RESUMO

Background: The medical care paradigm is face-to-face; however, technological development has led to the digital modality. Objective: To determine cost-effectiveness of digital care and face-to-face care at the first level of care. Material and methods: Cost-effectiveness study. 2 groups were integrated: the digital service and the face-to-face service. The sample size was calculated with the percentage formula for 2 groups, and the result was 217 per group. The effectiveness was evaluated in 3 dimensions: the satisfaction of the patient, of the doctor and of the medical assistant. In all 3 cases the Visual analogue scale was used. The cost corresponded to the fixed unit cost estimated with the technique of times and movements adjusted for the duration of care. The statistical analysis included averages, percentages and cost-effectiveness ratio. Results: The cost of digital attention is $343.83 and face-to-face attention is $171.91 (all estimated in Mexican pesos). From the patient's perspective, the effectiveness in digital care is $9.47 and in face-to-face is $9.25. The cost to reach effectiveness of 10 in face-to-face care is $185.85 and in digital care $363.20. From the physician's perspective, the cost to achieve effectiveness of 10 is $419.13 in digital care and $184.52 in face-to-face care. From the perspective of the medical assistant, to achieve effectiveness of 10, the cost in digital care is $468.43 and in face-to-face $179.83. Conclusions: Currently, the best cost-effectiveness ratio corresponds to face-to-face care; however, digital care is an option that will have to evolve.

Introducción: el paradigma de atención médica es presencial; sin embargo, el desarrollo tecnológico ha propiciado la modalidad digital. Objetivo: determinar el costo-efectividad de la atención digital y la atención presencial en primer nivel. Material y métodos: estudio de costo-efectividad. Se integraron 2 grupos: el de atención digital y el de atención presencial. El tamaño de muestra se calculó con la fórmula de porcentajes para 2 grupos y el resultado fue 217 por grupo. La efectividad se evaluó en 3 dimensiones: la satisfacción del paciente, del médico y de la asistente médica. En los 3 casos se utilizó la Escala visual analógica. El costo correspondió al costo unitario fijo estimado con la técnica de tiempos y movimientos ajustado por la duración de la atención. El análisis estadístico incluyó promedios, porcentajes y relación costo-efectividad. Resultados: el costo de la atención digital es $343.83 y la atención presencial $171.91. Desde la perspectiva del paciente, la efectividad en atención digital es 9.47 y en presencial 9.25. El costo para alcanzar una efectividad de 10 en la atención presencial es $185.85 y en la atención digital $363.20. Desde la perspectiva del médico, el costo para alcanzar una efectividad de 10 es $419.13 en la atención digital y $184.52 en la atención presencial. Desde la perspectiva de la asistente médica, para alcanzar una efectividad de 10 el costo en la atención digital es $468.43 y en la presencial $179.83. Conclusiones: actualmente la mejor relación costo-efectividad corresponde a la atención presencial; sin embargo, la atención digital es una opción que tendrá que evolucionar.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Antecedentes: El departamento del Cauca en Colombia es multiétnico, multicultural y biodiverso, también con grandes diferencias en bajo peso al nacer (BPN), mortalidad perinatal y mortalidad neonatal tardía entre municipios. Objetivo: Determinar la relación de costo-efectividad del control prenatal (CPN) cuando ha tenido buena calidad frente al que ha tenido calidad deficiente con respecto al BPN en el departamento del Cauca entre 2018 y 2020. Método: Evaluación económica con diseño epidemiológico de una cohorte histórica desde la perspectiva de la institución pagadora. Se calculó la razón incremental de costo-efectividad (RICE), análisis de sensibilidad e impacto presupuestal. Resultados: La incidencia de BPN fue del 8,3% (348/4182). La calidad deficiente en el CPN incrementó el riesgo de BPN (OR: 3,38; IC95%: 1,05-8,2) y la buena calidad tuvo una mejor relación de costo-efectividad (RICE: USD 2727,75), con posición dominante frente a la calidad deficiente (6,14 veces el PIB per cápita de ahorro) y con un impacto presupuestal de USD 2.904.392. Conclusiones: La buena calidad del CPN en el departamento del Cauca durante 2018-2020 fue costo-efectiva y dominante por ser de menor costo y mayor efectividad.

Background: The department of Cauca in Colombia is multiethnic, multicultural, and biodiverse, also with large differences in low birth weight (LBW), perinatal mortality, and late neonatal mortality among municipalities. Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness relationship of antenatal care (ANC) when it has had good quality compared to that which has had poor quality with respect to low birth weight in the department of Cauca between 2018 and 2019. Method: Economic evaluation with epidemiological cohort design historical from the perspective of the payer institution. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (RICE), sensitivity analysis, and budgetary impact were calculated. Results: The incidence of LBW was 8.3% (348/4182). Poor quality in ANC increased the risk of LBW (OR: 3.38; CI95%: 1.05-8.2), good quality had a better cost-effectiveness ratio (RICE: USD 2727.75), with dominant position against poor quality (6.14 times the GDP/capita savings) with a budgetary impact of USD 2,904,392. Conclusions: The good quality of the ANC in the department of Cauca during 2018-2020 was cost-effective and dominant because it is lower cost and more effective.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness ratio and economic impact of the Rapid Antigen Test (TR-Ag) to replace RT-PCR for the detection of the new Coronavirus in the Unified Health System (SUS). METHODS: This is a cost-effectiveness analysis. Clinical protocols were used for the diagnosis of COVID-19 at the São José Municipal Hospital, located in the city of Itaberá-SP. The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was divided into two scenarios. In the first, the accuracy reported by the test manufacturers was included, and in the second, the cost resulting from a systematic review. Both were compared with the performance of the RT-PCR test. The increase in diagnoses was chosen as a health outcome and absenteeism was used as a criterion for assessing the economic impact. RESULTS: The analysis resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of R$ 42,136.67 and R$ 68,329.73 for every thousand tests, according to the accuracy of the manufacturers' TR-Ag tests and what is reported in the literature in relation to RT-PCR, respectively. The average value found for the RT-PCR test (R$ 202.87) represents an increase of 165.32% in cost in relation to the value found for the TR-Ag. 4,305 tests were performed between April 2020 and December 2021 at the referral hospital. Also, maintaining the use of RT-PCR as the first choice for diagnosing COVID-19 and regulating absenteeism in the economically active population could have an impact of up to R$ 1,022,779.68 on municipal management. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that the TR-Ag are configured as a cost-effective alternative for the SUS in the detection of the new Coronavirus. The strategy becomes economically favorable for the expansion of testing, combating the COVID-19 pandemic and reducing the impact on the local economy. However, studies are needed to validate the accuracy of the tests so that economic evaluations on the subject are more assertive.

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Introduction For the reduction of PTH levels, two classes of drugs are available in the Brazilian market: non-selective and selective vitamin D receptor activators and calcimimetics. Among the mentioned drugs, the SUS provides oral calcitriol, paricalcitol and cinacalcet. Objectives: Develop cost-effectiveness (CE) and budgetary impact (BI) analysis of cinacalcet versus paricalcitol for patients on dialysis with SHPT, from the perspective of SUS. Methodology: A decision tree model was constructed for CE analysis, which considered the outcome of avoided parathyroidectomy and a time horizon of 1 year. As for the BI analysis, two scenarios were considered, one of which was measured demand and other epidemiological, based on data from the Brazilian Society of Nephrology (BSN). Results: The CE analysis showed that the use of cinacalcet results in one-off savings of R$1,394.64 per year and an incremental effectiveness of 0.08, in relation to avoided parathyroidectomy. The incremental CE ratio (ICER) was - R$ 17,653.67 per avoided parathyroidectomy for cinacalcet, as it was more effective and cheaper compared to paricalcitol. As for the BI analysis, it was estimated that the incremental BI with the expansion of the use of cinacalcet in the SUS will be between - R$ 1,640,864.62 and R$ 166,368.50 in the first year, considering the main and the epidemiological scenarios. At the end of 5 years after the expansion of use, an BI was estimated between - R$ 10,740,743.86 and - R$ 1,191,339.37; considering the same scenarios. Conclusion: Cinacalcet was dominant to avoid parathyroidectomies, being cost-effective.

RESUMO Introdução: Para a redução dos níveis do paratormônio (PTH) estão disponíveis no mercado brasileiro duas classes de medicamentos: ativadores do receptor da vitamina D (não seletivos e seletivos) e calcimiméticos. Dentre os medicamentos supracitados, o SUS disponibiliza calcitriol oral, paricalcitol e cinacalcete. Objetivos: Desenvolver análise de custo-efetividade (CE) e de impacto orçamentário (IO) do cinacalcete versus paricalcitol para pacientes em diálise com HPTS, na perspectiva do SUS. Metodologia: Foi construído um modelo de árvore de decisão para a análise de CE, que considerou o desfecho paratireoidectomia evitada e um horizonte temporal de 1 ano. Quanto à análise de IO, foram considerados dois cenários, um de demanda aferida e outro de abordagem epidemiológica, baseado nos dados da Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN). Resultados: A análise de CE mostrou que o uso de cinacalcete resulta em economia de R$ 1.394,64 ao ano e efetividade incremental de 0,08, em relação a paratireoidectomia evitada. A razão de CE incremental (RCEI) foi de - R$ 17.653,67 por paratireoidectomia evitada para o cinacalcete, já que se mostrou mais efetivo e mais barato comparado ao paricalcitol. Estimou-se que o IO incremental com a ampliação do uso do cinacalcete no SUS estará entre - R$ 1.640.864,62 e R$ 166.368,50 no primeiro ano, considerando os cenários principal e epidemiológico baseado nos dados da SBN. Já ao final de 5 anos após a ampliação do uso, estimou-se um impacto incremental entre - R$ 10.740.743,86 e - R$ 1.191.339,37; considerando os mesmos cenários. Conclusão: Cinacalcete foi dominante para evitar paratireoidectomias, sendo custo-efetivo.

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Purpose: To present the results of a retrospective study regarding the clinical and economic impact of intracameral cefuroxime administration to prevent endophthalmitis during cataract surgery in a referral hospital. Methods: This study included 16,902 eyes from patients who had undergone cataract surgery between 2013 and 2017. From May 2014 onwards, all patients received routine intracameral injections of 1 mg cefuroxime (10 mg/1 mL) after phacoemulsification. The prophylactic efficacy was evaluated using the relative risk ratio, whereas the economic impact was evaluated using number needed to treat to avoid endophthalmitis. Results: Before introducing cefuroxime, 3,407 cataract surgeries were performed using the phacoemulsification technique, and 7 post-operatory cases of endophthalmitis occurred (0.2% incidence). After introducing the cefuroxime protocol, 13,495 surgeries were performed, and 4 endophthalmitis cases were registered (0.03% incidence). Cefuroxime was identified as a protective factor against the development of endophthalmitis [risk ratio = 14%, p=0.002, 95% confidence interval (CI) 95%, 4%-49%], with an economic impact of number needed to treat = 568. The potential savings with cefuroxime was approximately US $2,334.36 for every 568 patients treated. Conclusion: The incidence of endophthalmitis decreased by 86% (risk ratio = 14%, p=0.002, 95% CI, 4%-49%) after introducing intracameral cefuroxime prophylaxis at the study hospital. The results presented herein provide strong evidence for the use of cefuroxime in endophthalmitis prophylaxis after phacoemulsification surgeries, outperforming the alter­native by providing both economic and clinical benefits.

RESUMO Objetivo: Apresentar os resultados de um estudo retrospectivo sobre o impacto clínico e econômico da administração de cefuroxima intracameral para prevenir endoftalmite nas cirurgias de catarata em um hospital de referência. Métodos: Este estudo incluiu 16.902 olhos de pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de catarata entre 2013 e 2017. A partir de maio de 2014, todos os pacientes receberam rotineiramente uma injeção intracameral de 1mg de cefuroxima (10mg/1mL) ao final da cirurgia de facoemulsificação. A eficácia da profilaxia foi avaliada usando o risco relativo e o impacto econômico foi avaliado com o número necessário para tratar para se evitar um caso de endoftalmite. Resultados: Antes da introdução do protocolo da cefuroxima, foram realizadas 3.407 cirurgias de catarata por facoemulsificação e ocorreram 7 casos de endoftalmite pós-operatória (incidência de 0,2%). Após a introdução do protocolo da cefuroxima, foram realizadas 13.495 cirurgias e registrados 4 casos de endoftalmite (incidência de 0,03%). A cefuroxima foi um fator de proteção no desenvolvimento de endoftalmite (risco relativo = 14%, p=0,002, Intervalo de Confiança de 95% [IC 95%], 4% - 49%) e o impacto econômico do número necessário para tratar = 568. A economia potencial com a cefuroxima foi de aproximadamente US$ 2.334,36 para cada 568 pacientes tratados. Conclusão: A incidência de endoftalmite diminuiu 86% (risco relativo = 14%, p=0,002, IC 95% 4% - 49%) desde a introdução da profilaxia com cefuroxima intracameral no hospital do estudo. Os resultados apresentados mostram forte evidência para o uso da cefuroxima na profilaxia da endoftalmite após cirurgias de facoemulsificação, por proporcionar economia de custos e benefício clínico.

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction: Hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) secondary to chronic kidney disease (CKD) is characterized by high levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH), hyperplasia of the parathyroid glands and cardiovascular disease. Selective and non-selective and selective vitamin D-receptor activators, calcimimetics, are available in the Brazilian market to reduce PTH levels. Objectives: To develop a cost-effectiveness (C/E) and budgetary impact (BI) analysis of intravenous paricalcitol vs. oral calcitriol for patients on dialysis with SHPT, from the perspective of the Brazilian Public Health Care System (SUS). Methodology: We built a decision-tree model to analyze C/E, which considered the outcome of avoided death and a time horizon of 1 year. As for the BI analysis, two scenarios were considered, one of demand and one of epidemiological approach, based on data from the Brazilian Society of Nephrology. Results: The analysis showed that the C/E ratio was R$ 1,213.68 per year, and an incremental effectiveness of 0.032, referring to avoided death. The incremental C/E ratio was R$37,927.50 per death averted by paricalcitol. It was estimated that the incremental BI with the expansion of paricalcitol use will be between R$1,600,202.28 and R$4,128,565.65 in the first year, considering the main and epidemiological scenarios. At the end of 5 years after the expansion of its use, an incremental BI was estimated between R$ 48,596,855.50 and R$ 62,90,555.73. Conclusion: Intravenous paricalcitol has superior efficacy and similar safety to oral calcitriol, reducing the overall mortality of dialysis patients, although it implies a higher cost.

Resumo Introdução: O hiperparatireoidismo secundário (HPTS) à doença crônica renal (DRC) é caracterizado por elevados níveis de paratormônio (PTH), hiperplasia das glândulas paratireoides e doença cardiovascular. Para a redução dos níveis do PTH, estão disponíveis no mercado brasileiro os ativadores não seletivos e seletivos do receptor da vitamina D e os calcimiméticos. Objetivos: Desenvolver análise de custo-efetividade (C/E) e de impacto orçamentário (IO) do paricalcitol intravenoso vs. calcitriol oral para pacientes em diálise com HPTS, na perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde. Metodologia: Foi construído um modelo de árvore de decisão para a análise de C/E, que considerou o desfecho morte evitada e um horizonte temporal de 1 ano. Quanto à análise de IO, foram considerados dois cenários, sendo um de demanda aferida e um de abordagem epidemiológica, baseado nos dados da Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia. Resultados: A análise mostrou que a relação de C/E foi de R$ 1.213,68 ao ano, e uma efetividade incremental de 0,032, referente à morte evitada. A razão de C/E incremental foi de R$ 37.927,50 por morte evitada para o paricalcitol. Estimou-se que o IO incremental com a ampliação do uso do paricalcitol estará entre R$ 1.600.202,28 e R$ 4.128.565,65 no primeiro ano, considerando os cenários principal e o epidemiológico. Já no fim de 5 anos após a ampliação do uso, estimou-se IO incremental entre R$ 48.596.855,50 e R$ 62.90.555,73. Conclusão: O paricalcitol intravenoso tem eficácia superior e segurança semelhante ao comparador calcitriol oral, diminuindo a mortalidade geral dos pacientes em diálise, embora implique maior custo.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fluoride varnish (FV) is a convenient way of professionally applying fluoride in preschoolers. However, its modest anticaries effect highlights the need for economic evaluations. AIM: To assess economic evaluations reporting applications of FV to reduce caries incidence in preschoolers. DESIGN: We included full economic evaluations with preschool participants, in which the intervention was FV and the outcome was related to dentin caries. We searched in CENTRAL; MEDLINE via PubMed; WEB OF SCIENCE; EMBASE; SCOPUS; LILACS; BBO; and BVS Economia em saúde, OpenGrey, and EconoLit. Clinical trial registers, thesis and dissertations, and meeting abstracts were hand searched, as well as 11 dental journals. Risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Philips' and Drummond's (full and simplified) tools. RESULTS: Titles and abstracts of 2871 articles were evaluated, and 200 were read in full. Eight cost-effectiveness studies were included: five modeling and three within-trial evaluations. None of the studies gave sufficient information to allow a thorough assessment using the bias tools. We did not combine the results of the studies due to the great heterogeneity among them. Four studies reported that FV in preschool children was a cost-effective measure, but in one of these studies, sealants and fluoride toothpaste were more cost-effective measures than the varnish, and three studies used limited data that compromised the generalizability of their results. The other four studies showed a large increase in costs due to the application of varnish and/or low cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION: We did not find convincing overall evidence that applying FV in preschoolers is an anticaries cost-effective measure. The protocol of this systematic review is available at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/xw5va/).

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objective: This study aimed to compare the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in pediatric patients who used vancomycin (VAN) or linezolid (LNZ) to treat Gram-positive coccus (GPC) infections and to assess which treatment (VAN or LNZ) is the most cost-effective considering a pediatric hospital perspective. Methods: A retrospective cohort was performed to evaluate the occurrence of nephrotoxicity in pediatric patients without previous AKI, with GPC infections that used LNZ, or VAN monitored by serum VAN levels. Initially, descriptive analysis and Fisher and chisquare test were performed for this comparison. Then, a cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted through a decision tree model. The outcomes of interest were the rate of AKI related to the drug and the rate of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and cure. Results: In patients without previous acute kidney injury (AKI), 20% developed nephrotoxicity associated with VAN versus 9.6% in the LNZ group (p = 0.241). As there was no difference in nephrotoxicity between VAN andlinezolid (LNZ), vancomycin (VAN) monitored by serum VAN levels can optimize and rationalize the treatment. The nephrotoxicity risk criterion should not guide the prescription for LNZ. Furthermore, the average global cost of treatment with VAN was approximately R$ 43,000, while for LNZ, it was R$ 71,000. Conclusion: VAN was considered dominant (lower cost and greater effectiveness) over LNZ for treating patients with GPC infection.

Objetivo: Este estudo objetivou comparar a ocorrência de lesão renal aguda (LRA) em pacientes pediátricos que usaram vancomicina (VAN) ou linezolida (LNZ) para tratar infecções por cocos Gram-positivos (CGP) e avaliar qual tratamento (VAN ou LNZ) é o mais custo-efetivo considerando a perspectiva de um hospital pediátrico. Métodos: Foi realizada uma coorte retrospectiva para avaliar a ocorrência de nefrotoxicidade em pacientes pediátricos sem LRA prévia, com infecções por CGP que utilizaram LNZ ou VAN, combinada com vancocinemia. Para essa comparação, inicialmente foram realizados análise descritiva e testes de Fisher e qui-quadrado. Em seguida, foi realizada uma análise de custo-efetividade por meio de um modelo de árvore de decisão. Os desfechos de interesse foram a taxa de LRA relacionada ao medicamento e a taxa de internação em unidade de terapia intensiva e cura. Resultados: Nos pacientes sem LRA prévia, 20% deles desenvolveram nefrotoxicidade associada à VAN versus 9,6% no grupo LNZ (p = 0,241). Como não houve diferença na nefrotoxicidade entre VAN e LNZ, a VAN combinada com a vancocinemia pode otimizar e racionalizar o tratamento, e a prescrição de LNZ não deve ser guiada pelo critério de risco de nefrotoxicidade. Além disso, o custo médio global do tratamento com VAN foi de aproximadamente R$ 43.000, enquanto para LNZ foi de R$ 71.000. Conclusão: Assim, a VAN foi considerada dominante (menor custo e maior eficácia) sobre a LNZ para o tratamento de pacientes com infecção por CGP.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Background Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is the most severe form of acute kidney injury in patients with advanced cirrhosis, and it is associated with high mortality. It is usually diagnosed according to criteria defined by the International Ascites Club. Currently, the most frequently indicated pharmacological therapy for the treatment of HRS is a combination of splanchnic vasoconstrictors (terlipressin or norepinephrine) in combination with albumin. With the progressive increase in healthcare spending, it is important to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of pharmacological treatment in patients who are diagnosed with HRS. Objective: To perform a cost-effectiveness assessment for the use of terlipressin in combination with albumin to treat HRS in patients with cirrhosis. Methods: Economic evaluation of cost-effectiveness based on secondary data from studies showed the efficacy of terlipressin therapy compared with norepinephrine combined with albumin or albumin alone. The cost-effectiveness analysis was calculated using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and a sensitivity analysis was developed by varying the values of therapies and probabilities. The Brazilian real was the currency used in the analysis, and the results were converted to US dollars. Results: After selection, eligibility, and evaluation of the quality of publications, the results demonstrated that administration of terlipressin or norepinephrine in combination with albumin in patients diagnosed with HRS type 1 was efficacious. The cost of treatment with terlipressin in combination with albumin was USD $1,644.06, administration of albumin alone was USD $912.02, and norepinephrine plus albumin was USD $2,310.78. Considering that the combination therapies demonstrated effectiveness, the incremental cost of terlipressin and norepinephrine in combination with albumin was USD $666.73, and an effectiveness of 0.570 was found for terlipressin in combination with albumin and 0.200 for norepinephrine in combination with albumin. The incremental effectiveness was 0.370, and the ICER was USD $1,801.97. Thus, the parameters of increasing cost per therapy and ICER indicated that the combined therapy of terlipressin plus albumin was cost effective compared to albumin alone or norepinephrine plus albumin in a public single-payer healthcare system. Conclusion: A cost-effectiveness analysis showed that terlipressin in combination with albumin when administered concomitantly to patients who were diagnosed with type 1 HRS is cost-effective compared to norepinephrine in combination with albumin administered in a controlled environment.

RESUMO Contexto: A Síndrome Hepatorrenal (SHR) é a forma mais grave de lesão renal aguda em pacientes com cirrose avançada, estando diretamente associada a alta taxa de mortalidade. Normalmente é diagnosticada seguindo critérios definidos pela International Ascites Club (IAC). Atualmente, as terapias farmacológicas mais indicadas no tratamento da SHR são a combinação de vasoconstritores esplâncnicos (terlipressina ou norepinefrina) associados à albumina. Com o aumento progressivo dos gastos em saúde, torna-se relevante realizar uma análise de custo-efetividade do tratamento farmacológico em pacientes com diagnóstico de SHR. Objetivo: Realizar avaliação de custo-efetividade do uso da terlipressina associada à albumina no tratamento da SHR em pacientes com cirrose. Métodos: Avaliação econômica de custo-efetividade, com base em dados secundários de estudos publicados com resultado da eficácia da terapia com terlipressina, em comparação com norepinefrina combinada com albumina ou apenas albumina. A análise de custo-efetividade foi calculada usando a razão de custo-efetividade incremental (RCEI) e uma análise de sensibilidade foi desenvolvida variando os valores das terapias e probabilidades. O real foi a moeda utilizada na análise. Resultados: Após a seleção, elegibilidade e avaliação da qualidade das publicações, os resultados demonstraram que a administração da associação de terlipressina ou norepinefrina com albumina em pacientes diagnosticados com SHR tipo 1 possui eficácia comprovada. Os custos do tratamento com a terapia combinada de terlipressina com albumina foram de USD $1,644.06, administração de somente albumina USD $912.02 e norepinefrina mais albumina USD $2,310.78. Considerando as terapias combinadas com efetividade terapêutica comprovada, isto é, terlipressina e norepinefrina associada a albumina, o custo incremental foi de USD $666.73 e efetividade de 0,570 para o grupo da terlipressina associada a albumina e de 0,200 para o grupo da norepinefrina associada a albumina. A efetividade incremental foi de 0,370 e o valor da RCEI foi de USD $1,801.97. Assim, os fatores de incremento do custo por terapia e razão de custo-efetividade incremental definem que a terapia combinada de terlipressina mais albumina é custo efetiva quando comparada a administração de somente albumina ou norepinefrina no cenário do sistema único de saúde. Conclusão: O estudo demonstrou por meio de uma análise de custo-efetividade que a terlipressina associada à albumina quando administrada concomitantemente a pacientes com diagnóstico de SHR tipo 1 é custo-efetiva quando comparada à albumina sozinha e com norepinefrina associada à albumina administrada em um ambiente controlado.

RESUMO

Objetivo: Estimar a custo-efetividade do blinatumomabe como novo padrão no tratamento de consolidação de pacientes pediátricos com leucemia linfoblástica aguda de células precursoras B (LLA-B) em primeira recidiva de alto risco. Métodos: Um modelo de sobrevida particionado com horizonte lifetime e ciclo de quatro semanas foi construído na perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Sobrevida livre de eventos e sobrevida global foram extrapoladas com base no ensaio clínico 20120215, usando funções paramétricas. A taxa de desconto foi de 5%. O impacto de variações em pressupostos foi explorado em análises de cenário. Resultados: O custo lifetime com desconto para o caso base foi de R$ 351.615 para blinatumomabe contra R$ 97.770 para HC3 (grupo controle de quimioterapia-padrão), com ganho de 9,96 e 6,74 anos de vida ajustados para qualidade (QALYs), respectivamente. A razão de custo-efetividade incremental (RCEI) foi de R$ 78.873/QALY. Considerando um cenário sem descontos, a RCEI foi de R$ 33.731/QALY ganho. Os outros cenários com maior impacto na RCEI foram a exclusão do desperdício de blinatumomabe (isto é, considerando que a sobra em frasco-ampola de um paciente seria reaproveitada para outro paciente: R$ 35.751) e a alteração do tempo de infusão (troca de bolsa em 48 ou 96 horas em vez de 24 horas: R$ 35.515). A probabilidade de o blinatumomabe ser custo-efetivo foi de 65,7% na análise probabilística, considerando um limiar de R$ 95.501. Conclusões: Blinatumomabe é custo-efetivo para pacientes pediátricos com LLA-B derivada em primeira recidiva de alto risco na perspectiva do SUS.

Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of blinatumomab as the new standard treatment of consolidation in high-risk first relapse pediatric patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Methods: A partitioned survival model with a lifetime horizon and a 4-week cycle was developed from the Brazilian public healthcare payer's perspective (SUS). Event-free survival and overall survival were extrapolated based on data from the 20120215 clinical trial using parametric functions. A 5% discount rate was used, and the impact of variations in model parameters and assumptions were explored in scenario analyses. Results: The discounted base case lifetime cost was R$ 351,615 for blinatumomab vs. R$ 97,770 for standard chemotherapy control group (HC3), with 9.96 QALYs gained with blinatumomab vs. 6.74 QALYs gained with HC3. The incremental costeffectiveness ratio (ICER) was R$ 78,873/QALY. Considering an undiscounted scenario, the ICER was.

Assuntos

RESUMO

RESUMO Objetivo: analisar os custos e benefícios da atenção domiciliar de adultos ou idosos com condições crônicas complexas (CCC). Método: revisão integrativa, relatada segundo o Preferred Reporting Items for Syste matic reviews and Meta-Analyses. Os resultados foram submetidos à análise narrativa. Resultados: A amostra final foi de 18 estudos, publicados no período de 2008 a 2021.As CCC identificadas foram insuficiência cardíaca grave, doença renal crônica, doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica,múltiplas condições crônicas, pacientes sob quimioterapia e em cuidados paliativos. A modalidade de atenção domiciliar prevalente foi o monitoramento adistância. Conclusão: Identificou-se redução de custos entre 23,9% e 67,1%, com variações entre os componentes analisados e as metodologias utilizadas para o cálculo. Os benefícios incluem diminuição de hospitalizações; redução de exacerbações de sintomas e do uso de serviços de saúde, melhoria na qualidade de vida e controle mais eficaz das condições crônicas complexas com autocuidado e autogerenciamento.

RESUMEN Objetivo: analizar los costos y beneficios de la atención domiciliaria a adultos o ancianos con condiciones crónicas complejas (CCC). Método: revisión integrativa, relatada según el PreferredReportingItemsforSysteMaticReviews and Meta-Analyses. Los resultados fueron sometidos al análisis narrativo. Resultados: la muestra final fue de 18 estudios, publicados en el período de 2008 a 2021. Las CCC identificadas fueron insuficiencia cardíaca grave, enfermedad renal crónica, enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica, múltiples condiciones crónicas, pacientes bajo quimioterapia y en cuidados paliativos. La modalidad de atención domiciliaria prevalente fue el monitoreo a distancia. Conclusión: se identificó reducción de costos entre el 23,9% y el 67,1%, con variaciones entre los componentes analizados y las metodologías utilizadas para el cálculo. Los beneficios incluyen disminución de hospitalizaciones; reducción de exacerbaciones de síntomas y del uso de servicios de salud, mejora en la calidad de vida y un control más eficaz de las condiciones crónicas complejas con autocuidado y autogestión.

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the costs and benefits of home care for adults or elderly with complex chronic conditions (CCC). Method: Integrative Review, reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews. The results were submitted to the Narrative analysis final sample was 18 studies, published from 2008 to 2021. The CCC identified were severe heart failure, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, multiple chronic conditions, patients undergoing chemotherapy and palliative care. The prevalent mode of home care was remote monitoring. Conclusion: Cost reduction was identified between 23.9% and 67.1%, with variations between the components analyzed and the methodologies used for the calculation. The benefits include decreased hospitalizations; reduced exacerbations of symptoms and use of health services, improved quality of life and more effective control of complex chronic conditions with self-care and self-management.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT This essay explores possibilities of advances in cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) in advanced practice nursing (APN). The arguments were structured according to the current health landscape, the need to evaluate APN practices as health technology and evidence and recommendations for conducting CEA. Benefits of APN were evidenced in the improvement of indicators such as mortality, hospital readmission, among others. However, the absence of a standard of care, combined with the existence of different models and short time horizon interfered with the estimation of direct costs. The studies on CEA were inconclusive, mainly due to the lack of cost per unit of success and calculation of the CEA ratio. In the context of the APN, to conduct CEA that really contributes to robust results, thus subsidizing decision-making requires a joint effort of training institutions, delimitation and standardization of practice by regulatory agencies of the profession and health services, based especially on accreditation policies.

RESUMEN Este ensayo explora las posibilidades de avances en la evaluación de costo-efectividad (ECA) de la enfermería de práctica avanzada (EPA). Los argumentos se estructuraron según el escenario de salud actual, la necesidad de evaluar las prácticas de la EPA, como tecnología sanitaria, evidencia y recomendaciones para realizar análisis de costo-efectividad. Los beneficios de la enfermería de práctica avanzada se evidenciaron en la mejora de los indicadores como mortalidad, reingreso hospitalario, entre otros. Sin embargo, la falta de un estándar de cuidados, combinado con la existencia de diferentes modelos y el corto plazo, interfirió en la estimación de los costos directos. Los estudios no fueron concluyentes sobre el análisis de costo-efectividad, principalmente debido a la falta de costo por unidad de éxito y cálculo de la relación ACE. En el contexto de la enfermería de práctica avanzada, la realización de análisis de costo-efectividad que contribuya a resultados robustos apoyando la toma de decisiones requiere un esfuerzo conjunto de las instituciones de formación, delimitación y estandarización de la práctica por parte de los organismos reguladores de la profesión y los servicios de salud fundamentados, especialmente, en las políticas de acreditación.

RESUMO O presente ensaio explora possibilidades de avanços na avaliação custo-efetividade (ACE) da enfermagem de práticas avançadas (EPA). Os argumentos foram estruturados segundo o panorama de saúde atual, necessidade de avaliação das práticas da EPA, como tecnologia em saúde, evidências e recomendações para condução de análise custo-efetividade. Benefícios da enfermagem de práticas avançadas foram evidenciados na melhora de indicadores como mortalidade, readmissão hospitalar, entre outros. Todavia, a ausência de um padrão de cuidados, combinada com a existência de modelos distintos e curto horizonte temporal, interferiram na estimativa de custos diretos. Os estudos foram inconclusivos acerca da análise custo-efetividade, sobretudo pela ausência de custo por unidade de sucesso e cálculo da razão ACE. No contexto da enfermagem de práticas avançadas, a condução de análise custo-efetividade que contribua com resultados robustos, subsidiando na tomada de decisões, requer esforço conjunto de instituições formadoras, delimitação e normatização da prática por órgãos reguladores da profissão e, de serviços de saúde, alicerçados, especialmente em políticas de acreditação.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Background: Implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) therapy for primary prevention (PP) of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is well-established but underutilized globally. The Improve SCA study has identified a cohort of patients called 1.5 primary prevention (1.5PP), based on PP patients with the presence of documented risk factors: non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, frequent premature ventricular contractions, left ventricular ejection fraction < 25%, and pre-syncope or syncope. Objective: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of ICD therapy compared to no ICD among 1.5PP patients in the Brazilian public healthcare system. Methods: Modified inputs to a published Markov model were applied to compare costs and outcomes of ICD therapy to no ICD therapy from the Brazilian payer's perspective. Mortality and utility estimates were obtained from the IMPROVE SCA trial. Additional effectiveness inputs were sourced from the literature. Cost inputs were obtained from the Brazilian Unified Health System and the Ministry of Health. Costs were discounted at 4.7%; quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at 1.45%. This study applied a willingness-to-pay (WTP) value of three times Brazil's gross domestic product (GDP) in 2017, R$105,723 (Brazilian Real). Results: The total discounted lifetime costs for ICD therapy were R$100,920 compared to R$43,866 for no ICD therapy. Total discounted QALYs for ICD therapy and no ICD therapy were 9.85 and 7.15, respectively. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio was R$21,156 per QALY and less than the R$105,723 WTP threshold. Results from sensitivity analyses were consistent with base case results. Conclusions: ICD therapy compared to no ICD therapy is cost-effective in the 1.5PP population in Brazil. (Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2021; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)

RESUMO

Objetivo: Descrever e analisar criticamente as avaliações econômicas de medicamentos antineoplásicos submetidas à Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar (ANS) durante o processo de atualização do rol de procedimentos em saúde 2020. Métodos: Estudo transversal de análise crítica dos estudos de avaliação econômica integrantes da documentação submetida à ANS com o objetivo de incorporação no rol de procedimentos. A avaliação da qualidade metodológica foi realizada por meio da ferramenta Methodology Checklist 6: Economic Evaluations Version 3.0 da Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Resultados: Foram incluídas 49 avaliações econômicas: 22 estudos de custo-efetividade, 10 estudos de custo-utilidade, três estudos de custo-minimização e 14 estudos de custo-efetividade e custo-utilidade. A qualidade metodológica foi considerada, na maior parte (88%), como aceitável ou de baixa qualidade. Conclusão: Estudos de avaliação econômica são fundamentais no processo decisório de incorporação de tecnologias na saúde suplementar. Esta análise crítica sugere que a qualidade dos estudos econômicos apresentados dentro das propostas de incorporação de antineoplásicos durante o processo de atualização do rol 2020 da ANS foi limitada. Inconsistências metodológicas e falta de um relato transparente reduzem a validade e a aplicabilidade dos achados na tomada de decisão.

Objective: To describe and critically appraise the economic evaluations of antineoplastic drugs submitted to the ANS during the process of updating its 2020' list of procedures. Methods: Cross-sectional study of critical analysis of the economic evaluation studies included in the documentation submitted to the ANS with the aim of incorporating them into the list of procedures. The methodological quality assessment was carried out using the Methodology Checklist 6: Economic Evaluations Version 3.0 of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Results: Overall, 49 economic evaluations were included: 22 cost-effectiveness studies, 10 cost-utility studies, three cost-minimization studies and 14 mixed economic studies. Methodological quality was mostly considered as acceptable or low quality. Conclusion: Economic evaluation studies are fundamental in the decision-making process of incorporating technologies into supplementary health care. This critical appraisal suggests that the quality of the economic studies presented within the proposals to incorporate antineoplastics during the process of updating the ANS 2020 roll was limited. Methodological inconsistencies and lack of transparent reporting reduce the validity and applicability of findings for decision-making

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objective: The transfusion of blood components and blood products in cardiac surgery patients can be guided by protocols based on standard laboratory tests and/or clinical decisions (Standardof-Care, SOC) or viscoelastic haemostatic assays (VHA). The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of VHAs compared to SOC. Methods: A decision tree model was built in TreeAge Pro® 2009. Costs and benefits were taken from the medical literature. The costeffectiveness was evaluated in a base-case scenario and a worst-case scenario, considering low costs of adverse events. The budget impact was evaluated from data taken from Datasus. Cost data were measured in 2019 USD and outcomes were measured in QALYs. Results: VHAs were considered dominant in the base-case scenario and very cost-effective in the worst-case scenario (ICER = $ 1,083.21 USD/QALY). The budget impact analysis varied from a cost-saving result in the base-case scenario to a reasonable increase in cost in the worst-case scenario. Since the total market share of the technology is unlikely, a reasonable estimative for the base-case scenario and the worst-case scenario are about -$275 million USD and $132 million USD, respectively. Conclusion: We conclude that the VHAs are cost-effective and should be recommended for the use in the perioperative period of cardiac surgeries, especially for patients with a high risk of hemorrhage or coagulation problems.

