RESUMO

AIM: To evaluate the influence of different kinematics on the efficiency and safety of an engine-driven file for glide path preparation in second mesiobuccal canals (MB2) of maxillary molars. In addition, the torsional resistance of the file was assessed after use. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-six maxillary first and second molars with two canals in the mesiobuccal root were selected and the anatomy of the canals was verified by micro-CT. The teeth were divided into 4 groups (n = 9) according to the kinematics used for glide path preparation: continuous rotation (CR), 30°/150° reciprocation (REC 30°/150°), 30°/90° reciprocation (REC 30°/90°), and 90° optimum glide path motion (OGP 90°). The duration of the procedure, number of canals in which the file reached the full working length (RFWL), canal volume before and after the procedure, rate of file fracture, and file torsional strength after use were evaluated. The ANOVA and Tukey tests or Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: No significant differences among the groups were found for procedure duration, success at reaching the FWL, distance from the file to apex, and number of fractured files (P > 0.05). The CR group showed a significant decrease in rotation angle compared with REC 90° and OGP 90° groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in canal volume among the groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The type of kinematics used did not affect the efficiency, success rate, and shaping ability of the file during glide path preparation. CR seems to induce more torsional stress than the other kinematics. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The glide path preparation of narrow canals such as the MB2 is difficult and accidents such as file fracture may occur. This study showed that reciprocation with different file angulations can be safer during this challenging stage.

Assuntos

RESUMO

We evaluated in vitro the influence of nickel-titanium instruments kinematics on the accuracy and variation of root canal working length measurements, performed with an integrated apex locator, at glide path and at the end of shaping. Forty-four mandibular incisors, included in an alginate model, were allocated at random to two groups: reciprocating and rotary. Working length was determined at glide path stage and at the end of shaping. Measurements given by the integrated apex locator were matched with visual measurements. The apex locator accuracy was based on inter-group comparison. The variation in working length was based on intra-group comparison. Kinematics influenced the accuracy of measurements only after shaping (p < 0.05), and not in the glide path (p > 0.05). Rotary had values closer to the visual measurements. Diminishing of measures occurred after shaping for reciprocating (p < 0.05); and at glide-path stage for rotary (p > 0.05). The integrated apex locator was more accurate with rotary kinematics.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance (CFR) of PathFile (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and ScoutRace (FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) glide path files which were either new or previously used. Forty PathFile (PF) 19/.02 and 40 ScoutRace (SR) 20/.02 instruments were used for this study. Half of the files in each group were used (PF-U and SR-U) in the 3D demo tooth models (FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) for creating glide paths, while the other half was new (PF-N and SR-N) and directly subjected to the cyclic fatigue test. The new and used files (n=80) were rotated in the cyclic fatigue test device with an artificial stainless-steel canal (60° curvature, 5 mm radius 1.5 mm width and 3.0 mm depth) under the continuous irrigation with distilled water at 37°C until fracture occurred. Time to fracture was recorded and the Weibull reliability analysis was performed. Data were statistically analysed. Conformity to normal distribution was examined using the Shapiro-Wilk test. A paired two-sample t-test was used to compare the TTF values according to the time within the groups. The new instruments (PF-N and SR-N) showed better CFR than the used groups (PF-U and SR-U) (P SR-N>PF-U>SR-U. Reuse of both glide path instruments reduced the time to fracture and the cyclic fatigue resistance of the files.

