RESUMO
Resumen Introducción: las neuropatías periféricas comprenden una amplia gama de entidades que afectan uno o múltiples nervios periféricos en cualquiera de sus categorías funcionales. Métodos: revisión de la literatura sobre la temática, mediante la búsqueda de artículos en las bases de datos Pubmed y Google Scholar publicadas en los últimos 21 años, sin restricción idiomática, excluyendo estudios descriptivos y reportes de caso. Resultados: las neuropatías periféricas tienen una prevalencia del 2 % al 3 %, pueden ser causadas por etiologías infecciosas, enfermedades inflamatorias, inmunológicas, trastornos neoplásicos, exposición a tóxicos, fármacos y deficiencias nutricionales. El diagnóstico depende del juicio clínico. La aplicación de estudios de laboratorios y electrodiagnóstico pueden clasificar adecuadamente estas entidades. El tratamiento depende de la entidad subyacente y debe incluir un enfoque multimodal. Conclusiones: establecer estrategias de prevención, detección y tratamiento temprano permite una potencial recuperación y disminuye los costos para el sistema de salud.
Abstract Introduction: peripheral neuropathies comprise a wide range of entities affecting one or multiple peripheral nerves in any of their functional categories. Methods: review of the literature on the subject, by searching for articles in Pubmed and Google Scholar databases published in the last 21 years, without language restriction, excluding descriptive studies and case reports. Results: peripheral neuropathies have a prevalence of 2 % to 3 %, and can be caused by infectious etiologies, inflammatory diseases, immunological, neoplastic disorders, exposure to toxins, drugs and nutritional deficiencies. Their diagnosis depends on clinical judgment. The application of laboratory and electrodiagnostic studies can adequately classify these entities. Treatment depends on the underlying entity and should include a multimodal approach. Conclusions: establishing strategies for prevention, early detection and treatment allows for potential recovery and decreases costs for the health system.
RESUMO
The relationship between Parkinson Disease (PD) and peripheral neuropathy (PN) has gained attention in recent years. There is increasing evidence of a-synuclein deposition and pointing to a form of small fiber neuropathy intrinsic to PD, medium-large fiber PN is also a relatively frequent and potentially severe complication in advanced levodopa-treated PD, but degenerative factors and vitamin deficiency were related. Objective: To determine the neurophysiological characteristics of patients with PD and the clinical manifestations of suspected PN. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study between January 2014 and December 2017, of 36 patients diagnosed with PD who were referred for electrodiagnostic studies (EDX) with suspected clinical PN. We performed electromyography of five muscle or more (brachial biceps, first dorsal interosseous, thumb abductor, anterior tibial, medial gastrocnemius and short finger extensor), and nerve conduction/velocity studies on fibular and tibial nerves (motor) sural and superficial fibular nerves (sensory) and median and ulnar, (both motor and sensory). Results: Twenty-one females (58.3%) with an average age of 69.6 years and fifteen males (41.7%) with an average age of 68.0 years who were submitted for EDX were included in this study. All had a tremor and the average evolution of PD was 5 years. Thirty-two patients were receiving oral levodopa treatment. EDX of twenty-two patients demonstrated neuropathy abnormalities, and in 90.9% of these patients, sensory neuropathy was confirmed. The most common nerve found to be compromised was the superficial fibular nerve (55.0%), followed by the sural (50.0%). Conclusions: Sensory neuropathy was the main finding. Diagnosing PN based on symptom prevalence assessed by checklists and questionnaire has a risk of overestimating the prevalence of PN. The age and the time of disease evolution were factors related to neuropathy. In our study we found that 39% of the patients did not have neuropathic alterations despite clinical suspicion, which opens up new questions about the mechanisms of PD neuropathy and the possibility of fine fiber neuropathy in these patients, motivating further research.
Assuntos
Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/epidemiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/etiologia , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , PrevalênciaRESUMO
Purpose: Although the literature has shown that the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the carpal tunnel on ultrasound is enlarged in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, it does not provide information regarding whether proximal nerve pathology, such as that seen in cervical radiculopathy, increases the CSA of the median nerve. Methods: In this study, 15 patients were enrolled who had a clinical diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy but not carpal tunnel syndrome. All patients underwent electrodiagnostic studies and ultrasound measurement of the CSA of the median nerve. Results: Increased median nerve CSA was seen in 1 of 15 patients (7%). Positive findings of cervical radiculopathy were found in 7 patients (47%) by electrodiagnostic studies. Conclusions: In patients clinically diagnosed with isolated cervical radiculopathy, the vast majority have normal median nerve CSA measured on ultrasound. Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic IV.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two diagnostic tests routinely used for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS)-ultrasonography (US) and nerve conduction studies (NCS)-by comparing their accuracy based on surgical results, with the remission of paresthesia as the reference standard. METHODS: We enrolled 115 patients, all of the female gender with a high probability of a clinical diagnosis of CTS. All patients underwent US and NCS for a diagnosis and subsequent surgical treatment. As a primary outcome, the accuracy of the US and NCS diagnoses was measured by comparing their diagnoses compared with those determined by the surgical outcomes. Their accuracy was secondarily evaluated based on before and after scores of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ). RESULTS: Overall, 104 patients (90.4%) were diagnosed with CTS by the surgical reference standard, 97 (84.3%) by NCS, and 90 (78.3%) by US. The concordance of NCS and surgical treatment (p < 0.001; kappa = 0.648) was superior to that of US and surgical treatment (p < 0.001; kappa = 0.423). The sensitivity and specificity of US and NCS were similar (p = 1.000 and p = 0.152, respectively: McNemar's test). The BCTQ scores were lower after surgery in patients diagnosed by both US and NCS (p < 0.001and p < 0.001, respectively: analysis of variance). CONCLUSIONS: US and NCS effectively diagnosed CTS with good sensitivity but were not effective enough to rule out a suspicion of CTS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at September, 10 th, 2015, and the registration number was NCT02553811 .
Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/diagnóstico por imagem , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Neurológico/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Condução Nervosa , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe the etiologies and frequency of traumatic peripheral nerve injury (TPNI) seen in the electrodiagnostic laboratory of a tertiary care hospital in Puerto Rico. METHODS: The charts of patients who underwent an electrodiagnostic study for a TPNI were revised. The main outcome measure was the frequency of each injury by anatomic location, specific nerve or nerves affected, injury mechanism, and injury severity. RESULTS: One hundred forty-six charts were included, and in them were listed a total of 163 nerve injuries; 109 (74.7%) cases were men and 37 (25.3%) were women. The mean age was 33.6 years. The facial nerve, the brachial plexus, and the ulnar nerve were more frequently injured than any other nerve or nerve bundle. The ulnar, sciatic, median, and radial nerves and the lumbosacral plexus were more commonly injured as a result of gunshot wounds than of any other mechanism of injury. The brachial plexus was most frequently injured in motor vehicle accidents and the facial nerve injuries most commonly had an iatrogenic cause. In terms of injury severity, 84.2% were incomplete and 15.8% were complete. CONCLUSION: TPNIs are common in young individuals and potentially can lead to significant disability. Further studies are needed to assess the socioeconomic impact of these injuries on our population.