Objetivo: A transfusão de sangue, hemocomponentes e produtos sanguíneos em pacientes submetidos a cirurgia cardíaca pode ser guiada por protocolos baseados em testes laboratoriais padrão e/ou decisão clínica (Standard-of-Care, SOC) ou testes viscoelásticos (TVEs). O objetivo deste estudo é avaliar o custo-efetividade e o impacto orçamentário dos TVEs em comparação com o SOC. Métodos: Um modelo de árvore de decisão foi construído em TreeAge Pro® 2009. Os parâmetros de custos e benefícios foram obtidos da literatura médica. A relação custo-efetividade foi avaliada em um cenário-base e no pior cenário, considerando baixos custos de eventos adversos. O impacto orçamentário foi avaliado a partir de dados extraídos do Datasus. Os custos foram avaliados em USD 2019 e os desfechos em AVAQs. Resultados: Os TVEs foram considerados dominantes no cenário-base e muito custo-efetivos no pior cenário avaliado (RCEI = 1.083,21 USD/QALY). A análise de impacto orçamentário variou de um resultado de economia de custos no cenário-base a um aumento razoável no custo no pior cenário. Como a hipótese de que a tecnologia será adotada para toda a demanda do mercado é improvável, estimativas razoáveis para o cenário-base e o pior cenário são de aproximadamente -275 milhões de USD e 132 milhões de USD, respectivamente. Conclusão: Concluímos que os VHAs são econômicos e devem ser recomendados para uso no período perioperatório de cirurgias cardíacas, principalmente para pacientes com alto risco de problemas de hemorragia ou coagulação.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introduction: Cystic fibrosis is an autosomal recessive genetic disease classified as a highcost orphan disease. Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness ratio of the diagnostic test for the CFTR gene-sequencing in asymptomatic family carriers in the first, second, and third degree of consanguinity. Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic search evaluating operative characteristics of the diagnostic test and decision-tree models in cost-effectiveness studies. A decision-tree model was elaborated taking prevention of future conceptions as a unit of analysis. We obtained the costs of the disease from the high-cost report of the Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. The costs of the test were referenced by national laboratories. We carried out a deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis with a third-payer perspective and a one-year horizon. Results: An ICER of USD$ 5051.10 was obtained as the incremental cost for obtaining 10.89% more probability of avoiding the birth of a child with cystic fibrosis per screened couple. For family members in second and third degrees, the ICER was USD$ 19,380.94 and USD$ 55,913.53, respectively, evidenced when applying the GDP per capita. This technology was cost-effective in 39%, 61.18%, and 74.36% for 1, 2, and 3 GDP per capita in first degree of consanguinity relatives. Conclusions: The genetic test for the detection of CFTR gene carriers was cost-effective depending on the threshold of availability to pay and the assumptions and limitations established in the model.

Introducción. La fibrosis quística es una enfermedad genética de carácter autosómico recesivo clasificada como enfermedad huérfana de alto costo. Objetivo. Determinar la razón de costo-efectividad de la prueba diagnóstica de secuenciación del gen CFTR para los portadores asintomáticos familiares en primer, segundo y tercer grados de consanguinidad. Materiales y métodos. Se hizo una búsqueda sistemática sobre la evaluación de las características operativas de la prueba diagnóstica y los modelos de árbol de decisiones en estudios de costo-efectividad. Se elaboró un modelo de árbol de decisiones tomando como unidad de análisis la prevención de futuras concepciones. Los costos de la enfermedad se obtuvieron del reporte de alto costo del Ministerio de Salud de Colombia. Los costos de la prueba se obtuvieron de laboratorios nacionales. Se hizo un análisis de sensibilidad, determinístico y probabilístico, con la perspectiva del tercer pagador y horizonte a un año. Resultados. Se obtuvo una razón incremental de costo-efectividad (RICE) de USD$5.051,10 por obtener 10,89 % más de probabilidades de evitar el nacimiento de un niño enfermo con fibrosis quística por pareja. Para los familiares de segundo y tercer grados, se encontró una RICE de USD$ 19.380,94 y USD$ 55.913,53, respectivamente, al aplicar el PIB per cápita. Esta tecnología fue costo-efectiva en 39 %, 61,18 % y 74,36 % para 1, 2 y 3 PIB per cápita en familiares de primer grado de consanguinidad. Conclusiones. La prueba genética de detección de portadores del gen CFTR resultó costo-efectiva dependiendo del umbral de la disponibilidad de pagar, y de los supuestos y limitaciones establecidas en el modelo.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción. La fibrosis quística es una enfermedad genética de carácter autosómico recesivo clasificada como enfermedad huérfana de alto costo. Objetivo. Determinar la razón de costo-efectividad de la prueba diagnóstica de secuenciación del gen CFTR para los portadores asintomáticos familiares en primer, segundo y tercer grados de consanguinidad. Materiales y métodos. Se hizo una búsqueda sistemática sobre la evaluación de las características operativas de la prueba diagnóstica y los modelos de árbol de decisiones en estudios de costo-efectividad. Se elaboró un modelo de árbol de decisiones tomando como unidad de análisis la prevención de futuras concepciones. Los costos de la enfermedad se obtuvieron del reporte de alto costo del Ministerio de Salud de Colombia. Los costos de la prueba se obtuvieron de laboratorios nacionales. Se hizo un análisis de sensibilidad, determinístico y probabilístico, con la perspectiva del tercer pagador y horizonte a un año. Resultados. Se obtuvo una razón incremental de costo-efectividad (RICE) de USD$ 5.051,10 por obtener 10,89 % más de probabilidades de evitar el nacimiento de un niño enfermo con fibrosis quística por pareja. Para los familiares de segundo y tercer grados, se encontró una RICE de USD$ 19.380,94 y USD$ 55.913,53, respectivamente, al aplicar el PIB per cápita. Esta tecnología fue costo-efectiva en 39 %, 61,18 % y 74,36 % para 1, 2 y 3 PIB per cápita en familiares de primer grado de consanguinidad. Conclusiones. La prueba genética de detección de portadores del gen CFTR resultó costo-efectiva dependiendo del umbral de la disponibilidad de pagar, y de los supuestos y limitaciones establecidas en el modelo.

Introduction: Cystic fibrosis is an autosomal recessive genetic disease classified as a high- cost orphan disease. Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness ratio of the diagnostic test for the CFTR gene-sequencing in asymptomatic family carriers in the first, second, and third degree of consanguinity. Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic search evaluating operative characteristics of the diagnostic test and decision-tree models in cost-effectiveness studies. A decision-tree model was elaborated taking prevention of future conceptions as a unit of analysis. We obtained the costs of the disease from the high-cost report of the Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. The costs of the test were referenced by national laboratories. We carried out a deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis with a third-payer perspective and a one-year horizon. Results: An ICER of USD$ 5051.10 was obtained as the incremental cost for obtaining 10.89% more probability of avoiding the birth of a child with cystic fibrosis per screened couple. For family members in second and third degrees, the ICER was USD$ 19,380.94 and USD$ 55,913.53, respectively, evidenced when applying the GDP per capita. This technology was cost-effective in 39%, 61.18%, and 74.36% for 1, 2, and 3 GDP per capita in first degree of consanguinity relatives. Conclusions: The genetic test for the detection of CFTR gene carriers was cost-effective depending on the threshold of availability to pay and the assumptions and limitations established in the model.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: O câncer de pulmão (CP), segundo dados da Organização Mundial de Saúde, é a neoplasia mais frequente e mais letal em homens e a segunda nas mulheres em todo o mundo. O CP compreende vários tipos histológicos, incluindo câncer de pulmão de pequenas células e os diferentes tipos de câncer de pulmão de não pequenas células (CPNPC). Esse subtipo representa cerca de 80% dos casos e compreende principalmente o adenocarcinoma. A terapia de escolha para tratamento de CPNPC com mutação no receptor do fator de crescimento epidérmico (EGFR) são os inibidores de tirosina quinase (ITKs), como erlotinibe e gefitinibe. Neste artigo avaliamos o custo-efetividade do erlotinibe comparado ao gefitinibe no tratamento de CPNPC. Métodos: Foi realizada uma análise de custo-efetividade sob a perspectiva de um hospital federal do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Em um modelo de árvore de decisão, foram aplicados os desfechos de efetividade e segurança dos ITKs. Os dados clínicos foram extraídos de prontuários e os custos diretos, consultados em fontes oficiais do Ministério da Saúde. Resultados: O custo de 10 meses de tratamento, englobando o valor dos ITKs, procedimentos e manejo de eventos adversos, foi de R$ 63.266,76 para o erlotinibe e de R$ 39.594,72 para o gefitinibe. Os medicamentos apresentaram efetividade estatisticamente equivalente e diferença estatisticamente significativa para o desfecho de segurança, no qual o gefitinibe obteve melhor resultado. Conclusão: O gefitinibe, nesse contexto, é a tecnologia dominante quando os custos de tratamento são associados aos de manejo de eventos adversos.

Objective: According to the World Health Organization (WHO), lung cancer (LC) is the most common and lethal neoplasm in men and the second most common in women worldwide. The LC comprises several histological types, including small cell lung cancer and the different types of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This subtype represents about 80% of the cases and mainly comprises adenocarcinoma. The therapy of choice for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant NSCLC are tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), like erlotinib and gefitinib. In this article, we evaluate the cost-effectiveness of erlotinib in comparison to gefitinib. Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from the perspective of a Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) federal hospital. In a decision tree model, the effectiveness and safety outcomes of TKIs were applied. The clinical data were extracted from the medical records and the direct costs consulted in official sources of the Ministry of Health. Results: The cost of 10 months of processing, encompassing the TKI value, procedures and resources of adverse events was R$ 63.266,76 for the year and R$ 39.594,72 for gefitinib. Forging cards have equal and statistically significant effectiveness for the safety outcome. Conclusion: Gefitinib, in this context, is a dominant technology when process costs are associated with those of managing adverse event.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Although the use of ultrasound for the insertion of central catheters has proven to be cost-effective in adults, it is not known if this is the case in the neonatal population. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided umbilical venous catheterisation with conventional catheterisation in a neonatal intensive care unit of a Public University Hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on newborns that required an umbilical venous catheter before completing their first 24hours of extra-uterine life. Two retrospective cohorts were formed, including one with ultrasound-guided catheterisation and the other with conventional catheterisation. The effectiveness was measured using 2 variables: placement of ideal position and insertion without complications. The cost of human and material resources (consumable and non-consumable), the cost-effectiveness ratio, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were estimated, as well as carrying out a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Catheter obstruction was more frequent in guided catheterisation than in conventional catheterisation (7.7% vs. 0%, p=.04) and catheter dysfunction was higher in the latter (79% vs. 3.8%, p<.0001). The cost-effectiveness ratio of the guided catheterisation was €153.9, and €484.6 for the conventional one. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €45.5. The sensitivity analysis showed a €2.6 increase in the cost-effectiveness ratio of the guided catheterisation and €47 in the conventional one. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ultrasound to guide umbilical catheterisation is more efficient than conventional catheterisation since, despite using more economic resources, it offers greater effectiveness.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Resumen Objetivo: Describir la efectividad del modelo multidisciplinario de atención en el tratamiento de personas con Diabetes tipo II. Materiales y Métodos: Con base a una búsqueda literaria usando el buscador google académico por la facilidad en su uso se buscaron estudios que involucraran el tema de interés modelos multidisciplinarios en el tratamiento de la Diabetes. Se realizó una síntesis narrativa que fue realizada de los estudios encontrados que consistió en un resumen de cada estudio que incluyó el país del estudio, descripción de la metodología, el tamaño de la muestra, y una sinopsis de los resultados. Resultados: Los estudios analizados se clasificaron de acuerdo a su puntaje en las categorías: cambios de marcadores bioquímicos, prevención y reducción de eventos adversos y análisis costo-efectividad. En todas las categorías de análisis las evidencias fueron ampliamente favorables en pacientes con manejo multidisciplinario. Conclusiones: La atención grupal multidisciplinaria en pacientes con diabetes tiene ventajas relevantes respecto a la atención puramente biomédica. Ofrece el apoyo emocional y social de personas con experiencias similares y sirve como modelo de mayor resolución del problema a pacientes en circunstancias parecidas, favoreciendo la capacidad de lograr metas del manejo de la diabetes.

Summary Objective: To describe the effectiveness of the multidisciplinary model of care in the treatment of people with type II diabetes. Material and Method: Based on a literary search using the google academic search engine for the ease in its use, studies were searched that will involve the subject of interest multidisciplinary models in the treatment of Diabetes. A narrative synthesis was carried out that was carried out from the studies that were found, which consisted in a summary of each study that included the country of the study, description of the methodology, the size of the sample, and a synopsis of the results. Results: The analyzed studies were classified according to their score in the categories: changes of biochemical markers, prevention and reduction of adverse events and cost-effectiveness analysis. In all the categories of analysis, the evidence was broadly favorable in patients with multidisciplinary management. Conclusions: Multidisciplinary group care in patients with diabetes has significant advantages with respect to purely biomedical care. It offers the emotional and social support of people with similar experiences and serves as a model of greater resolution of the problem to patients in similar circumstances, favoring the ability to achieve diabetes management goals.

Resumo Objetivo: Descrever a efetividade do modelo multidisciplinar de atendimento no tratamento de pessoas com Diabetes Tipo II. Métodos: Realisou-se uma pesquisa da literatura através do Google Scholar, por ser um motor de busca de facil utilisação. Procurou-se estudos que abordassem o tema de interesse sobre modelos multidisciplinares no tratamento de diabetes. Realizou-se uma síntese narrativa dos estudos encontrados que consistia no resumo de cada estudo incluindo o país de estudo, a descrição da metodologia, o tamanho da amostra, e uma sinopse dos resultados. Resultados: Os estudos analisados foram classificadas de acordo com a sua pontuação nas categorias: alterações dos marcadores bioquímicos, prevenção e redução de eventos adversos e a análise de custo-eficácia. Em todas as categorias de análise, as evidências foram amplamente favoráveis em pacientes com tratamento multidisciplinar. Conclusões: O atendimento multidisciplinar em grupo em pacientes com diabetes tem vantagens relevantes em relação aos cuidados puramente biomédicos. Oferece o apoio emocional e social de pessoas com experiências semelhantes e serve de modelo para uma maior resolução do problema em pacientes em circunstâncias semelhantes, favorecendo a capacidade de atingir metas de controle da diabetes.