RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The potential influence of a preoperative anterolateral ligament (ALL) lesion seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the mid- and long-term surgical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is still controversial. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and failure rate of isolated ACL reconstruction at a minimum 5-year follow-up in patients with and without ALL injury diagnosed preoperatively using MRI. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients with acute ACL injury was divided into 2 groups based on the presence (ALL injury group) or absence (control group) of ALL injury on preoperative MRI. This is a longer-term follow-up study of a previously published study that had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Both groups underwent anatomic isolated reconstruction of the ACL. The Lysholm and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee scores, KT-1000 arthrometer and pivot-shift tests, reconstruction failure rate, incidence of contralateral ACL injury, presence of associated meniscal injury, and presence of knee hyperextension were evaluated. The evaluation at the 5-year follow-up was also compared with the same patient's evaluation at 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were evaluated. No significant differences were found between the groups in the preoperative evaluation. In the postoperative evaluation, patients in the ALL injury group had a higher reconstruction failure rate (14.3% vs 4.6% for the control group; P = .049) and worse clinical outcomes according to the Lysholm scores (85.0 ± 10.3 vs 92.3 ± 6.6; P < .00001). Although the pivot-shift test results were similar, anteroposterior translation using the KT-1000 arthrometer revealed worse results for the ALL injury group (2.8 ± 1.4 mm vs 1.9 ± 1.3 mm; P = .00018). Patients in the ALL injury group also had an increase in KT-1000 arthrometer values from 2 to 5 years (2.4 ± 1.6 vs 2.8 ± 1.4; P = .038). Patients in the control group had no differences in outcomes from 2 to 5 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Combined ACL and ALL injuries were associated with significantly less favorable outcomes than were isolated ACL injuries at a minimum follow-up of 5 years after isolated ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Patients with concomitant ALL injury showed a higher failure rate and worse functional scores. Also, knee stability tended to slightly worsen from 2 to 5 years in cases of associated ALL injury.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Objective To evaluate if there is a significant difference in the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients with or without associated anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury. Methods We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study through the analysis of medical records and the application of the questionnaires of the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form to patients undergoing isolated ACL reconstruction. Results The 52 participants included were divided into two groups: 19 with associated ALL injury and 33 with no associated ALL injury. None of the patients with associated ALL injury suffered an ACL rerupture, and 21.1% presented injuries to other knee structures after surgery. Among the patients with no associated injury, 6.1% suffered ACL rerupture, and 18.2% presented injuries to other structures after surgery (p = 0.544). Return to activities at the same level as that of the preoperative period occurred in 60% of the patients with associated ALL injury and in 72% of those with no associated injury (p = 0.309). The mean score on the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale was of 81.6 points in patients with associated ALL injury, and of 90.1 in those with no associated injury (p = 0.032). The mean score on the IKDC Subjective Knee Form was of 70.3 points in patients with associated ALL injury and of 76.7 in those with no associated injury (p = 0.112). Conclusion There was no statistically significant difference regarding graft injuries or new injuries to other structures, satisfaction with the operated knee, or the score on the IKDC Subjective Knee Form. Return to activity was similar in the groups with and without associated ALL injuries. The scores on the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale were better, with a statistically significant difference in the group with no associated ALL injuries.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar se há diferença significativa nos resultados da reconstrução isolada do ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA) em pacientes com e sem lesão associada do ligamento anterolateral (LAL). Métodos Foi realizado um estudo transversal retrospectivo com análise de prontuários e aplicação dos questionários da Escala de Pontuação do Joelho de Lysholm e do Formulário Subjetivo de Joelho do International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) a pacientes com reconstrução isolada do LCA. Resultados Os 52 participantes incluídos foram separados em 2 grupos: 19 com lesão associada do LAL e 33 sem lesão associada. Nenhum paciente com lesão associada do LAL sofreu rerruptura do LCA, e 21,1% tiveram lesões em outras estruturas do joelho após a cirurgia. Entre os pacientes sem lesão associada, 6,1% sofreram rerruptura do LCA, e 18,2% tiveram lesões em outras estruturas após a cirurgia (p = 0,544). O retorno às atividades no mesmonível do quenopré-operatóriofoi observadoem60% dos pacientes com lesão associada do LAL e em 72% daqueles sem lesão associada (p = 0,309). Na Escala de Pontuação do Joelho de Lysholm, os pacientes com lesão associada do LAL obtiveram média de 81,6 pontos, e os sem lesão associada, média de 90,1 pontos (p = 0,032). No Formulário Subjetivo de Joelho do IKDC, os pacientes com lesão associada do LAL obtiveram média de 70,3 pontos, e os sem lesão associada, média de 76,7 pontos (p = 0,112). Conclusão Não foi observada diferença estatística significativa quanto a lesões do enxerto ou novas lesões de outras estruturas, satisfação com o joelho operado ou pontuação no Formulário Subjetivo de Joelho do IKDC. Oretorno às atividades foi semelhante nos grupos com e sem lesão associada do LAL, e os resultados na Escala de Pontuação do Joelho de Lysholm foram melhores, com diferença estatística significativa no gruposem lesãoassociada do LAL.

