RESUMO
In recent years, some new concepts have been added to asthma treatment such as "anti-inflammatory reliever" (ß2-agonist use associated to an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) as a reliever treatment) that combines the benefits of both therapies and provides short- and long-term benefits for treatment in asthma patients. Robust evidence has been presented in patients over 12 years, and the main changes in the international guidelines for asthma treatment were originally made in this age group. However, a few suggestions have been added to treatments in younger patients, in part because of the scarce evidence that exists in this group. We aim to analyze the information regarding the utilization of ICS + fast-acting beta-agonist (FABA) combination in children between 6 and 11 years. Although up until today only three published trials exist (two studies use beclomethasone + albuterol and one study uses budesonide + formoterol), they provide significant information on the benefits of ICS + FABA use in this population.
RESUMO
A asma grave é uma doença respiratória crônica que afeta as vias aéreas, provocando inflamação e estreitamento dos brônquios. Esse estreitamento pode dificultar a respiração e causar sintomas como tosse, falta de ar, chiado no peito e aperto no peito. Quando a asma não é controlada adequadamente com medicamentos e outras medidas, ela pode evoluir para um quadro de asma grave. O presente artigo científico consiste em uma revisão literária sobre o tratamento da asma grave com elevados níveis de anticorpos IgE por meio do uso do anticorpo monoclonal Omalizumabe, além de apresentar o relato de caso observacional em um paciente pediátrico atendido em um consultório especializado da cidade de Mineiros no estado de Goiás. Os estudos revisados demonstraram que a terapia com Omalizumabe pode melhorar a função pulmonar, reduzir a necessidade de medicação de resgate e melhorar a qualidade de vida em pacientes com asma grave. No entanto, também foi observado que o benefício do Omalizumabe é mais pronunciado em pacientes com níveis mais elevados de IgE e em pacientes que apresentam sintomas asmáticos frequentes. A revisão literária apresentou evidências consistentes de que o Omalizumabe é uma opção terapêutica eficaz e segura para o tratamento de asma grave com elevados níveis de IgE em pacientes pediátricos. Por fim com objetivo de fornecer informações importantes para médicos e profissionais de saúde sobre o uso do Omalizumabe no tratamento da asma grave em crianças, além de destacar a necessidade de mais pesquisas para avaliar a eficácia e segurança do medicamento em populações maiores e com seguimento mais prolongado.
Severe asthma is a chronic respiratory disease that affects the airways, causing inflammation and narrowing of the bronchi. This narrowing can make breathing difficult and cause symptoms such as coughing, shortness of breath, wheezing, and chest tightness. When asthma is not properly controlled with medication and other measures, it can develop into severe asthma. The present scientific article consists of a literature review on the treatment of severe asthma with high IgE antibody levels by the use of the monoclonal antibody Omalizumab, besides presenting the report of an observational case in a pediatric patient seen at a specialized clinic in the city of Mineiros in the state of Goiás. The studies reviewed showed that Omalizumab therapy can improve lung function, reduce the need for rescue medication, and improve quality of life in patients with severe asthma. However, it was also noted that the benefit of Omalizumab is more pronounced in patients with higher IgE levels and in patients who have frequent asthmatic symptoms. The literature review presented consistent evidence that Omalizumab is an effective and safe therapeutic option for the treatment of severe asthma with high IgE levels in pediatric patients. Finally with aim to provide important information for physicians and health care professionals about the use of Omalizumab in the treatment of severe asthma in children, and to highlight the need for further research to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the drug in larger populations and with longer follow-up.
