RESUMO
The objective of this systematic review is to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of rapid dengue diagnostic tests. The search was conducted in the following databases: LILACS, Medline (Pubmed), CRD, The Cochrane Library, Trip Medical Database and Google Scholar. ELISA and PCR assays were adopted as reference methods. Thirty-four articles were included in this systematic review. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Forest Plot were performed to evaluate sensitivity and specificity for each parameter analyzed (NS1, IgM and IgG). The results revealed that the combined analysis of the IgM antibody with the NS1 antigen resulted in greater sensitivity than the isolated analysis of IgM. The three analytes together showed the best performance, with a combined sensitivity of 90 % (95 % CI: 89-92 %) using ELISA as a comparator. Thus, the present review provides relevant knowledge for decision-making between the available rapid diagnostic tests.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais , Dengue , Imunoglobulina M , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Humanos , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Cromatografia de Afinidade/métodos , Dengue/diagnóstico , Vírus da Dengue/imunologia , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/normas , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Curva ROC , Proteínas não Estruturais Virais/imunologia , Proteínas não Estruturais Virais/sangueRESUMO
Rapid immunochromatographic tests are frequently used to diagnose dengue due to their easy use, low cost, and fast response. A high level of accuracy is essential for rapid diagnostic tests to support their large-scale use. Thus, this systematic review aims to evaluate the accuracy of rapid dengue diagnostic tests. The investigation was run through the following databases: LILACS, Medline (Pubmed), CRD, The Cochrane Library, Trip Medical Database, and Google Scholar. To solve difficulties, two independent reviewers performed document screening and selection. ELISA assay was adopted as a reference test because of several methodologic advantages. Seventeen articles were included accordingly, reckoning 6837 participating individuals. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Forest Plot were conducted to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity for each analyzed parameter (anti-dengue IgM, IgG, and NS1 antigen). The risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed as moderate using QUADAS-2 and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE), respectively. The sensitivity of IgM concerning the studied tests ranged from 13.8 to 90%, while that of NS1 ranged from 14.7 to 100% (95% CI). The antibodies with NS1 presented increased sensitivity; pooled data show that the association of the three analytes bestows the best result, with a combined sensitivity of 90% (CI 95%: 87-92%) and a pooled specificity of 89% (CI 95%: 87-92%). Thus, the present review provides relevant knowledge for decision-making between available rapid diagnostic tests.
Assuntos
Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Humanos , Imunoglobulina M , Curva ROC , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to determine whether Dengue virus (DENV) immunochromatographic tests can detect and differentiate nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) from each of the four DENV serotypes and do not cross-react with the Zika virus (ZIKV) NS1 protein. METHODS: We compared the specificity of six NS1-based DENV immunochromatographic tests (point of care) in the detection of NS1 proteins from each of the four DENV serotypes and ZIKV. The tests were performed with NS1 proteins produced in mammalian cells. Cross-reactivity was confirmed with a purified recombinant ZIKV NS1 protein and DENV+ or ZIKV+ human serum samples. RESULTS: Cross-reaction was observed in 2 out of the 6 evaluated tests using cell culture supernatants containing NS1 protein of each tested virus. Cross-reactivity with ZIKV was confirmed with purified recombinant ZIKV NS1 produced in Escherichia coli. Further analyses with serum samples collected from DENV+ or ZIKV+ patients confirmed the cross-reactivity with ZIKV protein in 2 tests. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of the NS1 protein is the basis for several commercially available serological DENV diagnostic tests. The present results emphasize the relevance of testing specificity of presently available NS1-based DENV serological tests and the need of adjustments of tests that cross-react with the ZIKV protein. Our results are particularly relevant for regions where both viruses are endemically found, as in the case of Brazil.
Assuntos
Cromatografia de Afinidade/métodos , Vírus da Dengue/imunologia , Dengue/virologia , Proteínas não Estruturais Virais/imunologia , Zika virus/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Brasil , Reações Cruzadas , Vírus da Dengue/isolamento & purificação , Glicoproteínas/imunologia , Humanos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Especificidade da EspécieRESUMO
ABSTRACT Background: Although performance of rapid immunochromatographic tests (RITs) for dengue virus (DENV) serotypes 1, 2 and 3 is relatively settled, evidence on accuracy of RITs for DENV-4 are based on studies with small sample sizes and with discrepant results. Objectives: To assess accuracy and inter-observer agreement of RITs targeting dengue nonstructural protein-1 (NS1) antigen - Dengue NS1-Bioeasy™, Dengue NS1 Ag Strip-Bio-Rad™, IVB Dengue Ag NS1-Orangelife™ and Dengue NS1-K130-Bioclin™ in DENV-4 samples. Methods: Study sample (n = 324) included adults presenting at an emergency unit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, with fever of ≤72 h and two or more dengue symptoms. A serum sample from each patient was tested by each RIT. A positive reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction was considered as the reference standard for dengue diagnosis. The diagnostic parameters analyzed for each RIT were sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios. Each RIT was read by homogeneous (two junior nurses) or heterogeneous (one junior nurse and one senior biologist) pairs. Agreement was estimated by simple kappa with 95% confidence interval, positive (Ppos) and negative (Pneg) proportion concordance and prevalence and bias adjusted kappa, rated from poor (k < 0.0) to almost perfect (0.8 < k < 1.0), and perfect (k = 1). Results: NS1 RITs for DENV-4 diagnosis showed high specificity (95.9%-99.4%), but low sensitivity (14.7%-45.4%). Bioeasy™ had the best performance, with a positive likelihood ratio of 26.0 (95% CI: 8.4;81.0). Inter-observer agreement was almost perfect for all evaluated RITs. Mismatches in confirmed dengue were more common for the Bioclin™ (Ppos 88.3-90.0 %) and Orangelife™ (Ppos 91.7-94.1 %) tests. Conclusions: For DENV-4, the tested RITs had high specificity, but lower sensitivity compared to published results for other serotypes. They should not be used for screening purposes. Different brands may have very different performances. This should be considered upon deciding of using RITs in DENV-4 outbreaks.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cromatografia de Afinidade/normas , Dengue/diagnóstico , Vírus da Dengue/isolamento & purificação , Padrões de Referência , Brasil , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Cromatografia de Afinidade/métodos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Dengue/imunologia , Dengue/virologia , SorogrupoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although performance of rapid immunochromatographic tests (RITs) for dengue virus (DENV) serotypes 1, 2 and 3 is relatively settled, evidence on accuracy of RITs for DENV-4 are based on studies with small sample sizes and with discrepant results. OBJECTIVES: To assess accuracy and inter-observer agreement of RITs targeting dengue nonstructural protein-1 (NS1) antigen - Dengue NS1-Bioeasy™, Dengue NS1 Ag Strip-Bio-Rad™, IVB Dengue Ag NS1-Orangelife™ and Dengue NS1-K130-Bioclin™ in DENV-4 samples. METHODS: Study sample (nâ¯=â¯324) included adults presenting at an emergency unit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, with fever of ≤72â¯h and two or more dengue symptoms. A serum sample from each patient was tested by each RIT. A positive reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction was considered as the reference standard for dengue diagnosis. The diagnostic parameters analyzed for each RIT were sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios. Each RIT was read by homogeneous (two junior nurses) or heterogeneous (one junior nurse and one senior biologist) pairs. Agreement was estimated by simple kappa with 95% confidence interval, positive (Ppos) and negative (Pneg) proportion concordance and prevalence and bias adjusted kappa, rated from poor (kâ¯<â¯0.0) to almost perfect (0.8â¯<â¯kâ¯<â¯1.0), and perfect (kâ¯=â¯1). RESULTS: NS1 RITs for DENV-4 diagnosis showed high specificity (95.9%-99.4%), but low sensitivity (14.7%-45.4%). Bioeasy™ had the best performance, with a positive likelihood ratio of 26.0 (95% CI: 8.4;81.0). Inter-observer agreement was almost perfect for all evaluated RITs. Mismatches in confirmed dengue were more common for the Bioclin™ (Ppos 88.3-90.0 %) and Orangelife™ (Ppos 91.7-94.1 %) tests. CONCLUSIONS: For DENV-4, the tested RITs had high specificity, but lower sensitivity compared to published results for other serotypes. They should not be used for screening purposes. Different brands may have very different performances. This should be considered upon deciding of using RITs in DENV-4 outbreaks.