RESUMO

Objective To evaluate if there is a significant difference in the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients with or without associated anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury. Methods We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study through the analysis of medical records and the application of the questionnaires of the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form to patients undergoing isolated ACL reconstruction. Results The 52 participants included were divided into two groups: 19 with associated ALL injury and 33 with no associated ALL injury. None of the patients with associated ALL injury suffered an ACL rerupture, and 21.1% presented injuries to other knee structures after surgery. Among the patients with no associated injury, 6.1% suffered ACL rerupture, and 18.2% presented injuries to other structures after surgery ( p = 0.544). Return to activities at the same level as that of the preoperative period occurred in 60% of the patients with associated ALL injury and in 72% of those with no associated injury ( p = 0.309). The mean score on the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale was of 81.6 points in patients with associated ALL injury, and of 90.1 in those with no associated injury ( p = 0.032). The mean score on the IKDC Subjective Knee Form was of 70.3 points in patients with associated ALL injury and of 76.7 in those with no associated injury ( p = 0.112). Conclusion There was no statistically significant difference regarding graft injuries or new injuries to other structures, satisfaction with the operated knee, or the score on the IKDC Subjective Knee Form. Return to activity was similar in the groups with and without associated ALL injuries. The scores on the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale were better, with a statistically significant difference in the group with no associated ALL injuries.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The association of ALL and KF injuries in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees remain topics of conflicting research despite improved magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We aimed to evaluate the rate of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) and Kaplan fibers (KF) injuries in adults with acute ACL injuries using MRI. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 64 patients with clinical and MRI diagnoses of acute ACL tears. Two radiologists analyzed and categorized the status of the ALL and KF in all patients as intact, partially injured, or completely injured. Interobserver agreement was assessed. Injuries to the collateral ligaments, ITB and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) were also evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 33 years. ALL injuries were observed in 46 (71%) patients, among whom 33 (71%) had partial and 13 (28%) had complete injuries. KF injuries were identified in 32 (50%) patients, with 28 (87.5%) of them having partial and 4 (12.5%) having complete injuries. Combined injuries of both ALL and KF were found in 25 (32.4%) patients (p-value of 0.266). The agreement between the examiners ranged from moderate to substantial (Kappa between 0.55 and 0.75), with the highest agreement observed in cases of KF injuries (Kappa = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: ALL and KF injuries were prevalent in acute ACL-injured knees with rates of injury of 71% and 50%, respectively. ALL injuries were more frequent and more frequently severe compared to KF injuries.

RESUMO

Objective: To evaluate the citation of the ligament in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports and confirm its presence and injury in the images of exams performed in the acute phase retrospectively. Methods: In total, 103 patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in 2019 were included. The images were reanalyzed by two radiologists. Results: In the first analysis, only one report mentioned the anterolateral ligament (ALL) and its injury (0.97%). On reanalysis, ALL was visualized in almost all cases (95% and 97%). An injury was found in 53 (51.5%) cases by radiologist A and in 56 (54.4%) cases by radiologist B. The injury was diagnosed by both in 39 (37.9%) cases (p < 0.0001). Radiologists disagreed regarding the injury (Kappa = 0.411). Conclusion: The reports failed to describe the ligament and diagnose a significant number of injuries. The analysis of conventional resonance images still presents divergences in the diagnosis of ALL injury associated with the ACL among radiologists. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.

Objetivo: Avaliar, de forma retrospectiva, a citação do ligamento anterolateral (LAL) em laudos de ressonância magnética (RM) e confirmar sua presença e lesão nas imagens de exames feitos na fase aguda. Métodos: Foram incluídos 103 pacientes submetidos à reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA) em 2019, cujas imagens foram reanalisadas por dois radiologistas. Resultados: Em primeira análise, apenas um laudo citava o LAL e sua lesão (0,97%); enquanto na reanálise, o LAL foi visualizado em quase todos os casos (95% pelo radiologista A e 97% pelo radiologista B). Foi encontrada lesão em 53 (51,5%) casos pelo radiologista A e 56 (54,4%) pelo radiologista B. Lesão foi diagnosticada por ambos em 39 (37,9%) casos (p < 0,0001). Houve divergência entre os radiologistas com relação à lesão (KappaL = 0,411). Conclusão: Os laudos deixaram de descrever o ligamento e diagnosticar um número significativo de lesões. A análise das imagens convencionais de ressonância ainda gera divergências no diagnóstico da lesão do LAL associada ao LCA entre os radiologistas. Nível de Evidência IV, Série de Casos.

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the citation of the ligament in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports and confirm its presence and injury in the images of exams performed in the acute phase retrospectively. Methods: In total, 103 patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in 2019 were included. The images were reanalyzed by two radiologists. Results: In the first analysis, only one report mentioned the anterolateral ligament (ALL) and its injury (0.97%). On reanalysis, ALL was visualized in almost all cases (95% and 97%). An injury was found in 53 (51.5%) cases by radiologist A and in 56 (54.4%) cases by radiologist B. The injury was diagnosed by both in 39 (37.9%) cases (p < 0.0001). Radiologists disagreed regarding the injury (Kappa = 0.411). Conclusion: The reports failed to describe the ligament and diagnose a significant number of injuries. The analysis of conventional resonance images still presents divergences in the diagnosis of ALL injury associated with the ACL among radiologists. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar, de forma retrospectiva, a citação do ligamento anterolateral (LAL) em laudos de ressonância magnética (RM) e confirmar sua presença e lesão nas imagens de exames feitos na fase aguda. Métodos: Foram incluídos 103 pacientes submetidos à reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA) em 2019, cujas imagens foram reanalisadas por dois radiologistas. Resultados: Em primeira análise, apenas um laudo citava o LAL e sua lesão (0,97%); enquanto na reanálise, o LAL foi visualizado em quase todos os casos (95% pelo radiologista A e 97% pelo radiologista B). Foi encontrada lesão em 53 (51,5%) casos pelo radiologista A e 56 (54,4%) pelo radiologista B. Lesão foi diagnosticada por ambos em 39 (37,9%) casos (p < 0,0001). Houve divergência entre os radiologistas com relação à lesão (KappaL = 0,411). Conclusão: Os laudos deixaram de descrever o ligamento e diagnosticar um número significativo de lesões. A análise das imagens convencionais de ressonância ainda gera divergências no diagnóstico da lesão do LAL associada ao LCA entre os radiologistas. Nível de Evidência IV, Série de Casos.

RESUMO

In the last few years, much more information on the anterolateral complex of the knee has become available. It has now been demonstrated how it works in conjunction with the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) controlling anterolateral rotatory laxity. Biomechanical studies have shown that the anterolateral complex (ALC) has a role as a secondary stabilizer to the ACL in opposing anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation. It is of utmost importance that surgeons comprehend the intricate anatomy of the entire anterolateral aspect of the knee. Although most studies have only focused on the anterolateral ligament (ALL), the ALC of the knee consists of a functional unit formed by the layers of the iliotibial band combined with the anterolateral joint capsule. Considerable interest has also been given to imaging evaluation using magnetic resonance and several studies have targeted the evaluation of the ALC in the setting of ACL injury. Results are inconsistent with a lack of association between magnetic resonance imaging evidence of injury and clinical findings. Isolated ACL reconstruction may not always reestablish knee rotatory stability in patients with associated ALC injury. In such cases, additional procedures, such as anterolateral reconstruction or lateral tenodesis, may be indicated. There are several techniques available for ALL reconstruction. Graft options include the iliotibial band, gracilis or semitendinosus tendon autograft, or allograft.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions are usually complex owing to previous tunnels. The objective of this study is to report the results of a revision ACL reconstruction technique with a tibial tunnel performed from the anterolateral plateau associated with an anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction. METHODS: Patients with at least two ACL reconstructions that failed and who had significant enlargement and confluence of tunnels in the medial tibial plateau and underwent revision ACL reconstruction associated with ALL reconstruction with the tibial tunnel for the ACL performed from the lateral plateau between 2017 and 2019 were evaluated. All patients were evaluated by physical examination, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Lysholm functional scales. RESULTS: Six patients who underwent this surgical procedure were evaluated. All patients were sports practitioners and presented a grade 3 pivot shift. The mean age was 28.5 ± 8.2 years, and the mean follow-up time was 34.1 ± 12.8 months. No patient had a new graft rupture, but three (50%) had grade 1 pivot shift. Four patients had minor complications with no clinical impact on the final result. All except one patient were able to return to pre-injury type of sports, at a mean time of 14.6 ± 2.3 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: The anterolateral tibial tunnel technique using an Achilles tendon allograft for revision ACL reconstruction after multiple failures associated with an ALL reconstruction showed good results and no major complications. The anterolateral tunnel can be considered a good alternative in cases of medial tibial confluence or significant enlargement of the medial tunnels in re-revision procedures.

