RESUMO
Segmental rectum resections for indications other than endometriosis were reported to result in up to 40% sexual dysfunctions. We, therefore, evaluated sexual function after low bowel resection (n = 33) for deep endometriosis in comparison with conservative excision (n = 23). Sexual function was evaluated with the FSFI-19 (Female Sexuality Functioning Index) and EHP 30 (Endometriosis Health Profile). The pain was evaluated with visual analogue scales. Linear excision and bowel resections improved FSFI, EHP 30, and postoperative pain comparably. By univariate analysis, a decreased sexual function was strongly associated with pain both before (p < 0.0001) and after surgery (p = 0.0012), age (p = 0.05), and duration of surgery (p = 0.023). By multivariate analysis (proc logistic), the FSFI after surgery was predicted only by FSFI before or EHP after surgery. No differences were found between low bowel segmental resection and a more conservative excision. In conclusion, improving pain after surgery can explain the improvement in sexual function. A deleterious effect of a bowel resection on sexual function was not observed for endometriosis. Sexual function in women with endometriosis can be evaluated using a simplified questionnaire such as FSFI-6.
RESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term impact of laparoscopic excision of endometriosis on quality of life through pain reduction as measured by the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) in uterine-sparing (preservation of the uterus and at least 1 ovary) and nonuterine-sparing (removal of the uterus) surgery. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: Sixty-one women who had undergone laparoscopic excision of endometriosis for pelvic pain were enrolled in a tissue-procurement study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients who had previously completed an EHP-30 preoperatively and at 4 weeks postoperatively were mailed a copy of the EHP-30 2.6 to 6.8 years after their index surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was quality of life as measured by changes in the EHP-30 scores before their index surgery and those measured weeks and years later. The secondary outcome was a comparison of the EHP-30 scores between patients who underwent excision of endometriosis alone and those who underwent excision of endometriosis with hysterectomy +/- oophorectomy. From 2011 to 2015, 61 women underwent laparoscopic excision of endometriosis for pelvic pain. Forty-six of the 61 patients completed the EHP-30 for a response rate of 75%. The patients demonstrated significant improvement in all 5 scales of the EHP-30 (pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image) at 4 weeks postoperatively (p <.001), which persisted for up to 6.8 years in follow-up (p <.001) when compared with their baseline scores. The improvement in EHP-30 scores did not differ by American Society for Reproductive Medicine staging or index surgery. Definitive surgery (total laparoscopic hysterectomy/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) was not associated with improved outcomes when compared with uterine-sparing surgery. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic excision of endometriosis offers improvement in all quality-of-life domains as measured by the EHP-30, including a reduction in pain, an effect that may persist for up to 6.8 years. These findings suggest that laparoscopic excision of endometriosis with uterine preservation can be considered as an option for discussion during counseling for treatment of endometriosis.