RESUMO

Seasonal variation of blood pressure (BP) is a topic in cardiology that has gained more attention throughout the years. Although it is extensively documented that BP increases in seasons coupled with lower temperatures, there are still many gaps in this knowledge field that need to be explored. Notably, seasonal variation of BP phenotypes, such as masked and white coat hypertension, and the impact of air pollution, latitude, and altitude on seasonal variation of BP are still poorly described in the literature, and the levels of the existing evidence are low. Therefore, further investigations on these topics are needed to provide robust evidence that can be used in clinical practice.

RESUMO

Isolated nocturnal hypertension (INH) and masked nocturnal hypertension (MNH) increase cardiovascular risk. Their prevalence and characteristics are not clearly established and seem to differ among populations. We aimed to determine the prevalence and associated characteristics of INH and MNH in a tertiary hospital in the city of Buenos Aires. We included 958 hypertensive patients ≥ 18 years who underwent an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) between October and November 2022, as prescribed by their treating physician to diagnose or to assess hypertension control. INH was defined as nighttime BP ≥ 120 mmHg systolic or ≥70 diastolic in the presence of normal daytime BP (<135/85 mmHg regardless of office BP; MNH was defined as the presence of INH with office BP < 140/90 mmHg). Variables associated with INH and MNH were analyzed. The prevalences of INH and MNH were 15.7% (95% CI 13.5-18.2%) and 9.7 (95% CI 7.9-11.8%), respectively. Age, male sex, and ambulatory heart rate were positively associated with INH, whereas office BP, total cholesterol, and smoking habits showed a negative association. In turn, diabetes and nighttime heart rate were positively associated with MNH. In conclusion, INH and MNH are frequent entities, and determination of clinical characteristics such as those detected in this study is critical since this might contribute to a more appropriate use of resources.

RESUMO

Hypertension disorders during pregnancy has a wide range of severities, from a mild clinical condition to a life-threatening one. Currently, office BP is still the main method for the diagnosis of hypertension during pregnancy. Despite of the limitation these measurements, in clinical practice office BP of 140/90 mmHg cut point is used to simplify diagnosis and treatment decisions. The out-of-office BP evaluations are it comes to discarding white-coat hypertension with little utility in practice to rule out masked hypertension and nocturnal hypertension. In this revision, we analyzed the current evidence of the role of ABPM in diagnosing and managing pregnant women. ABPM has a defined role in the evaluation of BP levels in pregnant women, being appropriate performing an ABPM to classification of HDP before 20 weeks of gestation and second ABMP performed between 20-30 weeks of gestation to detected of women with a high risk of development of PE. Furthermore, we propose to, discarding white-coat hypertension and detecting masked chronic hypertension in pregnant women with office BP > 125/75 mmHg. Finally, in women who had PE, a third ABPM in the post-partum period could identify those with higher long-term cardiovascular risk related with masked hypertension.

RESUMO

This study compared the ability of guideline-proposed office blood pressure (OBP) screening thresholds [European Society of Hypertension (ESH) guidelines: 130/85 mmHg for individuals with an OBP < 140/90 mmHg; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines: 120/75 mmHg for individuals with an OBP < 130/80 mmHg] and novel screening scores to identify normotensive individuals at high risk of having masked hypertension (MH) in an office setting. We cross-sectionally evaluated untreated participants with an OBP < 140/90 mmHg (n = 22,266) and an OBP < 130/80 mmHg (n = 10,005) who underwent home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) (derivation cohort) from 686 Brazilian sites. MH was defined according to criteria suggested by the ESH (OBP < 140/90 mmHg; HBPM ≥ 135/85 mmHg), Brazilian Society of Cardiology (BSC) (OBP < 140/90 mmHg; HBPM ≥ 130/80 mmHg) and ACC/AHA (OBP < 130/80 mmHg; HBPM ≥ 130/80 mmHg). Scores were generated from multivariable logistic regression coefficients between MH and clinical variables (OBP, age, sex, and BMI). Considering the ESH, BSC, and ACC/AHA criteria, 17.2%, 38.5%, and 21.2% of the participants had MH, respectively. Guideline-proposed OBP screening thresholds yielded area under curve (AUC) values of 0.640 (for ESH criteria), 0.641 (for BSC criteria), and 0.619 (for ACC/AHA criteria) for predicting MH, while scores presented as continuous variables or quartiles yielded AUC values of 0.700 and 0.688 (for ESH criteria), 0.720 and 0.709 (for BSC criteria), and 0.671 and 0.661 (for ACC/AHA criteria), respectively. Further analyses performed with alternative untreated participants (validation cohort; n = 2807 with an OBP < 140/90 mmHg; n = 1269 with an OBP < 130/80 mmHg) yielded similar AUC values. In conclusion, the accuracy of guideline-proposed OBP screening thresholds in identifying individuals at high risk of having MH in an office setting is limited and is inferior to that yielded by scores derived from simple clinical variables.