RESUMEN: El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar la resistencia a la fatiga cíclica (CFR en inglés) de las limas PathFile (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Suiza) y ScoutRace (FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Suiza) de tipo glide path, nuevas o ya previamente utilizadas. Para este estudio se utilizaron 40 instrumentos PathFile (PF) 19/.02 y 40 ScoutRace (SR) 20/.02. La mitad de las limas de cada grupo se utilizaron (PF-U y SR-U) en los modelos dentales de demostración 3D (FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de- Fonds, Suiza) para crear trayectorias de deslizamiento, mientras que la otra mitad se utilizaron nuevas directamente a la prueba de fatiga cíclica (PF-N y SR-N). Las limas nuevas y usadas (n=80) se hicieron girar en el dispositivo de prueba de fatiga cíclica con un canal artificial de acero inoxidable (curvatura de 60°, radio de 5mm, anchura de 1,5mm y profundidad de 3,0mm) bajo irrigación continua con agua destilada a 37°C hasta que se produjo la fractura. Se registró el tiempo hasta la fractura y se realizó el análisis de fiabilidad de Weibull. Los datos se analizaron estadísticamente. La conformidad con la distribución normal se examinó mediante la prueba de Shapiro- Wilk. Se utilizó una prueba t de dos muestras pareadas para comparar los valores de TTF según el tiempo dentro de los grupos. Los instrumentos nuevos (PF-N y SR- N) mostraron una mejor CFR que los grupos previamente utilizados (PF-U y SR-U) (p SR-N >PF-U >SR-U. La reutilización de ambos instrumentos tipo glide path redujo el tiempo hasta la fractura y la resistencia a la fatiga cíclica de las limas.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Aims: To compare the shaping efficiency of the XP-endo Shaper with or without glide path preparation with sequenced Scout Race files in J-shaped resin blocks Material and Methods: Forty simulated J-shaped root canals were classified into two groups (n=20). While the root canals were shaped with XPS after a glide path was created with Scout Race files in Group 1, the same procedures were done without the glide path preparation in Group 2. The pre-and post-instrumentation images were taken and superimposed. Transportation value (TV), centering ability (CA) and the total amount of resin removed (TRR) was calculated by using the obtained images with Adobe Photoshop CS5 software. These parameters were calculated based on 18 reference points (9 inner/9 outer walls) with 1-mm intervals according to 3 sections (coronal, middle, and apical of the canals). The data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and then Dunn's multiple comparison tests (p ≤ 0.05). Results: More resin was removed in Group 2 apical and coronal sections than in Group 1 (p=0.036). In Group 2, a higher transportation value was obtained in apical and middle sections compared to Group 1 (p<0.001). Group 1 showed a higher centering ratio in apical and middle sections than in Group 2 (p<0.001). The centering ability of the instruments was decreased in the curvature part (middle section) of the canals. Conclusions: Within the limits of this study, glide path preparation using Scout Race instruments improved the shaping ability of XPS instrument by leading to less transportation and maintaining centering ability.

RESUMO

This study evaluated the ability of reciprocating glide path instruments to reach the full working length (RFWL). Thirty mesial roots of mandibular molars were matched into 2 groups (n = 15 teeth, 30 root canals), according to the system used for glide path: WaveOne Gold Glider (WOGG) and R-Pilot. The samples with fractured instruments or when it was not possible to RFWL were scanned using micro-computed tomography. Fractured instruments were also visualised through a scanning electron microscopy to verify the type of fracture. The parameters were compared statistically by Fisher's and chi-square tests (P < 0.05). No instrument fractures were observed in the R-pilot, while 2 fractures occurred in the WOGG group (P > 0.05). RFLW was achieved in 29 canals (96.66%) and 28 canals (93.33%) with R-pilot and WOGG instruments, respectively (P > 0.05). The instruments are able to RFWL in mesial canals of mandibular molars. WOGG showed two fractures while no R-Pilot instruments fractured.

Assuntos

RESUMO

AIM: To evaluate in a laboratory setting the performance of two reciprocating glide path systems, WaveOne Gold Glider (WO) and R-Pilot (RP), to create a glide path in mesial root canals of mandibular molars and to assess the torsional resistance of instruments after performing the glide path. METHODOLOGY: A total of 60 mesial root canals of extracted human mandibular molars were divided into two groups (n = 30) according to the glide path system to be used. The data from the volume of each canal, acquired by microcomputed tomography (micro-CT), were validated statistically for the anatomical pairing of the groups. Preparation time, frequency in gaining apical patency, plastic deformation rate of instruments, and canal transportation and centring ability were recorded and compared statistically. The torsional fatigue of the instruments after use was also evaluated. Data were analysed using Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U-test with a 5% significance level. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between groups regarding the time required to perform the glide path, the frequency distributions of the canals classified as patent and the instruments with plastic deformation after use (P > 0.05). No significant differences were found between groups regarding the degree of canal transportation and centring ability at the cervical, middle and apical thirds (P > 0.05). The RP groups had significantly greater maximum torsional strength values compared with the WO groups (P < 0.05). The used WO group had greater angular deflection to fracture when compared to the new WO group (P < 0.05). A significant difference was also found in the percentage of loss of angular deflection in a comparison of the WO group with the RP group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The WO and RP instruments performed the same in terms of preparation time, plastic deformation, gaining apical patency, degree of canal transportation and centring ability. The RP instruments had greater torsional strength, less angular deflection and lower percentage of loss in angular deflection than the WO. The used WO group had the greatest angular deflection values.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study assessed the number of mesial and distal canals of mandibular molars in which the R-Pilot pathfinding reciprocating instrument reached the working length (WL) during macro glide path procedure. Fracture and deformation rates were also evaluated. METHODS: One hundred fifty-six root canals of 52 teeth were scouted to the length of the apical foramen. Then the R-Pilot instrument was positioned at the canal orifice and activated. The instrument was moved by using a pecking motion and light apical pressure. This procedure was repeated in an attempt to reach the WL. The type of fracture and/or instrument deformation was assessed by scanning electron microscopy, whereas the roots with fractured instruments were scanned through micro-computed tomography. The percentage frequency distribution of fractures, deformations, and root canals in which the R-Pilot reached the WL were recorded and statistically compared by using the Pearson's χ2 test with α = 5%. RESULTS: R-Pilot instruments reached the WL in 139 root canals (89.10%), and χ2 test showed a significant difference between the observed frequencies and the expected frequencies (χ2 = 95.41, P = .000). The observed frequencies of fractures (2.56%) and deformations (1.92%) were also significantly lower than the expected (fracture: χ2 = 140.41, P = .000; deformation: χ2 = 144.23, P = .000). Fractures occurred mostly at the apical and curved parts of the root canals. CONCLUSIONS: R-Pilot reached the WL in 89.10% of the root canals of mandibular molars with fracture and deformation rates of 2.56% and 1.92%, respectively.

Assuntos

RESUMO

AIM: To evaluate the bending, buckling and torsional resistance of ProGlider (PG) (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland), R-Pilot (RP) (VDW, Munich, Germany) and WaveOne Gold Glider (WOGG) (Dentsply Sirona). METHODOLOGY: Ninety instruments were used: 30 PG (size 0.16, .02v taper), 30 RP (size 0.125, .04 taper) and 30 WOGG (size 0.15, .02v taper). The bending resistance test was performed on 10 randomly selected instruments of each system according to ISO 3630-1 specifications. For the buckling resistance test, a loading was applied in the axial direction of each instrument using a universal test machine, with a 20 N cell and 15 mm min-1 speed, in the axial direction. When a lateral elastic displacement of 1 mm occurred, the force was registered. The torsional resistance test was performed according to ISO 3630-1 specifications. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way anova and post hoc Student-Newman-Keuls test (P < 0.05). RESULTS: WOGG had the lowest bending resistance, whilst RP had the highest bending resistance (P < 0.05). RP also had the highest buckling resistance, and WOGG had the lowest (P < 0.05). PG had intermediate results regarding bending and buckling resistance, with significant differences to RP and WOGG (P < 0.05). RP had the highest torsional strength and the lowest angular deflection when compared to PG and WOGG (P < 0.05). No differences in the torsional strength and angular deflection were observed between WOGG and PG (P> 0.05). CONCLUSION: The glide path instruments had different behaviours in term of bending, buckling and torsional resistance.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Preliminary canal enlargement (glide path preparation) may play a significant role in the development of pain. The aim of this systematic review of randomized clinical trials was to assess the influence of glide path kinematics during endodontic treatment on the occurrence and intensity of intraoperative and postoperative pain. METHODS: A search was performed in June 2019 in six electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, SciELO, Embase and Web of Science) and two grey literature databases (OpenGrey and OpenThesis). The bibliographic references of the eligible articles were also hand-searched. The included clinical studies assessed the occurrence and intensity of intraoperative and/or postoperative pain after root canal preparation without glide path preparation (WGP) or with glide path preparation using manual (M-GP), continuous rotary (CR-GP), or reciprocating (R-GP) instruments. The primary outcome was the occurrence and intensity of intraoperative and postoperative pain, while analgesic consumption was the secondary outcome. The full texts of the eligible studies were analyzed by two reviewers who performed calibration exercises to verify the risk of bias and quality of the individual studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool. RESULTS: From 1283 identified articles, only six studies were included in the qualitative analysis of the results, with a total sample of 884 patients/teeth. Three studies presented a high risk of bias, while three studies presented a moderate risk. Two studies reported that CR-GP causes lower pain levels than M-GP and WGP, and three studies showed no differences between CR-GP and R-GP. Regarding analgesic consumption, two studies found no differences among glide path kinematics, and one study reported lower consumption for CR-GP than for M-GP. Because of the limited number of studies and methodological differences, no statistical analyses were performed for the glide path kinematics comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Compelling evidence indicating a significantly different occurrence and intensity of pain among glide path kinematics is lacking. The systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database [CRD42020139989].

Assuntos

RESUMO

The role and effect of glide path preparation in root canal treatment remain controversial. This systematic review aims to compare apical transportation and canal centring of different glide path preparation techniques, with or without subsequent engine-driven root canal preparation. A database search in PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, Scopus, EBSCO Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source and Virtual Health Library was conducted, using appropriate key words to identify the effect of glide path preparation (or its absence) on apical transportation and canal centring. An assessment for the risk of bias in included studies was carried out. Amongst 2146 studies, 18 satisfied the inclusion criteria. Nine studies assessed glide path preparation per se, comparing apical transportation and canal centring of rotary systems and/or manual files; eleven further investigations examined the efficacy of the glide path prior to final canal preparation with different engine-driven systems. Risk of bias and other study design features with potential influence on study outcomes and clinical implications were assessed. Based on the available evidence, and within the limitation of the studies included, preparation of a glide path using rotary sequences performs similarly (in most of the component studies) or significantly better than manual preparation when assessing apical transportation or canal centring. When compared to the absence of a glide path, canal shaping following glide path preparation was of similar, or significantly better quality, in regard to apical transportation or canal centring.

Assuntos

RESUMO

La mantención de la anatomía original del canal radicular incide directamente en el éxito del tratamiento endodóntico. Para ello, los sistemas rotatorios de instrumentación requieren de canales radiculares permeables. Existen distintas limas y sistemas para la permeabilización o glide path como las limas tipo K manuales de acero inoxidable y los sistemas de NiTi rotatorios PathFile y ProGlider (Dentsply, Maillefer). Así, el objetivo de esta investigación fue comparar la capacidad de distintos sistemas de permeabilización para mantener la anatomía radicular sin producir transporte apical en canales mesiales de molares inferiores humanos extraídos. Se realizó un estudio cuantitativo experimental cuya muestra estuvo conformada por 36 canales mesiales de molares mandibulares humanos extraídos. Las muestras fueron divididas aleatoriamente en tres grupos conformados por 12 canales, cada uno de los cuales fueron sometidos a distintos sistemas de permeabilización (Lima K, PathFile y ProGlider). Las muestras fueron fotografiadas antes y después de la permeabilización utilizando un microscopio con magnificación 30X. Se cuantificó el desplazamiento del canal radicular en sentido mesio - distal y buco - lingual posterior a la permeabilización. Para el análisis de los datos se utilizó el paquete estadístico InfoStat/L y se aplicó la prueba de ANOVA / Tukey. Se observó que el sistema PathFile produce mayor transporte del canal radicular en su tercio apical en la dirección mesio-distal (p=0,77) y el sistema ProGlider en la dirección buco-lingual (p=0,57). Sin embargo, estas diferencias no fueron significativas. En conclusión, los sistemas de permeabilización analizados no presentaron diferencias en cuanto a su capacidad para mantener la anatomía sin producir transporte apical.

Preservation of the original root canal anatomy has a direct influence on the success of an endodontic treatment. In order to achieve this, rotary instrumentation systems require permeable root canals. Different files and systems are used for the establishment of a glide path such as manual stainless steel K files and NiTi rotatory systems like PathFile and ProGlider (Dentsply, Maillefer). Thus, the objective of this research was to compare the ability of different systems to create a glide path and maintain root canal anatomy without producing apical transportation in mesial root canals of extracted human lower molars. A quantitative experimental study was performed with a sample of 36 mesial root canals of extracted human mandibular molars. The samples were randomly divided into three groups consisting of 12 root canals each, which were subjected to different glide path systems (K-Files, PathFile and ProGlider). Samples were photographed before and after creating glide path using a microscope with 30X magnification. The displacement of the root canal in a mesio - distal and bucco - lingual direction was quantified after creating glide path. Data was analyzed using the statistical package InfoStat / L and the ANOVA / Tukey test was applied. The PathFile system produced greater transport of the root canal in its apical third in the mesio-distal direction (p = 0.77) and the ProGlider system in the bucco-lingual direction (p = 0.57). However, these differences were not significant. In conclusion, the glide path systems analyzed do not present any differences in their ability to maintain the anatomy without producing apical transportation.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of establishing glide path on the centering ability and preparation time of two single-file reciprocating systems in mesial root canals of mandibular molars. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty extracted mandibular molars with curvatures of 25-39 degrees and separate foramina for the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals, were divided into four groups (n=15); WaveOne+glide path; WaveOne; Reciproc+glide path and Reciproc. Non-patent canals were excluded and only one canal in each tooth was instrumented. A manual glide path was established in first and third groups with #10, 15 and 20 hand K-files. Preparation was performed with reciprocating in-and-out motion, with a 3-4 mm amplitude and slight apical pressure. Initial and final radiographs were taken to analyze the amount of dentin removed in the instrumented canals. The radiographs were superimposed with an image editing software and examined to assess discrepancies at 3-, 6- and 9-mm distances from the apex. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis. The level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Preparation in groups without glide paths was swifter than the other groups (P=0.001). However, no difference was observed regarding centering ability. CONCLUSION: Establishing a glide path increased the total instrumentation time for preparing curved canals with WaveOne and Reciproc instruments. Glide path had no influence on the centering ability of these systems.

RESUMO

Abstract The aim of the present study was to prospectively assess the frequency of teeth in which the Reciproc instruments were able to reach the full working length (WL). This case series study enrolled 277 consecutive teeth requiring primary endodontic treatment performed with the Reciproc system (VDW) without a previous glide path by 3 experienced endodontists. Instruments R25, R40 or R50 were selected, respectively, for narrow, medium and large canals, according to the preoperative radiographs, as per manufacturer recommendation. Canals were instrumented and classified as reaching the full WL (RFWL) and not reaching the full WL (NRFWL), according to the ability of the Reciproc instrument to reach without a glide path the full electronically determined WL. Finally, canals were filled using a single matched cone technique. Pearson's squared-chi test compared the frequency distributions of canals classified as RFWL and NRFWL. From a total pool of 673 root canals, Reciproc instruments reached the FWL in 96.28% of cases and 3 fractures occurred. For narrow canals the percentage of RFWL was 95.37% with 3 fractures. For medium and large canals, the R40 or R50 instruments reached the FWL in 98.51% and 97.62% of the cases respectively, with no fracture. Enlarging of root canals using the Reciproc instruments up to the FWL without a glide path is successful in a great percentage of cases. This case series suggests the possibility of using a single instrument to enlarge the root canal space of teeth by a simpler approach without an a prioriglide path procedure.

Resumo O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar prospectivamente a frequência de dentes em que os instrumentos Reciproc foram capazes de alcançar o comprimento de trabalho (CT) completo. Este estudo com série de casos envolveu 277 dentes consecutivos que necessitavam de tratamento endodôntico primário realizado com o sistema Reciproc (VDW) sem a realização de uma via de penetração inicial (glide path) prévio por 3 endodontistas experientes. Instrumentos R25, R40 ou R50 foram selecionados, respectivamente, para canais estreitos, médios e largos, de acordo com as radiografias pré-operatórias, seguindo a recomendação do fabricante. Os canais foram instrumentados e classificados como atingindo o WL completo (ACTC) e de não atingindo o WL completo (NACTC), de acordo com a capacidade do instrumento Reciproc de alcançar o CT completo determinado eletronicamente, sem a realização de glide path. Finalmente, os canais foram preenchidos usando a técnica de obturação de cone único. O teste de qui-quadrado de Pearson comparou a frequência das distribuições de canais classificados como ACTC e NACTC. A partir de um pool total de 673 canais radiculares, instrumentos Reciproc atingiram o CTC em 96,28% dos casos e 3 fraturas ocorreram. Para canais estreitos, a percentagem de ACTC foi 95,37% com 3 fraturas. Para canais médios e largos, os instrumentos R40 e R50 atingiram o CTC em 98,51% e 97,62% dos casos, respectivamente, sem fratura. Ampliação dos canais radiculares utilizando os instrumentos Reciproc até o CTC sem a realização de glide pathfoi bem sucedida em uma grande porcentagem dos casos. Esta série de casos sugere a possibilidade de utilizar um único instrumento para ampliar o espaço do canal radicular usando uma abordagem mais simples, sem um procedimento prévio deglide path.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the apical transportation, the centering ability, and the cleaning effectiveness of a reciprocating single-file system associated to different glide path techniques. METHODS: The mesial root canals of 52 mandibular molars were randomly distributed into 4 groups (n = 13) according to the different glide path techniques used before biomechanical preparation with Reciproc System (RS): KF/RS (sizes 10 and 15 K-files), NGP/RS (no glide path, only reciprocating system), PF/RS (sizes 13, 16, and 19 PathFile instruments), and NP (no preparation). Cone-beam computed tomography analysis was performed before and after instrumentation for apical third images acquisition. Apical transportation and its direction were evaluated by using the formula D = (X1 - X2) - (Y1 - Y2), and the centering ability was analyzed by the formula CC = (X1 - X2/Y1 - Y2 or Y1 - Y2/X1 - X2). The samples were submitted to histologic processing and analyzed under a digital microscope for debris quantification. The values were statistically analyzed (Kruskal-Wallis, the Dunn multiple comparisons test, P < .05). RESULTS: All groups had similar apical transportation values, with no significant difference among them (P > .05). Groups had a tendency toward transportation in the mesial direction. No technique had perfect centering ability (=1.0), with no significant difference among them. KF/RS had larger amount of debris, with statistically significant difference in comparison with NGP/RS (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The different glide path techniques promoted minimal apical transportation, and the reciprocating single-file system tested remained relatively centralized within the root canal. Also, the different techniques interfered in the cleaning effectiveness of the reciprocating system.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción: para prevenir la fractura de instrumentos endodonticos actualmente se siguen investigando materiales, técnicas y diseños los cuales buscan reducir su incidencia. La conformación de túnel liso (Glide Path) se ha propuesto con este fin, sin embargo su utilidad ha sido controvertida. Objetivo: comprobar teóricamente mediante la utilización de un análisis de elementos finitos, la utilidad de la conformación de túnel liso, antes de la utilización de limas rotatorias endodonticas de níquel-titanio. Métodos: se realizó una simulación numérica mediante un análisis de elementos finitos, para lo cual se construyeron modelos matemáticos de las limas rotatorias de níquel-titanio S1 y S2 de la serie Protaper®. Con el software Simulation multyphisics de Autodesk® se programaron las propiedades mecánicas de las limas y un límite de falla por fractura de 1270,588 MPa. Posteriormente se aplicó el torque recomendado por el fabricante y se fijo la punta del instrumento (sin conformación de túnel liso) aplicando allí restricciones en todos los grados de libertad.Para simular la realización de la conformación de túnel liso, se aplicaron restricciones en todos los grados de libertad a una determinada distancia de la punta del instrumento, simulando de esta forma que la punta del instrumento permanecía libre. Resultados: al fijar la punta de las limas, los esfuerzos máximos fueron 1545,77 MPa para la S1 y 1306,47 MPa para la S2, observando fractura de los instrumentos. Al fijar las limas a distancia de la punta no se observó fractura. Conclusiones: se demostró teóricamente que al impedir que se atrapen la punta de las limas, se previene su fractura y que dicho atrapamiento se evita con una conformación de túnel liso, por lo que se concluye que este procedimiento es útil para prevenir la fractura de los instrumentos rotatorios de níquel-titanio(AU)

Introduction: materials, techniques and designs continue to be studied with the purpose of reducing the incidence of fracture in endodontic instruments. Shaping of the glide path has been proposed for this end; however, its usefulness has been a matter of controversy. Objective: based on the finite element method, carry out a theoretical analysis of the usefulness of shaping the glide path before using rotary nickel-titanium endodontic files. Methods: numerical simulation was performed based on finite element analysis, to achieve which mathematical models were built of rotary nickel-titanium files S1 and S2 of the Protaper™ series. Autodesk™ Simulation Multiphysics software was used to program the mechanical properties of the files, as well as a fracture failure limit of 1270.588 MPa. The torque recommended by the manufacturer was then applied and the instrument tip fixed into place (without shaping the glide path) with restrictions on all degrees of freedom. In order to simulate glide path shaping, restrictions were applied to all degrees of freedom at a certain distance from the instrument tip, thus simulating that the instrument tip remained free. Results: on fixing the file tips, maximum efforts were 1545.77 Mpa for S1 and 1306.47 Mpa for S2. Instrument fracture was observed. When files were fixed at a distance from the tip, no fracture was observed. Conclusions: it was theoretically demonstrated that when file tips are prevented from being caught, fracture is prevented as well, and such catch is avoided by shaping the glide path. It is therefore concluded that the procedure is useful to prevent the fracture of rotary nickel-titanium instruments(AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare, using digital subtraction radiography, apical transportation in mesiobuccal root canals of extracted human maxillary molars instrumented with ProTaper Universal F3 and F4 files (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) with and without the prior creation of glide paths using the PathFile system and to compare, using cone-beam computed tomographic imaging, remaining dentin thickness (RDT) after complete preparation. METHODS: Forty mesiobuccal roots with curvatures of 20°-35° were used. In group A, glide paths were created with PathFile #1, #2, and #3 to the working length; in group B, no glide paths were used. All canals were instrumented up to F4 to the working length. Digital subtraction radiographic images were obtained in buccolingual and mesiodistal directions. Apical transportation associated with F3 or F4 was calculated based on the difference between the tip of the first and the last instrument analyzed in each group. RDT was calculated based on cone-beam computed tomographic images. RESULTS: Apical transportation was higher after F4 regardless of the use of the PathFile system. No statistically significant differences between groups A and B were observed in apical transportation after instrumentation with F3 or F4 (P > .05). Group A showed greater RDT values at 2 (buccal and mesial walls, P < .05) and 3 mm (buccal and distal walls, P < .05) from the apex but not at 1 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the PathFile system before root canal preparation with ProTaper Universal F3 and F4 did not influence apical transportation but was associated with greater RDTs at 2 and 3 mm from the apex.