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with combined reconstruction of the ACL and anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee. METHODS: A search was conducted on the PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases, in line with the PRISMA protocol. The indexation terms used were "anterior cruciate ligament" OR "acl" AND "anterolateral ligament" AND "reconstruction." Articles that compared patients submitted to combined ACL and ALL reconstruction with those submitted to isolated reconstruction of the ACL, with levels of evidence I, II, and III, were included. Studies with follow-up of less than 2 years and articles that did not use "anatomical" techniques for ALL reconstruction, such as extraarticular tenodesis, were excluded. A meta-analysis with R software was conducted, with a random effects model, presented as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD), with a 95% confidence level (CI) and statistically significant at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Ten articles were selected, with a total of 1495 patients, most of whom were men, of whom 674 submitted to ACL and ALL reconstruction and 821 to isolated ACL reconstruction. Combined ACL and ALL reconstruction exhibited a statistically significant advantage in residual pivot shift (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.24-0.47, I2 = 0%, p < 0.01), rerupture rate (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.19-0.62, I2 = 0%, p < 0.01), Lachman test (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.86, I2 = 21%, p < 0.01), and postoperative Lysholm score (MD 2.28, CI 95% 0.75-3.81, I2 = 73%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Combined ACL and ALL reconstruction obtained better postoperative clinical outcomes when compared with isolated ACL reconstruction, especially in reducing residual pivot shift and rerupture rate.

RESUMO

The present research aims to compare the outcomes from the combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) with the standard isolated ACL reconstruction in patients with chronic ACL injury. To do so, a meta-analysis was carried out to determine whether the combined ACL and ALL reconstruction would lead to a significant improvement in knee function according to the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Lysholm test and KT-2000 evaluation scores and lower graft rupture rates in comparison with isolated reconstruction. To identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the combined ACL and ALL reconstruction with the isolated ACL reconstruction, papers published between 2010 and 2019 were searched in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, LILACS and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. The stability of the knee joint is only marginally improved with the combined reconstruction of ACL and ALL, and both reconstruction techniques show functional results. The main outcomes sought were patient function and graft stability and rupture rates after ACL reconstruction. Out of the 421 studies identified, 6 were included in our meta-analysis. Study quality (internal validity) was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool; in general, the studies included presented moderate-quality evidence. The graft rupture rate was higher in patients undergoing isolated ACL reconstruction (relative risk, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 0.41; p < 0.00001).

RESUMO

Abstract The present research aims to compare the outcomes from the combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) with the standard isolated ACL reconstruction in patients with chronic ACL injury. To do so, a meta-analysis was carried out to determine whether the combined ACL and ALL reconstruction would lead to a significant improvement in knee function according to the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Lysholm test and KT-2000 evaluation scores and lower graft rupture rates in comparison with isolated reconstruction. To identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the combined ACL and ALL reconstruction with the isolated ACL reconstruction, papers published between 2010 and 2019 were searched in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, LILACS and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. The stability of the knee joint is only marginally improved with the combined reconstruction of ACL and ALL, and both reconstruction techniques show functional results. The main outcomes sought were patient function and graft stability and rupture rates after ACL reconstruction. Out of the 421 studies identified, 6 were included in our meta-analysis. Study quality (internal validity) was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool; in general, the studies included presented moderate-quality evidence. The graft rupture rate was higher in patients undergoing isolated ACL reconstruction (relative risk, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 0.41; p < 0.00001).

Resumo O objetivo da presentepesquisa é comparar, por meio de uma metanálise, os resultados da reconstrução combinada do ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA) e do ligamento anterolateral (LLA), comparado com a reconstrução isolada padrão, em pacientes com lesão crônica do ligamento cruzado anterior. Buscando alcançar o objetivo da pesquisa, foi realizada uma meta-análise para determinar se a combinação da reconstrução combinada LCA e LLA levaria àmelhoria significativa da função do joelho, medida pelos escores de avaliação International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, KT-2000 e menor taxa de ruptura do enxerto, em comparação com a reconstrução isolada. Para identificar ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECR) comparando a reconstrução combinada do LCA e LLA com a reconstrução isolada do LCA, foram pesquisados artigos publicados entre 2010 e 2019 nas bases MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, LILACS e Cochrane Central RegisterofControlledTrials e seguiram os critérios de Itens de Relatórios Preferidos para Revisões Sistemáticas e Metanálises (PRISMA). A estabilidade da articulação do joelho é apenas marginalmente aprimorada com a reconstrução combinada de LCA e LLA, e ambas as técnicas de reconstrução mostram resultados funcionais. Os principais desfechos procurados foram a função do paciente e as taxas de estabilidade e ruptura do enxerto após a reconstrução do LCA. Dos 421 estudos identificados, 6estudos foram incluídos em nossa meta-análise. A qualidade do estudo (validade interna) foi avaliada usando o instrumento Cochrane risco-de-viés; em geral, foi encontrada uma qualidade moderada de evidências dos estudos incluídos. Os pacientes submetidos à reconstrução isolada do LCA mostraram maior taxa de ruptura do enxerto (RR 0,22; índice de confiança [IC]95%: 0,12-0,41; p< 0,00001).

