RESUMO

Background: The ligation of intersphincteric fistula fract (LIFT) technique avoids postoperative anal continence disturbances and preserves quality of life. Methods: A total of 70 patients with anal fistula (AF) were treated in the Day Surgery Unit. The LIFT technique was the primary treatment in 63 patients. The other had previously undergone placement of a loose seton (two-step approach). The mean follow-up was 66.8 months. Statistical analysis was performed using contingency tables, the chi-square test, and the Student T-test. Results: The use of LIFT was successful in 40 patients (57.1%). However, 6 patients (8.6%) presented persistence of postoperative intersphincteric fistula, being successfully treated by fistulotomy. There were no differences in this technique's success rate between high and low AF (p = 0.45). The success rate of one-step LIFT, however, was significantly higher (p = 0.03). No disturbances of continence were observed. Conclusions: The LIFT technique has a role in the treatment of AF, is suitable for ambulatory surgery, and has a low complications rate. A two-step approach is not always needed. (AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background: Fistula-in-ano is one of the most common clinical condition encountered in a surgical outpatient department. Many treatment modalities have been described with variable outcomes but gold standard surgical treatment is yet to be agreed upon. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the treatment outcomes of ligature of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) technique in the treatment of simple and complex fistula-in-ano with the primary objective of recurrence rate and broad objective of other postoperative complications during the period of study and after long-term follow-up. Methods: It is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from the patients who havebeen operated for fistula-in-ano using the LIFT technique at our institute from February 2018 to March 2020 and followed-up until September 2020. Results: A total of 56 patients with fistula-in-ano were treated with the LIFT procedure during the study period, of which 20 patients had simple fistula and 36 had complex fistula. A success rate of 83% was obtained with completely healed fistulas in 46 patients. No patient developed postoperative incontinence. Conclusion: Ligature of intersphincteric fistula tract is an effective treatmentmodality for fistula-in-ano with less procedure-related morbidity, but it is associated with a higher recurrence rate in simple fistula than in complex fistula. (AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background: There is still controversy over the usefulness of seton placement prior to the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) surgery in the management of anal fistula. Objective: To evaluate the impact of preoperative seton placement on the outcomes of LIFT surgery for the management of fistula-in-ano. Design: systematic review and meta-analysis. Data Sources: A search was performed on the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar databases. Study Selection: Original studies without language restriction reporting the primary healing rates with and without seton placement as a bridge to definitive LIFT surgery were included. Intervention: The intervention assessed was the LIFT with and without prior seton placement. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome was defined as the primary healing rate with and without the use of seton as a bridge to definitive LIFT surgery. Results: Ten studiesmet the criteria for systematic review, all retrospective,with a pooled study population of 772 patients. There were no significant differences in the percentages of recurrence between patients with and without seton placement (odds ratio [OR] 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.43: p=0.35). The I2 value was 9%, which shows the homogeneity of the results among the analyzed studies. The 10 included studies demonstrated a weighted average overall recurrence of 38% (interquartile range [IQR] 27-42.7%), recurrence with the use of setonwas 40%(IQR26.6-51.2%), and without its use, the recurrence rate was 51.3% (IQR 31.3-51.3%) Limitations: The levels of evidence found in the available literature were relatively fair, as indicated after qualitative evaluation using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Attitude Heading Reference System (AHRS) evidence levels. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests that the placement of seton as a bridge treatment prior to LIFT surgery does not significantly improve long-term anal fistula healing outcomes. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract surgery can be performed safely and effectively with no previous seton placement. International prospective register of systematic reviews-PROSPERO registration number: CDR42020149173. (AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Background: The surgical treatment of anal fistula is complex due to the possibility of fecal incontinence. Fistulotomy and cutting Setons have the same incidence of fecal incontinence depending on the complexity of the fistula. Sphincter-preserving procedures such as anal fistula plug and ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure may result in more recurrence requiring repeated operations. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the outcomes of treating fistula in Ano utilizing two methods: Fistula plug (Gore Bio-A) and ligation of intersphincteric tract (LIFT). Methods: Fifty four patients (33 males; 21 female, median ages 42 [range 32-47] years) with high anal inter-transphenteric fistula were treated with LIFT and fistula plug procedures from September 2011 until August 2016 by a single surgeon and were retrospectively evaluated. All were followed for a median of 23.9 (range 4-54) months with clinical examination. Twenty one patients underwent fistula plug and 33 patients underwent LIFT procedure (4 patients of the LIFT group underwent LIFT and rectal mucosa advancement flap). The healing rate and complications were evaluated clinically and through telephone calls. Results: The mean operative time for the Plug was 25 ± 17 min and for the LIFT was 40 ± 20 min (p = 0.017) and the mean hospital stay was 2.4 ± 1.1 and 1.9 ± 0.3 (p = 0.01) respectively. The early complications of the plug and LIFT procedures included; anal pain (33.3%, 66.6%, p = 0.13), perianal discharge (77.8%, 91%, p = 0.62), anal pruritus (38.9%, 50.0%, p = 0.71) and bleeding per rectum (16.7%, 33.3%, p = 0.39) respectively. The overall mean follow-up was 20.9 ± 16.8 months, p = 0.68. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (21.9 ± 7.5 months, 19.9 ± 16.1 months, p = 0.682). The healing rate was 76.2% (16/21 patients) in the fistula plug group and 81.1% (27/33 patients) in the LIFT group (p = 0.73). Patients who had LIFT procedure and a mucosal advancement flap had 100% healing rate (4 out of 4 patients). No incontinence of stool or feces and no fistula plug expulsion were seen in our patients. The healing time ranged from 1 to 6 months after surgery. There was no post-operative perianal abscess, cellulitis or pain. Conclusions: LIFT and anal plug are safe procedures for patients with primary and recurrent anal fistula. Both techniques showed excellent results in terms of healing and complication rate. None of our patients had incontinence after 5 years follow-up. The best success rate in our patients was seen after LIFT procedure with mucosal advancement flap. Larger and controlled randomized trials are needed for better assessment of treatment options.