Assuntos

RESUMO

AIM: To assess and compare the flexibility and torsional resistance of PathFile, RaCe ISO 10 and Scout RaCe instruments in relation to stainless steel K-File hand instruments. METHODOLOGY: Rotary PathFile (sizes 13, 16 and 19; .02 taper), Race ISO 10 (size 10; 0.02, 0.04 and 0.06 tapers), Scout RaCe (sizes 10, 15 and 20; 0.02 taper) and hand K-File (sizes 10, 15 and 20; 0.02 taper) instruments were evaluated. Alloy chemical composition, phases present and transformation temperatures were determined for the NiTi instruments. For all instruments, diameters at each millimetre from the tip as well as cross-sectional areas at 3 mm from the tip were measured based on ANSI/ADA Specification No. 101 using image analysis software. Resistance to bending and torsional resistance were determined according to specification ISO 3630-1. Vickers microhardness measurements were also taken in all instruments to assess their strength. Data were analysed using analysis of variance (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The alloys used in the manufacture of the three types of NiTi instruments had approximately the same chemical composition, but the PathFile instruments had a higher Af transformation temperature and contained a small amount of B19' martensite. All instruments had diameter values within the standard tolerance. The bending and torsional resistance values were significantly increased relative to the instrument diameter and cross-sectional area. CONCLUSIONS: PathFile instruments were the most flexible and the least torque resistant, whilst the stainless steel instruments were the least flexible although they were more torque resistant than the NiTi instruments.

Assuntos

RESUMO

AIM: To assess the frequency in which the Reciproc instrument reaches the full working length (FWL) of mandibular molar canals without a glide path. METHODOLOGY: From a pool of mandibular molars, 253 root canals were classified as straight (G1) and, 249 root canals as moderately curved (G2) following Schneider's method. A R25 Reciproc instrument (VDW, Munich, Germany) was advanced in the canals without any previous glide path. All cases where Reciproc instruments reached the FWL were classified as 'Reaching the FWL' (RFWL). When the FWL was not reached by the R25, the root canals were classified as 'Not Reaching the FWL' (NRFWL). Pearson's χ(2) test compared (i) the frequency distributions of root canals classified as RFWL and NRFWL for each group and (ii) the frequency distributions of NRFWL canals between the groups. RESULTS: In G1, 9 cases (3.56%) and in G2, 23 canals (9.34%) were classified as NRFWL. The difference between NRFWL and RFWL was significant in both groups (P = 0.00, χ(2) = 217.2 for G1; P = 0.00, χ(2) = 167.8 for G2). The frequency of NRFWL was significantly higher for G2 (P = 0.02, χ(2) = 5.452). CONCLUSION: The R25 Reciproc instrument is able to reach the FWL of straight- and moderate-curved mandibular molar canals without a glide path in a large proportion of cases.

Assuntos

RESUMO

O presente estudo avaliou a eficácia do instrumento Reciproc®#25 em atingir o forame de canais de molares inferiores sem um glide path manual prévio. Para isso, uma amostra geral de 300 molares inferiores foi radiografada e previamente selecionada quanto ao grau de curvatura segundo critério de Schneider sendo divididos em classes I e II. Após a aplicação dos critérios de inclusão e exclusão, uma amostragem total de 502 canais radiculares foi incluída para formar os grupos experimentais: 253 canais no grupo de molares inferiores classe I e 249 no grupo de molares classe II. Todos os canais foram instrumentados diretamente com a lima 25, sem nenhum glide path prévio, seguindo criteriosamente as diretrizes do fabricante. Os dados foram descritos como a frequência da distribuição do número de canais (%) nos quais foi possível chegar ao forame apical sem a necessidade de glide path, assim como o número de fraturas em cada grupo. Os resultados compilados dos 2 grupos experimentais mostraram que em 93,4% do total dos canais instrumentados, o instrumento R25 foi capaz de ir até o forame apical sem a necessidade de glide path. Em 6,4% do total dos canais, o instrumento R25 não chegou até o forame apical e em somente 0,2% dos casos ocorreu fratura da lima (um caso no grupo classe I, enquanto no grupo classe II não houve nenhuma ocorrência de fratura). O teste Qui-quadrado foi realizado para verificar se uma determinada classe de canais encontra-se mais associada ou não a necessidade de glide path quando o sistema Reciproc® é usado. No grupo de molares classe II houve maior número de canais (23) que o instrumento R25 não foi capaz de ir até o forame apical do que no grupo de molares classe I (9), sendo essa diferença estatisticamente significante (Qui-quadrado, p=0,020, X2=5,452). Dentro das condições experimentais do presente estudo, pode-se concluir então quea lima R25 mostrou uma alta eficácia em instrumentar toda a extensão dos canais de molares inferiores ...

