RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate hip and knee muscular function, knee patient-reported outcome measures and hop performance in patients with a clinical indication for combined ACL+ALL reconstruction surgery compared to patients with an isolated ACL reconstruction surgery indication (preoperative phase) and to a control group. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: The sample was composed of male individuals, aged between 18 and 59 years, divided into three groups (ACL, ACL+ALL and Control). Isokinetic dynamometry was performed for the flexor and extensor knee muscles and for the hip abductors and adductors. SLHT, COHT and the Lysholm score were performed. Pain, swelling, and thigh trophism were also measured. RESULTS: The study participants were 89 male individuals: 63 in the injury group and 26 in the control group. After applying the criteria for an ALL reconstruction indication, 33 patients were assigned to the ACL Group and 30 patients to the ACL+ALL Group. Regarding knee and hip muscle function, both groups presented worse results when compared to the control group, however, did not show significant differences compared to each other. Regarding the functional variables, the ACL+ALL group showed a significantly shorter distance achieved in the Crossover Hop Test than the other groups, as well as more pain during the tests. CONCLUSION: Knee and hip muscular functions are impaired after an ACL injury and do not seem to be influenced or worsened in individuals with greater rotational instability with clinical indications for combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate and the anterolateral ligaments of the knee.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Objective To evaluate hip and knee muscular function, knee patient-reported outcome measures and hop performance in patients with a clinical indication for combined ACL+ALL reconstruction surgery compared to patients with an isolated ACL reconstruction surgery indication (preoperative phase) and to a control group. Design Cross-sectional study. Methods The sample was composed of male individuals, aged between 18 and 59 years, divided into three groups (ACL, ACL+ALL and Control). Isokinetic dynamometry was performed for the flexor and extensor knee muscles and for the hip abductors and adductors. SLHT, COHT and the Lysholm score were performed. Pain, swelling, and thigh trophism were also measured. Results The study participants were 89 male individuals: 63 in the injury group and 26 in the control group. After applying the criteria for an ALL reconstruction indication, 33 patients were assigned to the ACL Group and 30 patients to the ACL+ALL Group. Regarding knee and hip muscle function, both groups presented worse results when compared to the control group, however, did not show significant differences compared to each other. Regarding the functional variables, the ACL+ALL group showed a significantly shorter distance achieved in the Crossover Hop Test than the other groups, as well as more pain during the tests. Conclusion Knee and hip muscular functions are impaired after an ACL injury and do not seem to be influenced or worsened in individuals with greater rotational instability with clinical indications for combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate and the anterolateral ligaments of the knee.

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the clinical and functional outcomes of two different graft fixation methods, all-inside and anteromedial (AM), for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction techniques. Methods: Comparing the mid-term results of two groups, the prospectively recorded data of patients diagnosed with isolated ACL rupture between 2015 and 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Two groups of patients who underwent unilateral isolated ACL reconstruction via two different tibial fixation techniques (19 patients with all-inside [Group 1]; 20 patients with AM portal [Group 2]) from the same institution were enrolled as the study group. The patients were called for the final follow-up and evaluated for symptoms, knee stability (Lachman test, pivot shift test, and KT-1000 arthrometer analysis), and functional scores (Tegner and Lysholm knee scoring scale, International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] subjective knee score, and visual analog scale [VAS]). Results: The mean age and follow-up period were statistically equal between the two groups. The functional comparison of patients with Tegner and Lysholm knee and IKDC scores, showed no statistical difference at the mid-term follow-up period. In the clinical assessment of the operated knees, based on the Lachman test and KT-1000 arthrometer, the anterior translation results in group 1 were better than those in group 2, which was statistically significant. However, we obtained similar pivot shift test results in both groups. Conclusion: The study showed that ACL reconstruction via the all-inside had functionally better anterior translation and similar rotational stability results compared with the AM portal technique. Level of Evidence III, Case Control Study.

RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar desfechos clínicos e funcionais de dois métodos de fixação do enxerto, all-inside e anteromedial (AM), em técnicas de reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA). Métodos: Comparação dos resultados de médio prazo de dois grupos, os dados obtidos prospectivamente de pacientes diagnosticados com ruptura isolada do LCA entre 2015 e 2016 foram retrospectivamente analisados. Doisgrupos de pacientes submetidosà reconstrução unilateral isolada do LCA por duas diferentes técnicas de fixação tibial (19 pacientes por all-inside [Grupo 1]; 20 pacientes por portal AM [Grupo 2]) da mesma instituição foram registrados como grupo de estudo. Os pacientes foram convocados para o último acompanhamento e avaliados sobre sintomas, estabilidade do joelho (teste de Lachman, teste de pivot-shift, e análise com artrômetro KT-1000), e escores funcionais (escore de Tegner e Lysholm para joelho, escala subjetiva de joelho do International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), e escala visual analógica [EVA]). Resultados: A idade média e período de acompanhamento foram estatisticamente iguais entre osdoisgrupos. A comparação funcional de pacientespelosescore de Tegner and Lysholm para joelho e do IKDC, não revelou diferenças estatísticas no acompanhamento de médio prazo. Na avaliação clínica dos joelhos operados, baseada no teste de Lachman e no artrômetro KT-1000, os resultados de translação anterior no grupo 1 foram melhores do que os do grupo 2, o que foi estatisticamente significante. Entretanto, obtivemos resultados similares do teste de pivot-shift em ambos os grupos. Conclusão: O estudo mostro que a reconstrução do LCA pela técnica all-inside apresentou melhor translação anterior functional e resultados de estabilidade rotacional similares aos da técnica do portal AM. Nível de Evidência III, Estudo de Caso Controle.

RESUMO

Abstract Objective The aim of the present study was to investigate the difference between clinician-completed and patient-completed outcome scores in detecting improvement following arthroscopic meniscectomy in patients with meniscal tears of the knee. Methods Thirty-four patients with meniscal tears were prospectively assessed using 9 clinical outcome measures. The five clinician-completed knee scores included the Tegner Activity Score, the Lysholm Knee Score, the Cincinnati Knee Score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Examination Knee Score, and the Tapper and Hoover Meniscal Grading Score. The four patient-completed knee scores included the IKDC Subjective Knee Score, the Knee Outcome Survey - Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS), the Short Form-12 Item Health Survey (SF-12), and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Twenty-nine of the 34 patients underwent an arthroscopic meniscectomy and were reassessed with all 9 outcome scores upon their follow-up review. Results A significant longitudinal improvement was observed in 4 of the 5 clinician-completed scores (Tegner [p< 0.001], Lysholm [p= 0.004], Cincinnati [p = 0.002] and Tapper and Hoover [p< 0.001], but not in the IKDC Examination [p= 0.332]. However, the IKDC Subjective score (p= 0.021) was the only patient-completed score to demonstrate significant improvement postoperatively. Conclusion Overall, clinician-completed scoring systems were found to be inconsistent with those of patient-completed instruments. The mode of administering outcome measures can have a significant influence on the outcome results both for research and for clinical practice. A combination of both a clinician-completed with a patient-completed instrument may be a more balanced approach to assessing and quantifying meniscus tears and the outcome following arthroscopic meniscectomy.

