RESUMO

Resumo: Os critérios para definir os preços de medicamentos no Brasil estão previstos na Resolução CMED nº 2/2004 da Câmara de Regulação do Mercado de Medicamentos. Os preços estipulados influenciam o mercado privado e público, o que torna desafiador a revisão de políticas de preços devido a necessidade de harmonizar interesses sociais e econômicos. Uma proposta de revisão dessa Resolução foi disponibilizada por meio da Consulta Pública SEAE nº 2/2021 da Secretaria de Advocacia da Concorrência e Competitividade/Ministério da Economia, porém, até o momento sem publicação dos resultados consolidados até o momento. Recomendações recentes da Organização Mundial da Saúde em relação à adoção de diferentes limiares para definição de preços de medicamentos são adotadas nessa Resolução, embora essa tenha sido publicada há 20 anos. Com o objetivo de interpretar e descrever o alinhamento e os possíveis avanços e retrocessos nos textos legais relacionados à regulação de preços de medicamentos, foi utilizado o método da pesquisa documental analítica-descritiva, de cunho exploratório. Como resultado, foram mantidas a lista de países referência para conferência de preço internacional e os limiares de referenciamento interno e externo de preços. As omissões normativas da Resolução permanecem na Consulta Pública, como a ausência de critérios para precificar radiofármacos, terapias avançadas e medicamentos sem preço internacional, e sem comparadores no mercado brasileiro para revisar preços e transpor preço provisório para definitivo. Um ponto crítico foi a criação de bônus de 35% acima do preço estipulado para medicamentos que apresentem benefício clínico adicional sem, contudo, definir contornos claros quanto às evidências científicas aceitáveis para a comprovação desse benefício. Em suma, poucos avanços foram percebidos na Consulta Pública.

Abstract: Criteria for setting medication prices in Brazil are set forth in CMED Resolution n. 2/2004 of the (Medicines Market Regulation Chamber). The stipulated prices influence the private and public markets, which makes it challenging to review pricing policies due to the need to harmonize social and economic interests. A proposal for reviewing this Resolution was made available through the SEAE Public Consultation n. 2/2021 of the Competition and Competitiveness Advocacy Secretariat/Brazilian Ministry of Economy; however, so far without publication of the consolidated results. Recent recommendations from the World Health Organization regarding the adoption of different thresholds for setting medication prices are adopted in this Resolution, although it was published 20 years ago. To interpret and describe the alignment, possible advances and setbacks between the legal texts related to medication price regulation, we conducted an analytical-descriptive and exploratory documentary research. As a result, the list of reference countries for international price verification and the thresholds for internal and external price referencing were maintained. The normative omissions of the Resolution remain in the Public Consultation, such as the absence of criteria for pricing radiopharmaceuticals, advanced therapies and medication without international and comparator prices in the Brazilian market, to revise prices and transpose provisional to definitive prices. A critical point was the creation of a 35% bonus above the stipulated price for medication that present additional clinical benefit without, however, defining clear contours as to the acceptable scientific evidence to prove such benefit. In short, few advances were noticed in the Public Consultation.

Resumen: Los criterios para definir los precios de los medicamentos en Brasil están establecidos en la Resolución CMED nº 2/2004 de la Cámara de Regulación del Mercado de Medicamentos. Los precios estipulados influyen en el mercado público y privado, lo que dificulta la revisión de las políticas de precios debido a la necesidad de armonizar los intereses sociales y económicos. Una propuesta para revisar esta Resolución se puso a disposición mediante la Consulta Pública SEAE nº 2/2021 de la Secretaría de Competencia y Promoción de la Competitividad/Ministerio de Economía, sin embargo, hasta el momento no se han publicado los resultados consolidados. En esta Resolución se adoptan recomendaciones recientes de la Organización Mundial de la Salud sobre la adopción de diferentes umbrales para fijar los precios de los medicamentos, aunque fue publicada hace 20 años. Con el objetivo de interpretar y describir el alineamiento, posibles avances y retrocesos, entre los textos legales relacionados con la regulación de precios de medicamentos, se utilizó el método de investigación documental analítica-descriptiva, de carácter exploratorio. Como resultado, se mantuvieron la lista de países de referencia para la verificación de precio internacional y los umbrales para la referenciación interna y externa de precios. Quedan en Consulta Pública las omisiones normativas de la Resolución, como la ausencia de criterios de fijación de precios de radiofármacos, terapias avanzadas y medicamentos sin precio internacional y comparadores en el mercado brasileño, para revisar precios y transponer el precio provisional al definitivo. Un punto crítico fue la creación de una bonificación del 35% sobre el precio estipulado para los medicamentos que presenten un beneficio clínico adicional sin definir, sin embargo, contornos claros sobre las evidencias científicas aceptables para demostrar dicho beneficio. En definitiva, se percibieron pocos avances en la Consulta Pública.

