RESUMO
The aim of the present study was to use different models that include body composition phenotypes for the evaluation of residual feed intake (RFI) in Nellore bulls of different ages. Phenotypic and genotypic data of bulls that had participated in feed efficiency tests of a commercial (COM) and an experimental (EXP) herd between 2007 and 2019 were used. The mean entry age in the two herds was 645 and 279 days, respectively. The phenotypes were evaluated: rib eye area (REA), backfat thickness (BFT), residual feed intake (RFIKOCH), RFI adjusted for REA (RFIREA), RFI adjusted for BFT (RFIBFT), and RFI adjusted for REA and BFT (RFIREA BFT). The (co)variance components and prediction of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were obtained by REML using ssGBLUP in single and two-trait analyses. Spearman's correlations were calculated based on the GEBV for RFIKOCH. The RFI phenotypes exhibited moderate heritability estimates in both herds (0.17 ± 0.03 to 0.27 ± 0.04). The genetic correlation between phenotypes was positive and high (0.99) in the two herds, a fact that permitted the creation of a single database (SDB). The heritability estimates of the SDB were also of moderate magnitude for the different definitions of RFI (0.19 ± 0.04 to 0.21 ± 0.04). The genetic correlations were positive and high between RFI traits 0.97 ± 0.01 to 0.99 ± 0.01), and positive and low/moderate between REA and BFT (0.01 ± 0.10 to 0.31 ± 0.12). The selection of animals based on the GEBV for RFIKOCH did not alter the ranking of individuals selected for RFIREA, RFIBFT, and RFIREA BFT. The results of the present study suggest that records of Nellore bulls of different ages and with different body compositions can be combined in a SDB for RFI calculation. Therefore, young animals can be evaluated in feed efficiency tests in order to reduce costs and the generation interval and possibly to obtain a higher response to selection.
Assuntos
Composição Corporal , Ingestão de Alimentos , Animais , Bovinos/genética , Ingestão de Alimentos/genética , Genoma , Masculino , Fenótipo , CostelasRESUMO
The level of genetic diversity in a population is inversely proportional to the linkage disequilibrium (LD) between individual single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and quantitative trait loci (QTLs), leading to lower predictive ability of genomic breeding values (GEBVs) in high genetically diverse populations. Haplotype-based predictions could outperform individual SNP predictions by better capturing the LD between SNP and QTL. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy and bias of individual-SNP- and haplotype-based genomic predictions under the single-step-genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) approach in genetically diverse populations. We simulated purebred and composite sheep populations using literature parameters for moderate and low heritability traits. The haplotypes were created based on LD thresholds of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.6. Pseudo-SNPs from unique haplotype alleles were used to create the genomic relationship matrix ( G ) in the ssGBLUP analyses. Alternative scenarios were compared in which the pseudo-SNPs were combined with non-LD clustered SNPs, only pseudo-SNPs, or haplotypes fitted in a second G (two relationship matrices). The GEBV accuracies for the moderate heritability-trait scenarios fitting individual SNPs ranged from 0.41 to 0.55 and with haplotypes from 0.17 to 0.54 in the most (Ne â 450) and less (Ne < 200) genetically diverse populations, respectively, and the bias fitting individual SNPs or haplotypes ranged between -0.14 and -0.08 and from -0.62 to -0.08, respectively. For the low heritability-trait scenarios, the GEBV accuracies fitting individual SNPs ranged from 0.24 to 0.32, and for fitting haplotypes, it ranged from 0.11 to 0.32 in the more (Ne â 250) and less (Ne â 100) genetically diverse populations, respectively, and the bias ranged between -0.36 and -0.32 and from -0.78 to -0.33 fitting individual SNPs or haplotypes, respectively. The lowest accuracies and largest biases were observed fitting only pseudo-SNPs from blocks constructed with an LD threshold of 0.3 (p < 0.05), whereas the best results were obtained using only SNPs or the combination of independent SNPs and pseudo-SNPs in one or two G matrices, in both heritability levels and all populations regardless of the level of genetic diversity. In summary, haplotype-based models did not improve the performance of genomic predictions in genetically diverse populations.
RESUMO
The constrained linear genomic selection index (CLGSI) is a linear combination of genomic estimated breeding values useful for predicting the net genetic merit, which in turn is a linear combination of true unobservable breeding values of the traits weighted by their respective economic values. The CLGSI is the most general genomic index and allows imposing constraints on the expected genetic gain per trait to make some traits change their mean values based on a predetermined level, while the rest of them remain without restrictions. In addition, it includes the unconstrained linear genomic index as a particular case. Using two real datasets and simulated data for seven selection cycles, we compared the theoretical results of the CLGSI with the theoretical results of the constrained linear phenotypic selection index (CLPSI). The criteria used to compare CLGSI vs. CLPSI efficiency were the estimated expected genetic gain per trait values, the selection response, and the interval between selection cycles. The results indicated that because the interval between selection cycles is shorter for the CLGSI than for the CLPSI, CLGSI is more efficient than CLPSI per unit of time, but its efficiency could be lower per selection cycle. Thus, CLGSI is a good option for performing genomic selection when there are genotyped candidates for selection.