RESUMO
BACKGROUND: No preeclampsia screening test has been validated in our country. OBJECTIVE: To assess the fit and performance of the FMF 4.0 Bayesian algorithm in a Mexican population. METHOD: Cohort study in singleton pregnancies, according to the competing risks model for preeclampsia. A priori risk was calculated based on medical history. Mean blood pressure (MBP), uterine artery mean pulsatility index (UtAmPI) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) were measured at 11-14 weeks of gestation using standardized methodology. The value of each marker was transformed into multiples of the median (MoM) by the originala algorithm and by population-correctionb. Multivariate normal distribution and Bayes theorem were applied to obtain post-test probabilities. RESULTS: There was 5.0% (40/807) of preeclampsia. Distributions in women without preeclampsia were MBP = 0.927a vs. 0.991b, UtAmPI = 0.895a vs. 1.030b and PAPP-A = 0.815a vs. 0.963b (p < 0.001). The AUC was 0.821a vs. 0.823b. For a detection rate of 69 %, cutoff points were 1 in 240a and 1 in 120b, with false positive rates of 31 %a and 29 %b. CONCLUSIONS: The model has to be adjusted to the target population.
ANTECEDENTES: Ninguna prueba de tamiz de preeclampsia ha sido validada en nuestro país. OBJETIVO: Evaluar el ajuste y rendimiento del algoritmo bayesiano FMF 4.0 en una población mexicana. MÉTODO: Estudio de cohorte en embarazos de feto único, según el modelo de riesgos en competencia para preeclampsia. El riesgo a priori se calculó por historia clínica. La presión arterial media (PAM), el índice de pulsatilidad medio de la arteria uterina (IPmAUt) y la proteína plasmática A asociada al embarazo (PAPP-A) se midieron a las 11-14 semanas de gestación con metodología estandarizada. El valor de cada marcador se transformó en múltiplos de la mediana (MoM) por el algoritmo originala y el corregidob a la población. Se aplicaron la distribución normal multivariante y el teorema de Bayes para las probabilidades posprueba. RESULTADOS: Hubo un 5.0% (40/807) de preeclampsia. Las distribuciones sin preeclampsia fueron PAM 0.927a vs. 0.991b, UtAmPI 0.895a vs. 1.030b y PAPP-A 0.815a vs. 0.963b (p < 0.001). El área bajo la curva fue 0.821a vs. 0.823b. Para una detección del 69%, los puntos de corte fueron 1 en 240a y 1 en 120b, a falsos positivos del 31%a y 29%b. CONCLUSIONES: El modelo debe ajustarse a la población diana.
Assuntos
Pré-Eclâmpsia , Teorema de Bayes , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Pré-Eclâmpsia/diagnóstico , Pré-Eclâmpsia/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
A sífilis congênita (SC) é um agravo prevenível, mas o Brasil ainda apresenta alta prevalência da doença, com consequente morbimortalidade perinatal. Objetivo: Avaliar a abordagem de sífilis em gestantes e seus recém-nascidos encaminhados para centro de referência. Métodos: Estudo transversal, de março de 2012 a abril de 2013. A coleta de dados foi realizada em prontuários de pacientes referenciados com SC, considerando critérios estabelecidos pelo Ministério da Saúde (MS). Os dados foram analisados pelo Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) e o estudo foi aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética. Resultados: Um total de 31 recém-nascidos foi encaminhado devido à triagem materna com Venereal Disease Research Laboratory(VDRL) materno positivo durante a gestação, com 4 mulheres adequadamente tratadas. Treze recém-nascidos apresentaram alteração no hemograma e1 apresentou alteração óssea, 28 deles com tratamento adequado. Discussão: Quando se considera adequação de tratamento de acordo com as diretrizes nacionais, poucos casos de sífilis na gestação são considerados adequadamente tratados. Isso impacta na assistência ao recém-nascido, que, muitas vezes,é submetido a propedêutica invasiva e tratamento extenso, embora na maioria das vezes seja assintomático. Conclusão: O seguimento das recomendações para o tratamento da sífilis na gestante tem sido, frequentemente, considerado inadequado, o que dificulta a eliminação da SC.
Congenital syphilis (CS) is a preventable disease, but its prevalence is still high in Brazil, with consequent perinatal morbidity and mortality.Objective: To evaluate the approach of syphilis in pregnant women and their newborns referred to the referral center of Orestes Diniz, in Belo Horizonte.Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out from March 2012 to April 2013. Data collection was performed on the medical records of patients referred with CS, considering the criteria established by the Ministry of Health. Data were analyzed using SPSS and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee. Results: A total of 31 newborns were referred due to a positive result in maternal testing with Venereal Disease Research Laboratory during pregnancy. However, only four women have been adequately treated in accordance with the Ministry of Health. Thirteen newborns presented alterations inblood cells count, one had bone rarefactions, and 28 presented proper information of treatment. Discussion: When considering the adequacy of treatmenta ccording to the national guidelines, few cases of syphilis during pregnancy can be considered adequately treated. This affects the assistance to the newborn,who is often subjected to invasive investigation and extensive treatment, although most are asymptomatic. Conclusion: The follow-up of recommendations for the treatment of syphilis in pregnant women has often been considered inadequate, making CS difficult to eliminate