Resumo Objetivo O objetivo do presente estudo foi investigar a diferença entre instrumentos de desfechos preenchidos por médicos e pacientes na detecção de melhora após a meniscectomia artroscópica para tratamento de rupturas de menisco. Métodos Trinta e quatro pacientes com rupturas de menisco foram avaliados de forma prospectiva usando 9 medidas de desfechos clínicos. Os cinco instrumentos de avaliação de joelho respondidos por médicos foram o Escore de Atividade de Tegner, o Escore de Joelho de Lysholm, o Escore de Joelho de Cincinnati, o Escore de Exame do Joelho do International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC, na sigla em inglês) e o Escore de Classificação do Menisco de Tapper e Hoover. Os quatro instrumentos de avaliação do joelho respondidos por pacientes foram o Escore Subjetivo do Joelho do IKDC, a Pesquisa de Desfecho de Joelho - Escala de Atividades de Vida Diária (KOS-ADLS, na sigla em inglês), o Formulário Curto de Pesquisa em Saúde de 12 Itens (SF-12, na sigla em inglês) e o Escore de Desfecho de Osteoartrite e Lesões no Joelho (KOOS, na sigla em inglês). Vinte e nove dos 34 pacientes foram submetidos a uma meniscectomia artroscópica e reavaliados com todos os 9 instrumentos na sua consulta de acompanhamento. Resultados Uma melhora longitudinal significativa foi observada em 4 dos 5 instrumentos respondidos por médicos (Tegner [p< 0,001], Lysholm [p= 0,004], Cincinnati [p= 0,002] e Tapper e Hoover [p< 0,001], mas não no IKDC [p= 0,332]). Por outro lado, o Escore Subjetivo do Joelho do IKDC (p= 0,021) foi o único instrumento respondido por pacientes a demonstrar melhora pós-operatória significativa. Conclusão De modo geral, os instrumentos respondidos por médicos foram considerados inconsistentes em relação àqueles respondidos por pacientes. O modo de administração dos instrumentos pode ter influência significativa nos resultados, tanto para fins de pesquisa quanto para a prática clínica. A combinação de um instrumento respondido pelo médico com um instrumento respondido pelo paciente pode ser uma abordagem mais equilibrada para a avaliação e a quantificação das rupturas do menisco e do desfecho após a meniscectomia artroscópica.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción La escala de Lysholm fue desarrollada en 1982 y modificada en 1985 con el fin de evaluar la funcionalidad de los pacientes con lesiones ligamentarias; desde entonces ha sido ampliamente utilizada para evaluar subjetivamente a los pacientes en relación con su capacidad funcional. El propósito de este estudio fue realizar su traducción y adaptación transcultural al español colombiano y desarrollar la validación psicométrica a través de la evaluación de la consistencia interna y fiabilidad test-retest. Materiales y métodos Previa identificación de la escala original de interés, se realizó traducción (inglés-español), adaptación cultural y re-traducción (español-inglés) por expertos lingüistas nativos, quienes valoraron la similitud del contenido de ambos productos (original y retraducido). Asimismo, dicha última versión fue valorada por 40 pacientes con enfermedad de rodilla (lesión meniscal, ruptura de ligamento cruzado anterior, condromalacia y gonartrosis), quienes confirmaron comprender el texto. Posteriormente fue evaluada la consistencia interna mediante la prueba de alfa de Cronbach para todos los ítems, y el coeficiente correlación intraclase­puntaje total del sub-constructo a través de una muestra aleatoria (n=93), la cual validó la estructura factorial de la escala. Resultados El alfa de Cronbach fue de 0,737 y el coeficiente de correlación interclase fue de 0,844, asociado a una concordancia inter-observador alta (Gamma=0,752). El gráfico de Bland-Altman no demostró diferencias sistemáticas entre las mediciones Discusión La presente versión al español (colombiano) de la escala Lysholm es una herramienta válida para medir la funcionalidad en pacientes con lesiones meniscales del ligamento cruzado anterior, condromalacia patelofemoral y gonartrosis en países de habla hispana (preferentemente en Colombia).

Background The Lysholm scale was developed in 1982 and modified in 1985 in order to assess the functionality of patients with knee ligament injuries; since then it has been widely used to subjectively evaluate patients in relation to their functional capacity. The purpose of the study was to carry out its translation and cross-cultural adaptation to Colombian Spanish and to develop psychometric validation through the evaluation of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Methods After identifying the original scale of interest, translation (English-Spanish), cultural adaptation and re-translation (Spanish-English) were carried out by native linguist experts, who assessed the similarity of the content of both products (original and retranslated). Likewise, this latest version was evaluated by 40 patients with knee disease (meniscal injury, anterior cruciate ligament rupture, chondromalacia and gonarthrosis), who confirmed that they understood the text. Subsequently, the internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha test for all items, and the intraclass correlation coefficient ­ ??total score of the sub-construct through a random sample (n=93), which validated the factorial structure of the scale. Results Cronbach's alpha was 0.737 and the interclass correlation coefficient was 0.844, associated with a high inter-observer agreement (Gamma=0.752). The Bland-Altman plot did not show systematic differences between the measurements Discussion This Spanish (Colombian) version of the Lysholm scale is a valid tool to measure functionality in patients with meniscal lesions of the anterior cruciate ligament, patellofemoral chondromalacia and gonarthrosis in Spanish-speaking countries (preferably in Colombia).