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate if the anterolateral ligament of the knee (ALL) is present in the human fetus and describe its topography along with other structures of the region. METHODS: Forty human fetuses knee joints, at mean age 34 weeks (± 2.57 weeks), fixed in 10% formalin, were submitted to cross-sectional dissection and mesoscopic analysis. RESULTS: The ALL was not identified, although the usual topography of the region was identified in all specimens: skin, subcutaneous tissue, iliotibial tract (ITT), fibular collateral ligament, popliteal muscle tendon, lateral meniscus, patellar ligament, infrapatellar fat pad, lateral patellar retinaculum, knee joint capsule, lateral inferior genicular vessels, and the biceps femoris tendon. The ITT reveals anterior (n = 12) and lateral thickening (n = 17) in some specimens. This thickening was found in both knees of the same subject in 6/20 specimens. CONCLUSION: The anterolateral ligament of the knee is not a congenital or solid structure. Our results suggest that the ALL may be a deep layer of the ITT or part of the knee joint capsule, or its identification is evaluator dependent.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Isolated reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) does not reestablish the normal knee biomechanics in cases of associated injuries to the anterolateral structures. Studies evaluating the potential clinical effect of anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury on the treatment of ACL injuries are necessary to validate the findings of biomechanical studies. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and failure rate of ACL reconstruction in patients with and without ALL injury diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients with acute ACL injury was divided into 2 groups based on the presence (ALL group) or absence (no-ALL group) of ALL injury on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans. Both groups underwent anatomic reconstruction of the ACL with autologous hamstring tendon grafts. The Lysholm and subjective IKDC scores (International Knee Documentation Committee), KT-1000 arthrometer and pivot-shift test results, reconstruction failure rate, incidence of contralateral ACL injury, presence of associated meniscal injury, and presence of knee hyperextension were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were evaluated. Postoperative mean ± SD follow-up was 33.6 ± 7.1 and 36.1 ± 8.1 months for the ALL and no-ALL groups, respectively. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of age, sex, knee hyperextension, duration of injury before reconstruction, follow-up time, or associated meniscal injuries. In the preoperative evaluation, the pivot-shift grade was similar, and the ALL group had worse KT-1000 arthrometer values (7.9 ± 1.2 mm vs 7.2 ± 1.1 mm; P < .001). In the postoperative evaluation, patients in the no-ALL group had a lower reconstruction failure rate (10.2% vs 1.4%; P = .029) and better clinical outcomes according to the IKDC subjective (85.5 ± 10.7 vs 89.1 ± 6.6; P = .035) and Lysholm scores (85.9 ± 10.1 vs 92.0 ± 6.3; P < .001). There was no postoperative difference in the KT-1000 or pivot-shift results. CONCLUSION: Combined ACL and ALL injuries were associated with significantly less favorable outcomes than were isolated ACL injuries at a minimum follow-up of 2 years after ACL reconstruction. Patients with concomitant ALL injury showed a higher rerupture rate and worse functional scores.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción El complejo anterolateral de la rodilla es un estabilizador secundario de la rotación tibial interna, su inserción distal esta localizada en el aspecto anterolateral de la tibia proximal y su avulsión es conocida como fractura de Segond, fue descrita hace mas de un siglo por el cirujano francés que le dio su nombre. Es frecuente la asociación de la lesión del ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA) con este complejo, tanto que en la actualidad se considera la fractura de Segond como un signo patognomónico de ruptura del cruzado anterior. Dada la importancia de brindar estabilidad rotacional desde la periferia de la articulación y las propiedades cada vez mas reconocidas de las estructuras anterolaterales, este artículo reporta un caso de fijación directa de la fractura de Segond, en el cual se buscó restituir la anatomía original de la rodilla. Métodos Revisión de la literatura relevante y reporte retrospectivo del caso de un paciente con lesión de LCA y fractura de Segond que fue llevado a reconstrucción de LCA con autoinjerto de HTH y reducción directa y fijación con sutura de anclaje de fractura de Segond por una incisión mínima, con un seguimiento clínico de 4 años. Se aplicaron escalas de valoración subjetiva previo al procedimiento y en el seguimiento postoperatorio. Resultados La inestabilidad anterior y anterolateral posterior al manejo quirúrgico presentó mejoría clínica pasando de tener Lachman IIB a negativo, y Pivot shift grado II a negativo. Las escalas de valoración subjetivas de Lysholm e IKDC mejoraron notablemente de resultados regulares previo al procedimiento a excelentes en el postoperatorio. No presentó complicaciones durante el procedimiento ni requirió reintervenciones. Discusión Aunque la fractura de Segond está descrita desde hace más de un siglo, y su asociación con lesiones de ligamento cruzado anterior se documentó hace mas de 20 años, aun no hay consenso en el manejo de esta fractura. Desde el punto de vista biomecánico, una estructura localizada en el centro de la rodilla como el LCA, de manera aislada, sería insuficiente para controlar la rotación tibial en relación al fémur. Por lo tanto, sería lógico pensar que una estructura localizada lejos del centro de rotación de la rodilla pueda ser más efectiva en controlar la rotación ya que ejerce un mayor control del torque rotacional. Reportamos resultados funcionales satisfactorios y estabilidad postoperatoria adecuada a 4 años de seguimiento, posterior a la fijación de la fractura de Segond asociada a reconstrucción de LCA; consideramos que puede ser una medida exitosa y segura para el manejo de la inestabilidad anterolateral de la rodilla.