RESUMO

Introduction: Biological medicines have been assuming an important role among the therapeutic options for several diseases, however, due to their complex production process, the products obtained from this technology have a high added value and do not reach the purchasing power of most patients, which overwhelms the budget of health systems. With the development of biosimilars, which have reduced production costs, it is expected that access to biological medicines will become broader. However, in Brazil, the criteria for determining the price of biosimilars, unlike the generic policy in the country, do not foresee a price reduction due to the reduction of development costs. Objective: To understand the impact of the current model of economic regulation on the availability and access of these products in the country, based on a comparative analysis in selected countries, and identify trends that can help to expand the availability and access to biological medicines. Method: Quantitative and qualitative study, to identify the variation between the entry prices of biological medicines in Brazil and in selected countries, as well as the differences in the economic regulation policies established in these countries. Results: The results demonstrate that the current pricing model in Brazil has generated distortions in the prices of biosimilars in the market, which, consequently, makes it difficult for the population to access this category of products, in addition to allowing unsustainable market practices for the systems of public and private health in Brazil. It was also found that most of the analyzed countries, unlike Brazil, seek to harmonize the prices of different brands of the same molecule marketed in the country and with the international market, in addition to establishing incentive policies for indication and replacement by biosimilars, which expands the participation of biosimilars in the market significantly. Conclusion: Based on the data presented, it is concluded that it is essential to build a broader political and regulatory debate on the market for biologicals and biosimilars in the country to guarantee the access of the Brazilian population to more cost-effective technologies, generate a more competitive market and consequently contribute to the financial sustainability of health systems.

RESUMO

INTRODUCCIÓN: El cannabidiol (CBD), un derivado de la planta de cannabis, está autorizado como especialidad medicinal para su comercialización en Argentina y otros países con el fin de tratar la epilepsia resistente a fármacos. Se encuentran en estudio otras potenciales indicaciones. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una evaluación de tecnología sanitaria para la Comisión Nacional de Evaluación de Tecnologías de Salud (CONETEC) sobre CBD para epilepsia resistente a fármacos en Argentina. RESULTADOS: Se describen aspectos legales, regulatorios y económicos, las evidencias disponibles sobre eficacia y seguridad en epilepsia y el impacto presupuestario. DISCUSIÓN: La evaluación pone de manifiesto una serie de desafíos para el sistema de salud argentino, relacionados con el mercado del CBD para la epilepsia en el país, su tamaño, los distintos actores y su comportamiento. Se indaga acerca de la estructura de costos, los márgenes de ganancia, y se mencionan algunas estrategias que fueron puestas en práctica por la industria farmacéutica en Argentina y otros países. Se discute el impacto de la competencia en los precios y se describen potenciales herramientas del Estado para la regulación como el uso de precios de referencia internacionales, la evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias y las compras mancomunadas, así como la articulación con productores nacionales y actores internacionales.

INTRODUCTION: Cannabidiol (CBD), a derivative of the cannabis plant, is authorized as a medicinal product for sale in Argentina and other countries for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. Other potential indications are under study. METHODS: A health technology assessment was conducted for CONETEC (National Commission for Health Technology Assessment), analyzing CBD for drug-resistant epilepsy in Argentina. RESULTS: Legal, regulatory and economic aspects are described as well as the available evidence on efficacy and safety in epilepsy, and the budget impact. DISCUSSION: The assessment highlights a series of challenges for the Argentine health system, related to the CBD market for epilepsy, its size, the different actors, and their behavior. Inquiries are made about cost structure and profit margins, mentioning some strategies that were put into practice by the pharmaceutical industry in Argentina and other countries. The impact of competition on prices is discussed, and potential State tools for price regulation like the use of international reference prices, health technology assessment and joint purchases, as well as articulation with national producers and international actors are described.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objective of this paper is to analyze the prices of biological drugs in the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in three Latin American countries (Brazil, Colombia and Mexico), as well as in Spain and the United States of America (US), from the point of market entry of biosimilars. METHODS: We analyzed products authorized for commercialization in the last 20 years, in Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico, comparing them to the United States of America (USA) and Spain. For this analysis, we sought the prices and registries of drugs marketed between 1999 and October 1, 2019, in the regulatory agencies' databases. The pricing between countries was based on purchasing power parity (PPP). RESULTS: The US authorized the commercialization of 13 distinct biologicals and four biosimilars in the period. Spain and Brazil marketed 14 biopharmaceuticals for RA, ten original, four biosimilars. Colombia and Mexico have authorized three biosimilars in addition to the ten biological ones. For biological drug prices, the US is the most expensive country. Spain's price behavior seems intermediate when compared to the three LA countries. Brazil has the highest LA prices, followed by Mexico and Colombia, which has the lowest prices. Spain has the lowest values in PPP, compared to LA countries, while the US has the highest prices. CONCLUSION: The economic effort that LA countries make to access these medicines is much higher than the US and Spain. The use of the PPP ensured a better understanding of the actual access to these inputs in the countries analyzed.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Background: The objective of this paper is to analyze the prices of biological drugs in the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in three Latin American countries (Brazil, Colombia and Mexico), as well as in Spain and the United States of America (US), from the point of market entry of biosimilars. Methods: We analyzed products authorized for commercialization in the last 20 years, in Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico, comparing them to the United States of America (USA) and Spain. For this analysis, we sought the prices and registries of drugs marketed between 1999 and October 1, 2019, in the regulatory agencies' databases. The pricing between countries was based on purchasing power parity (PPP). Results: The US authorized the commercialization of 13 distinct biologicals and four biosimilars in the period. Spain and Brazil marketed 14 biopharmaceuticals for RA, ten original, four biosimilars. Colombia and Mexico have authorized three biosimilars in addition to the ten biological ones. For biological drug prices, the US is the most expensive country. Spain's price behavior seems intermediate when compared to the three LA countries. Brazil has the highest LA prices, followed by Mexico and Colombia, which has the lowest prices. Spain has the lowest values in PPP, compared to LA countries, while the US has the highest prices. Conclusions: The economic effort that LA countries make to access these medicines is much higher than the US and Spain. The use of the PPP ensured a better understanding of the actual access to these inputs in the countries analyzed.(AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To characterize at a global level the concept of therapeutic value (TV) and describe the experience of value-based pricing (VBP) policies in 6 reference countries. METHODS: We conducted a rapid review of the literature that addressed 2 exploratory research questions. A systematic and exhaustive search was carried out up to July 2018 in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. RESULTS: The concepts of TV and VBP are related; value frameworks for medicines should include social preferences, comparative effectiveness, safety, adoption viability, social impact, high quality of evidence, severity of illness, and innovation. The added therapeutic value (ATV) is the manner of measuring the therapeutic advantages of new medicines compared with existing ones in terms of comparative effectiveness and safety. There are variations in the mechanisms of reimbursement and drug pricing regulation between the countries of study. CONCLUSION: In a VBP system it is essential to establish the TV and ATV of a new medicine. Although there are no methodological guidelines for the implementation of VBP policies, the process implies from the beginning the definition of TV categories that will be included in the drug pricing and reimbursement systems. Agreements between the pharmaceutical industry and governments have become a useful tool as a negotiating mechanism in most countries.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: Analisar o preço real de aquisição de medicamentos anunciados como promessas terapêuticas para tratamento da COVID-19 no Brasil. Métodos: Identificaram-se os medicamentos que estão sendo estudados e/ou noticiados como promissores e, posteriormente, analisaram-se os custos de aquisição desses medicamentos por uma drogaria do interior do estado de Minas Gerais, entre janeiro e junho de 2020. Resultados: Sete (87,5%) medicamentos apresentaram aumento do valor de compra no período estudado. Dexametasona e ivermectina apresentaram elevação de mais de 200% no preço. A menor elevação foi o polivitamínico, 5,44%. A hidroxicloroquina foi o único medicamento (12,5%) que não sofreu variação no preço e só foi adquirida nos três primeiros meses do ano de 2020. Conclusão: O preço de aquisição da maioria dos medicamentos anunciados como "promessas terapêuticas" para tratamento da Covid-19 no Brasil sofreu aumento significativo no período da pandemia.

Objective: To analyze the real purchase price of drugs announced as therapeutic promises for the treatment of Coronavirus disease in Brazil. Methods: The drugs that are being studied and/or announced as promising were identified and, subsequently, the costs of purchasing these drugs by a drugstore in the countryside of the state of Minas Gerais were analyzed between January and June 2020. Results: A total of seven (87.5%) drugs showed an increase in the purchase price in the period studied. Dexamethasone and ivermectin showed an increase of more than 200% in price. The lowest increase was the multivitamin, 5.44%. Hydroxychloroquine was the only drug (12.5%) that did not change its price and was only purchased in the first three months of 2020. Conclusion: The purchase price of the vast majority of drugs announced as "therapeutic promises" for the treatment of Covid-19 in Brazil suffered a significant increase during the pandemic period.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background: Iron deficiency (ID) in patients with heart failure (HF) leads to greater morbidity and mortality and its treatment has been associated with significant improvements in quality of life. Since no head-to-head studies are available, there is uncertainty as to which intravenous iron supplement should be used. This study aimed to compare the effect of ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) and iron saccharate (IS) on clinical and biochemical outcomes in patients with HF and ID.Methods: We reviewed electronic health records from a referral centre in Bogotá, Colombia for patients with HF. We selected records with a follow-up of at least 2 years. Primary outcomes were clinically significant changes in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) , 6-minute-walk test (6MWT), resolution of ID, and direct costs.Results: We obtained data on 119 patients with a median age of 69 years and a median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 35%. All patients met criteria for ID, and 58% were treated with FCM. A significant difference in GFR of 11 mL/min/1.72 m2 was found at baseline between groups. Neither bivariate, nor multivariate analyses could identify significant differences between patients receiving FCM and IS for any of the primary outcomes. Direct cost analysis showed that FCM use generates 2.8 times the cost associated with saccharate use.Conclusions: This retrospective cohort study did not identify any significant differences in clinical or biochemical outcomes between HF patients with ID receiving FCM or IS. Direct cost analysis favoured use of IS in this group of patients.

RESUMO

Resumo: O parágrafo único do art. 40 da Lei de Propriedade Industrial brasileira estabelece a extensão de vigência de patentes pela mora do exame, ao menos, até dez anos a partir da concessão. Pensado como exceção, esse dispositivo tornou-se a regra no caso das patentes farmacêuticas, prolongando o prazo de exclusividade de exploração de medicamentos. Isso impacta o consumo privado e o orçamento do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Este trabalho investiga o custo, para o SUS, da extensão de vigência de nove medicamentos, por ser proibida a compra de versões genéricas ou biossimilares. Foram analisados três grupos: (a) quatro já em extensão; (b) três que, com a concessão das patentes, terão extensão; e (c) dois com patentes mailbox que estão em domínio público, mas que podem ter a extensão garantida judicialmente. A partir de valores unitários e quantidades totais de compra pelo Departamento de Logística em Saúde do Ministério da Saúde (DLOG), foi estimado um gasto total de R$ 10,6 bilhões com os nove medicamentos entre 2014 a 2018. Assim, foi projetado o gasto total nos respectivos períodos de extensão: R$ 6,8 bilhões. Uma busca de mercado por preços de alternativas genéricas retornou uma redução potencial de R$ 1,2 bilhão para o gasto do DLOG com apenas quatro medicamentos. Por fim, com base nas reduções mínimas, médias e máximas do mercado, foi encontrada uma economia potencial de até R$ 3,9 bilhões no gasto do DLOG com a compra dos nove medicamentos, se não houvesse o dispositivo de extensão de vigência.

Abstract: The sole paragraph of Article 40 of the Brazilian Industrial Property Law determines the extension of the patent term in case of delayed prosecution, guaranteeing 10 years of protection from grant. Originally conceived as an exception, this provision became the rule in the case of drug patents, prolonging period of exclusive exploitation. This situation impacts both the out-of-pocket spending by families and the budget of the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS). This study explores the cost to SUS of extending the patent term for nine drugs, which delays the launch of generic or biosimilar alternatives. Three groups were analyzed: (a) four patents already extended; (b) three that will be extended if granted; and (c) two drugs with mailbox patents that are in the public domain, but that may have the extension granted by court order. Based on the unit values and the total amounts of purchases by the Logistics Department of the Ministry of Health (DLOG), a total expenditure of BRL 10.6 billion on the nine drugs from 2014 to 2018 was estimated. The total projected expenditure for the respective extension periods was thus BRL 6.8 billion. A market price search for generic alternatives yielded potential savings of BRL 1.2 billion in expenditures by DLOG on four drugs alone. Finally, based on the minimum, average, and maximum market price reductions, potential savings of up to BRL 3.9 billion were estimated for DLOG on the purchase of the nine medicines, if the patent terms were not extended.

Resumen: El párrafo único del art. 40 de la Ley de Propiedad Industrial brasileña establece la extensión de la vigencia de patentes, debido al retraso de su examen, garantizando al menos 10 años a partir de su concesión. Concebido como excepcional, este recurso se convirtió en una regla en el caso de las patentes farmacéuticas, prolongando el plazo de exclusividad de explotación de medicamentos. Esto impacta en el consumo privado y el presupuesto del Sistema Único de Salud de Brasil (SUS). Este trabajo investiga el coste para el SUS de la extensión de vigencia de nueve medicamentos, por estar prohibida la compra de versiones genéricas o biosimilares. Se analizaron tres grupos: (a) cuatro ya en extensión; (b) tres que, si fueran concedidas las patentes, tendrán extensión; y (c) dos con patentes mailbox que son de dominio público, pero pueden contar con una extensión garantizada judicialmente. A partir de valores unitarios, y cantidades totales de compra por parte del Departamento de Logística en Salud del Ministerio de la Salud (DLOG), se estimó un gasto total de BRL 10,6 billones con los nueve medicamentos de 2014 a 2018. De este modo, se proyectó el gasto total en los respectivos períodos de extensión: BRL 6,8 billones. Una búsqueda de mercado con precios de alternativas genéricas arrojó una reducción potencial de BRL 1,2 billón para el gasto del DLOG, con solo cuatro medicamentos. Finalmente, basándose en las reducciones mínimas, medias y máximas del mercado, se encontró un ahorro potencial de hasta BRL 3,9 billones en el gasto del DLOG con la compra de los nueve medicamentos, si no existiera un recurso de extensión de la vigencia.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract This study seeks to understand biological cancer drug availability through registration and prices of the biological agents used for cancer therapy and authorized for sale in the last 5 years in Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico, comparing the data to those for the United States of America (USA) and Spain. The regulatory agencies' websites were assessed for drugs registered between January 1, 2014, and February 20, 2019. Drug prices were sought in the clerical databases. Prices were also compared using purchasing power parity (PPP). The comparison between the purchasing power (PP) of the three Latin American countries is hampered by market heterogeneity and uncertainty in the data. There is no registration synchronization. The average difference between the launch time in the USA and in the other countries is 1.6 to 2.6 years. The USA has the lowest PPP values, compared to the Latin American countries studied, but higher prices. Differences in registration time reveal issues in drug access in the Latin American countries studied or a lack of equity between countries. The economic effort that these countries make to have access to these supplies is much higher than that of the USA and Spain.

Resumo Este estudo busca entender a disponibilidade de medicamentos contra o câncer biológico por meio do registro e preços dos agentes biológicos utilizados na terapia do câncer e autorizados para venda nos últimos cinco anos no Brasil, Colômbia e México, comparando os dados com os dos Estados Unidos da América (EUA) e Espanha. Os sites das agências reguladoras foram consultados para medicamentos registrados entre 1º de janeiro de 2014 e 20 de fevereiro de 2019. Os preços dos medicamentos foram procurados nas bases de dados administrativas. Os preços também foram comparados usando a paridade do poder de compra (PPP). A comparação entre o poder de compra (PP) dos três países da América Latina é dificultada pela heterogeneidade de mercado e incerteza nos dados. Não há sincronização de registro. A diferença média entre o tempo de lançamento nos EUA e nos outros países é de 1,6 a 2,6 anos. Os EUA têm os menores valores de PPP, em comparação com os países latino-americanos estudados, mas preços mais altos. As diferenças no tempo de registro revelam problemas no acesso a medicamentos nos países latino- americanos estudados ou falta de equidade entre os países. O esforço econômico que esses países fazem para ter acesso a esses suprimentos é muito maior do que o dos EUA e da Espanha.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: Background: From 2006 to 2017, the Brazilian federal government provided free of charge traditional insulins for diabetes treatment. This involved public tendering by the Department of Health Logistics of the Ministry of Health (DLOG-MOH) and the reimbursement after direct contracting for supply with commercial private retailers (Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program - PFPB). Objective: We aim to describe the budget of the Brazilian federal government committed to for the acquisition of insulin, as well as corresponding prices and treatment availability from 2009 to 2017. Methods: Insulin volume and expenditure data were obtained in official administrative databases and in the Electronic System of the Information Service to Citizens. Data were analyzed according to the total provision by the federal government, DLOG-MOH and PFPB. Moreover, data were presented according to insulin type. Volumes were calculated in number of defined daily doses (DDD)/1,000 inhabitants/day. Results: Budgetary commitments due to insulin over nine years amounted to U$1,027 billion in 2017, with an approximate average of U$114.1 million per year. DLOG-MOH was the main insulin provider, despite the increase in PFPB provision along period. DLOG-MOH and PFBP together provided an average of 6.08 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day for nine years. Average prices in PFPB were higher than those in the DLOG series, with a downward trend over the years, narrowing to 2.7 times in 2017, when compared to 2009. Conclusions: Brazil evidenced a moderately sustainable and effective, albeit imperfect, policy for public provision of traditional insulins in the period preceding mandatory free supply of insulin analogues. Future studies must address treatment availability and financial sustainability in the new scenario.

RESUMO: Introdução: Entre 2006 e 2017, o governo federal forneceu gratuitamente insulinas tradicionais para o tratamento de diabetes por meio de licitação pública pelo Departamento de Logística em Saúde do Ministério da Saúde (DLOG-MOH) e reembolso a drogarias privadas credenciadas pelo Programa Farmácia Popular do Brasil (PFPB) após contratação direta para fornecimento. Objetivo: Descrever o orçamento federal brasileiro empenhado pela aquisição de insulinas, bem como preços e disponibilidade de tratamento correspondentes entre 2009 e 2017. Métodos: Dados de despesas e volume de insulina foram obtidos em registros administrativos oficiais e mediante solicitação ao Sistema Eletrônico do Serviço de Informações ao Cidadão. Os dados foram analisados de acordo com a provisão total do governo federal e segundo aquisições via DLOG-MOH e PFPB e tipo de insulina. Os volumes de insulina foram calculados em número de doses diárias definidas (DDD)/1.000 habitantes/dia. Resultados: Em nove anos, o orçamento empenhado com a insulina totalizou US$ 1.027 bilhões em 2017, média de US$ 114,1 milhões/ano. O DLOG-MOH foi o principal fornecedor de insulina apesar do crescimento do PFPB durante o período. O DLOG-MOH e o PFPB disponibilizaram em média 6,08 DDD/1.000 habitantes/dia durante o período analisado. Os preços médios no PFPB foram maiores que os do DOG-MOH ao longo do período, com tendência de queda ao longo dos anos, estreitando-se para 2,7 vezes em 2017 em comparação a 2009. Conclusão: O Brasil evidenciou uma política de fornecimento gratuito de insulina moderadamente sustentável e eficaz, ainda que imperfeita, no período que antecedeu o fornecimento obrigatório de análogos. Recomendam-se estudos futuros para avaliar a disponibilidade de tratamento e a sustentabilidade do financiamento nesse novo cenário.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Measure and compare the price, availability, and affordability of insulin and metformin in public and private pharmacies in six regions of Peru. METHODS: Cross-sectional study using the World Health Organization/Health Action International (WHO/HAI) revised methodology. Public and private pharmacies in six regions of Peru were surveyed. Data were collected on availability and prices for insulin (all types) and 850 mg metformin. Availability is expressed as percentages and prices are reported in medians. Affordability is defined as the number of days that a person must work at minimum wage to cover the cost of one month of treatment. RESULTS: Availability in public pharmacies is 63.2% for regular insulin and 68.4% for NPH (isophane) insulin, but differences in availability were observed between levels of care and between regions. Private pharmacies have a greater variety of insulin, but availability is less than 11%. The median price of human insulin was three to four times higher in private pharmacies than in public pharmacies. In comparison, availability of metformin was 89.5% in public pharmacies and 77.7% in private ones. Affordability in public pharmacies for one month of treatment with human insulin or generic metformin is less than one day's wages. CONCLUSIONS: The price for human insulin and generic metformin in public pharmacies is affordable. However, efforts are needed to improve their availability in the different regions and levels of care.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar o preço, a disponibilidade e a acessibilidade à insulina e metformina, como comparativo, em farmácias públicas e privadas em seis regiões do Peru. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal conduzido com metodologia adaptada da Organização Mundial da Saúde/Ação Internacional para a Saúde (OMS/AIS). Farmácias públicas e privadas foram pesquisadas em seis regiões do Peru com a coleta de dados sobre a disponibilidade e os preços da insulina (de todos os tipos) e metformina na apresentação de 850 mg. A disponibilidade é expressa em porcentagem e os preços estão descritos como mediana. A acessibilidade foi definida no estudo como o número de dias que um indivíduo que ganha salário mínimo precisa trabalhar para arcar com o custo de um mês de tratamento. RESULTADOS: A disponibilidade em farmácias públicas da insulina regular foi de 63,2% e da insulina isófana (NPH) foi de 68,4%, porém se observou diferença de disponibilidade entre os níveis de atenção e as regiões. Nas farmácias privadas, a variedade de insulinas é maior, mas a disponibilidade é inferior a 11%. A mediana de preços para a insulina humana nas farmácias privadas é 3 a 4 vezes maior que nas farmácias públicas. Comparativamente, a disponibilidade da metformina foi de 89,5% nas farmácias públicas e 77,7% nas farmácias privadas. A acessibilidade nas farmácias públicas para um mês de tratamento com insulina humana ou metformina genérica é inferior à remuneração de um dia de trabalho. CONCLUSÕES: As insulinas humanas e a metformina genérica têm preço acessível nas farmácias públicas. Porém, esforços devem ser empreendidos para aumentar a disponibilidade destes medicamentos nos níveis de atenção e nas regiões.