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical, functional, and quality of life outcomes between patients with tibial plateau fractures operated with locked or conventional plates, and to compare the costs of these implants. METHODS: This was a comparative cross-sectional study of a consecutive series of patients with tibial plateau fractures treated surgically from August 2015 to June 2016. Patients < 18 years old, those unable to answer the questionnaires or to attend the outpatient reassessment, polytrauma patients, those with associated injuries on the ipsilateral limb, and patients who had not undergone treatment with bone plates were excluded. The present study compared the costs of the implants for the hospital, quality of life (with the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-12]), Lysholm score, pain scale, and clinical and radiological parameters. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients with tibial plateau fractures were admitted, and 11 cases were excluded. Two cases were lost to follow-up; therefore, 32 remained for the analysis (94%). The mean follow-up time was of 15.1 months (standard deviation [SD] = 4.8 months). In group A (locked plates), there were 22 patients (69%), at an average hospital cost of BRL 4,125.39/patient (SD = 1,634.79/patient) for the implants. In group B (conventional plates) there were 10 patients (31%), at an average cost of BRL 438.53 (SD = 161.8/patient) ( p < 0.00001). For the other parameters, no differences were observed, except for a greater articular depression in group A (2.7 mm ± 3.3 mm versus 0.5 mm ± 1.6 mm; p = 0.02; TE = 0.90). CONCLUSION: The costs of locked implants for the treatment of tibial plateau fractures are significantly higher than those of conventional implants, without any clinical, quality of life, radiological, or functional advantages of the locked implants demonstrated in the present series.

RESUMO

Abstract Objective To compare clinical, functional, and quality of life outcomes between patients with tibial plateau fractures operated with locked or conventional plates, and to compare the costs of these implants. Methods This was a comparative cross-sectional study of a consecutive series of patients with tibial plateau fractures treated surgically from August 2015 to June 2016. Patients < 18 years old, those unable to answer the questionnaires or to attend the outpatient reassessment, polytrauma patients, those with associated injuries on the ipsilateral limb, and patients who had not undergone treatment with bone plates were excluded. The present study compared the costs of the implants for the hospital, quality of life (with the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-12]), Lysholm score, pain scale, and clinical and radiological parameters. Results A total of 45 patients with tibial plateau fractures were admitted, and 11 cases were excluded. Two cases were lost to follow-up; therefore, 32 remained for the analysis (94%). The mean follow-up time was of 15.1 months (standard deviation [SD] = 4.8 months). In group A (locked plates), there were 22 patients (69%), at an average hospital cost of BRL 4,125.39/patient (SD = 1,634.79/patient) for the implants. In group B (conventional plates) there were 10 patients (31%), at an average cost of BRL 438.53 (SD = 161.8/patient) (p < 0.00001). For the other parameters, no differences were observed, except for a greater articular depression in group A (2.7 mm ± 3.3 mm versus 0.5 mm ± 1.6 mm; p = 0.02; TE = 0.90). Conclusion The costs of locked implants for the treatment of tibial plateau fractures are significantly higher than those of conventional implants, without any clinical, quality of life, radiological, or functional advantages of the locked implants demonstrated in the present series.

Resumo Objetivos Comparar resultados clínicos, funcionais e de qualidade de vida de pacientes com fratura do planalto tibial operados com placa bloqueada ou convencional e comparar os custos hospitalares dos implantes. Métodos Estudo comparativo de coortes transversal, retrospectivo, em uma série consecutiva de pacientes com fratura do planalto tibial tratados cirurgicamente entre agosto de 2015 e junho de 2016. Foram excluídos: menores de 18 anos; indivíduos incapazes de responder os questionários ou de comparecer para reavaliação; politraumatizados ou comlesões associadas no mesmomembro; pacientes não tratados complaca ou conservadoramente. Os autores compararam os custos dos implantes, a qualidade de vida (SF-12), o escore de Lysholm, a escala visual de dor e os parâmetros clínicos e radiográficos. Resultados Foramobservadas 45 fraturas no período, das quais 11 foramexcluídas. Dos 34 pacientes, dois não compareceram à entrevista (seguimento de 94%). O tempo de seguimento foi 15,1 ± 4,8 meses.Ogrupo A (placa bloqueada) incluiu 22 pacientes (69%), comcusto hospitalarmédio dos implantes de R$ 4.125,39 (dp = R$1.634,79/paciente). O grupo B (placa convencional) incluiu dez pacientes (31%), a um custo médio de R$ 438,53 (dp = R$ 161,8/paciente; p < 0,00001). Para os demais parâmetros avaliados, não foram observadas diferenças significativas entre os grupos, exceto por ummaior degrau articular no grupo A (2,7 mm ± 3,3 mm vs. 0,5 mm ± 1,6 mm; p = 0,02; TE = 0,90). Conclusão O custo dos implantes bloqueados para o tratamento das fraturas do planalto tibial é significativamente superior aos implantes convencionais, embora não tenham apresentado vantagem clínica, radiográfica, funcional ou de qualidade de vida, nos pacientes dessa amostra.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the microfracture intervention with tibial valgus osteotomy associated in the treatment of varus gonarthrosis. Methods: From November 2005 to May 2013, 129 patients with medial gonarthrosis, varus deformity (8°-12°), and range of movement greater than 90° were evaluated. Patients with advanced gonarthrosis (Alhbäck 3, 4, and 5), Outerbridge lesion inferior to IV, previous knee surgery, body mass index greater than 35 kg/m2, and/or cruciate ligament injuries were not included. All patients were treated with videoarthroscopy followed by tibial valgus osteotomy. In the group osteotomy associated with microfracture (n = 56, mean age = 39.3), tibial valgus osteotomy and microfracture techniques to address chondral defects were used. In the isolated osteotomy group (n = 73, mean age = 41.4), only this procedure was performed. Post-surgical follow-up was 24 months, with four evaluations in the first 6 months, proceeding to biannual twice-a-year evaluation in the subsequent period. The Lysholm scale was used for functional monitoring. Results: There was a significant improvement in the pain, limping, and squatting domains of the Lysholm scale but only in the isolated osteotomy group. A greater variance of results was observed in the osteotomy group associated to microfracture, in addition to an increased risk of functional deterioration (OR = 8.64). Conclusion: The association of microfractures and tibial valgus osteotomy was correlated to lower functional outcomes than tibial valgus osteotomy alone, and may be related to the risk of worsening in the first two postoperative years.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a intervenção de microfratura associada a osteotomia tibial valgizante no tratamento de gonartrose medial com geno varo. Métodos: Entre novembro de 2005 e maio de 2013, foram avaliados 129 pacientes portadores de gonartrose medial, geno varo entre 8° e 12° e arco de movimento superior a 90°. Não foram incluídos pacientes com gonartrose avançada (Alhbäck 3, 4 e 5), lesão Outerbridge inferior a IV, cirurgia prévia na articulação, índice de massa corpórea superior a 35 kg/m2 e/ou lesão de ligamentos cruzados. Todos os pacientes foram submetidos a videoartroscopia do joelho seguida de osteotomia tibial valgizante. No grupo osteotomia tibial valgizante associado a microfratura (n = 56, média de idade = 39,3) foram associadas as técnicas de osteotomia tibial valgizante e microfratura nos defeitos condrais. No grupo osteotomia