Introduction The anterolateral complex of the knee is a secondary stabiliser of the internal tibial rotation. Its distal insertion is located in the anterolateral aspect of the proximal tibia, and its avulsion is known as Segond fracture. This was described more than a century ago by the French surgeon who gave it his name. The combination of anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL) with the anterolateral complex is so common in as much that Segond fracture is currently considered as a pathognomonic sign of rupture of the anterior cruciate. Given the importance of providing rotational stability from the periphery of the joint and the increasingly recognised properties of the anterolateral structures, this article reports a case of direct fixation of the Segond fracture, in which it was sought to restore the original anatomy of the knee. Methods Review of relevant literature and retrospective case report of a patient with ACL injury and Segond fracture who underwent ACL reconstruction with a host-to-host (HTH) autograft and direct reduction and fixation with Segond fracture anchor suture through a minimal incision. There was a clinical follow-up of 4 years. Subjective assessment scales were applied prior to the procedure and in the postoperative follow-up. Results Anterior and anterolateral instability after surgical management showed a clinical improvement, going from having Lachman IIB to negative, and from Pivot shift grade II to negative. The subjective rating scales of Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) improved markedly from regular results prior to the procedure to excellent in the postoperative period. There were no complications during the procedure and no reoperations were required Discussion Although the Segond fracture has been described for more than a century, and its association with anterior cruciate ligament injuries was documented more than 20 years ago, there is still no consensus on the management of this fracture. From the biomechanical point of view, a structure located in the centre of the knee like the ACL, in isolation, would be insufficient to control the tibial rotation in relation to the femur. Therefore, it would be logical to think that a structure located far from the centre of rotation of the knee can be more effective in controlling rotation, since it exerts a greater control of rotational torque. Satisfactory functional results are reported, together with an adequate postoperative stability at 4 years of follow-up, after the fixation of the Segond fracture associated with ACL reconstruction. It is considered that this can be a successful and safe measure for the management of anterolateral instability of the knee.

Assuntos

RESUMO

En la enseñanza de la anatomía, el uso de los epónimos es cada vez más escaso, sin embargo su uso aún es evidente incluso en la literatura actualizada, en este caso el uso del epónimo se acompaña generalmente del término correcto según la Terminología Anatómica Internacional (TAI). El denominado "Tubérculo de Gerdy" (TG) es un epónimo ampliamente usado en la literatura y la comunidad científica para denominar un reparo óseo ubicado en el cóndilo lateral de la tibia, corresponde a un referente anatómico y clínico importante para inserción de músculos, ligamentos y procedimientos medicoquirúrgicos de la rodilla. A pesar de esta amplia denominación, y en comparación con otros epónimos, la TAI no la incluye y no relaciona algún término oficial con esta estructura anatómica. El objetivo del trabajo fue revisar libros usados en la enseñanza de la anatomía y artículos científicos actualizados para ver la presencia y descripción de esta estructura a fin de proponer un término que se ajuste a los principios básicos de la Terminología Anatómica Internacional en concordancia con la tarea del Programa Federativo Internacional de Terminología Anatómica (FIPAT), organismo de la Federación Internacional de Asociaciones de Anatomistas (IFAA). El TG se describe como una estructura ubicada entre la tuberosidad de la tibia y la cabeza de la fíbula, refiriéndose a él con sinónimos como tubérculo del músculo tibial anterior, tubérculo del músculo tensor de la fascia lata, tubérculo del tracto iliotibial y tubérculo anterolateral de la tibia. En revistas morfológicas aparece en artículos actuales relacionados al ligamento anterolateral. Según la descripción de la literatura proponemos como término anatómico para esta estructura "Tuberculum anterolateralis tibiae", cuya traducción es usada como sinónimo por otros autores, ajustándose así a los principios básicos de la TAI. Pretendemos que estos antecedentes sean discutidos por los expertos que conforman el FIPAT.