RESUMO Introdução: O tratamento cirúrgico da fístula anal é complexo devido à possibilidade de incontinência fecal. A fistulotomia e o seton de corte têm a mesma incidência da incontinência fecal, dependendo da complexidade da fístula. Procedimentos de preservação do esfíncter, como o tampão da fístula anal e o procedimento LIFT (ligadura do trato da fístula interesfincteriana), podem resultar em mais recorrência, exigindo cirurgias repetidas. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar e comparar os desfechos do tratamento da fístula anal utilizando dois métodos: Tampão de fístula (Gore Bio-A) e Ligadura do Trato Interesfincteriano (LIFT). Métodos: Cinquenta e quatro pacientes (33 homens; 21 mulheres, com mediana de idade de 42 [variação 32-47] anos) foram tratados com LIFT e procedimentos com tampão de fístula de setembro de 2011 até agosto de 2016 por um único cirurgião e foram avaliados retrospectivamente. Todos foram acompanhados por uma mediana de 23,9 (variação de 4 a 54) meses com exame clínico. Vinte e um pacientes foram submetidos a tampão de fístula e 33 pacientes foram submetidos ao procedimento LIFT (4 pacientes do grupo LIFT foram submetidos a LIFT e retalho de avanço da mucosa retal). A taxa de cicatrização e as complicações foram avaliadas clinicamente e por meio de ligações telefônicas. Resultados: O tempo cirúrgico médio para o Tampão foi de 25 ± 17 minutos e para o LIFT foi de 40 ± 20 minutos (p = 0,017) e o tempo médio de internação foi de 2,4 ± 1,1 e 1,9 ± 0,3 (p = 0,01), respectivamente. As primeiras complicações dos procedimentos de tampão e LIFT incluíram: dor anal (33,3%, 66,6%, p = 0,13), secreção perianal (77,8%, 91%, p = 0,62), prurido anal (38,9%, 50,0%, p = 0,71) e sangramento pelo reto (16,7%, 33,3 %, p = 0,39) respectivamente. A média geral de acompanhamento foi de 20,9 ± 16,8 meses, p = 0,68. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os dois grupos (21,9 ± 7,5 meses, 19,9 ± 16,1 meses, p = 0,682). A taxa de cicatrização foi de 76,2% (16/21 pacientes) no grupo com tampão de fístula e 81,1% (27/33 pacientes) no grupo LIFT (p = 0,73). Pacientes submetidos ao procedimento LIFT e um retalho de avanço da mucosa tiveram 100% de taxa de cura (4 de 4 pacientes). Nenhuma incontinência fecal e nenhuma expulsão do tampão da fístula foram observadas em nossos pacientes. O tempo de cicatrização variou de 1 a 6 meses após a cirurgia. Não houve abscesso perianal, celulite ou dor no pós-operatório. Conclusões: LIFT e tampão anal são procedimentos seguros para pacientes com fístula anal primária e recorrente. Ambas as técnicas apresentaram excelentes resultados em termos de cicatrização e taxa de complicações. Nenhum de nossos pacientes teve incontinência após 5 anos de acompanhamento. A melhor taxa de sucesso em nossos pacientes foi observada após o procedimento LIFT com retalho de avanço da mucosa. Ensaios clínicos randomizados de maior porte e controlados são necessários para melhor avaliação das opções de tratamento.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Purpose: Treatment of anal fistulae is regarded as a challenge due to the diverse nature of this disease and its countless complications. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure and its modifications have been popularized among many surgeons worldwide due to their simplicity and promising outcomes. The main purpose of this article was to conduct a comprehensives review of the published literature on ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure and its modifications. Method: PubMed, the Cochrane database and Ovid were searched from January 2007 to June 2017. Fully published peer-reviewed studies which applied ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure and its modifications for the treatment of anal fistulae of cryptogenic origin with follow-up of median 12 months were eligible. Uncompleted studies, case reports, reviews, abstracts, letters, short communication, comments, and studies which did not fulfill inclusion criteria were excluded. The primary outcome was to measure primary healing, overall healing, failure, and recurrence of ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure and its modifications. Results: Twenty-two studies were identified with only ten studies meeting criteria of inclusion. Original ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract was performed in five studies with a population of 199 patients while the remaining five studies showed four different modifications of the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract with a total number of 147 patients. Both original LIFT and its modifications have promising as well as potentially similar outcomes; primary healing in the original ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (73.95%) (95% CI 60.3-85.6) performed less than the modifications (82.3%) (95% CI 64.8-94.7). Overall healing in the original ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (78.9%) (95% CI 58.5-93.7) performed relatively less than in the modifications (93.6%) (95% CI 81.4-99.6). Failure in the original ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (17.9%) (95% CI 4.9-36.5) performed almost the same as the modifications (17.7%) (95% CI 5.3-35.2). Recurrence in the original ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract was 9.7% (95% CI 1.7-23.2). However, there was no recurrence in the modifications. Conclusion: Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract and its modifications are effective and simple procedures in treating simple anal fistulae, especially high transsphincteric ones. However, more trials should be performed to evaluate its effectiveness regarding complex fistulae.

RESUMO Objetivo: O tratamento de fístulas anais é considerado um desafio devido à natureza diversa dessa doença e suas incontáveis complicações. O procedimento de ligadura do trato da fístula interesfincteriana e suas modificações foi popularizado entre cirurgiões em todo o mundo devido a sua simplicidade e desfechos promissores. O principal objetivo deste artigo foi conduzir uma revisão abrangente da literatura publicada sobre o procedimento de ligadura do trato da fístula interesfincteriana e suas modificações. Método: as bases de dados PubMed, Cochrane e Ovid foram pesquisadas de janeiro de 2007 a junho de 2017. Estudos publicados com revisão por pares que aplicaram o procedimento de ligadura do trato da fístula interesfincteriana e suas modificações para o tratamento de fístulas anais de origem criptogênica com acompanhamento de mediana de 12 meses foram elegíveis. Estudos incompletos, relatos de casos, revisões, resumos, cartas, comunicação breve, comentários e estudos que não preenchiam os critérios de inclusão foram excluídos. O desfecho primário foi medir a cicatrização primária, a cicatrização geral, falhas e recorrência do procedimento de ligadura do trato da fístula interesfincteriana e suas modificações. Resultados: Vinte e dois estudos foram identificados com apenas dez estudos atendendo aos critérios de inclusão. A ligadura original do trato da fístula interesfincteriana foi realizada em cinco estudos com uma população de 199 pacientes, enquanto os cinco estudos restantes apresentaram quatro modificações diferentes da ligadura do trato da fístula interesfincteriana com um total de 147 pacientes. Tanto o LIFT original quanto suas modificações têm resultados promissores e desfechos potencialmente semelhantes; cicatrização primária na ligadura original do trato da fístula interesfincteriana de 73,95% (IC 95% 60,3-85,6) menos realizada que as modificações de 82,3% (IC 95% 64,8-94,7). Cicatrização geral na ligadura original do trato da fístula interesfincteriana de 78,9% (IC 95% 58,5-93,7) realizada relativamente menos do que as modificações (93,6%, IC 95% 81,4-99,6). A falha na ligadura original do trato da fístula interesfincteriana (17,9%; IC 95% 4,9-36,5) realizada quase tanto quanto as modificações (17,7%; IC 95% 5,3-35,2). Recidiva na ligadura original do trato da fístula interesfincteriana em 9,7% (IC 95% 1,7-23,2). No entanto, não houve recorrência nas modificações. Conclusão: A ligadura do trato da fístula interesfincteriana e suas modificações são procedimentos eficazes e simples no tratamento de fístulas anais simples, especialmente as transesfincterianas altas. No entanto, mais estudos devem ser realizados para avaliar sua eficácia em relação às fístulas complexas.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Background: It is important but difficult to treat complex fistula-in-ano due to the high recurrent rate and following incontinence. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT), a novel surgical procedure with the advantage of avoiding anal incontinence, has a variable success rate of 57-94.4 %. Aim: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of modified LIFT operative procedure - ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract - to treat complex fistula-in-ano. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 62 cases of complex fistula-in-ano. The group was treated with the modified approach of LIFT (curved incision was made in the anal canal skin; purse-string suture was performed around the fistula; the residual fistulas were removed in a tunnel-based way) and had a follow-up time of more than one year. Patient´s preoperative general condition, postoperative efficacy and their anal function were compared. Results: The median age of the participants was 34, and 43 (69.4%) cases were male. Forty-one (66.1%) cases were of high transsphincteric fistula, four (6.5%) cases of high intrasphincter fistula, and 17 (27.4%) cases of anterior anal fistula in female. The median follow-up duration was 24.5 (range, 12-51) months. The success rate in the end of follow-up was 83.9% (52/62). The anorectal pressure and Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence (CCF-FI) evaluated three months before and after the operation did not find apparent changes. Conclusions: Compared with LIFT, the modified LIFT remarkably reduces postoperative failure and the recurrence rate of complex fistula with acceptable long-term outcomes.

