Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 13(5)2020 May 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32414772

RESUMO

We describe a case of a biphasic anaphylactic reaction that occurred in a young woman soon after the ingestion of soy milk that led to her hospitalisation. Early recognition and appropriate treatment led to a successful outcome of this life-threatening condition. Challenges encountered in the care of this common illness are highlighted. There is a need for an increase in public awareness on dangerous allergic reactions caused by allergens present in food products in public use, thereby facilitating primary preventative measures to minimise its occurrence. Healthcare stakeholders need to implement measures of contemporary preventative medicine and efficient therapeutic protocols to safeguard the public welfare concerning this global health problem where appropriate interventions can reduce morbidity and mortality. Trial registration numbers NCT02991885 and NCT02851277.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/tratamento farmacológico , Saúde Global , Leite de Soja , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto Jovem
3.
BMJ Case Rep ; 13(2)2020 Feb 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32041756

RESUMO

A 25-year-old woman presented a challenging diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever (ARF). Initial symptoms included dry cough and three minor Jones criteria (unabating fever (38.4°C, 0d), elevated acute phase reactants (C-reactive protein, 13d) and joint pain (monoarthralgia) in her neck (0d)). ARF was diagnosed only after presentation of two major Jones criteria (polyarthritis/polyarthralgia (16d) and erythema marginatum (41d)) and positive antistreptolysin O titre (44d). Parotid swelling, peripheral oedema, elevated liver enzymes and diffuse lymphadenopathy complicated the diagnosis. Throat swab, chorea and carditis were negative or absent. Atypical ARF is challenging to recognise. There is no diagnostic test and its presentation is similar to that of other diseases. While the 2015 Jones criteria modification increased specificity of ARF diagnosis, atypical cases may still be missed, especially by physicians in developed countries. Suspicion of atypical ARF, especially after travel to high incidence regions, would allow for earlier treatment and prevention of rheumatic heart disease.


Assuntos
Febre Reumática/complicações , Febre Reumática/diagnóstico , Adulto , Antiestreptolisina/sangue , Artralgia/etiologia , Artrite/etiologia , Região do Caribe/epidemiologia , Tosse/etiologia , Diagnóstico Tardio , Edema/etiologia , Eritema/etiologia , Feminino , Febre/etiologia , Humanos , Linfadenopatia/etiologia , Diagnóstico Ausente , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Avaliação de Sintomas , Sinovite/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA