p < .0001). Fallers differed significantly from non-fallers in all tasks and the greatest difference was in stair descent (Z score = 0.89). The time to complete each task was not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The MDP distinguished older adult fallers from non-fallers. The stair descent task should be highlighted because it presented the greatest difference between groups.
Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Caminhada , Humanos , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Marcha , MovimentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating kinematics lead to different conclusions, not all changes appear in all assessed tasks and in all subgroups of patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP). The inconsistencies between studies could be reduced if we knew which task separates patients best from healthy controls. RESEARCH QUESTION: Identify which functional task, between gait, forward step down (FSD), lateral step down (LSD), stair ascent and descent and propulsion and landing phase of the single leg hop test (SLHT), differentiates the three-dimensional kinematics of women with patellofemoral pain from asymptomatic women. METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated thirty-five PFP and thirty-five asymptomatic women during the execution of the following tasks: gait, FSD, LSD, stair ascent and descent and the propulsion and landing phase of single leg hop test. Frontal, sagittal and transverse plane angles of the trunk, pelvis and hip, frontal and sagittal plane angles of the knee, ankle dorsiflexion, foot progression angle and hindfoot eversion were analyzed through the Movement Deviation Profile (MDP). To compare the groups, the multivariate analysis with Bonferroni post hoc test were used, with a significance level of pâ¯<â¯0.01. To identify which task presented the most difference between the groups, the Z-score of the mean MDP was calculated. RESULTS: For all tasks, the groups presented significant differences. According to the Z-score, the groups got farther apart considering the MDP for each task in the following order: LSD (7.97), FSD (7.62), landing phase of SLHT (3.43), gait (2.85), propulsion phase of SLHT (1.64), descending stairs (1.63) and ascending stairs (1.00). SIGNIFICANCE: We suggest that step down tests should be included in the assessment of PFP patients, since these tests most differentiate the kinematics of women with and without PFP. Identifying the tasks with the highest sensitivity to detect the kinematic differences is expected to improve clinical decision-making.