RESUMO
This study has a quantitative cross-sectional design that aims to investigate the relationships between gender, age, status (migrant or Chilean-born), educational satisfaction, and overall life satisfaction among adolescent students in 7th and 8th grades of the Chilean educational system. The sample includes 406 students from four municipal public educational centers located in the Santiago district of the Metropolitan Region of Chile, with at least 20% migrant enrollment. The data were analyzed using quantitative methods using the R language, with descriptive analysis, cross-tabulation analysis, and independence tests. The packages used were: ggplot2, tidyverse and ggstatplot. The study found that age has an impact on the level of satisfaction with education and relationships formed with peers. Specifically, younger students expressed higher levels of satisfaction in these areas compared to older students. Moreover, foreign students showed a statistically significant difference in relation to age range, suggesting that as these students grow older, they tend to become less satisfied with the relationships they form with their classmates. In contrast, no statistically significant difference was found among Chilean students, indicating that the findings discussed here may not be generalizable to this specific population. The analysis also indicates a significant difference in the entire sample, suggesting a correlation between age range and level of satisfaction with schooling.
Assuntos
Satisfação Pessoal , Estudantes , Humanos , Chile , Adolescente , Feminino , Masculino , Estudantes/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Fatores Etários , Instituições Acadêmicas , Fatores Sexuais , Migrantes/psicologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite accounting for a minority of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) diagnoses, females may experience differential survival relative to males. It is unclear if there are gender-based differences in receipt of treatment or disease-related outcomes for patients with MPM. We therefore utilized the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to assess patterns-of-care and overall survival (OS) among patients with MPM by gender. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed MPM treated from 2004 to 2013 were identified from the NCDB. The association between female gender and OS was assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models with propensity score matching. Patterns-of-care were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. The overall treatment effect was tested in subsets of patients by treatment strategy, histology, and clinical stage. RESULTS: A total of 18,799 patients were identified, of whom 14,728 (78%) were male and 4071 (22%) were female. Females were statistically more likely to present at a younger age, with fewer comorbidities, and with epithelioid histology. Despite these favorable prognostic features, women were less likely to receive surgery (P ≤ .001) or chemotherapy (P ≤ .001) compared with males. On multivariable analysis, female gender was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.86; P ≤ .001). Gender-based survival differences were seen across all stages, but only among patients with epithelioid (P ≤ .001) and not biphasic (P = .17) or sarcomatoid (P = 1.00) histology. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery and chemotherapy are disproportionately underutilized in female patients with MPM. Despite this concerning disparity, female gender is independently associated with improved survival relative to males. Further research to understand factors that lead to gender disparities in MPM is warranted.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/normas , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Mesotelioma Maligno/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pleurais/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Mesotelioma Maligno/patologia , Mesotelioma Maligno/terapia , Neoplasias Pleurais/patologia , Neoplasias Pleurais/terapia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare men and women with low back pain and identify the prevalence and some of its associated factors in a population-based sample of adults aged 20 and over a seven day period. METHODS: Cross-sectional study based on a population survey. 600 individuals were interviewed on the following: (1) characteristics of the participants (i.e. demographic, socioeconomic, and labor aspects); (2) physical activity level (IPAQ); (3) musculoskeletal symptoms (Nordic Questionnaire). Descriptive, bivariate, and Poisson regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of LBP was 28.8%, being 39.0% in men and 60.9% in women. The measured associated factors in men were age between 36 and 59 years (PR=3.00 [1.31-6.88]) and over 60 (PR=4.52 [2.02-10.12]), smoking (PR=2.47 [1.20-5.11]), fewer years of formal education (0-4 years) (PR=6.37 [2.15-18.62]), and hypertension (PR=2.27 [1.15-4.50]). For women, the associated factors were occupational activities that involved heavy lifting (PR=1.80 [1.03-3.16]), standing posture leaning forward (PR=2.04 [1.20-3.44]), sitting posture leaning forward (PR=2.17 [1.24-3.82]), and sitting at the computer three or more days per week (PR=4.00 [1.44-11.11]). Widowed or divorced participants were more likely to report LBP, in both men (PR=3.06 [1.40-6.66]) and women (PR=2.11 [1.15-3.88]). CONCLUSION: This study reveals high prevalence of low back pain in a seven day period. Older age, low education, hypertension, and smoking were associated with LBP in men. Occupational and ergonomic factors were associated with LBP in women. Marital status was associated with LBP in both genders.