RESUMO Racional: É importante, mas difícil de se tratar fístula anal complexa devido à alta taxa de recorrência e de incontinência pós-operatória. A ligadura do trajeto da fístula interesfincteriana (LIFT) - um novo procedimento cirúrgico com a vantagem de evitar a incontinência anal - tem taxa de sucesso variável entre 57-94,4%. Objetivo: Avaliar os resultados em longo prazo do procedimento cirúrgico LIFT modificado - ligadura do trato interesfincteriano com fístula - para tratar fístula complexa anal. Métodos: Análise retrospectiva de 62 casos de fístula complexa no ânus tratados com abordagem modificada de LIFT (incisão curva na pele do canal anal; sutura em bolsa realizada em torno da fístula; as fístulas residuais removidas em um túnel) e teve tempo de acompanhamento de mais de um ano. A condição geral pré-operatória dos pacientes, a eficácia pós-operatória e a função anal foram comparadas. Resultados: A mediana de idade dos participantes foi de 34 anos, e 43 (69,4%) dos casos eram de homens. Quarenta e um (66,1%) casos eram de fístula transesfincteriana alta, quatro (6,5%) de fístula intra-esfincteriana alta e 17 (27,4%) de fístula anal anterior em mulheres. A mediana da duração do acompanhamento foi de 24,5 meses (12-51). A taxa de sucesso no final do acompanhamento foi de 83,9% (52/62). A pressão anorretal e a Incontinência Fecal da Cleveland Clinic Florida (CCF-FI) avaliadas três meses antes e após a operação não encontraram alterações aparentes. Conclusões: Comparado com o LIFT, o LIFT modificado reduz notavelmente a falha pós-operatória e a taxa de recorrência de fístula complexa com resultados aceitáveis em longo prazo.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Background: Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract technique is a new sphincter saving method with good results in management of anal fistula, but few studies report long-term follow-up data. Material and methods: This study investigated the use of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract as a sphincter saving method based on long term results. This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. The study was conducted at two tertiary care university medical centers. 36 patients with complex fistula from January 2010 to January 2014 treated with classic ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract were retrospectively followed. Demographic data, previous repair attempts, the type of the fistula and score of fecal continence were collected. The procedure was performed by colorectal surgeons. Primary healing rate, failures and fecal incontinence score of patients were followed for 6-48 months. Results: A total of 36 patients underwent ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract during 24 months. The mean age of the patients was 35 years and 50% had two previous attempts at surgery. A total of 25 patients (69/5%) had high transsphincteric fistula. The mean follow up was 27 months. Successful fistula closure was achieved in 63/8% of the patients (23 of 36). The mean time of recurrence was 4.5 weeks. Only one (2/77%) patient reported gas incontinence (score: 3) after the procedure. Conclusion: The recurrence rate and fecal incontinence were measured. The ligation of intersphincteric fistula is a promising sphincter-preserving procedure that is simple and safe. Our study demonstrates favorable long-term results of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract for management of complex anal fistulas.

