RESUMO
PURPOSE: The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy and severity of adverse effects of HCAG and CAG re-induction chemotherapy in elderly low- and intermediate-risk group patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following induction failure. METHODS: A total of 94 AML patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 46 were treated with HCAG chemotherapy, while 48 were treated with CAG chemotherapy. RESULT: The complete remission (CR) was 39.6% in the patients with HCAG, while the CR was 33.3% in the CAG group. The overall remission (ORR) was 63.0% and 43.5% in patients of the HCAG and CAG groups, respectively (P = 0.038). The median survival time of progression free survival (PFS) was 8.0 (95% CI 3.843-10.157) months in the HCAG group and 7.0 (95% CI 2.682-13.318) months in the CAG group (P = 0.032). A total of 31 patients in the HCAG group suffered from grade 4 hematological toxicity, whereas 29 patients were treated with CAG (P = 0.622). A total of 27 (58.7%) cases indicated apparent pulmonary infection in the HCAG group, while 25 (52.1%) were noted with this complication in the CAG group (P = 0.519). Oral cavity toxicity was evident for 13 (28.3%) and 11 (23.0%) cases in the HCAG and CAG groups, respectively (P = 0.216). CONCLUSION: The HCAG regimen was more effective than the CAG regimen in elderly low- and intermediate-risk group patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia although the HCAG regimen exhibited similar toxicity with that of the CAG group.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Mepesuccinato de Omacetaxina/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia de Indução/métodos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Aclarubicina/efeitos adversos , Aclarubicina/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Citarabina/efeitos adversos , Citarabina/uso terapêutico , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/efeitos adversos , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/uso terapêutico , Mepesuccinato de Omacetaxina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução/efeitos adversos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Indução de Remissão , Retratamento/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Terapia de Salvação , Método Simples-Cego , Fatores de Tempo , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and adverse effects of HCAG and FLAG re-induction chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients of low- and intermediate-risk groups following induction failure. METHODS: A total of 98 AML patients were enrolled. Among these subjects, 47 patients were treated with HCAG chemotherapy, while 51 patients were treated with FLAG chemotherapy. RESULT: The complete remission (CR) and overall remission (OFF) were 24% and 38%, respectively in patients with HCAG induction chemotherapy, while the corresponding percentages were 28% and 42% in subject receiving FLAG chemotherapy. The median survival time of progress-free survival (PFS) was 29.8 (95% CI 23.749-35.851) months in the HCAG group and 30.8 (95% CI 21.728-39.872) months in the FLAG group (P = 0.620). A total of 42 patients in the HCAG group suffered from grade 4 hematological toxicity, while this adverse reaction was noted for all patients who were treated with FLAG chemotherapy (P = 0.023). A total of 19 cases indicated apparent nonhematological toxicity in the HCAG group, while only 40 (78.4%) were noted with these adverse reactions in the FLAG group (P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: The HCAG regimen exhibited a similar effect compared with the FLAG regimen in low- and intermediate-risk groups, although the HCAG regimen significantly decreased the toxicity compared with that noted in the FLAG regimen group.