Assuntos

RESUMO

A hipertensão arterial (HA) é o principal fator contributivo para as doenças cardiovasculares, as quais constituem a mais importante causa de morte prevenível no mundo. A falta de conhecimento da população acerca da doença, e consequentemente de um diagnóstico adequado, torna baixo o número de pessoas que se tratam. O aspecto silencioso da HA, e a má adesão ao tratamento proposto, dentre outros fatores, contribuem para o elevado risco de complicações. A medida da pressão arterial (PA) neste contexto apresenta grande importância não apenas no diagnóstico, mas também no acompanhamento de portadores de HA, podendo ser realizada de forma casual, em consultório, ou fora do mesmo com a utilização de outros métodos para tal. Dentre as medidas de PA, a monitorização residencial da PA (MRPA) se destaca. É um método destinado a fazer registro da PA fora do ambiente de consultório, obedecendo a um protocolo previamente estabelecido e normatizado. Além disto, a MRPA apresenta custos menores do que a monitorização ambulatorial da PA (MAPA). De acordo com a atual Diretriz Brasileira de HA, são considerados anormais valores de PA consultório ≥ 140/90 mmHg e de MRPA ≥ 130/80 mmHg. Sob esta perspectiva, a MRPA é um exame que permite que se faça o diagnóstico de HA verdadeira (PA elevada no consultório e na MRPA), normotensão verdadeira (PA normal no consultório e na MRPA), HA do avental branco (HAB) (PA elevada no consultório e normal na MRPA) e HA mascarada (HM) (PA normal no consultório e elevada na MRPA). O diagnóstico de HM é bastante relevante na prática clínica, pois em termos prognósticos, a HM apresenta um risco cardiovascular maior que a HAB e a normotensão verdadeira. Além disto, a incidência de eventos cardiovasculares na HM é similar ou até superior à da HA verdadeira.

Hypertension is the main contributing factor to cardiovascular diseases, which are the most important cause of death in the world. The lack of proper diagnosis, mainly due to the silent aspect of hypertension, makes the rate of people undergoing treatment low, contributing to the high risk of complications. The measurement of blood pressure (BP) in this context is important not only in the diagnosis, but also in the follow-up of patients with hypertension, and it can be performed casually, in the office, or outside the office, using other methods for this purpose. Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is a method designed to record BP outside the office environment, following a previously established and standardized protocol and has a lower cost than ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) According to the current Brazilian hypertension guideline, office BP values ≥ 140/90 mmHg and HBPM values ≥ 130/80 mmHg are considered abnormal. From this perspective, HBPM is a test that allows the diagnosis of true hypertension (high BP in the office and in HMBP), true normotension (normal BP in the office and in the HBPM), white coat hypertension (high BP in the office and normal BP in HBPM) and masked hypertension (normal BP in the office and high in HBPM). The diagnosis of masked hypertension is quite relevant in clinical practice, because this phenotype has greater cardiovascular risk than true normotension and white coat hypertension. On the other hand, the incidence of cardiovascular events is similar or even greater in masked hypertension in comparison with true hypertension.

Assuntos

RESUMO

This study investigated the impact of changing abnormal home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) cutoff from 135/85 to 130/80 mmHg on the prevalence of hypertension phenotypes, considering an abnormal office blood pressure cutoff of 140/90 mmHg. We evaluated 57 768 individuals (26 876 untreated and 30 892 treated with antihypertensive medications) from 719 Brazilian centers who performed HBPM. Changing the HBPM cutoff was associated with increases in masked (from 10% to 22%) and sustained (from 27% to 35%) hypertension, and decreases in white-coat hypertension (from 16% to 7%) and normotension (from 47% to 36%) among untreated participants, and increases in masked (from 11% to 22%) and sustained (from 29% to 36%) uncontrolled hypertension, and decreases in white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (from 15% to 8%) and controlled hypertension (from 45% to 34%) among treated participants. In conclusion, adoption of an abnormal HBPM cutoff of 130/80 mmHg markedly increased the prevalence of out-of-office hypertension and uncontrolled hypertension phenotypes.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Resistant hypertension is common in the chronic kidney disease population and conveys increased risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes and the development of kidney failure. Recently, the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association published a revised scientific statement on the definition and management of resistant hypertension, which codified the long-debated differences between pseudoresistant hypertension and true resistant hypertension. We review this distinction and its importance to nephrologists, who frequently encounter patients for whom antihypertensive therapy fails due to difficulty adhering to complex multidrug regimens. Second, we discuss the evaluation of patients with resistant hypertension, including appropriate screening and diagnostic testing for causes of secondary hypertension. Third, we examine the management of established resistant hypertension, including medication optimization, recent clinical trials supporting lifestyle modifications, and the evidence behind the routine use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Special attention is given to the vital role of diuretics in the treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease. We propose an algorithm for the diagnosis and management of these cases. Finally, we briefly discuss the current state of antihypertensive device therapies, including kidney denervation and baroreceptor-directed therapies.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introduction: Hypertension (HTA) is an important comorbidity in children with aortic coarctation (COAO) and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) allows an accurate diagnosis. Objective: Describe the prevalence of HTA in the office and its recategorization with ABPM Material and methods: Descriptive, observational, retrospective study; It included children between 4 and 18 years with COAO who performed ABPM. PA was registered in the office and ABPM, echocardiogram and medication. Results: 33 patients, 26 men, age 10.2 ± 3.8 years, By PA in the office: 22 normotensive; 8 HTA controlled; 2 preHTA; 1 HTA not medicated. With 32 complete MAP records, they were categorized: normotensive 11, preHTA 7, nocturnal HTA 3, masked HTA 4; HTA controlled 3; Uncontrolled HTA 3 and 1 HTA. Conclusion: The prevalence of hypertension in this population in the office was low. The ABPM recategorized and detected nocturnal HTA and masked HTA.

