RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bone age determination is usually employed to evaluate growth disorders and their treatment. The Greulich-Pyle method is the simplest and most frequently used type of evaluation, but it presents huge interobserver variability. The BoneXpert is a computer-automated method developed to avoid significant bone age variability among distinct observers. OBJECTIVE: To compare the BoneXpert and Greulich-Pyle methods of bone age determination in eutrophic children and adolescents, as well as in overweight and obese pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample comprised 515 participants, 253 boys (159 eutrophic, 53 overweight and 41 obese) and 262 girls (146 eutrophic, 76 overweight and 40 obese). Left hand and wrist radiographs were acquired for bone age determination using both methods. RESULTS: There was a positive correlation between chronological age and Greulich-Pyle, chronological age and BoneXpert, and Greulich-Pyle and BoneXpert. There was a significant increase (P<0.05) in bone age in both the Greulich-Pyle and BoneXpert methods in obese boys when compared to eutrophic or overweight boys of the same age. In girls, there was an increase in bone age in both obese and overweight individuals when compared to eutrophic girls (P<0.05). The Greulich-Pyle bone age was advanced in comparison to that of BoneXpert in all groups, except in obese boys, in which bone age was similarly advanced in both methods. CONCLUSION: The BoneXpert computer-automated bone age determination method showed a significant positive correlation with chronological age and Greulich-Pyle. Furthermore, the impact of being overweight or obese on bone age could be identified by both methods.
Assuntos
Determinação da Idade pelo Esqueleto/métodos , Obesidade , Sobrepeso , Magreza , Adolescente , Brasil , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Mãos/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Punho/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
Resumen: Objetivo: Determinar el grado de correlación en la valoración de la edad ósea radiológica mediante el método de Greulich y Pyle versus la evaluación automatizada por el programa computacional BoneXpert® entre los años 2013-2016. Material y Método: Estudio de correlación de técnicas diag nósticas de 1500 radiografías de carpo para evaluar la edad ósea, en pacientes menores de 16 años pertenecientes a Clínica Alemana de Santiago. Las radiografías con evaluación de la edad ósea por el Atlas de Greulich y Pyle (GP) por 1 de 7 radiólogos pediatras fueron sometidas al programa BoneX pert (BE) para la evaluación automatizada de la edad ósea. Se tomó 100 casos al azar para un análisis/ re-análisis del método BE, para conocer su precisión. Se analizó el nivel de correlación de las medicio nes por coeficiente de correlación (r de Pearson) y la variabilidad de las mediciones mediante análisis de Bland-Altman. Resultados: Se incluyeron 1.493 casos, se excluyeron 7 por falla en técnica de la radiografía, 922 de sexo femenino (61.8%), mediana de edad cronológica 9.96 años y 11.12 años para los varones (p 0,001). La correlación entre la edad ósea manual GP y la edad ósea automatizada BE entre los lectores varió entre 0,91 y 0,93. El análisis de Bland-Altman indicó una diferencia promedio entre la edad ósea manual y la edad ósea BE de 0,19 años (IC 0,13 a 0,25). En el análisis/re-análisis de 100 casos al azar mediante BoneXpert, la correlación fue de 1,0. Conclusión: El análisis automatizado mediante BoneXpert permite una evaluación estandarizada, de baja variabilidad, y alta concordancia.
Abstract: Objective: To determine the degree of correlation in the radiological bone age assessment using the Greulich and Pyle method versus automated assessment through BoneXpert® software between 2013 and 2016. Material and Method: Correlation study of diagnostic techniques of 1500 carpal X-rays to assess bone age in patients under 16 years of age from Clínica Alemana de Santiago. X-rays with bone age assessment using the Atlas of Greulich and Pyle (GP) by 1 out of 7 pediatric radiologists, were analyzed using the BoneXpert (BE) software for automated bone age assessment. 100 cases were taken at random for analysis/re-analysis using the BoneXpert method to determine its accuracy. The level of correlation of the measurements was analyzed using the correlation coefficient (Pearson's r) and the variability of the measurements using the Bland-Altman analysis. Results: 1493 cases were assessed, seven were excluded due to failure in the X-ray technique, 922 females (61.8%), with a median chronological age of 9.96 years and 11.12 years for males (p 0.001). The correlation between manual bone age (GP) and automated bone age using BoneXpert method among radiologists ran ged from 0.91 to 0.93. The Bland-Altman analysis indicated an average difference between manual bone age and bone age using the BoneXpert method of 0.19 years (CI 0.13 to 0.25). In the analysis/ re-analysis of 100 random cases using the BoneXpert software, the correlation was 1.00 (100% accu racy). Conclusion: The automated analysis using BoneXpert allows for standardized, low-variability, and high-concordance assessment.