RESUMO

RESUMO A regulação de preços visa garantir sustentabilidade à assistência farmacêutica. Com o objetivo de discutir criticamente o tema, elaborou-se um ensaio sustentado em análise documental (2000-2017) da regulação econômica da indústria farmacêutica brasileira na Câmara de Regulação de Medicamentos (CMED), periódicos, teses e publicações do Legislativo e indústria farmacêutica. Vigorando há 15 anos, a Lei nº 10.742/2003 instituiu um modelo de teto de preços, compreendendo estabelecimento de preços máximos para medicamentos e reajustes anuais por fórmula definida em lei. Modelo, implementação e fórmula são alvos de crítica. A fórmula vincula reajustes ao Índice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo - IPCA (inflação), agregando índices de custos de produção, concorrência e produtividade setoriais. A longevidade do modelo, sem realinhamento periódico dos tetos aos preços de mercado recomendado na literatura especializada, tem gerado preços máximos descolados da realidade, que aumentam a assimetria de informação e podem respaldar futuros aumentos abusivos. A priorização da eficiência do mercado em detrimento do combate à assimetria de informações no modelo regulatório tem reduzido a força dos consumidores no debate. O atual modelo avançou em relação às políticas de preços liberados, mas seu aperfeiçoamento pressupõe a apropriação do tema e crescente participação de consumidores e profissionais de saúde no processo regulatório.

ABSTRACT Price regulation aims to ensure sustainability of pharmaceutical care. Aiming to critically discuss the regulation of pharmaceutical prices in Brazil, we elaborated an essay based on document analysis (2000-2017) of the pharmaceutical economic regulation found at the Medication Regulation Chamber (CMED), journals, theses, and publications of the Legislature and pharmaceutical industry. For 15 years, Act no. 10.742/2003 has established a price ceiling model, comprising maximum prices for medicines and annual readjustments according to a formula defined in law. Model, implementation and formula have all been criticized. The formula links adjustments to the IPCA (general inflation index), adding indexes for production costs, competition, and productivity. The longevity of the model, without regular realignment of the ceiling to actual market prices, as recommended in specialized literature, generates price ceilings detached from reality, which deepen information asymmetries and may support abusive price increases in the future. Prioritization of market efficiency over reduction of information asymmetry in the regulatory model has reduced the strength of consumers in the debate. The current regulatory model has advanced in relation to previous liberalized pricing policies, but further improvement depends on the appropriation of the theme and increasing participation of consumers and health professionals in the regulatory process.

RESUMO

RESUMO O acesso aos medicamentos pode ser limitado pelos seus altos preços impactados pela tributação, especialmente pelo Imposto de Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços (ICMS). O artigo problematiza a aplicação do princípio constitucional da seletividade no ICMS e sua repercussão na carga tributária dos medicamentos, com reflexo na capacidade de pagamento de medicamentos pelos cidadãos. O método foi de revisão de literatura, com base em documentos, em normas e no referencial teórico de Carrazza. O artigo está dividido em três seções: Caracterização do panorama geral dos tributos incidentes nos medicamentos; Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços e Princípio da seletividade como vetor da dignidade da pessoa humana. Identificaram-se alguns contrapontos doutrinários, trazendo, importantes debates sobre a aplicação da seletividade prevista na Constituição brasileira. Verificou-se existência de benefícios fiscais envolvendo os tributos federais aplicáveis sobre os medicamentos no sistema tributário nacional. Conclui-se que a não aplicação do princípio da seletividade no ICMS pode ensejar problemas, especialmente no abandono do tratamento e na ocorrência de gastos superiores ao que as famílias podem suportar, o que afronta o princípio da universalidade da saúde tornando difícil sua equidade.