Introducción: La hipertensión arterial (HTA) es una comorbilidad importante en niños con coartación de aorta (COAO) y el monitoreo ambulatorio de presión arterial de 24horas (MAPA) permite un diagnóstico preciso. Objetivo: Describir la prevalencia de HTA por presión arterial (PA) en consultorio y su recategorización con MAPA Material y Método: Estudio descriptivo, observacional, retrospectivo; incluyó niños entre 4y18 años con COAO que realizaron MAPA. Se registró PA en consultorio y MAPA, ecocardiograma y medicación. Resultados: 33 pacientes, 26 varones, edad 10,2 ± 3,8 años, Por PA en consultorio: 22 normotensos; 8 HTA controlada; 2 preHTA; 1 HTA no medicado. Con 32 registros completos de MAPA, se recategorizaron: normotensos 11, preHTA 7, HTA nocturna 3, HTA enmascarada 4; HTA controlada 3; HTA no controlada 3 y 1 HTA. Conclusión: La prevalencia de HTA en esta población en consultorio fue baja. El MAPA recategorizó y detectó HTA nocturna e HTA enmascarada.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to analyze which 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) parameters should be used on masked hypertension (MH) and white-coat hypertension (WCH) diagnoses in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Non-dialysis CKD patients underwent 24-hour ABPM examination between 01/27/2004 and 02/16/2012. They were followed from the 24-hour ABPM to January/2014 in an observational study. The WCH definitions tested were as follows: (a) office blood pressure (BP) ≥ 140/90 mm Hg and daytime ABPM BP ≤ 135/85 mm Hg (old criterion); and (b) office BP ≥ 140/90 mm Hg and 24-hour ABPM BP ≤ 130/80 mm Hg, daytime ABPM BP ≤ 135/85 mm Hg, and nighttime ABPM BP ≤ 120/70 mm Hg (new criterion). The MH definitions tested were as follows: (a) office BP < 140/90 mm Hg and daytime ABPM BP > 135/85 mm Hg (old criterion); and (b) office BP < 140/90 mm Hg and 24-hour ABPM BP > 130/80 mm Hg or daytime ABPM BP > 135/85 mm Hg or nighttime ABPM BP > 120/70 mm Hg (new criterion). The two definitions' predictive capacity was compared, regarding both WCH and MH. Cardiovascular mortality was the primary and all-cause mortality was the secondary outcome. Cox regression was adjusted to the variables: glomerular filtration rate, age, diabetes mellitus, and active smoking. There were 367 patients studied. The old criterion (exclusive mean daytime ABPM BP) was the only to distinguish sustained hypertension from WCH (adjusted HR: 3.730; 95% CI: 1.068-13.029; P = .039), regarding all-cause mortality. Additionally, the old criterion was the only one to distinguish normotension and MH, regarding cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR: 7.641; 95% CI: 1.277-45.738; P = .026). Therefore, WCH and MH definitions based exclusively on daytime ABPM BP values (old criterion) were able to better distinguish mortality in this studied CKD cohort.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Entende-se como hipertensão mascarada (HM) a existência de níveis pressóricos aumentados fora do consultório em pessoas supostamente normotensas e não tratadas. A hipertensos medicados, aplica-se a denominação de "hipertensão mascarada não controlada" (HMNC). Estas condições expõem expressivo contingente de indivíduos a um risco não identificado para eventos cardiovasculares. O presente trabalho teve como objetivo realizar uma revisão sistemática da literatura a fim de identificar os principais estudos de associação entre HM, HMNC e o risco de eventos cardiovasculares. De um total de 566 estudos, 19 foram incluídos na revisão. Dentre estes, apenas 4 não documentaram associação entre HM/HMNC e maior risco cardiovascular. Um estudo observou apenas associação com risco de infarto agudo do miocárdio (IAM) e outro apenas com o risco de acidente cerebrovascular (AVC). Os demais 13 estudos mostraram relação entre presença de HM e/ou HMNC e maior risco de eventos cardiovasculares como AVC, IAM e/ou morte. Em conclusão, existe associação entre a presença de hipertensão mascarada e o aumento no risco de eventos cardiovasculares. Alguns fenótipos especialmente vulneráveis e possíveis estratégias diagnósticas são também objeto de discussão.

