RESUMO
This study presents a new pneumatic air jet excitation nozzle, specifically designed for food processing applications. The device, which uses compressed air equipment and a precision solenoid valve, controls air discharge through a parametric air jet nozzle. Tests showed that the device could achieve shooting frequencies in the 40-45 Hz range, with operational pressures between 5 and 7 bar. A sensor system was used to measure the force generated by the device at different frequencies and pressures. Using the Design of Experiments (DOE) methodology, we identified optimal cavity designs for 5 and 6 bar pressures. These designs outperformed others in generating uniform force and maintaining consistent vibration voltage behavior. This highlights the efficacy of our approach in enhancing device performance under different conditions. The device's practical application in food processing was demonstrated, particularly in delicate tasks such as the selective harvesting of sensitive crops like coffee fruits. The precise vibrations generated by the device could potentially enhance harvesting efficiency while significantly reducing mechanical damage to plants. The results position the device as a compelling proof of concept, offering an alternative method for exciting biostructures in food processing. This device opens up new possibilities in agricultural and biological fields, providing a non-intrusive and practical approach to manipulating and interacting with delicate, contactless structures, with a specific focus on improving food processing efficiency and quality.
RESUMO
A realização de mais de uma operação da colhedora de café pode aumentar a eficiência de colheita dos frutos, minimizando a quantidade de café remanescente nas plantas e a necessidade de repasse manual. O repasse manual comumente encarece o processo de produção e promove maiores danos às plantas em relação à colheita mecanizada. Entretanto, deve-se conhecer qual número de operações da colhedora é necessário para derriçar completamente os frutos dos cafeeiros, em lavouras que apresentem diferentes cargas produtivas, notadamente as de cargas mais elevadas, por apresentarem maior dificuldade em serem totalmente colhidas. Portanto, objetivou-se, com este trabalho, avaliar o número de operações da colhedora, em duas lavouras de café, para uma colheita eficiente. Foram comparadas duas situações: lavoura com carga intermediária (50,78 sacas de café ben ha-1)e lavoura com carga alta (121,54 sacas de café ben ha-1), na região do Cerrado Mineiro, utilizando de uma a seis operações de uma colhedora KTR. Utilizou-se delineamento de blocos ao acaso e quatro repetições. Avaliou-se a quantidade de café caído, remanescente, colhido e eficiência de colheita. Obteve-se que, para que a quantidade de café remanescente nas plantas seja suficiente para dispensar o repasse manual, são necessárias três operações da colhedora de café em cargas elevadas e duas em cargas intermediárias. Independentemente da carga de café, utilizar três ou mais operações da colhedora colhe maior quantidade de frutos, no entanto, sem diferir quanto à eficiência de colheita da colheita com duas operações.
Performing more than one operation of coffee harvester can increase fruit harvest efficiency by minimizing the amount of remaining plants and the need for manual transfer. This manual harvest makes often more expensive the production process and promote more damage to the plants in relation to mechanization. However, it should know how many operations it is necessary to completely harvest the fruits of the trees, in fields that have different production loads, especially the higher loads, since they are more difficult to be fully harvested. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the number of harvester operations in two coffee plantations, for an efficient harvesting. Two situations were compared: crop with intermediate load (50.78 benefited coffee bags ha-1)and tillage with high load (121.54 benefited coffee bags ha-1)on the Cerrado Mineiro region, using one to six operations of a KTR harvester. It was used a randomized block design with four replications. The number of fallen coffee, remainned harvested and harvesting efficiency were evaluated. It was found that for the remainned amount of coffee plants, to dispense the manual harvest it is required three operations of coffee harvester at high loads and two at intermediate loads. Regardless of the coffee load, using three or more harvester operations, a larger amount of fruits was harvested, without differing in crop harvest efficiency with two operations.
RESUMO
A realização de mais de uma operação da colhedora de café pode aumentar a eficiência de colheita dos frutos, minimizando a quantidade de café remanescente nas plantas e a necessidade de repasse manual. O repasse manual comumente encarece o processo de produção e promove maiores danos às plantas em relação à colheita mecanizada. Entretanto, deve-se conhecer qual número de operações da colhedora é necessário para derriçar completamente os frutos dos cafeeiros, em lavouras que apresentem diferentes cargas produtivas, notadamente as de cargas mais elevadas, por apresentarem maior dificuldade em serem totalmente colhidas. Portanto, objetivou-se, com este trabalho, avaliar o número de operações da colhedora, em duas lavouras de café, para uma colheita eficiente. Foram comparadas duas situações: lavoura com carga intermediária (50,78 sacas de café ben ha-1)e lavoura com carga alta (121,54 sacas de café ben ha-1), na região do Cerrado Mineiro, utilizando de uma a seis operações de uma colhedora KTR. Utilizou-se delineamento de blocos ao acaso e quatro repetições. Avaliou-se a quantidade de café caído, remanescente, colhido e eficiência de colheita. Obteve-se que, para que a quantidade de café remanescente nas plantas seja suficiente para dispensar o repasse manual, são necessárias três operações da colhedora de café em cargas elevadas e duas em cargas intermediárias. Independentemente da carga de café, utilizar três ou mais operações da colhedora colhe maior quantidade de frutos, no entanto, sem diferir quanto à eficiência de colheita da colheita com duas operações.(AU)
Performing more than one operation of coffee harvester can increase fruit harvest efficiency by minimizing the amount of remaining plants and the need for manual transfer. This manual harvest makes often more expensive the production process and promote more damage to the plants in relation to mechanization. However, it should know how many operations it is necessary to completely harvest the fruits of the trees, in fields that have different production loads, especially the higher loads, since they are more difficult to be fully harvested. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the number of harvester operations in two coffee plantations, for an efficient harvesting. Two situations were compared: crop with intermediate load (50.78 benefited coffee bags ha-1)and tillage with high load (121.54 benefited coffee bags ha-1)on the Cerrado Mineiro region, using one to six operations of a KTR harvester. It was used a randomized block design with four replications. The number of fallen coffee, remainned harvested and harvesting efficiency were evaluated. It was found that for the remainned amount of coffee plants, to dispense the manual harvest it is required three operations of coffee harvester at high loads and two at intermediate loads. Regardless of the coffee load, using three or more harvester operations, a larger amount of fruits was harvested, without differing in crop harvest efficiency with two operations.(AU)