In teaching anatomy, the use of eponyms is increasingly scarce. Nonetheless, eponyms remain evident in updated literature, in this case the use of the eponym is accompanied by the correct term according to the International Anatomical terminology (TAI) Gerdy´s tubercle (GT) is an eponym widely used in the literature and scientific community to name a lateral tubercle of the tibia. It is an insertion site of muscles and ligaments and an important anatomical reference in knee surgical procedures. Despite its importance, it is not included in the International Anatomical Terminology (IAT) and an official name for this structure is lacking. The aim of this work was to review classic books used in the anatomy teaching and recent scientific papers, and further, to propose an anatomical term for the Gerdy tubercle that fit IAT basic principles, in agreement with the International Federal Program of Anatomical Terminology (IFPAT), and organism that is part of the International Federation of Anatomist Associations (IFAA). The TG is described as a structure located between the tuberosity of the tibia and the head of the fibula, referring to it with synonyms such as tubercle of the anterior tibia, tubercle of the tensor fascia lata, tubercle of iliotibial tract and anterolateral tibial tubercle. In morphological journals it appears in current articles related to the anterolateral ligament. We propose as an anatomical term for the Gerdy´s tubercle the name of "Tuberculum anterolteralis tibiae" its translation is used as a synonym by other authors and fits the basic principles of TAI. We hope that this information be considered by the experts that make up the FIPAT.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the knowledge and technical preferences of Brazilian knee surgeons in relation to the treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries using intra-articular reconstruction in combination with extra-articular reconstruction. METHODS: A questionnaire consisting of 16 questions about intra-articular ACL reconstruction in combination with extra-articular procedures and about the Anterolateral Ligament (ALL) was applied at the 48th Brazilian Congress of Orthopedics. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven surgeons answered the questionnaire. Most surgeons perform 10-30 ACL reconstructions per year, with the transtibial technique appearing as the most common. Most surgeons find some percentage of residual pivot-shift after reconstructions, but the minority performs extra-articular procedures on a routine basis. The main indications for extra-articular reconstruction are revision and profuse pivot-shift cases. Most surgeons consider the ALL a true ligament, but 46.7% with less biomechanical importance and 32.3% with greater importance in knee stability. However, 91.4% had a positive perception of the reconstruction of this structure. CONCLUSION: Although the preferred technique is still the transtibial procedure, combined anatomical reconstructions already make up more than 50% of cases. Extra-articular reconstructions associated with the ACL are still performed by the minority of Brazilian surgeons, but 91.4% of them report having had a positive perception with their reconstruction. Level of Evidence III, Descriptive Study.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar o conhecimento e as preferências técnicas entre os cirurgiões de joelho brasileiros no tratamento das lesões do ligamento cruzado anterior, com reconstrução intra-articular associada à reconstrução extra-articular. MÉTODOS: Foi aplicado questionário de 16 perguntas no 48° Congresso Brasileiro de Ortopedia acerca de reconstrução intra-articular do ligamento cruzado anterior associada a procedimentos extra-articulares e sobre o ligamento anterolateral. RESULTADOS: Responderam o questionário 137 cirurgiões. A maioria faz entre 10 e 30 reconstruções de ligamento cruzado anterior por ano, sendo a técnica transtibial a mais realizada. A maioria encontrou alguma porcentagem de pivot-shift residual após as reconstruções, mas a minoria realizou procedimento extra-articular de rotina. As indicações principais de reconstrução extra-articular foram casos de revisão e pivot-shift exuberante. A maioria considera o ligamento anterolateral um ligamento verdadeiro, porém 46,7% o caraterizou com importância biomecânica menor e 32,3% com importância maior na estabilidade do joelho, mas 91,4% tiveram percepção positiva em relação à reconstrução dessa estrutura. CONCLUSÃO: Apesar da técnica de preferência ainda ser a transtibial, as reconstruções anatômicas combinadas já são mais de 50% dos casos. As reconstruções extra-articulares associadas ao ligamento cruzado anterior ainda são feitas pela minoria dos cirurgiões brasileiros, mas 91,4% deles referem ter tido uma percepção positiva com sua reconstrução. Nível de Evidência III, Estudo Descritivo.