Masked hypertension (MH) is defined as a normal ambulatory blood pressure, though elevated in the outpatient setting, in supposedly normotensive patients. For hypertensive patients, the term "uncontrolled masked hypertension" (MUCH) applies. Previous data suggest that subjects who present either MH or MUCH may be exposed to higher cardiovascular risk. The authors sought to carry out a systematic review of the literature regarding the association between MH, MUCH and risk of cardiovascular events. Among 566 studies retrieved,19 were included in the review. Only 4 studies did not document an association between MH/MUCH and risk of cardiovascular events. One study found an association only with the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and another with the risk of cerebrovascular events. The remaining 13 studies revealed a relationship between the presence of MH/MUCH and a higher risk of cardiovascular events such as stroke, AMI and/or death. In conclusion, there is an association between the presence of MH/MUCH and an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Some especially vulnerable phenotypes as well as possible diagnostic strategies are also discussed.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Hypertension management in lupus nephritis (LN) is guided by in-office blood pressure (BP); however, recent studies demonstrate that lupus patients frequently have nocturnal hypertension and reduced BP dipping. The aim of the study was to evaluate 24-h blood pressure in patients with active LN and after response to treatment. METHODS: Seventy active LN patients were evaluated during a LN flare by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Later, 10 patients with complete response were re-evaluated after 12 months along with 20 matched controls. Overall, daytime and nightime BP, day-to-night dipping, BP load and variability, and the incidence of abnormal BP patterns were assessed. Blood pressure levels were correlated with clinical and histologic parameters and independent associations evaluated by linear regression. RESULTS: Overall systolic hypertension occurred in 25 (36%) patients and diastolic hypertension in 28 (40%). Nighttime systolic and diastolic hypertension occurred in 35 (50%) and 44 (63%) of patients, respectively. Nocturnal systolic day-to-night BP decrease was abnormal in 59 (84%) patients. Only 18 (26%) were diagnosed with HT by in-office evaluation while 29 (41%) had masked hypertension (MH)/masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH), and 3 (4%) had white coat hypertension. Patients with MH had lower eGFR, complement C3, hemoglobin, and higher systolic variability compared with patients with normal BP. Systolic and diastolic BP levels were associated with the years under corticosteroid treatment, activity biomarkers (proteinuria, complement C3), and the degree of interstitial inflammation in the kidney biopsy. A re-evaluation at 12 months showed that although 9 out of 10 patients had normal in-office BP and BP loads improved, still 5 patients remained with MH due to nocturnal hypertension, and 7 remained with abnormal day-to-night dipping. These numbers were higher than those of matched controls. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the high frequency of nocturnal hypertension and abnormal day-to-night dipping, office BP measurements alone may not be sufficient to guide hypertension management in patients with LN.Key Points• Nocturnal hypertension and abnormal BP patterns are frequent and not detectable by the standard in-office BP evaluation in LN patients.• BP abnormalities may not be fully corrected after a complete clinical response to treatment in lupus nephritis and are only detectable by ABPM.• The degree of interstitial inflammation in the kidney biopsy in LN patients is associated to BP levels. This supports the hypotheses underlining the role of interstitial inflammation in salt sensitivity and hypertension.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Background: The diagnosis of arterial hypertension based on measurements of blood pressure in the office has low accuracy. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of masked hypertension (MH) and white-coat hypertension through home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) in pre-hypertensive and stage 1 hypertensive patients. Method: Retrospective study, of which sample consisted of individuals with BP ≥ 120/80 mmHg and < 160/100 mmHg at the medical office without the use of antihypertensive medication and who underwent exams on the HBPM platform by telemedicine (TeleMRPA) between May 2017 and September 2018. The four-day MRPA protocol was used, with 24 measurements, using automated, validated, calibrated equipment with a memory function. Results: The sample consisted of 1,273 participants, of which 739 (58.1%) were women. The mean age was 52.4 ± 14.9 years, mean body mass index (BMI) 28.4 ± 5.1 kg/m2. The casual BP was higher than the HBPM in 7.6 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 5.2 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP), both with statistical significance (p < 0.001). There were 558 (43.8%) normotensive individuals; 291 (22.9%) with sustained hypertension; 145 (11.4%) with MH and 279 (21.9%) with white-coat hypertension (WCH), with a diagnostic error by casual BP in the total sample in 424 (33.3%) patients. In stage 1 hypertensive individuals, the prevalence of WCH was 48.9%; in prehypertensive patients, the prevalence of MH was 20.6%. Conclusion: MH and WCH have a high prevalence rate in the adult population; however, in prehypertensive or stage 1 hypertensive patients, the prevalence is higher. Out-of-office BP measurements in these subgroups should be performed whenever possible to prevent misdiagnosis.

Resumo Fundamento: O diagnóstico de hipertensão arterial baseado nas medidas do consultório tem baixa acurácia. Objetivo: Avaliar a prevalência de hipertensão mascarada (HM) e do avental branco pela monitorização residencial da pressão arterial (MRPA) em pacientes pré-hipertensos e hipertensos estágio. Método: Estudo retrospectivo com amostra constituída de indivíduos com pressão arterial (PA) na clínica ≥ 120/80 mmHg e < 160/100 mmHg sem uso de medicação anti-hipertensiva e que realizaram exames na plataforma de MRPA por telemedicina (TeleMRPA) entre maio de 2017 e setembro de 2018. Foi utilizado o protocolo MRPA de quatro dias, com 24 medidas, com equipamentos automáticos, validados, calibrados e com memória. Resultados: A amostra foi constituída de 1.273 participantes, sendo 739 (58,1%) mulheres. A idade média foi 52,4 ± 14,9 anos, índice de massa corporal (IMC) médio 28,4 ± 5,1 kg/m2. A PA casual foi maior que a MRPA em 7,6 mmHg para pressão arterial sistólica (PAS) e 5,2 mmHg para a pressão arterial diastólica (PAD), ambas com significância estatística (p < 0,001). Foram diagnosticados 558 (43,8%) normotensos; 291 (22,9%) hipertensos sustentados; 145 (11,4%) com HM e 279 (21,9%) com hipertensão do avental branco (HAB), com erro diagnóstico pela PA casual na amostra total em 424 (33,3%) pacientes. Em hipertensos estágio 1, a prevalência de HAB foi de 48,9%; nos pré-hipertensos a prevalência de HM foi de 20,6%. Conclusão: HM e HAB têm elevada prevalência na população adulta; entretanto, na população de pré-hipertensos ou hipertensos estágio 1 a prevalência é maior. Medidas da PA fora do consultório, nestes subgrupos, devem ser realizadas sempre que possível para evitar erro diagnóstico.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

Data on the association of blood pressure (BP) phenotypes with office and out-of-office markers of vascular stiffness and pressure wave reflection are sparse. This study investigated office and 24-h measures of brachial BP, pulse wave velocity (PWV), and central augmentation index (AIx) across hypertension phenotypes among individuals not using BP-lowering medications [normotension (NT), white-coat hypertension (WH), masked hypertension (MH) and sustained hypertension (SH)] and those using BP-lowering medications [controlled hypertension (CH), white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH), masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) and sustained uncontrolled hypertension (SUCH)]. We evaluated 454 untreated (age = 45 ± 15 years, 50% males) and 238 treated (age = 52 ± 15 years, 45% males) individuals who underwent office and 24-h brachial BP, PWV, and AIx measures using a Mobil-O-Graph PWA monitor. In the analysis adjusted for age and sex, WH had higher (p < 0.05) office PWV (7.53 ± 0.09 vs 6.89 ± 0.05), office AIx (27.9 ± 1.3 vs 23.8 ± 0.8), and daytime AIx (24.6 ± 0.7 vs 22.7 ± 0.4) compared with those of NT, while WUCH had higher (p < 0.05) office PWV (8.28 ± 0.11 vs 7.43 ± 0.08) and 24-h PWV (7.54 ± 0.09 vs 7.21 ± 0.07) than those of CH. MH had higher (p < 0.05) 24-h PWV (7.00 ± 0.09 vs 6.69 ± 0.04) and 24-h AIx (24.3 ± 0.9 vs 21.9 ± 0.4) than those of NT, whereas MUCH had higher (p < 0.05) 24-h PWV (7.64 ± 0.13 vs 7.21 ± 0.07) than that of CH. Lastly, SH or SUCH had significantly higher office and 24-h PWV and AIx than those of NT and CH, respectively. In conclusion, these results suggest that individuals with masked BP phenotypes are more predisposed to have adverse out-of-office vascular characteristics, while individuals with white-coat phenotypes have adverse office and out-of-office vascular characteristics compared with those of individuals with normal BP levels.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The values used to define the presence of white-coat or masked blood pressure (BP) effects are arbitrary. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of several cutoff points based on the difference between office and home BP (ΔBP) values to detect white-coat uncontrolled (WUCH) and masked uncontrolled (MUCH) hypertension, which are phenotypes with adverse prognoses, in a large cohort of treated hypertensive patients. This multicenter cross-sectional study included 6,049 treated hypertensive patients (40% males, mean age 59.1 ± 14.4 years) who underwent office and home BP monitoring. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, area under curve (AUC), and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of several ΔBP cutoffs to detect WUCH and MUCH. The 15/9 mmHg cutoff, which reflects a 1.0 standard deviation of the ΔBP, showed the best AUC (0.783, 95% CI = 0.772-0.794) for the detection of WUCH, particularly in individuals with office grade 1 hypertension (AUC = 0.811, 95% CI = 0.793-0.829). The -1/-1 mmHg cutoff, which considers all individuals who had lower systolic or diastolic BP levels in the office than at home, had the highest AUC (0.822, 95% CI = 0.808-0.836) for the detection of MUCH. Both cutoff values also had the best performances for identifying all patients with higher and lower office-than-home BP grades. In conclusion, the 15/9 and -1/-1 mmHg cutoffs showed the best performance for the detection of treated hypertensive patients with WUCH and MUCH, respectively, and therefore might be markers of significant white-coat and masked effects and could be useful for identifying preferential targets for more routine home BP measures.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción. La hipertensión enmascarada (HE) en niños se define por registros de presión arterial normal en la consulta y elevados fuera de ella. El monitoreo ambulatorio de presión arterial de 24 horas (MAPA) permite su diagnóstico. Existe poca información sobre su prevalencia en nuestra población. Objetivo. Estimar la prevalencia de HE en niños con factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de hipertensión arterial. Material y método. Estudio prospectivo, observacional, corte transversal. Se incluyeron en forma consecutiva pacientes asistidos en el Hospital General de Niños P. de Elizalde entre 1/7/2015 y 1/12/2016, de 5 a 11 años, con presión arterial normal y, al menos, un factor de riesgo para hipertensión arterial. Se realizó MAPA durante 24 horas (SpaceLabs 90207/90217). Muestra estimada: 110 pacientes. Se contó con las aprobaciones pertinentes. Resultados. Se incluyeron 110 pacientes, edad de 8,7 ± 1,8 años, 60 mujeres. Tiempo de MAPA: 23,18 ± 1,8 horas. Tenían antecedentes neonatales 23 pacientes; todos tenían, al menos, un antecedente personal (los más frecuentes, ingesta aumentada de sal y obesidad); 101 tenían, al menos, un antecedente familiar. El MAPA permitió identificar a 10 pacientes con HE (9,1%; IC 95%: 5,1-15,9); 7 con hipertensión nocturna aislada (6,4%; IC 95%: 3,1-23,5) y 28, prehipertensión (25,4%; IC 95%: 18,2-34,3). Los 10 pacientes con HE fueron 7 varones, 9 obesos y con, al menos, un antecedente familiar. Conclusión. La prevalencia de HE en niños con factores de riesgo de desarrollar hipertensión arterial fue cercana al 10%.