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Reciproc® #25 instrument in reaching the apical foramen of mandibular molars root canals without any manual glide path. For this, a general sample of 300 mandibular molars was radiographed and graded accordantly the degree of curvature (Schneider’s criteria) – classes I and II. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 502 root canals were included to form the two experimental groups: 253 canals in the class Igroupand 249 in the class II group. All canals were instrumented directly with R25 file, without any manual glide path, carefully following the manufacture’s guidelines. The pooled results of two experimental groups showed that the R25 instrument was able to reach the apical foramen without glide path in 93.4% of the cases. In 6.4%, the instrument R25 was unable to reach the apical foramen and in only 0.2% of the cases occurredinstrument fracture (one fracture in the class I group andnone in the class II group). The chi-square test was accomplished to verify that a certain class of channels is more associated with or without the need for glide path when the Reciproc® system is used. . In the group of class II molar higher number of channels (23) that the instrument was not able to go to the apical foramen than in the molar class I (9), and this difference was statistically significant (Chi-square test, p = 0.020, X2 = 5.452) Within the experimental conditions of this study, it can be concluded that the file R 25 showed to be a highly effective instrument in the instrumentation of the entire length of the canals of mandibular molars class I and II without prior glide path. In addition, the instrumentation system was shown to be highly safe in the rate of fracture.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introdução: Instrumentos rotatórios em níquel-titânio reduzem erros processuais e o tempo requerido para finalização do preparo do canal radicular. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar as ocorrências de transporte apical e aberrações nos canais produzidas com diferentes instrumentos utilizados para a criação de trajetória-guia (“glide path”) no preparo de canais curvos: limas manuais K e limas rotatórias em níquel-titânio PathFile e Mtwo. Material e Métodos: Os canais mesiais de 45 primeiros e segundos molares inferiores (com ângulos de curvatura entre 25 e 35 graus) foram selecionados para o estudo. As amostras foram divididas aleatoriamente em três grupos de 15 canais cada e o preparo foi realizado por um endodontista utilizando limas manuais de aço inoxidável tipo K #10-15-20, conicidade 0,02 (grupo M), instrumentos rotatórios PathFile #13-16-19, conicidade 0,02 (grupo PF) e instrumentos rotatórios Mtwo #10/04- #15/05- #20/06 (grupo MT). Foi utilizada a técnica da dupla radiografia digital, pré e pós-instrumentação, para avaliar se ocorreu transporte apical e/ou aberrações na morfologia dos canais. Por meio de uma análise computadorizada e com o auxílio de magnificação, as imagens inicial e final do eixo central foram comparadas por meio de sua sobreposição. Os espécimes foram analisados por 3 avaliadores, cuja calibração foi checada por meio do teste de concordância de Kendall. Resultados: Não ocorreu transporte apical nem aberração na morfologia do canal em 100% dos dentes, portanto nenhuma análise estatística foi realizada. Conclusão: Tanto os instrumentos rotatórios PathFile e Mtwo quanto os instrumentos manuais utilizados para a criação de trajetória-guia não exerceram influência sobre a ocorrência de transporte apical nem promoveram aberrações na morfologia dos canais .

Introduction: Nickel-titanium rotary instruments reduce procedural errors and the time required to finish root canal preparation.The goal of this study was to evaluate the occurrences of apical transportation and canal aberrations produced with different instruments used to create a glide path in the preparation of curved root canals, namely: manual K files and PathFile and Mtwo nickel-titanium rotary files. Methods:The mesial canals of 45 mandibular first and second molars (with curvature angles between 25 and 35 degrees) were selected for this study. The specimens were divided randomly into three groups with 15 canals each, and canal preparation was performed by an endodontist using #10-15-20 K-type stainless steel manual files (Group M), #13-16-19 PathFile rotary instruments (Group PF), and #10-15-20 Mtwo rotary instruments (Group MT). The double digital radiograph technique was used, pre- and post-instrumentation, to assess whether apical transportation and/or aberration in root canal morphology occurred. The initial and final images of the central axis of the canals were compared by superimposition through computerized analysis and with the aid of magnification. The specimens were analyzed by 3 evaluators, whose calibration was checked using the Kendall agreement test. Results: No apical transportation or aberration in root canal morphology occurred in any of the teeth; therefore, no statistical analysis was conducted. Conclusion: Neither the manual instruments nor the PathFile or Mtwo rotary instruments used to create a glide path had any influence on the occurrence of apical transportation or produced any canal aberration

Assuntos