RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this article is to do a comprehensive literature review about the current understandings of the pachychoroid disease spectrum, describing its multimodal imaging analysis, pathophysiology, differential diagnosis, and current types of management. METHODS: This comprehensive literature review was performed based on a search on the PubMed database, of relevant pachychoroid published papers according to our current knowledge. DISCUSSION: The pachychoroid disease spectrum, according to some authors, includes the following: pachychoroid pigment epitheliopathy (PPE), central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC), pachychoroid neovasculopathy (PNV), polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV)/aneurysmal type 1 neovascularization (AT1), and more recently focal choroidal excavation (FCE) and peripapillary pachychoroid syndrome (PPS). Each one of these entities will be described and discussed in this article. CONCLUSION: Significant advances in multimodal imaging have enabled a better understanding of the typical choroidal changes in pachychoroid disease spectrum. The clinical knowledge and managing options about this disease significantly increased in the last years. However, it is still unclear why some eyes with typical pachychoroid disease phenotype show no evidence of RPE damage and subretinal fluid (uncomplicated pachychoroid) while others present progressive tissue damage, neovascularization, and atrophy.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) has shown sensitivity in the detection of macular edema. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate indices formed with FAF and retinal anatomical-functional variables in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with ziv-aflibercept (ziv-AFL). METHODS: Twenty-nine eyes of 15 DME patients who received ziv-AFL intravitreal injections were included in the study. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity (CS), optical coherence tomography (OCT) and FAF were evaluated before treatment and at one and two months. OCT variables were central subfield thickness (CST), macular volume (MV) and macular cube average thickness (MCAT). FAF/BCVA, FAF/CS, FAF/CST, FAF/MV and AF/MCAT indices baseline values were obtained. Analysis was performed with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between baseline FAF/BCVA index and BCVA at second month (rs = - 0.78, p = 0.000), between baseline FAF/CS index and BCVA at second month (rs = -0.68, p = 0.0009) and between baseline FAF/CS index and MV at first month of follow-up (rs = 0.64, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In DME, composite indices with baseline FAF predict variables such as BCVA in the follow-up of patients receiving ziv-AFL.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La autofluorescencia retiniana (AF) ha mostrado sensibilidad en la detección del edema macular. OBJETIVOS: Evaluar índices formados con la AF y variables anatomofuncionales retinianas en pacientes con edema macular diabético (EMD) tratados con ziv-aflibercept (ziv-AFL). MÉTODOS: Fueron incluidos 29 ojos de 15 pacientes con EMD que recibieron inyecciones intravítreas de ziv-AFL. Se evaluó agudeza visual mejor corregida (AVMC), sensibilidad al contraste (SC), tomografía de coherencia óptica (TCO) y AF, antes del tratamiento, así como al primer y segundo mes de iniciado este. Las variables de la TCO fueron grosor foveal central (GFC), volumen macular (VM) y grosor promedio macular (GPM). Se obtuvieron los valores basales de AF/AVMC, AF/SC, AF/GFC, AF/VM y AF/GPM. Se realizó análisis con el coeficiente de correlación de rangos de Spearman y análisis de regresión lineal. RESULTADOS: Hubo una correlación significativa entre el índice AF/AVMC basal y la AVMC en el segundo mes (rs = −0.78, p = 0.000), entre el índice AF/SC basal y la AVMC en el segundo mes (rs = −0.68, p = 0.0009) y entre AF/SC basal y el VM en el primer mes de seguimiento (rs = 0.64, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONES: En el EMD, los índices compuestos con AF basales predicen variables como AVMC en el seguimiento de pacientes que reciben ziv-AFL.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The present study was an open-label, prospective, uncontrolled and multicenter clinical trial to investigate the safety and effectiveness of bevacizumab (Lumiere®) administered by the intravitreal route for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). A total of 22 patients without previous treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor were recruited. Monthly therapy with 1.25 mg intravitreal bevacizumab was applied. Adverse events (AE), visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were assessed at baseline, day 1 and day 28 after each injection. A total of 87 AEs were reported; most of them were not serious (96.6%), expected (65.5%) and occurred after the third injection (56.3%). The most frequent AE was 'conjunctival hemorrhage' (29.9% of AEs), attributed to the injection procedure. Treatment was not suspended due to safety reasons in any case. After six months, a statistically significant gain of +8.2 (SD±8.8) letters and a CRT reduction of -75.50 µm (SD±120.3) were achieved with unilateral therapy. VA improvement and CRT reduction were also achieved with bilateral therapy, although to a lesser extent. The results of the present study suggested that therapy with a minimum of 3 doses of bevacizumab over a 6-month period was well tolerated and resulted in a sustained response regarding VA improvement and CRT reduction from the beginning of therapy compared with the baseline value. The study protocol was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ref. no. NCT03668054).