Introduction. Masked hypertension (MH) in children is defined as normal office blood pressure values and high values outside the clinical setting. The 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is helpful for diagnosis. There is little information on MH prevalence in our population. Objective. To estimate the prevalence of MH in children with risk factors for arterial hypertension. Material and method. Prospective, observational, cross-sectional study. Patients seen at Hospital General de Niños "P. de Elizalde" between July 1st, 2015 and December 1st, 2016, aged 5-11 years, with normal blood pressure and at least one risk factor for arterial hypertension were included in consecutive order. A 24-hour ABPM was done (SpaceLabs 90207/90217). Estimated sample: 110 patients. All relevant authorizations were obtained. Results. One hundred and ten patients aged 8.7 ± 1.8 years were included; 60 were girls. ABPM duration: 23.18 ± 1.8 hours. Twenty-three patients had neonatal history; all had at least one factor corresponding to personal history (the most common ones were increased salt intake and obesity); 101 had at least one factor corresponding to family history. ABPM helped to identify 10 patients with MH (9.1%; 95% confidence interval --1;CI--3;: 5.1-15.9); 7 had isolated nocturnal hypertension (6.4%; 95% CI: 3.1-23.5) and 28 had prehypertension (25.4%; 95% CI: 18.234.3). Among the 10 patients with MH, 7 were boys, 9 were obese and had at least one factor corresponding to family history. Conclusion. The prevalence of MH in children with risk factors for arterial hypertension was close to 10%.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Masked hypertension (MH) in children is defined as normal office blood pressure values and high values outside the clinical setting. The 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is helpful for diagnosis. There is little information on MH prevalence in our population. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of MH in children with risk factors for arterial hypertension. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Prospective, observational, cross-sectional study. Patients seen at Hospital General de Niños "P. de Elizalde" between July 1st, 2015 and December 1st, 2016, aged 5-11 years, with normal blood pressure and at least one risk factor for arterial hypertension were included in consecutive order. A 24-hour ABPM was done (SpaceLabs 90207/90217). Estimated sample: 110 patients. All relevant authorizations were obtained. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients aged 8.7 ± 1.8 years were included; 60 were girls. ABPM duration: 23.18 ± 1.8 hours. Twenty-three patients had neonatal history; all had at least one factor corresponding to personal history (the most common ones were increased salt intake and obesity); 101 had at least one factor corresponding to family history. ABPM helped to identify 10 patients with MH (9.1%; 95% confidence interval |-1;CI|-3;: 5.1-15.9); 7 had isolated nocturnal hypertension (6.4%; 95% CI: 3.1-23.5) and 28 had prehypertension (25.4%; 95% CI: 18.234.3). Among the 10 patients with MH, 7 were boys, 9 were obese and had at least one factor corresponding to family history. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of MH in children with risk factors for arterial hypertension was close to 10%.

Introducción. La hipertensión enmascarada (HE) en niños se define por registros de presión arterial normal en la consulta y elevados fuera de ella. El monitoreo ambulatorio de presión arterial de 24 horas (MAPA) permite su diagnóstico. Existe poca información sobre su prevalencia en nuestra población. Objetivo. Estimar la prevalencia de HE en niños con factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de hipertensión arterial. Material y método. Estudio prospectivo, observacional, corte transversal. Se incluyeron en forma consecutiva pacientes asistidos en el Hospital General de Niños P. de Elizalde entre 1/7/2015 y 1/12/2016, de 5 a 11 años, con presión arterial normal y, al menos, un factor de riesgo para hipertensión arterial. Se realizó MAPA durante 24 horas (SpaceLabs 90207/90217). Muestra estimada: 110 pacientes. Se contó con las aprobaciones pertinentes. Resultados. Se incluyeron 110 pacientes, edad de 8,7 ± 1,8 años, 60 mujeres. Tiempo de MAPA: 23,18 ± 1,8 horas. Tenían antecedentes neonatales 23 pacientes; todos tenían, al menos, un antecedente personal (los más frecuentes, ingesta aumentada de sal y obesidad); 101 tenían, al menos, un antecedente familiar. El MAPA permitió identificar a 10 pacientes con HE (9,1%; IC 95%: 5,1-15,9); 7 con hipertensión nocturna aislada (6,4%; IC 95%: 3,1-23,5) y 28, prehipertensión (25,4%; IC 95%: 18,2-34,3). Los 10 pacientes con HE fueron 7 varones, 9 obesos y con, al menos, un antecedente familiar. Conclusión. La prevalencia de HE en niños con factores de riesgo de desarrollar hipertensión arterial fue cercana al 10%.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Population-based studies estimating prevalence's of white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension in non-European adolescents are needed, particularly in developing countries. Aiming to determine these estimates and, additionally identify factors associated to these conditions this study was conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study with a representative sample of secondary school students from a Brazilian state capital. Office measurements were performed with validated semi-automatic devices. Home BP (blood pressure) monitoring protocol included two day-time and two evening-time measurements over 6 days. Adolescents' were classified as: normotensives (office and home BP <95th percentile); sustained hypertensives (office and home BP ≥95th percentile); white-coat hypertensives (office BP ≥95th percentile and home BP <95th percentile) and masked hypertensives (office BP <95th percentile and home BP ≥95th percentile). Logistic regression models were built to identify if sex, age, BMI and family history of HTN were independently associated with white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension. RESULTS: In a sample of 1024 adolescents, prevalence of white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension was 7.5%, 2.2% and 1.7%, respectively. Male sex was positively associated with white-coat hypertension (OR 2.68; 95%CI 1.58-4.54; p < 0.001). BMI was positively associated with both white-coat (OR 1.23; 95%CI 1.16-1.30; p < 0.001) and sustained hypertension (OR 1.19; 95%CI 1.11-1.29; p < 0.001). None of the independent variables were associated with masked hypertension in this population. CONCLUSION: The estimated prevalence of white-coat hypertension, masked and sustained hypertension in a population of non-European adolescents assessed by home BP monitoring was 7.5%, 2.2% and 1.7% respectively. Male sex was positively associated with white-coat hypertension in these adolescents while BMI was positively associated with both white-coat and sustained hypertension.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction Epistaxis and hypertension are frequent conditions in the adult population. Masked hypertension is defined as a clinical condition in which a patient's office blood pressure level is <140/90 mmHg, but the ambulatory or home blood pressure readings are in the hypertensive range. Many studies have proved that hypertension is one of the most important causes of epistaxis. The prevalence of this condition in patients with epistaxis is not well defined. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of masked hypertension using the results of office blood pressure measurement compared with the results of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Methods Sixty patients with epistaxis and 60 control subjects were enrolled in the study. All patients with epistaxis and controls without history of hypertension underwent physical examination, including office blood pressure measurement, ambulatory or home blood pressure, and measurement of anthropometric parameters. Results Mean age was similar between the epistaxis group and the controls – 21–68 years (mean 42.9) for the epistaxis group and 18–71 years (mean 42.2) for the control group. A total of 20 patients (33.3%) in the epistaxis group and 7 patients (11.7%) in the control group (p = 0.004) had masked hypertension. Night-time systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in patients with epistaxis than in the control group (p < 0.005). However, no significant difference was found in daytime systolic blood pressure between the control group and the patients with epistaxis (p = 0.517). Conclusion This study demonstrates increased masked hypertension prevalence in patients with epistaxis. We suggest that all patients with epistaxis should undergo ambulatory or home blood pressure to detect masked hypertension, which could be a possible cause of epistaxis.

