RESUMO
A link between the T3SS and inhibition of swimming motility by the transcriptional regulator TtsI in Mesorhizobium japonicum MAFF303099 has been previously reported. Here, we show that mutants in T3SS components display impaired biofilm formation capacity, indicating that a functional T3SS, or at least pili formation, is required for this process. As a first approach to the cdiG regulation network in this bacterium, we started a study of the second messenger cdiG by overexpressing or by deleting some genes encoding cdiG metabolizing enzymes. Overexpression of two putative PDEs as well as deletion of various DGCs led to reduced biofilm formation on glass tubes. Mutation of dgc9509 also affected negatively the nodulation and symbiosis efficiency on Lotus plants, which can be related to the observed reduction in adhesion to plant roots. Results from transcriptional nopX- and ttsI-promoter-lacZ fusions suggested that cdiG negatively regulates T3SS expression in M. japonicum MAFF303099.
Assuntos
Mesorhizobium , Simbiose , Mesorhizobium/genética , Membrana Celular , BiofilmesRESUMO
Bacteria sense intracellular and environmental signals using an array of proteins as antennas. The information is transmitted from such sensory modules to other protein domains that act as output effectors. Sensor and effector can be part of the same polypeptide or instead be separate diffusible proteins that interact specifically. The output effector modules regulate physiologic responses, allowing the cells to adapt to the varying conditions. These biological machineries are known as signal transduction systems (STSs). Despite the captivating architectural diversity exhibited by STS proteins, a universal feature is their allosteric regulation: signal binding at one site modifies the activity at a physically distant site. Allostery requires protein plasticity, precisely encoded within their 3D structures, and implicating programmed molecular motions. This review summarizes how STS proteins connect stimuli to specific responses by exploiting allostery and protein plasticity. Illustrative examples spanning a wide variety of protein folds will focus on one- and two-component systems (TCSs). The former encompass the entire transmission route within a single polypeptide, whereas TCSs have evolved as separate diffusible proteins that interact specifically, sometimes including additional intermediary proteins in the pathway. Irrespective of their structural diversity, STS proteins are able to modulate their own molecular motions, which can be relatively slow, rigid-body movements, all the way to fast fluctuations in the form of macromolecular flexibility, thus spanning a continuous protein dynamics spectrum. In sum, STSs rely on allostery to steer information transmission, going from simple two-state switching to rich multi-state conformational order/disorder transitions.
RESUMO
The ability to perceive the environment, an essential attribute in living organisms, is linked to the evolution of signaling proteins that recognize specific signals and execute predetermined responses. Such proteins constitute concerted systems that can be as simple as a unique protein, able to recognize a ligand and exert a phenotypic change, or extremely complex pathways engaging dozens of different proteins which act in coordination with feedback loops and signal modulation. To understand how cells sense their surroundings and mount specific adaptive responses, we need to decipher the molecular workings of signal recognition, internalization, transfer, and conversion into chemical changes inside the cell. Protein allostery and dynamics play a central role. Here, we review recent progress on the study of two-component systems, important signaling machineries of prokaryotes and lower eukaryotes. Such systems implicate a sensory histidine kinase and a separate response regulator protein. Both components exploit protein flexibility to effect specific conformational rearrangements, modulating protein-protein interactions, and ultimately transmitting information accurately. Recent work has revealed how histidine kinases switch between discrete functional states according to the presence or absence of the signal, shifting key amino acid positions that define their catalytic activity. In concert with the cognate response regulator's allosteric changes, the phosphoryl-transfer flow during the signaling process is exquisitely fine-tuned for proper specificity, efficiency and directionality.