RESUMO Introdução: A técnica LIFT (Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract; ligadura interesfincteriana do trato fistuloso) é um novo método de preservação esfinctérica com bons resultados no tratamento da fístula anal, mas são poucos os estudos que relatam dados de seguimento em longo prazo. Material e métodos: Esse estudo investigou o uso de LIFT como método de preservação esfinctérica, com base em resultados em longo prazo. Essa foi uma revisão retrospectiva de dados prospectivamente coletados. O estudo foi realizado em dois centros médicos terciários universitários. Trinta e seis pacientes com fístula complexa tratados com LIFT cássica de janeiro de 2010 até janeiro de 2014 foram retrospectivamente seguidos. Foram coletados dados demográficos, tentativas precedentes de reparo, tipo de fístula, e escore de continência fecal. O procedimento foi realizado por cirurgiões colorretais. Percentual de cicatrização primária, insucessos, e escore de incontinência fecal dos pacientes foram monitorados durante 6 a 48 meses. Resultados: No total, 36 pacientes foram submetidos a LIFT em um período de 24 meses. A média de idade dos pacientes era de 35 anos e 50% já tinham sido previamente submetidos a duas tentativas de cirurgia. Vinte e cinco pacientes apresentavam fístula trans-esfinctérica alta. A média do seguimento foi de 27 meses. Foi obtido fechamento bem-sucedido da fístula em 63,8% dos pacientes (23 de 36). O tempo médio até a recorrência foi de 4,5 semanas. Apenas um (2,77%) paciente informou incontinência gasosa (escore = 3) após o procedimento. Conclusão: O percentual de recorrência e a incontinência fecal foram mensurados. A ligadura de fístula intersfinctérica é um procedimento promissor de preservação esfinctérica, de simples execução e seguro. Nosso estudo demonstra resultados favoráveis com o uso de LIFT em longo prazo para o tratamento de fístulas anais complexas.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Anal pain can be caused by various medical conditions; the exclusion of organic causes for proper treatment is important. Three-dimensional anorectal ultrasound can identify organic causes of anal pain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the importance of three-dimensional anorectal ultrasound in the detection of organic abnormalities in patients with anal pain. METHODS: Twenty-two patients (mean age: 49 years; 13 women) with chronic anal pain were enrolled to join a prospective study between June 2009 and June 2011. A complete proctology and colonoscopy examination was normal. Subsequently, the patients underwent three-dimensional anorectal ultrasound. RESULTS: Intersphincteric sepsis was found in 14 patients (63.6%). Two female patients (9.1%) had anal sphincter injury, one of them with the presence of a grade II rectocele. There was an increase in the thickness of the subepithelial tissue in three patients (13.6%). In one patient (4.6%), the presence of a hypoechoic circular retrorectal (presacral) cyst of the middle and lower rectum was observed. The three-dimensional anorectal ultrasound examination showed no abnormalities in two patients (9.1%). CONCLUSION: The three-dimensional anorectal ultrasound is a simple, economical, fast and useful test for the study of anorectal diseases and should be included in the examination of patients with anal pain, to exclude organic causes. (AU)