Resumo Introdução Epistaxe e hipertensão são condições frequentes na população adulta. Hipertensão mascarada é definida como uma condição clínica em que o nível da pressão arterial do paciente no consultório é < 140/90 mm Hg, mas as leituras da pressão arterial ambulatorial ou em casa se encontram na faixa hipertensiva. Muitos estudos demonstraram que a hipertensão é uma das causas mais importantes de epistaxe. Ainda não está devidamente definida a prevalência dessa condição em pacientes com epistaxe. Objetivo Avaliar a prevalência de HM com o uso dos resultados de mensurações da pressão arterial no consultório, em comparação com os resultados da MAPA. Método Foram recrutados 60 pacientes com epistaxe e 60 indivíduos para controle. Todos os pacientes com epistaxe e os controles sem histórico de hipertensão passaram por exame físico, inclusive determinação da pressão arterial no consultório, MAPA e mensuração dos parâmetros antropométricos. Resultados A média de idade foi similar entre o grupo com epistaxe e os controles: de 21 a 68 (média 42,9) anos para o grupo com epistaxe e de 18 a 71 (média 42,2) anos para o grupo controle. No total, 20 pacientes (33,3%) no grupo com epistaxe e sete (11,7%) no grupo controle (p = 0,004) apresentaram hipertensão mascarada. A pressão arterial sistólica noturna foi significantemente mais alta em pacientes com epistaxe, em comparação com o grupo controle (p < 0,005). No entanto, não foi observada diferença significante na pressão arterial sistólica obtida durante o dia entre o grupo controle e os pacientes com epistaxe (p = 0,517). Conclusão O presente estudo demonstra maior prevalência de hipertensão mascarada em pacientes com epistaxe. Sugerimos que todos os pacientes com epistaxe devam ser submetidos à monitoração da pressão arterial caseira ou em consultório com o objetivo de detectar hipertensão mascarada, que pode ser uma causa possível de epistaxe.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Epistaxis and hypertension are frequent conditions in the adult population. Masked hypertension is defined as a clinical condition in which a patient's office blood pressure level is <140/90mmHg, but the ambulatory or home blood pressure readings are in the hypertensive range. Many studies have proved that hypertension is one of the most important causes of epistaxis. The prevalence of this condition in patients with epistaxis is not well defined. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of masked hypertension using the results of office blood pressure measurement compared with the results of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. METHODS: Sixty patients with epistaxis and 60 control subjects were enrolled in the study. All patients with epistaxis and controls without history of hypertension underwent physical examination, including office blood pressure measurement, ambulatory or home blood pressure, and measurement of anthropometric parameters. RESULTS: Mean age was similar between the epistaxis group and the controls - 21-68 years (mean 42.9) for the epistaxis group and 18-71 years (mean 42.2) for the control group. A total of 20 patients (33.3%) in the epistaxis group and 7 patients (11.7%) in the control group (p=0.004) had masked hypertension. Night-time systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in patients with epistaxis than in the control group (p<0.005). However, no significant difference was found in daytime systolic blood pressure between the control group and the patients with epistaxis (p=0.517). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates increased masked hypertension prevalence in patients with epistaxis. We suggest that all patients with epistaxis should undergo ambulatory or home blood pressure to detect masked hypertension, which could be a possible cause of epistaxis.

Assuntos