Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Dent ; 147: 105080, 2024 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38788919

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of dentin moisture on the clinical behavior of a universal adhesive on posterior teeth after 36 months of follow-up. METHODS: Forty-five patients participated in this study. Following a split-mouth design, three operators placed 90 Class I/Class II restorations over moist dentin (MD) or dry (DD) (n = 45) with resin composite (Filtek Bulk Fill) and a universal adhesive used in the etch-and-rinse mode (Single Bond Universal). Each restoration was evaluated according to the FDI and USPHS criteria (postoperative sensitivity, fracture and retention, marginal staining, marginal adaptation, and recurrence of caries) at baseline and after 6-, 12-, and 36 months. For statistical analysis, Kruskal Wallis analysis of variance rank (α = 0.05) and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used. RESULTS: No significant difference between groups was observed in each FDI criterion after 36 months of clinical evaluation (p > 0.05). The retention rates (confidence interval 95 %) were 97.37 % (86.5 - 99.5) for both MD and DD without significant difference between them (p > 0.05). Eight restorations (MD = 4; DD = 4) showed minimal marginal staining defects (p > 0.05). Two restorations were lost (MD = 1; DD = 1). Fifteen restorations (MD = 8; DD = 7) presented minor marginal discrepancies according to the FDI criteria (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The clinical performance of the universal adhesive when applied in etch-and-rinse mode was not influenced by dentin moisture in posterior bulk-fill composite restorations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The level of dentin moisture appears not to influence the clinical efficacy of a universal adhesive when applied using the etch-and-rinse technique in posterior composite resin restorations.


Assuntos
Bis-Fenol A-Glicidil Metacrilato , Resinas Compostas , Cárie Dentária , Adaptação Marginal Dentária , Falha de Restauração Dentária , Restauração Dentária Permanente , Sensibilidade da Dentina , Adesivos Dentinários , Dentina , Cimentos de Resina , Humanos , Restauração Dentária Permanente/métodos , Resinas Compostas/química , Resinas Compostas/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Masculino , Método Duplo-Cego , Adulto , Cimentos de Resina/química , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Bis-Fenol A-Glicidil Metacrilato/química , Bis-Fenol A-Glicidil Metacrilato/uso terapêutico , Cárie Dentária/terapia , Adesivos Dentinários/química , Adesivos Dentinários/uso terapêutico , Seguimentos , Adulto Jovem , Resultado do Tratamento , Colagem Dentária/métodos , Condicionamento Ácido do Dente
2.
Dent Mater ; 39(6): 586-594, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37147235

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical performance of a universal adhesive system (Futurabond U, Voco) when applied following different adhesive strategies in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) after 5 years. METHODS: Fifty participants were included. Futurabond U (Voco) was applied in NCCLs using four adhesive strategies (n = 50 each): only self-etch (SE); selective enamel etching + self-etch (SET + SE); etch-and-rinse with dry dentin (ERD); and etch-and-rinse with wet dentin (ERW). All cavities were restored with Admira Fusion composite resin (Voco). Restorations were evaluated after 1, 3, and 5 years using the World Federation criteria (FDI) and the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. RESULTS: After 5 years, retention rates were 81 % (65.8-90.5) for SE, 87 % (73.2-94.4) for SET + SE, 84 % (69.6-92.6) for ERD, and 78 % (63.6-88.9) for ERW (p > 0.05). Thirty-five restorations were considered to have minor discrepancies in marginal adaptation at the 5-year recall (14 for SE, 9 for SET + SE, 6 for ERD, and 6 for ERW; p > 0.05). Sixteen restorations were detected as a minor marginal discoloration (6 for SE, 4 for SET + SE, 1 for ERD, and 5 for ERW; p > 0.05) and one restoration showed a recurrence of caries (1 for ERW; p > 0.05) at the 5-year recall. No restorations showed postoperative sensitivity after 5 years. SIGNIFICANCE: NCCLs restorations using a universal adhesive showed satisfactory clinical performance after 5 years, regardless of the adhesive strategy.


Assuntos
Colagem Dentária , Cárie Dentária , Humanos , Cimentos Dentários , Adesivos Dentinários/química , Cimentos de Resina/química , Restauração Dentária Permanente , Adaptação Marginal Dentária , Falha de Restauração Dentária , Resinas Compostas/química , Cárie Dentária/terapia , Cárie Dentária/patologia , Colo do Dente/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA