RESUMO
Cu(II) complexes bearing NNO-donor Schiff base ligands (2a, b) have been synthesized and characterized. The single crystal X-ray analysis of the 2a complex revealed that a mononuclear and a dinuclear complex co-crystallize in the solid state. The electronic structures of the complexes are optimized by Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations. The monomeric nature of 2a and 2b species is maintained in solution. Antioxidant activities of the ligands (1a, b) and Cu(II) complexes (2a, b) were determined by in vitro assays such as 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl free radicals (DPPH.) and 2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radicals (ABTS+). Our results demonstrated that 2a showed better antioxidant activity. MTT assays were performed to assess the toxicity of ligands and Cu(II) complexes in V79 cells. The antiproliferative activity of compounds was tested against two human tumor cell lines: MCF-7 (breast adenocarcinoma) and SW620 (colorectal carcinoma) and on MRC-5 (normal lung fibroblast). All compounds showed high cytotoxicity in the all-cell lines but showed no selectivity for tumor cell lines. Antiproliferative activity by clonogenic assay 2b showed a more significant inhibitory effect on the MCF-7 cell lines than on MRC-5. DNA damage for the 2b compound at 10 µM concentration was about three times higher in MCF-7 cells than in MRC-5 cells.
RESUMO
DNA-targeting agents have a significant clinical use, although toxicity remains an issue that plays against their widespread application. Understanding the mechanism of action and DNA damage response elicited by such compounds might contribute to the improvement of their use in anticancer chemotherapy. In a previous study, our research group characterized a new DNA-targeting agent - pradimicin-IRD. Since DNA-targeting agents and DNA repair are close-related subjects, the present study used in silico-modelling and a transcriptomic approach seeking to characterize the DNA repair pathways activated in HCT 116 cells following pradimicin-IRD treatment. Molecular docking analysis showed pradimicin-IRD as a DNA intercalating agent and a potential inhibitor of DNA-binding proteins. Furthermore, the transcriptomic study highlighted DNA repair functions related to genes modulated by pradimicin-IRD, such as nucleotide excision repair, telomeres maintenance and double-strand break repair. When validating these functions, PCNA protein levels decreased after exposure to pradimicin. Furthermore, molecular docking analysis suggested DNA-pradimicin-PCNA interaction. In addition, hTERT and POLH showed reduced mRNA levels after 6 h of treatment with pradimicin-IRD. Moreover, POLH-deficient cells displayed higher resistance to pradimicin-IRD than POLH-proficient cells and the compound prevented formation of the POLH/DNA complex (molecular docking). Since the modulation of DNA repair genes by pradimicin-IRD is TP53-independent, unlike doxorubicin, dissimilarities between the mechanism of action and the DNA damage response of pradimicin-IRD and doxorubicin open new insights for further studies of pradimicin-IRD as a new antineoplastic compound.