RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests for diagnosing Echinococcus granulosus in dog feces among national reference laboratories in Argentina, Chile, Peru, and Uruguay. METHODS: National laboratories affiliated with the Ministry of Health/Agriculture of each country exchanged panels of 10 positive/negative samples obtained from their regular national surveillance programs in November 2015 - November 2016. All laboratories applied PCR; two also applied ELISA techniques. Sensitivity and specificity were determined for each laboratory and concordance of results among the laboratories was evaluated by Cohen Kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Poor concordance (3 of 10 paired comparisons had values of Kappa > 0.4), low sensitivity and specificity across all laboratories, and poor performance of both techniques in detecting E. granulosus in canine feces was demonstrated in this study. An ex-post comparison of the laboratories' test protocols showed substantial heterogeneity that could partially explain poor concordance of results. CONCLUSION: The results underscore the heterogeneity of canine echinococcosis diagnosis across the region and indicate possible sources of variability. Efforts to standardize canine echinococcosis testing must be included in the plan of action for the Regional Initiative for the Control of Cystic Echinococcosis. Future comparisons with fecal samples of known parasite load are needed.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work is to design a selection algorithm for total allowable error (TEa) source using a graphic tool that, by integrating internal (IQC) and external (EQC) quality control performances, enables the laboratory to evaluate which TEa source better fits the test analytical performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two analytical performance indicators (bias and Sigma metrics) were estimated for 23 biochemistry tests during 2016. Bias was estimated on the EQC, and Sigma metrics was calculated through the results obtained in the IQC. The Sigma metrics was charted as a function of the bias (TEa%). Following the proposed algorithm (considering the hierarchy in the Milan 2014 consensus), the TEa was evaluated depending on two areas. One area in the chart was defined as the objective area in which the used TEa is the appropriate one for the analytical performance of the test under evaluation. For any test located outside this area, a performance re-evaluation was required using another source of TEa. RESULTS: In 19 out of 23 evaluated tests, the resulting analytical performance allowed for the selection of biologic variability as TEa source. In the four remaining cases, TEa sources of lesser hierarchy were selected. CONCLUSION: The graphic tool designed together with the proposed algorithm enabled the laboratory to standardize the selection procedure of the most appropriate TEa for the test analytical performance.
Assuntos
Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Gestão da Qualidade Total/métodos , HumanosRESUMO
Desde la aparición de las primeras pruebas de laboratorio que diagnosticaban la infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana, hace más de treinta años, el avance tecnológico ha permitido contar con una diversidad de pruebas cada vez más sensibles y específicas, cuya adecuada interpretación en la práctica médica diaria es indispensable para el manejo terapéutico de los pacientes. El objetivo de esta revisión es difundir la apropiada comprensión interrelación de los resultados de aquellas pruebas de uso común actualmente
Since the advent of the first laboratory tests for diagnosing the human immunodeficiency virus infection more than thirty years ago, technological advances have allowed us to have more sensitive and specific tests, and their adequate interpretation in clinical practice is indispensable for proper management of patients. The purpose of this review is to describe the adequate understanding and relationships of the results of all commonly used tests
RESUMO
Objetivo. Evaluar la capacidad de 17 laboratorios nacionales de referencia que participan en el Programa Latinoamericano de Control de Calidad en Bacteriología y Resistencia a los Antimicrobianos (LA-EQAS) para detectar mecanismos de resistencia emergentes, a saber: resistencia de enterobacterias a carbapenemes por presencia de Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemasa (KPC); resistencia de enterobacterias a carbapenemes por presencia de metalobetalactamasas (MBL) tipo IMP, y resistencia intermedia a vancomicina de aislamientos de Staphylococcus aureus (VISA). Métodos. Se enviaron los siguientes tres aislamientos a los 17 laboratorios participantes del LA-EQAS: Klebsiella pneumoniae OPS-161 productor de KPC, Enterobacter cloacae OPS-166 productor de IMP y S. aureus OPS-165 con resistencia intermedia a vancomicina. Se evaluó la interpretación de las pruebas de sensibilidad y detección del mecanismo de resistencia y el tamaño de los halos de inhibición (método de difusión por discos) o valor de la concentración inhibitoria mínima (CIM). Resultados. La concordancia en la detección de los mecanismos de resistencia fue de 76,4%, 73,3% y 66,7% con respecto a la cepas K. pneumoniae OPS-161, E. cloacae OPS-166 y S. aureus OPS-165, respectivamente. La concordancia entre las zonas de inhibición obtenidas por los laboratorios participantes y los rangos establecidos por el laboratorio coordinador fue aceptable en los tres aislamientos, ya que alcanzó 90,8%, 92,8% y 88,9%, respectivamente, para cada cepa. Conclusiones. La concordancia global en la detección de los mecanismos de resistencia KPC, MBL y VISA fue de 72,1%. Consideramos que los laboratorios nacionales de referencia de América Latina son capaces de reconocer estos mecanismos de resistencia emergentes y se espera que en el futuro la concordancia alcance su nivel máximo.
Objective. To evaluate the capability of 17 national reference laboratories participating in the Latin American Quality Control Program in Bacteriology and Antibiotic Resistance (LA-EQAS) to detect emerging resistance mechanisms namely: resistance of enterobacteria to carbapenems due to the presence of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) type IMP, and intermediate resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolates to vancomycin (vancomycinintermediate resistant S. aureusVISA). Methods. The following three isolates were sent to the 17 participating LA-EQAS laboratories: KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae PAHO-161, IMP-producing Enterobacter cloacae PAHO-166, and S. aureus PAHO-165 with intermediate resistance to vancomycin. Performance of each of the following operations was evaluated: interpretation of sensitivity tests, detection of the resistance mechanism, and assessment of either inhibition halo size (disk diffusion method) or minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Results. Concordance in the detection of resistance mechanisms was 76.4%, 73.3%, and 66.7% for the K. pneumoniae PAHO-161, E. cloacae PAHO-166, and S. aureus PAHO- 165 strains, respectively. Concordance between the inhibition areas observed by the participating laboratories and the ranges established by the coordinating laboratory was acceptable for all three isolates, at 90.8%, 92.8%, and 88.9%, respectively. Conclusions. Overall concordance in on the detection of KPC, MBL, and VISA resistance mechanisms was 72.1%. We consider the national reference laboratories in Latin America capable of recognizing these emerging resistance mechanisms and expect that maximum levels of concordance will be reached in the future.