OBJETIVOS: A dor anal pode resultar várias condições clínicas e se faz necessário excluir causas orgânicas para o tratamento adequado. A ultra-sonografia anorretal tridimensional (3D-US) pode identificar causas orgânicas de dor anal. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a importância da 3D-US para detectar anomalias orgânicas em pacientes com dor anal. MÉTODOS: Vinte e dois pacientes (média de idade: 49 anos; treze mulheres) com dor anal crônica foram incluídos em um estudo prospectivo entre junho de 2009 e junho de 2011. O exame proctológico completo e colonoscopia foram normais. Posteriormente, os pacientes foram submetidos à 3D-US. RESULTADOS: Sepse interesfincteriana foi evidenciada em quatorze pacientes (63,6%). Duas pacientes (9.1%) apresentaram lesão do esfíncter anal, sendo uma com presença de retocele grau II. O aumento da espessura do tecido subepitelial apresentou-se em três pacientes (13,6%). Em um paciente (4,6%), foi evidenciada a presença de cisto retrorretal circular hipoecoico no reto médio e inferior. O exame de US-3D não evidenciou anormalidades em dois indivíduos (9.1%). CONCLUSÃO: A ultra-sonografia anorretal tridimensional é um exame simples, econômico, rápido e útil no estudo de doenças anorretais e deve ser incluído no estudo dos pacientes com dor anal para descartar causas orgânicas. (AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: fistula-in-ano is a common problem. Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) is a new addition to the list of operations available to deal with complex fistula-in-ano. OBJECTIVE: we sought to qualitatively analyze studies describing LIFT for crpytoglandular fistula-in-ano and determine its efficacy. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (Pubmed, Ovid), Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched. STUDY SELECTION: all clinical trials which studied LIFT or compared LIFT with other methods of treatment for anal fistulae, prospective observational studies, clinical registry data and retrospective case series which reported clinical healing of the fistula as the outcome were included. Case reports, studies reporting a combination with other technique, modified technique, abstracts, letters and comments were excluded. INTERVENTION: the intervention was ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract in crpytoglandular fistula-in-ano. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: primary outcome measured was success rate (fistula healing rate) and length of follow-up. (AU)

BACKGROUND: fístula anal é um problema comum. A ligadura interesfincteriana do trajeto fistuloso (LIFT) é uma nova adição à lista de cirurgias disponíveis para tratar a fístula anal complexa. OBJETIVO: buscou-se analisar qualitativamente estudos descrevendo o uso de LIFT para fístula anal criptoglandular e determinar a sua eficácia. FONTES DE DADOS: as bases de dados MEDLINE (Pubmed, Ovid), Embase, Scopus e Biblioteca Cochrane foram pesquisadas. SELEÇÃO DOS ESTUDOS: todos os ensaios clínicos que estudaram LIFT ou compararam LIFT com outros métodos de tratamento da fístula anal, estudos observacionais prospectivos, dados de registros clínicos e série de casos retrospectivos que relataram a cura clínica da fístula anal como desfecho foram incluídos. Relatos de casos, estudos que relatam uma combinação com outra técnica, técnica modificada, resumos, cartas e comentários foram excluídos. INTERVENÇÃO: a intervenção foi ligadura interesfincteriana do trajeto fistuloso em fístula anal criptoglandular. MEDIDA DO DESFECHO PRINCIPAL: a medida do desfecho principal foi a taxa de sucesso (taxa de cura da fístula) e período de seguimento. (AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: laparoscopic rectal surgery has not yet achieved a high penetration rate because of its steep learning curve and its relatively high conversion rate. Robotic rectal resection represents the main indication of the use of the robotic platform in colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to present an early experience with robotic surgery to treat mid and low rectal cancer focusing on the technique and early postoperative outcomes. METHODS: from December 2012 to October 2013, a total of 16 patients with colorectal diseases were operated on using a four-arm single docking full robotic procedure (daVinci Si Surgical System). The treatment of six consecutive patients who underwent robotic rectal cancer surgery for mid or low rectal adenocarcinoma was prospectively analyzed regarding technique standardization, pathological findings and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: there were no conversions and one intraoperative complication. The mean operative time was 245 min (180-360 min). The mean console time was 170 min (110-240 min). All patients underwent a standardized totally robotic rectal dissection. There were no mortality or urinary dysfunction and one complication (postoperative ileo-16%). The median length of hospital stay was 6 (4-11 days). The median number of lymph nodes harvested was 22 (7-38), and distal and circumferential resection margins were negative in all specimen. R0 resection was achieved in all cases and complete total mesorectal excision in five specimen and nearly complete in one. CONCLUSION: standardized robotic rectal surgery is a promising alternative to treat patients with mid or low rectal cancer and is expected to overcome the low penetration rate of laparoscopic surgery in this field. This technique was successfully performed in six patients with excellent immediate postoperative and pathological results. Additional studies in a large series of patients are necessary to confirm those advantages. (AU)