tibial valgizante isolada (n = 73, média de idade = 41,4), apenas esse procedimento foi feito. O acompanhamento pós-cirúrgico foi de 24 meses, com quatro avaliações ambulatoriais nos primeiros seis meses, passou-se a avaliações semestrais no período subsequente. A escala de Lysholm foi usada no acompanhamento funcional. Resultados: Uma melhoria significativa nos domínios dor, claudicação e agachamento da escala de Lysholm foi observada apenas no grupo osteotomia tibial valgizante isolada. Maior variância de resultados foi observada no grupo osteotomia tibial valgizante associada a microfratura e uma razão de chances de pioria de 8,64. Conclusão: A associação das microfraturas e osteotomia tibial valgizante tem resultado funcional inferior à osteotomia tibial valgizante isolada, pode ainda estar relacionada ao risco de pioria nos primeiros dois anos de pós-operatório.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the microfracture intervention with tibial valgus osteotomy associated in the treatment of varus gonarthrosis. METHODS: From November 2005 to May 2013, 129 patients with medial gonarthrosis, varus deformity (8°-12°), and range of movement greater than 90° were evaluated. Patients with advanced gonarthrosis (Alhbäck 3, 4, and 5), Outerbridge lesion inferior to IV, previous knee surgery, body mass index greater than 35 kg/m2, and/or cruciate ligament injuries were not included. All patients were treated with videoarthroscopy followed by tibial valgus osteotomy. In the group osteotomy associated with microfracture (n = 56, mean age = 39.3), tibial valgus osteotomy and microfracture techniques to address chondral defects were used. In the isolated osteotomy group (n = 73, mean age = 41.4), only this procedure was performed. Post-surgical follow-up was 24 months, with four evaluations in the first 6 months, proceeding to biannual twice-a-year evaluation in the subsequent period. The Lysholm scale was used for functional monitoring. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in the pain, limping, and squatting domains of the Lysholm scale but only in the isolated osteotomy group. A greater variance of results was observed in the osteotomy group associated to microfracture, in addition to an increased risk of functional deterioration (OR = 8.64). CONCLUSION: The association of microfractures and tibial valgus osteotomy was correlated to lower functional outcomes than tibial valgus osteotomy alone, and may be related to the risk of worsening in the first two postoperative years.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a intervenção de microfratura associada a osteotomia tibial valgizante no tratamento de gonartrose medial com geno varo. MÉTODOS: Entre novembro de 2005 e maio de 2013, foram avaliados 129 pacientes portadores de gonartrose medial, geno varo entre 8° e 12° e arco de movimento superior a 90°. Não foram incluídos pacientes com gonartrose avançada (Alhbäck 3, 4 e 5), lesão Outerbridge inferior a IV, cirurgia prévia na articulação, índice de massa corpórea superior a 35 kg/m2 e/ou lesão de ligamentos cruzados. Todos os pacientes foram submetidos a videoartroscopia do joelho seguida de osteotomia tibial valgizante. No grupo osteotomia tibial valgizante associado a microfratura (n = 56, média de idade = 39,3) foram associadas as técnicas de osteotomia tibial valgizante e microfratura nos defeitos condrais. No grupo osteotomia tibial valgizante isolada (n = 73, média de idade = 41,4), apenas esse procedimento foi feito. O acompanhamento pós-cirúrgico foi de 24 meses, com quatro avaliações ambulatoriais nos primeiros seis meses, passou-se a avaliações semestrais no período subsequente. A escala de Lysholm foi usada no acompanhamento funcional. RESULTADOS: Uma melhoria significativa nos domínios dor, claudicação e agachamento da escala de Lysholm foi observada apenas no grupo osteotomia tibial valgizante isolada. Maior variância de resultados foi observada no grupo osteotomia tibial valgizante associada a microfratura e uma razão de chances de pioria de 8,64. CONCLUSÃO: A associação das microfraturas e osteotomia tibial valgizante tem resultado funcional inferior à osteotomia tibial valgizante isolada, pode ainda estar relacionada ao risco de pioria nos primeiros dois anos de pós-operatório.