Assuntos
Proteínas/metabolismo , Transdução de Sinais , Regulação Alostérica , Proteínas de Bactérias/química , Proteínas de Bactérias/metabolismo , Células Eucarióticas/metabolismo , Histidina Quinase/química , Histidina Quinase/metabolismo , Modelos Moleculares , Complexos Multiproteicos/química , Complexos Multiproteicos/metabolismo , Fosforilação , Células Procarióticas/metabolismo , Ligação Proteica , Conformação Proteica , Proteínas/química , Relação Estrutura-AtividadeRESUMO
Leptospira interrogans serovar Copenhageni is a human pathogen that causes leptospirosis, a worldwide zoonosis. The L. interrogans genome codes for a wide array of potential diguanylate cyclase (DGC) enzymes with characteristic GGDEF domains capable of synthesizing the cyclic dinucleotide c-di-GMP, known to regulate transitions between different cellular behavioral states in bacteria. Among such enzymes, LIC13137 (Lcd1), which has an N-terminal cGMP-specific phosphodiesterases, adenylyl cyclases, and FhlA (GAF) domain and a C-terminal GGDEF domain, is notable for having close orthologs present only in pathogenic Leptospira species. Although the function and structure of GGDEF and GAF domains have been studied extensively separately, little is known about enzymes with the GAF-GGDEF architecture. In this report, we address the question of how the GAF domain regulates the DGC activity of Lcd1. The full-length Lcd1 and its GAF domain form dimers in solution. The GAF domain binds specifically cAMP (KD of 0.24µM) and has an important role in the regulation of the DGC activity of the GGDEF domain. Lcd1 DGC activity is negligible in the absence of cAMP and is significantly enhanced in its presence (specific activity of 0.13s-1). The crystal structure of the Lcd1 GAF domain in complex with cAMP provides valuable insights toward explaining its specificity for cAMP and pointing to possible mechanisms by which this cyclic nucleotide regulates the assembly of an active DGC enzyme.
Assuntos
AMP Cíclico/química , AMP Cíclico/metabolismo , Proteínas de Escherichia coli/química , Proteínas de Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Leptospira interrogans/enzimologia , Fósforo-Oxigênio Liases/química , Fósforo-Oxigênio Liases/metabolismo , Cristalografia por Raios X , Cinética , Modelos Moleculares , Ligação Proteica , Conformação Proteica , Multimerização ProteicaRESUMO
Las bacterias, a pesar de ser organismos unicelulares, presentan una gran complejidad. Durante mucho tiempo fueron consideradas como organismos asociales cuyas funciones principales eran el nutrirse y el reproducirse. Sin embargo, se ha observado que las bacterias son los microorganismos con la mayor capacidad de adaptación a ambientes diversos, además responden a múltiples estímulos, tanto nutricionales como ambientales (pH, disponibilidad de oxígeno, osmolaridad, etc.). En las últimas décadas se ha reportado que tanto las bacterias grampositivas como las gramnegativas son capaces de comunicarse entre si mediante sistemas especializados de comunicación celular. A tales sistemas se les ha denominado sistemas de señalización y autoinductores a las moléculas señal que desencadenan diferentes respuestas celulares, como la formación de biopelículas, la transformación bacteriana, la producción de bioluminiscencia, la producción de antibióticos o de factores de virulencia, entre otras. En este trabajo se presentan los aspectos más relevantes relacionados a los autoinductores de bacterias grampositivas y gramnegativas, así como su participación en diferentes procesos biológicos.
Bacteria, in spite of being unicellular organisms, present great complexity. During a long time they were considered as asocial organisms whose main functions were feeding and reproducing. Nevertheless, it has been observed that bacteria are the microorganisms with the greatest capacity for adapting to diverse environments, also responding to multiple stimuli, both nutritional and environmental (pH, oxygen availability, osmolarity, etc.). During the last decades it has been reported that bacteria, both gram negative and gram positive, are capable of communicating among them through specialized cell-communication systems. These systems have been called signaling systems and the signaling molecules which unchain the various cell responses such as biofilm formation, bacterial transformation, luminescence production, antibiotic production, or virulence factor production, among others, have been called autoinducers. This paper presents the most relevant aspects related with gram positive and gram negative bacteria autoinducers, as well as their participation in different biological processes.