ABSTRACT Access to medicines may be limited by their high prices impacted by taxation, especially the Tax on Circulation of Goods and Services (ICMS). This paper discusses the application of the principle of selectivity in the ICMS and its impacts on the tax burden of medicines, with a reflection on the ability of citizens to pay for medicines. The method was literature review, based on documents, norms and theoretical background of Carrazza. The article is divided into three sections: General overview of taxes on medicines; Tax on Circulation of Goods and Services and Principle of selectivity as a vector of human dignity. It was also sought to debate the doctrinal counterpoints, bringing important discussions on the application of selectivity foreseen in the Brazilian Constitution. It was possible to verify tax benefits involving the applicable federal taxes on medicines in the national tax system. It is concluded that the non-application of the principle of selectivity in the ICMS can cause problems, especially regarding the abandonment of treatment and in the occurrence of higher expenses than families can afford, which violates the principle of universality of health making its equity difficult.

RESUMO

Introducción: La Hipertensión Arterial es el factor de riesgo más frecuente de infarto agudo de miocardio, enfermedad cerebrovascular, insuficiencia cardíaca y otras afecciones. Objetivo: Caracterizar el consumo intrahospitalario de medicamentos antihipertensivos en el Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico Manuel Fajardo en el período comprendido entre 2013 y 2017. Material y Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo, de corte transversal sobre el consumo intrahospitalario de antihipertensivos. El universo estuvo determinado por todos los antihipertensivos que tuvieron indicación facultativa intrahospitalaria en los años comprendidos. Resultados: Se consumió un total de 301 616 unidades de drogas antihipertensivas. El Enalapril fue el antihipertensivo más consumido con 126 306 unidades, representando 41.89 por ciento del consumo total de antihipertensivos en el período, siendo además el más empleado en todos los años del estudio. El mayor costo lo representó el Enalapril para un total de 31 576.50 CUP. Conclusiones: Los antihipertensivos más empleados fueron el Enalapril, la Clortalidona y el Amlodipino. El Enalapril fue el más consumido en todos los años estudiados, mientras que la Clortalidona estuvo entre los tres más empleados en todos esos años. En cuanto a la repercusión económica del consumo de los antihipertensivos más empleados, el Enalapril fue el más costoso, seguido por el Amlodipino(AU)

Introduction: Arterial hypertension is the most frequent risk factor associated with acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, and other conditions. Objective: To characterize the intra-hospital consumption of antihypertensive drugs at Manuel Fajardo Hospital throughout the period between 2013 and 2017. Material and Methods: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study of the intra-hospital consumption of antihypertensive drugs was carried out. The universe was determined by all the antihypertensive drugs that had intra-hospital medical prescription during the period studied. Results: A total of 301.616 units of antihypertensive drugs were used. Enalapril was the most consumed drug with 126.306 units, representing 41.89 percent of the total consumption of antihypertensive drugs during the period; also being the most used drug for the entire years of the study. The increased cost was represented by Enalapril for a total of 31.576.50 Cuban pesos (CUP). Conclusions: The most used antihypertensive drugs were Enalapril, Chlorthalidone and Amlodipine. Enalapril was the most consumed drug in all the years studied, whereas Chlorthalidone was one of the three most commonly used. Regarding economical repercussion of the most consumed antihypertensive drugs, Enalapril was the most expensive one, followed by Amlodipine(AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the average price of oral hypoglycemic agents provided by the Brazilian health system (SUS) and to compare them to other public health systems. METHODS: Cross-sectional study about drug prices purchased by Belo Horizonte (municipal level), Minas Gerais (state level) and federal institutions in January and February of 2014. Average prices were calculated by defined daily dosage (DDD) and were compared to the management levels and the program "Aqui Tem Farmácia Popular" (ATFP). For international comparison, reimbursement values from Spain, Portugal, the United Kingdom and Canada (Province of Quebec) were used. RESULTS: Belo Horizonte had higher average prices than Minas Gerais. In general, essential oral hypoglycemic agents purchased by the SUS had lower prices than ATFP. For example, glibenclamide 5 mg was 1.023% more expensive. Metformin purchased by ATFP was more expensive than by SUS. Eight drugs purchased by SUS had average values above the respective Brazilian price ceiling. As an international comparison, SUS had lower average prices for glibenclamide and metformin. In ATFP, metformin was more expensive than in other countries, while glibenclamide was cheaper than Portugal only. CONCLUSION: The municipal management level had higher average prices than state level. Oral hypoglycemic agents purchased by SUS are predominantly cheaper than ATFP. Average prices paid by SUS are lower, while the prices paid by ATFP are higher than the reimbursed amounts from other countries.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Resumo O objetivo do estudo é analisar a evolução do preço do tenofovir (TDF) no Brasil à luz das diferentes iniciativas para sua redução. Os critérios para a seleção do caso foram: ter sido objeto de pelo menos uma estratégia de enfrentamento da barreira patentária, que no caso foi o subsídio ao exame do pedido da patente (oposição à patente); e ter sido objeto de uma Parceria para Desenvolvimento Produtivo (PDP) para produção local. Os principais resultados sugerem que os subsídios ao exame apresentados em 2005 e 2006 contribuíram para a decisão de indeferimento do pedido de patente em 2009. Estima-se que o Brasil pagou cerca de US$ 200 milhões a mais pelo monopólio gerado a partir de um pedido de patente pendente. Houve uma redução do preço do TDF entre 2003 e 2013, inclusive durante a vigência da PDP (2011 a 2013). Em 2010, após o anúncio da PDP, também houve uma diminuição de 40% no preço do TDF ofertado pela Gilead, que refletiu no preço de oferta do produto PDP. No entanto, o preço pago no Brasil para o produto nacional foi cerca de dez vezes mais caro que o genérico ofertado internacionalmente.