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2020 Colombia may expect to have close to 231,700 patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). Treatment of neovascular ARMD involves the sequential Intra-vitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF therapy) medications. The efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF therapy on a treat-and-extend (T&E) dosing scheme are similar when ranibizumab or aflibercept are administered. Objective : A cost-minimization analysis from the payer`s perspective in Colombia projects treatment expenses of anti-VEGF therapy using aflibercept or ranibizumab on T&E regimens for the treatment of neovascular ARMD. Methods : A model projects the expenses of the compared treatment regimens for two and five-year periods beginning on February 2020. The model used information from clinical trials, case series and meta-analyses on the compared treatment regimens, demographic, epidemiologic and economic data originated from the Colombian government sources. A 3% discount rate was applied. Results : Projected cost differences in favor of ranibizumab after two and five-year treatment periods beginning February 2020 could be close to U.S. $ 4,861 and U.S $ 7,241 per treated eye, respectively. If all patients with unilateral and bilateral neovascular ARMD in Colombia were to receive appropriate anti-VEGF therapy for two years, the projected expected cost difference in favor of ranibizumab could be close to U.S. $ 462,717,092 dollars. Conclusion : Within the Colombian healthcare setting anti-VEGF therapy on a T&E regimen utilizing ranibizumab for neovascular ARMD may be cost-saving compared with employing aflibercept. Despite cost favorability, ranibizumab should not be the only therapeutic option since in clinical practice alternatives are required.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To describe the long-term outcome of a patient with multifocal choroiditis, who underwent surgical removal of a type 2 choroidal neovascular membrane employing 23 G pars plana vitrectomy. OBSERVATIONS: A 50-year-old man was treated with 3 monthly intravitreal bevacizumab injections, but despite treatment, visual acuity continued to worsen from 20/40 to 20/100, and bleeding was not receding. A minimal invasive pars plana vitrectomy was performed for surgical removal of the neovascular complex without any complicating incident. Subsequent visual acuity was 20/25 for more than eleven years. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Surgical removal of choroidal neovascular membranes employing minimal invasive surgery in addition to anti-VEGF therapy, and OCT evaluation can be a viable approach for selected cases of juxtafoveal type 2 CNV.

RESUMO

INTRODUCCIÓN: La miopía patológica es una causa importante de pérdida de visión irreversible y es la cuarta a novena causa más frecuente de ceguera en el mundo. Es también conocida como miopía alta, degenerativa o maligna; condición en la que los individuos tienen una longitud axial superior a 25,5 - 26,5mm, y/o un error de refracción de por lo menos -5.0 dioptrías, acompañado por cambios patológicos. La neovascularización coroidea (NVC) asociada a miopía patológica puede resultar en la pérdida significativa de la visión y/o la ceguera. La NVC suele ser subfoveal y es una importante complicación, desarrollándose en aproximadamente 5-10% de ojos con miopía patológica. De manera similar que en otras enfermedades maculares asociadas a NVC, se ha encontrado un aumento del nivel del factor de crecimiento de endotelial (VEGF) en NVC miópicas, y por lo tanto, la terapia anti-VEGF sería útil. Desde la introducción en oftalmología de agentes anti factor de crecimiento de endotelial (anti-VEGF), el tratamiento anti-angiogénico con antiVEGF intravítreo se ha convertido en el tratamiento de primera línea para la NVC miópica. El bevacizumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal humano, anti factor de crecimiento endotelial (anti-VEGF), que inhibe la proliferación de nuevas células endoteliales produciendo un bloqueo de la fosforilación de las uniones estrechas (tight junctions) de las mismas. Este mecanismo produciría una mejoría anatómica-funcional en los pacientes e impediría una de las complicaciones más importantes de esta patología como lo es la neovascularización. OBJETIVO: Evaluar la eficacia de bevacizumab intravítreo (Avastin ®™) como tratamiento de la neovascularización coroidea (NVC) en miopías patológicas. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Se evaluaron retrospectivamente 22 pacientes con diagnóstico de maculopatía miópica neovascular tratados mediante inyección intravítrea de bevacizumab, con un seguimiento mínimo de 12 meses. La agudeza visual se evaluó mediante tabla de Snellen y se convirtió en unidades LogMAR. El espesor macular se evaluó mediante tomografía de coherencia óptica (OCT). Las variables cuantitativas se analizaron mediante medidas de tendencia central, dispersión y forma. Los cambios en la agudeza visual se calcularon utilizando la prueba de Wilcoxon para variables apareadas y con la prueba de Mann Whitney para comparar variables independientes. Las diferencias entre variables continuas con distribución normal y de muestras independientes fueron calculadas mediante la prueba T de Student. RESULTADO: Se estudiaron 22 pacientes con diagnóstico de maculopatía miópica neovascular, cuya edad promedio fue de 59,68 (de 11,75; rango 34,00 ­ 85,00), de los cuales 7 (31,8%) fueron hombres y 15 (68,2%) fueron mujeres. El tiempo de seguimiento fue de 12 meses. El tiempo promedio transcurrido entre el comienzo de los síntomas y el inicio del tratamiento fue 38,68 (de 34,63) días. El 68,2% (15) de los pacientes consultaron por disminución brusca de la agudeza visual del ojo afectado y 31,8% (7) consultaron por metamorfopsias. Todos los pacientes presentaron miopía patológica (> 5.0 dioptrías). La cantidad total de inyecciones durante el seguimiento tuvo una media de 4,27 (DE 1.86; Rango 2,00 ­ 9,00), con un máximo de 9 inyecciones y un mínimo de 2 inyecciones. Durante los primeros 6 meses se realizaron la mayor parte de las inyecciones con una media de 3,36 (DE 1,22; Rango 1,00 ­ 6,00). La mediana de la AV al momento del tratamiento fue de 1,00 (P25-75=0,40-1,00). Al analizar la totalidad de los pacientes se encontró que existe una diferencia significativa al comparar las agudezas visuales previas al tratamiento y a los 12 meses de tratamiento (p=<0.0001). La mejoría franca de la AV se observó entre el primer mes (mediana= 1.00 RIQ= 0,6) y los 3 meses de tratamiento (mediana= 0,60 RIQ= 0,6) (p= 0,0002), mientras que no hubo diferencias significativas en la variación de la AV más allá de los 3 meses de seguimiento (p= 0,09). Al estudiar los espesores maculares antes del tratamiento, encontramos una mediana de 290 (RIQ=105); mientras que a los 12 meses de seguimiento fue de 269,50 (RIQ= 91). Teniendo en cuenta el total de los pacientes estudiados, no hubo diferencias significativas en el análisis del espesor macular medido por OCT antes y después del tratamiento (p=0,8812). CONCLUSIONES: El bevacizumab fue eficaz en el tratamiento de la maculopatía miópica, si bien no se encontraron diferencias significativas en la variación del espesor macular. En nuestra serie no hubo complicaciones oculares ni sistémicas vinculadas al tratamiento. (AU)

