RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity has increased dramatically in children worldwide. Obesity has been recognized as a risk factor for more serious viral respiratory infections, mainly in adults. OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between overnutrition (obesity and overweight) and clinical severity in children hospitalized with acute respiratory infections of viral origin. METHODS: One hundred and forty-three clinical records of children between 2 and 18 years old hospitalized for acute respiratory infection at Clínica Dávila (2014-2018) were analyzed, recording the respiratory viruses detected at the time of hospitalization, weight, and height. Nutritional status was estimated using Z score or body mass index, according to age. RESULTS: Eighty-tree3 children (58%) were positive for more than one respiratory virus. The main virus detected in monoinfection was adenovirus (9.8%), followed by respiratory syncytial virus (7.7%) and parainfluenza virus (7.7%). There were no deaths. Patients with obesity presented more days of hospitalization (P = .04), oxygen therapy (P = .03) and mechanical ventilation (P < .001), as well as a higher probability of requiring mechanical ventilation (P = .001) and of ICU admission (P = .003) compared with children with normal weight. Patients with overweight presented more days of mechanical ventilation (P < .001) than patients with normal weight. No significant differences were found between the presence of viral coinfection and nutritional status. CONCLUSION: Overnutrition is associated with greater severity of viral respiratory infection in hospitalized children.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción: La emergencia de la COVID-19 se ha convertido en un serio problema de salud a nivel mundial. La identificación de comorbilidades asociadas a la presentación clínica grave de la COVID-19, es de importancia para el adecuado abordaje terapéutico de los pacientes afectados. Objetivo: Evaluar el riesgo de COVID-19 con presentación clínica grave en pacientes con comorbilidades. Material y métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática y meta-análisis en bases de datos especializadas en busca de artículos publicados hasta el 20 de marzo de 2020, que aportaran información sobre la asociación entre la gravedad de la presentación clínica de la COVID-19 y comorbilidades. Se empleó la razón de probabilidades con un intervalo de confianza de 95 por ciento, y modelos de efectos fijos o aleatorios. Resultados: En el análisis fueron incluidos 13 estudios para un total de 99 817 pacientes. Se obtuvieron los efectos globales para la hipertensión arterial (RP: 4,05; IC 95 por ciento: 3,45-4,74), enfermedad cardiovascular (RP: 4,39; IC 95 por ciento: 3,29-5,87), Diabetes Mellitus (RP: 3,53; IC 95 por ciento: 2,79-4,47), hábito de fumar (RP: 2,87; IC 95 por ciento: 1,81-4,54), enfermedades respiratoria (RP: 2,73; IC 95 por ciento: 2,55-2,94), renal (RP: 5,60; IC 95 por ciento: 4,13-7,60) y hepática crónicas (RP: 1,98 (IC 95 por ciento: 1,08-3,64) e inmunodeficiencias (RP: 2,90; IC 95 por ciento: 2,06-4,09), en pacientes graves en comparación con pacientes no graves. Conclusiones: La enfermedad renal crónica, la enfermedad cardiovascular, la hipertensión arterial y la Diabetes Mellitus están entre las comorbilidades que mayor riesgo implican para una presentación clínica grave en pacientes con COVID-19, seguidas en importancia por las inmunodeficiencias, hábito de fumar, enfermedad respiratoria crónica y enfermedad hepática crónica(AU)

Introduction: The recent emergence of COVID-19 has become a serious global health problem. The identification of comorbidities associated with the clinical severity in COVID-19 patients is of paramount significance for the appropriate therapeutic approach of affected patients. Objective: To evaluate the risk of severe clinical presentation of COVID-19 in patients with comorbidities. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search and meta-analysis was conducted in specialized databases to obtain information from articles published until March 20, 2020. All relevant papers with information on the association between clinical severity and comorbidities were included. The odds ratio with 95 percent confidence interval and fixed or random effect models were used. Results: Thirteen studies were included for a total of 99 817 patients. Global effects were obtained for hypertension (OR: 4.05; 95 percent CI: 3.45-4.74), cardiovascular disease (OR: 4.39; 95 percent CI: 3.29-5.87), diabetes mellitus (OR: 3.53; 95 percent CI: 2.79-4.47), smoking (OR: 2.87; 95 percent CI: 1.81-4.54), chronic lung disease (OR: 2.73; 95 percent CI: 2.55-2.94), chronic kidney disease (OR: 5.60; 95 percent CI: 4.13-7.60), chronic liver disease (OR: 1.98; 95 percent CI: 1.08-3.64), and immunodeficiency (OR: 2.90; 95 percent CI: 2.06-4.09) in severe patients compared with non-severe patients. Conclusions: Chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, hypertension and diabetes are among the comorbidities with the highest risk of severe clinical presentation in COVID-19 patients, followed in importance by immunodeficiency, smoking, chronic lung disease and chronic liver disease(AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivos: evaluar los resultados obtenidos con el uso de la toxina botulínica A en la corrección del estrabismo paralítico e identificar los factores asociados que influyen sobre la respuesta terapéutica. Métodos: se realizó un estudio descriptivo en una serie de 93 casos con estrabismo paralítico, que recibieron tratamiento con toxina botulínica A. Resultados: se diagnosticaron 53 casos con estrabismo leve, 38 moderado y solo dos en estado grave. El tiempo de evolución y la gravedad clínica fueron los factores asociados que interfirieron con la respuesta terapéutica. Conclusiones: la toxina botulínica A es efectiva en la mayoría de los casos tratados. Los mejores resultados se obtienen en los casos con menor grado de desviación y con menor tiempo de evolución entre el inicio del estrabismo y la inyección del medicamento(AU)

Objectives: to assess the results of the use of botulinum toxin A in correcting paralytic strabismus and to identify those associated factors that have an impact on the therapeutic response. Methods: a descriptive study of a series of 93 cases with paralytic strabismus which were treated with botulinum toxin A. Results: fifty three cases were diagnosed with mild, 38 with moderate and just two with severe strabismus. The time of progression and the clinical severity were related factors that influence the therapeutic response. Conclusions: botulinum toxin A is effective in most of cases. The best results are achieved in those people with lower deviation degree and less time of progression elapsed from the onset of strabismus to the administration of the injected medication(AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivos: evaluar los resultados obtenidos con el uso de la toxina botulínica A en la corrección del estrabismo paralítico e identificar los factores asociados que influyen sobre la respuesta terapéutica. Métodos: se realizó un estudio descriptivo en una serie de 93 casos con estrabismo paralítico, que recibieron tratamiento con toxina botulínica A. Resultados: se diagnosticaron 53 casos con estrabismo leve, 38 moderado y solo dos en estado grave. El tiempo de evolución y la gravedad clínica fueron los factores asociados que interfirieron con la respuesta terapéutica. Conclusiones: la toxina botulínica A es efectiva en la mayoría de los casos tratados. Los mejores resultados se obtienen en los casos con menor grado de desviación y con menor tiempo de evolución entre el inicio del estrabismo y la inyección del medicamento(AU)

Objectives: to assess the results of the use of botulinum toxin A in correcting paralytic strabismus and to identify those associated factors that have an impact on the therapeutic response. Methods: a descriptive study of a series of 93 cases with paralytic strabismus which were treated with botulinum toxin A. Results: fifty three cases were diagnosed with mild, 38 with moderate and just two with severe strabismus. The time of progression and the clinical severity were related factors that influence the therapeutic response. Conclusions: botulinum toxin A is effective in most of cases. The best results are achieved in those people with lower deviation degree and less time of progression elapsed from the onset of strabismus to the administration of the injected medication(AU)

Assuntos