Abstract This study aimed to analyze the evolution of the price of tenofovir (TDF) in Brazil considering the different initiatives for its reduction. The selection criteria for the case were: to have been subject to at least one strategy to overcome patent barrier, which in the case was the support to examination of the patent application (patent opposition); and have been subject of a local production Partnership for Productive Development (PDP). The main results suggest that patent opposition presented in 2005 and 2006 contributed to the decision to reject the patent application in 2009. Brazil is estimated to have paid around US$ 200 million more for the monopoly due to the patent pending application period. There was a reduction in the price of TDF between 2003 and 2013, including during the PDP (2011 to 2013). In 2010, after the PDP announcement, there was an additional 40% decrease in the price of the TDF offered by Gilead, which reflected in the price offered by the PDP. However, the price paid in Brazil for the national product was about ten times higher than the generic offered internationally.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

RESUMO Este artigo tem como objetivo verificar a vulnerabilidade do Sistema Único de Saúde ante a influência das variações cambiais sobre a dinâmica de importação de medicamentos e equipamentos médicos de 1996 a 2014. A hipótese que orientou o trabalho é que as condições externas e a política econômica, expressas nas taxas de câmbio, afetam a dinâmica de produção e inovação do Complexo Econômico-Industrial da Saúde. Conclui que a elasticidade da relação entre variação cambial e importação dos segmentos estudados foi relativizada no período, consideradas as mudanças ocorridas. Este resultado sugere a importância de desenhar modelos econômicos que incorporem essas variáveis.

ABSTRACT This article is aimed at determining the vulnerability of the Unified Health System when subject to the influence of exchange rates variations on the dynamics of drugs and medical equipment import from 1996 to 2014. The hypothesis that guided this work is that external conditions and economics policies expressed in exchange rates do affect the dynamics of both production and innovation of the Economic-Industrial Complex of Health. It comes to the conclusion that, considering changes that took place, the elasticity of the relationship between import and exchange rate of the segments analyzed herein was not so heavily affected over the period. This result suggests the importance of designing economic models that incorporate those variables.

RESUMO

Resumo Objetivo: Analisar o perfil das compras realizadas por órgãos federais brasileiros dos antineoplásicos mesilato de imatinibe, trastuzumabe e L-asparaginase, entre janeiro/2004 e dezembro/2013. Métodos: Dados de compras foram extraídos do Sistema Integrado de Administração de Serviços Gerais-SIASG. Foram analisados: quantidade, preço unitário, data e tipo de compra e órgão comprador. Para permitir comparação de preços, os valores correntes foram corrigidos para dezembro/2013, pelo IPCA. Resultados: As quantidades adquiridas do imatinibe e trastuzumabe aumentaram progressivamente, sendo o Ministério da Saúde (MS) o principal comprador. Seus preços médios ponderados (PMP) apresentaram tendência de queda. Observou-se redução nos PMP do imatinibe, mesmo antes da centralização da compra pelo MS. O PMP do transtuzumabe foi reduzido em 57% após a incorporação pela CONITEC e a centralização de compras. As quantidades e preços da L-asparaginase variaram entre os órgãos. Diferentemente dos outros medicamentos, verificou-se significativa elevação de 117% no PMP da L-asparaginase, refletindo o desabastecimento no mercado mundial. Conclusões: A inclusão em Parcerias de Desenvolvimento Produtivo e a centralização das compras pelo MS parecem justificar as reduções de preço do imatinibe e trastuzumabe, reforçando a tese do uso do poder de compra do Estado. Estas reduções podem contribuir na ampliação de seu acesso no SUS.

Abstract Objective: To analyze the Brazilian federal procurement profile for imatinib mesylate, trastuzumab and L-asparaginase from January 2004 to December 2013. Methods: Information was extracted from the Brazilian Federal Government procurement database and included volume, unit price, date and type of purchase, government agency buyer. Prices were deflated to December 2013 by the Brazilian Pricing Index. Results: Purchase volumes of imatinib and trastuzumab increased progressively. The Ministry of Health was the main buyer. Weighted average prices (WAP) for these medicines showed a downward trend. A WAP reduction for imatinibe occurred before centralized purchases by the Ministry of Health began. After incorporation by CONITEC and centralized purchases in 2012, trastuzumab WAP was reduced by 57%. For L-asparaginase volumes and prices varied among different government agencies, but contrary to the two other medicines, L-asparaginase presented a 117% WAP increase, possibly reflecting stockouts in the international market. Conclusions: The setting of Productive Development Partnerships (PDPs) and centralized purchasing by the Brazilian Ministry of Health suggest a decrease in prices for imatinib and trastuzumab, underlining the government´s purchasing power. These reductions may contribute to availability of these medicines in the Brazilian Public Health System.

Assuntos