BACKGROUND: Pathological myopia is observed in about 2% of the general population. Submacular choroidal neovascularization is a leading cause of severe visual loss and blindness in eyes with pathological myopia, affecting 4-11% of those eyes. PURPOSE: Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab in the treatment of neovascular myopic maculopathy (NMM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 22 nonpreviously treated eyes of 22 consecutive patients with NMM. were reated with monthly intravitreal injections of bevacizumab and followed up for 12 months. Changes in BCVA and central macular thickness were evaluated at 12 months of follow-up. Snellen best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was converted into LogMAR units. Mean central macular thickness was obtained by means of spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SP-OCT). Quantitative variables were analyzed with central tendency, dispersion and shape. Changes in BCVA were calculated with Wilcoxon test in paired variables. Mann Whitney test was used to compare independent variables. Differences between continuous variables with normal distribution and independent samples were calculated with the Student T test. Main outcome measures: Changes in BCVA and central macular thickness at12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Mean age was 54.45 (SD 12.30; r= 28.00 ­ 79.00); 7 patients (31.8%) were male and 15 (68.2%) female. Mean spherical equivalent refractive error was -10.89±4.13 (r= 7.00 to -21,00) Mean time elapsed between initial symptoms and the beginning of treatment was 38.68 (SD34.63) days. Patients received a mean of 4.27 (SD 1.86; r=2.00 to 9.00) injections. Most injections were performed during the first 6 months of treatment (mean 3.36 months; SD 1.22; r=1.00 to 6.00). Median BCVA at baseline was 1.00 (P25-75=0.40-1.00) and at 12 months 0.45 (P25-75=0.30- 0.70) (p<0.0001). Significant visual improvement was observed between the first (median=1.00, IQR= 0.6) and the third month of treatment (median=0.60, IQR=0.6) (p=0.0002), with no further significant improvement (p=0.09). No ocular or systemic side effects attributable to treatment were observed. When comparing patients 55 years old or younger with those older, and between both genders, all individuals improved, although not significantly (Mann Whitney for age P=0.1765; gender P=3454). No significant improvement in macular thickness was observed (pretreatment median thickness 290 microns, IQR=105; month 12 post-treatment median thickness 269.5 microns, IQR=91) (P=0.8812). CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab was effective and safe in our series of myopic patients with neovascular maculopathy, and visual gain remained stable during follow-up. (AU)

Assuntos