El asma grave es una enfermedad respiratoria crónica que afecta a las vías respiratorias, causando inflamación y estrechamiento de los bronquios. Este estrechamiento puede dificultar la respiración y causar síntomas como tos, falta de aire, sibilancias y opresión torácica. Cuando el asma no se controla adecuadamente con medicación y otras medidas, puede convertirse en asma grave. El presente artículo científico consiste en una revisión bibliográfica sobre el tratamiento del asma grave con niveles elevados de anticuerpos IgE mediante el uso del anticuerpo monoclonal Omalizumab, además de presentar el informe de un caso observacional en un paciente pediátrico atendido en una clínica especializada de la ciudad de Mineiros, en el estado de Goiás. Los estudios revisados demostraron que el tratamiento con omalizumab puede mejorar la función pulmonar, reducir la necesidad de medicación de rescate y mejorar la calidad de vida en pacientes con asma grave. Sin embargo, también se observó que el beneficio del omalizumab es más pronunciado en pacientes con niveles más altos de IgE y en pacientes que presentan síntomas asmáticos frecuentes. La revisión bibliográfica presentó pruebas consistentes de que omalizumab es una opción terapéutica eficaz y segura para el tratamiento del asma grave con niveles elevados de IgE en pacientes pediátricos. Finalmente con el objetivo de proporcionar información importante para los médicos y profesionales de la salud sobre el uso de Omalizumab en el tratamiento del asma grave en niños, así como destacar la necesidad de nuevas investigaciones para evaluar la eficacia y seguridad del fármaco en poblaciones más grandes y con un seguimiento más prolongado.
RESUMO
Recognition that about half of asthma deaths might be preventable if recommended guidelines are followed suggests that better implementation of established management strategies is needed. However, to achieve a further substantive reduction in asthma mortality, novel strategies will also be required. It is well established that asthma is a disease of chronic inflammation, with episodes of worsening inflammation associated with increased symptoms and/or exacerbations; however, current guidelines paradoxically recommend that initial treatment is only symptomatic, rather than directed at the underlying inflammatory mechanism. The "Treat to target" (TTT) approach has become a popular concept in the medical management of several common chronic conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia. For example, as part of a TTT approach, rheumatologists recommend methotrexate for RA with onset within 6 months. Applying the TTT approach to asthma, the primary target could be clinical remission and the primary goals as follows: eliminate symptoms and exacerbation risk; prevent airway remodeling; and normalize lung function. To construct a TTT algorithm for chronic asthma, the proposal is to eradicate short-acting ß2-agonists (SABA) at all asthma severity levels and replace SABA with "Anti-Inflammatory Reliever Therapy" (AIR), using inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)/SABA or ICS/formoterol. For individuals with equal to or less than 12 months' history of symptoms, fewer than two symptoms per month, no exacerbations in the last 12 months and normal lung function, the recommendation is early initiation of ICS/SABA or ICS/formoterol as AIR.
Assuntos
Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/uso terapêutico , Algoritmos , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Fumarato de Formoterol/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Indução de Remissão , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In April 2017 the Mexican Asthma Guidelines (GUIMA) were published. Before the launch, physicians' knowledge was explored related to key issues of the guideline. METHODS: A SurveyMonkey® survey was sent out to board-certified physicians of 5 medical specialties treating asthma. Replies were analyzed per specialty against the GUIMA evidence-based recommendations. We present the treatment part here. RESULTS: A total of 364 allergists (ALLERG), 161 pulmonologists (PULM), 34 ENTs, 239 pediatricians (PED) and 62 general practitioners (GPs) replied to the survey and 247-83-14-135-37 respectively finished it. Spirometry is not routinely indicated when asthma is very probable by ALLERG 54%, PULM 47%, ENT 39%, PED 65%, GP 64%. A fictitious case proposed to the physicians with intermittent asthma was erroneously treated with ICS by ALLERG 9%, PULM 11%, ENT 28%, PED 10%, GP 11%. The mild persistent case received mistakenly ICS-LABA by ALLERG 25%, PULM 26%, ENT 33%, PED 27%, GP 23%. The first-line option for moderate persistent asthma was ICS(median dose) instead of ICS(low)+LABA for ALLERG 29%, PULM 25%, ENT 17%, PED 27%, GP 23% and in severe asthma maintenance treatment PULM20%, ALLERG-ENT-PED-GP 22-34% failed to indicate LABA. Concerning the guidelines' recommendation to use one inhaler for maintenance & rescue in moderate-to-severe asthma, PULM45%, ALLERG-ENT-PED-GP 56-80% (p < 0.00001), erroneously indicated ICS-salmeterol could be used, instead of ICS-formoterol. Oral ß2 or theophylline are no longer recommended, but PULM 37% and ALLERG-ENT-PED-GP 42-62% (p < 0.01) still indicate their use. In severe asthma 61-73% of physicians consider adding LTRA to the treatment; only PULM38%, OTHERS12-25% consider adding tiotropium (p < 0.001) and 3-17% consider adding omalizumab, both guideline recommended add-ons. As for asthma in pregnancy, most surveyed are not aware budesonide is the 1st line option ICS. Finally, 81-97% of the group-members recognized allergen immunotherapy, as a viable add-on, in line with GINA/GEMA/GUIMA recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: An online survey could detect knowledge-gaps related to asthma treatment. Interestingly, surveyed physicians tended to over-treat the milder asthma cases, thus clearly leaving room for cost-savings. Caution should be taken in the promotion of the SMART (single-maintenance-and-reliever-treatment) approach, which can only be done with ICS-formoterol. Many physicians opt for other combinations not apt for this approach. Among all surveyed specialties there is ample room for improvement in mild and severe asthma management.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Daily inhaled corticosteroids are widely recommended for mild persistent asthma. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the intermittent use of beclomethasone as an alternative treatment for mild persistent asthma. METHODS: In this 16-week trial, children aged 6-18 years were evaluated. Subjects in the continuous treatment arm of the study received 500 µg/day of beclomethasone, whereas the intermittent ones were given 1000 µg/day (250 µg every 6 h) in combination with albuterol for 7 days upon exacerbations or worsening of symptoms. Primary outcome (i.e., treatment failure) was the occurrence of any asthma exacerbation requiring prednisone, and co-secondary outcomes were the mean/median differences for both, (1) the pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (% predicted) and (2) asthma control test (ACT/cACT) scores, from randomization to the last follow-up visit, and beclomethasone and albuterol consumption. RESULTS: Ninety-four subjects from each treatment arm were included. They were comparable regarding all baseline characteristics; prednisone was used by 10 (10.6%) and 7 (7.4%) patients, respectively (95% CI - 6.1 to 12.6%, for the difference; p = 0.47). Statistical analysis showed no statistically significant differences with respect to both FEV1 (p = 0.39) and ACT/cACT scores (p = 0.38). As assessed through canister weighting, children used from 0.5 to 0.7 and from 1.6 to 1.8 puffs per day of beclomethasone in the intermittent and continuous regimens, respectively. Regarding albuterol, received 0.3-0.4 (intermittent) and 0.1-0.2 (continuous) inhalations per day. There were no relevant clinical or functional differences between the two treatment regimens. CONCLUSION: Clinicians might consider intermittent inhaled steroid therapy as a therapeutic regimen for mild persistent asthma.Trial registration The Portuguese and English versions of the study protocol were submitted, approved, and registered in the Brazilian Network Platform for Clinical Trials (http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br) under the primary identifier number "RBR-3gbyhk". This platform is part of the Primary Registries in the World Health Organization Registry Network, where the trial is registered under the following Universal Trial Number: 1111-1149-4774.
RESUMO
La crisis de asma es el conjunto de síntomas, signos físicos y de laboratorio que apuntan a un aumento de la resistencia al flujo aéreo y como consecuencia la obstrucción bronquial. Es una causa frecuente de consulta y muchas veces la forma como se hace evidente la enfermedad en los pacientes y sus padres. En esta revisión entregamos algunas recomendaciones de cómo reconocer y responder rápidamente a esta situación. Los objetivos primarios al enfrentar una crisis son corregir la hipoxemia, obtener la bronco dilatación y disminuir el riesgo de recaídas. Para lograrlos, debe reconocer rápidamente la hipoxemia y aportar oxígenos suplementario, demostrar la obstrucción de la vía aérea (por clínica y/o laboratorio) y tratarla con broncodilatadores de acción rápida y corticoides sistémicos y una vez manejada la crisis dejar indicaciones suficientes para evitar que esto vuelva a ocurrir.
The asthma crisis is a group of symptoms, with physical and laboratory signs that show an increase in resistance to airflow because of the bronchial obstruction. It is a frequent cause of consultation and It is an often way that the disease becomes evident in patients and their parents. In this review we give some recommendations on how to recognize and have a quickly response to this situation. The primary objectives in facing a crisis are correcting hypoxemia, obtain broncho dilatation and decrease the risk of relapse. In order to achieve this, you should promptly recognize hypoxemia, provide supplemental oxygen, demonstrate airway obstruction (by clinic and / or laboratory) and treat it with rapid-acting bronchodilators and systemic corticosteroids and once the crisis is handled, leave sufficient indications to avoid this to happen again
Assuntos
Humanos , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Bronchiolar Clara cells play a critical role in lung homoeostasis. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of chronic allergy on these cells and the efficacy of budesonide (BUD) and montelukast (MK) in restoring their typical phenotypes after ovalbumin-induced chronic allergy in mice. Chronic allergy induced extensive bronchiolar Alcian blue-periodic acid-Schiff (AB/PAS)-positive metaplasia. In addition, cells accumulated numerous big electron-lucent granules negative for Clara cell main secretory protein (CC16), and consequently, CC16 was significantly reduced in bronchoalveolar lavage. A concomitant reduction in SP-D and CYP2E1 content was observed. The phenotypic changes induced by allergy were pharmacologically reversed by both treatments; MK was more efficient than BUD in doing so. MK decreased AB/PAS reactivity to control levels whereas they remained persistently elevated after BUD. Moreover, most non-ciliated cells recovered their normal morphology after MK, whereas for BUD normal cells coexisted with 'transitional' cells that contained remnant mucous granules and stained strongly for CC16 and SP-D. Glucocorticoids were also less able to reduce inflammatory infiltration and maintained higher percentage of neutrophils, which may have contributed to prolonged mucin expression. These results show that chronic allergy-induced mucous metaplasia of Clara cells affects their defensive mechanisms. However, anti-inflammatory treatments were able to re-establish the normal phenotype of Clara cell, with MK being more efficient at restoring a normal profile than BUD. This study highlights the role of epithelial cells in lung injuries and their contribution to anti-inflammatory therapies.
Assuntos
Acetatos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/patologia , Brônquios/patologia , Budesonida/uso terapêutico , Fenótipo , Quinolinas/uso terapêutico , Acetatos/farmacologia , Animais , Antiasmáticos/farmacologia , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios/farmacologia , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Asma/induzido quimicamente , Brônquios/efeitos dos fármacos , Brônquios/metabolismo , Budesonida/farmacologia , Doença Crônica , Ciclopropanos , Citocromo P-450 CYP2E1/metabolismo , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Epitélio/efeitos dos fármacos , Epitélio/metabolismo , Epitélio/patologia , Feminino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Ovalbumina/efeitos adversos , Proteína D Associada a Surfactante Pulmonar/metabolismo , Quinolinas/farmacologia , Sulfetos , Uteroglobina/metabolismoRESUMO
Un tercio de los preescolares tienen sibilancias intermitentes, una condición que en muchos de ellos desaparecerá posteriormente en la vida. Estudios epidemiológicos han aclarado la historia natural, pero no tienen utilidad práctica en el diagnóstico, manejo ni en el pronóstico del caso individual, dado que se requiere de una evolución en el tiempo para clasificarlos. Los virus respiratorios son los desencadenantes más importantes a esta edad, produciendo sibilancias episódicas que se caracterizan por no presentar síntomas entre los episodios. Los niños con historia de atopia tienen un fenotipo diferente conocido como multigatillado, que se presentan con síntomas posteriores a la exposición de ejercicio, tabaco, alérgenos, aire frío o infecciones virales respiratorias, constituyendo los verdaderos asmáticos. El tratamiento recomendado se basa en la severidad de los síntomas, considerando que hasta un 50 por ciento de los fenotipos puede cambiar. Los esteroides inhalatorios pueden ser de utilidad en sibilancias multigatilladas y el montelukast en aquellas inducidas por virus.