INTRODUÇÃO: a utilização da cirurgia videolaparoscópica para o tratamento do câncer do reto ainda não apresentou uma alta penetração devido a longa curva de aprendizado e a uma taxa de conversão relativamente alta. A ressecção retal robótica é a principal indicação para o uso da plataforma robótica na cirurgia colorretal. O objetivo desse estudo é apresentar as técnicas e os resultados pós-operatórios imediatos com o uso da cirurgia robótica para o tratamento do câncer do reto distal. PACIENTES E MÉTODOS: no período de dezembro de 2012 a outubro de 2013 foram operados 16 pacientes com patologias colorretais utilizando o robô daVinci SI Surgical System. O tratamento de 6 consecutivos pacientes portadores de câncer do reto do terço médio e do terço inferior foram prospectivamente avaliados quanto a sistematização técnica, achados patológicos e evolução pós-operatória. RESULTADOS: não houve conversão e ocorreu uma complicação intraoperatória. A duração média das operações foi de 245 minutos (180-360 minutos) e o tempo médio do uso do console foi de 170 minutos (110-240 minutos). Ocorreu uma complicação pós-operatória (Íleo) e não houveram nenhuma disfunção urinária ou mortalidade. A duração média da internação hospitalar foi de 6 dias (4-11 dias). O número médio de linfonodos examinados foi de 22 (7-38) e todas as peças tinham margens distal e circunferencial negativas. Ressecção RO foi observada em todos os casos e o grau de excisão total do mesorreto foi completo em 5 peças e quase completo em uma. CONCLUSÃO: cirurgia robótica sistematizada esta tendo uma crescente aceitação e é uma ótima alternativa para o tratamento dos pacientes com câncer do reto distal. Esta tecnologia foi utilizada em 6 pacientes com excelentes resultados não só na recuperação pós-operatória imediata como também nos achados da avaliação patológica. Grandes series randomizadas são importantes para confirmar as possíveis vantagens dessa nova tecnologia. (AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

Broadly, complex fistulas are those that are not low transsphincteric or intersphincteric. The objectives of surgical management are to achieve fistula healing, prevent recurrences and maintain continence. The risk of incontinence associated with treatment ranges from 10% to 57%. The objective of this manuscript is to review the current literature to date on the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure (LIFT procedure) as a treatment option in these types of fistula. A search was conducted in Medline, PUBMED, EMBASE and ISI Web of Knowledge, and studies published from January 2009 to May 2013 were included. The primary outcomes were fistula healing rates, mean healing time and patient satisfaction with this surgical technique. Eighteen studies were included in this review. The total number of patients included was 592 (65% male). The median age reported was 42.8 years. The most common type of fistula included was transsphincteric (73.3% of cases). The mean healing rate reported was 74.6%. The risk factors for failure discovered were obesity, smoking, multiple previous surgeries and the length of the fistula tract. The mean healing time was 5.5 wk, and the mean follow-up period was 42.3 wk. The patient satisfaction rates ranged from 72% to 100%. No de novo incontinence developed secondary to the LIFT procedure. There is not enough evidence that variants in the surgical technique achieve better outcomes (Bio-LIFT, LIFT-Plug, LIFT-Plus). This review indicates that the LIFT procedure is primarily effective for transsphincteric fistulas with an overall fistula closure of 74.6% and has a low impact on fecal continence. This procedure produces better outcomes at the first surgical attempt.

Assuntos

RESUMO

O autor apresenta, detalhadamente, a técnica de ressecção anterior ultrabaixa e interesfinctérica com anastomose coloanal por videolaparoscopia para tratamento do câncer do reto distal. São descritos os principais passos da operação: 1 - Posição do Paciente; 2 - Posicionamento do Equipamento e Equipe; 3 - Posicionamento dos Trocartes e Exploração da Cavidade Abdominal; 4 - Exposição do Campo Operatório; 5 - Ligadura dos Vasos Mesentéricos Inferiores pelo acesso medial; 6 - Mobilização do Ângulo Esplênico e do Colon Sigmóide; 7 - Excisão total do mesorreto, preservação dos nervos pélvicos e mobilização do reto pela técnica de Rullier; 8- Secção do reto distal e anastomose coloanal;9-Ressecção interesfinctérica (RI) e anastomose coloanal com coloplastia transversa, bolsa colónica em J ou anastomose latero-terminal. A utilização desta técnica, apesar de ser um procedimento complexo, mostrou-se viável e segura, pois apresentou baixo índice de complicação pós-operatória e mortalidade.

The author present the laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis and intersphincteric resection technique to treat patients with very low rectal cancer. The operative steps are: 1 - Patient positioning; 2 - Instruments and equip positioning; 3 - Insertion of the ports; 4 - Preparation of the operative field; 5 - Difining and dividing the inferior mesenteric artery and vein by the medial approach; 6 - Mobilization of splenic flexure and sigmoid colon; 7 - rectal mobilization and total mesorectum excision by Rullier technique; 8 - Rectal division and coloanal anastomosis; 9 - intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis by coloplasty, J pouch or latero-to-end techniques. The technique employed is safe and have presented low rate of complication and no mortality.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Identificar as complicações pós-operatórias, a duração da internação hospitalar, os resultados funcionais clínicos, e os resultados oncológicos num seguimento médio de 2,5 anos nos pacientes com câncer do reto distal submetidosà ressecção anterior ultrabaixa e interesfinctérica com anastomose coloanal por videolaparoscopia. CASUÍSTICA E MÉTODOS: De um total de 491 pacientes operados pelo acesso videolaparoscópico, foram selecionados para esse estudo prospectivo 13 doentes , nove do sexo feminino,com câncer da porção distal do reto inferior entre os 172 pacientes com câncer do reto.Nenhum tumor T4 ou com resposta completa à quimiorradioterapia foi selecionado. A quimiorradioterapia neo-adjuvante foi aplicada em 8 doentes. RESULTADOS: A taxa de complicaçãos pós-operatória foi de 23,1 por cento., sendo de 7,7 por cento o índice de fístula anastomótica. A mortalide foi nula. A alta hospitalar ocorreu até o 7º dia de pós-operatório para 8 pacientes (61,5 por cento), 4 dos quais no quinto dia.. O número médio de linfonodos por peça foi 13. A margem distal média foi de 1,5 cm. A margem circunferencial foi positiva em um caso (7,7 por cento). Evacuação fracionada foi relatada por 11 pacientes (91 por cento) e incontinência fecal por 5 pacientes (41 por cento). Onze pacientes (84 por cento) estão satisfeitos com a operação. Um paciente continua ileostomizado (7,7 por cento). Em um seguimento médio de 30 meses ocorreu uma recidiva local (7,7 por cento) e dois casos de metástase pulmonar (15,4 por cento). As três pacientes faleceram da doença. Dez pacientes (77 por cento) estão sem doença. CONCLUSÕES: Apesar da pequena casuística, a analise permitiu as seguintes conclusões: a) A técnica empregada mostrou ser viável e segura, pois apresentou baixo índice de complicação pós-operatória e mortalidade nula; b) O emprego dessa técnica permitiu período de internação hospitalar pós-operatório curto; c) Apesar dos resultados funcionais com avaliação...

PURPOSES: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the postoperative complications, the length of the hospital stay, the clinic functional results, and the oncological outcome at 2,5 years follow-up of patients with very low rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis and intersphincteric resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 491 patients were treated by laparoscopic colorectal surgery, 13 of 172 with rectal cancer were selected and prospectively evaluated. All with very low rectal cancer, 9 female. No patient T4 or with complete response to quimioirradiation was selected. Quimioirradiation was used in 8 patients. RESULTS: The postoperative complication rate was 23,1 percent and the anastomotic fistulas rate was 7,7 percent. No patients died postoperatively. 61,5 percent of the patients were discharged before 7 days of hospital stay. The median number of harvested lymphnodes was 13. Mean distal tumor-free margin was 1,5 cm. Circumferential margin was positive in 1 case (7,7 percent). Fecal incontinence was related in 41 percent of the patients and fracionned evacuations in 91 percent. Eleven patients (84 percent) have related good quality of life. One patient is with definitive stoma (7,7 percent). With median follow-up of 30 months, there were one local recurrence (7,7 percent) and two cases of lung metastases (15,4 percent). All, the three patients died of the diseases. Ten patients are survived (77 percent) without disease. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of results led to the following conclusions: a) The technique employed is safe and have presented low rate of complication and no mortality; b) The use of this technique have permited short length of the hospital stay; c) Functional results were regular , but colostomy was avoid in 92,3 percent of the patients; d) The use of this technique does not compromise the oncological outcome at a median follow-up of 30 months.

Assuntos