One third of preschool children have intermittent wheezing, a condition that many of them outgrow. Epidemiological studies have taught us the natural history, but they are not useful in diagnosis, treatment and prognosis for the individual case, because time is needed to classify it. Respiratory viruses are the most common triggers at this age, leading to a pattern of episodic wheezing, with no symptoms between viral infections. Children with atopy, have a different phenotype known as multitrigger wheezing. This condition is characterized by wheezing after exposure to multiple triggers, such as exercise and exposure to smoke, allergens, cold air or viral infection. Treatment is based on disease severity; inhaled steroids may be useful in multitrigger wheezing and montelukast in viral induce children.
Assuntos
Pré-Escolar , Asma/classificação , Sons Respiratórios/etiologia , Ventilação PulmonarRESUMO
Background. Despite the high prevalence of asthma in Mexico, studies describing general characteristics of these patients are scarce. Objective.To analyze the sociodemographic, clinical and respiratory functional profile of asthmatic patients attending for the first time the outpatient service of a tertiary-level hospital, as well as to investigate treatments already received and the abandonment rate. Methods.Adolescent and adult asthmatic subjects seen from February 2000 to November 2002 in the outpatient service of the National Institute of Respiratory Diseases, in Mexico City, were prospectively studied. Sociodemographic information was gathered and clinical and spirometric evaluations were carried out. The severity of the disease was classified according to international criteria. Results. A total of 1403 patients between 12 and 82 years of age, with predominance of the female gender, were included in the analysis. An 88.7% of patients had the mildest forms of the disease, 10% had moderate asthma, and 1.3% had severe asthma. While 21.4% had never received anti-asthma treatment, about one third of the remaining patients had received corticosteroids, independently of the asthma severity, indicating an over-treatment of the intermittent form of the disease and an under-treatment of persistent forms. A high abandonment rate (65.7%) was observed. A positive bronchodilator test was observed in 30.3% of patients with intermittent asthma, though this proportion increased to about 67% in those with moderate and severe asthma. Conclusion.Mildest forms of the disease predominate among asthmatic patients attending for the first time an outpatient service, with a still very high frequency of inadequate use of corticosteroids.
Antecedentes. A pesar de que en México existe una alta prevalencia de asma, hay pocos estudios que describan las características generales de estos pacientes. Objetivo. Conocer el perfil sociodemográfico, clínico y funcional respiratorio de pacientes asmáticos que acuden por primera vez a consulta externa de un hospital de tercer nivel de atención, así como los tratamientos recibidos y su tasa de abandono. Métodos. Se estudiaron, prospectivamente, sujetos asmáticos adolescentes y adultos, atendidos de febrero del 2000 a noviembre del 2002 en el servicio de consulta externa del Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, de la ciudad de México. Se recabó información sociodemográfica y se realizó evaluación clínica y por espirometría. La gravedad del asma se clasificó de acuerdo con criterios internacionales. Resultados. Se incluyeron 1,403 pacientes de 12 a 82 años de edad, con predominio del sexo femenino. El 88.7% de los pacientes tenían formas leves de la enfermedad, 10% asma moderada, y 1.3% asma grave. El 21.4% no había recibido tratamiento antiasmático. Entre los demás, cerca de una tercera parte recibió corticosteroides, independientemente de la gravedad del asma, indicando sobretratamiento del asma intermitente y subtratamiento de las formas persistentes. Encontramos una alta tasa de deserción (65.7%). Una respuesta positiva a la prueba con broncodilatador se observó en 30.3% de los pacientes con asma intermitente, cifra que se elevó a cerca de 67% en las formas moderada y grave. Conclusión. Entre los pacientes asmáticos que acuden a consulta externa, predominan las formas leves, detectándose que todavía existe una alta frecuencia del uso inadecuado de los corticosteroides.