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the knowledge and technical preferences of Brazilian knee surgeons in relation to the treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries using intra-articular reconstruction in combination with extra-articular reconstruction. Methods: A questionnaire consisting of 16 questions about intra-articular ACL reconstruction in combination with extra-articular procedures and about the Anterolateral Ligament (ALL) was applied at the 48th Brazilian Congress of Orthopedics. Results: One hundred thirty-seven surgeons answered the questionnaire. Most surgeons perform 10-30 ACL reconstructions per year, with the transtibial technique appearing as the most common. Most surgeons find some percentage of residual pivot-shift after reconstructions, but the minority performs extra-articular procedures on a routine basis. The main indications for extra-articular reconstruction are revision and profuse pivot-shift cases. Most surgeons consider the ALL a true ligament, but 46.7% with less biomechanical importance and 32.3% with greater importance in knee stability. However, 91.4% had a positive perception of the reconstruction of this structure. Conclusion: Although the preferred technique is still the transtibial procedure, combined anatomical reconstructions already make up more than 50% of cases. Extra-articular reconstructions associated with the ACL are still performed by the minority of Brazilian surgeons, but 91.4% of them report having had a positive perception with their reconstruction. Level of Evidence III, Descriptive Study.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o conhecimento e as preferências técnicas entre os cirurgiões de joelho brasileiros no tratamento das lesões do ligamento cruzado anterior, com reconstrução intra-articular associada à reconstrução extra-articular. Métodos: Foi aplicado questionário de 16 perguntas no 48° Congresso Brasileiro de Ortopedia acerca de reconstrução intra-articular do ligamento cruzado anterior associada a procedimentos extra-articulares e sobre o ligamento anterolateral. Resultados: Responderam o questionário 137 cirurgiões. A maioria faz entre 10 e 30 reconstruções de ligamento cruzado anterior por ano, sendo a técnica transtibial a mais realizada. A maioria encontrou alguma porcentagem de pivot-shift residual após as reconstruções, mas a minoria realizou procedimento extra-articular de rotina. As indicações principais de reconstrução extra-articular foram casos de revisão e pivot-shift exuberante. A maioria considera o ligamento anterolateral um ligamento verdadeiro, porém 46,7% o caraterizou com importância biomecânica menor e 32,3% com importância maior na estabilidade do joelho, mas 91,4% tiveram percepção positiva em relação à reconstrução dessa estrutura. Conclusão: Apesar da técnica de preferência ainda ser a transtibial, as reconstruções anatômicas combinadas já são mais de 50% dos casos. As reconstruções extra-articulares associadas ao ligamento cruzado anterior ainda são feitas pela minoria dos cirurgiões brasileiros, mas 91,4% deles referem ter tido uma percepção positiva com sua reconstrução. Nível de Evidência III, Estudo Descritivo.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Combined partial lateral collateral and complete anterolateral ligament (PLCCALL) injuries are a specific injury pattern seen in Brazilian jiu-jitsu (BJJ) because of the knee varus-flexion mechanism that frequently occurs during grappling. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of this injury pattern in a series of BJJ athletes with an acute knee injury and to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes after nonoperative management at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Our hypotheses were that PLCCALL injuries are common in BJJ and that nonoperative treatment is associated with excellent clinical outcomes and return to the preinjury level of sport. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: All BJJ athletes who presented with an acute knee injury between July 2013 and June 2017 and who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee were included. A specific emphasis was placed on identifying those whose imaging demonstrated PLCCALL injury. Clinical evaluation included physical examination as well as Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. RESULTS: Of the 27 patients analyzed, 7 (25.9%) had MRI-proven PLCCALL injuries. The mean follow-up after nonoperative management was 41.3 months. The mean IKDC and Lysholm scores were 94 and 92 before the injury, 26 and 36 at the initial assessment after the injury, and 83 and 78 at 12-month follow-up, respectively (P < .00001). All 7 patients had returned to their preinjury level of sports by the 12-month follow-up. The mean time between injury and return to competition level was 4.7 months (range, 4-6 months). CONCLUSION: PLCCALL injury is a specific but infrequent injury pattern in BJJ. The prognosis of this injury after nonoperative treatment appears to be excellent. Improved functional scores (IKDC and Lysholm) and changes on MRI demonstrated that the anterolateral ligament has intrinsic healing potential, as the images showed complete healing of the previously documented rupture of the anterolateral ligament from its proximal attachment.

RESUMO

Introducción Aunque las indicaciones para su reconstrucción aún son motivo de debate, desde su descripción, la anatomía del ligamento anterolateral ha sido estudiada extensivamente. Sus puntos de inserción se han modificado en los estudios más recientes y esto es importante en el momento de hacer una reconstrucción anatómica. Este estudio busca hacer una revisión sistemática de la literatura para establecer sus puntos de inserción en fémur y tibia. Materiales y métodos Revisión sistemática desde enero de 2012 hasta junio de 2017. Se buscaron publicaciones en Pubmed, Embase, Google Scholar y Cochrane. Se incluyeron estudios cadavéricos que evaluaran la anatomía del ligamento anterolateral y describieran sus puntos de inserción. Resultados Se encontraron 334 estudios con los términos de interés, que tras su evaluación llevó a incluir 13 artículos. El ligamento no estaba presente en el 100% de los especímenes evaluados en los diferentes artículos. Su inserción tibial se ha mantenido sin cambios desde la descripción inicial, en un punto intermedio entre la cabeza del peroné y el tubérculo de Gerdy, mientras que la femoral ha cambiado. Esta se ha modificado a un punto posterior y proximal al epicóndilo lateral del fémur y al origen del colateral externo, contrario a la ubicación inicial anterior y distal a estos. Discusión Actualmente se considera que la inserción del ligamento anterolateral es posterior y proximal al origen del ligamento colateral externo. Esto tiene importancia para su reconstrucción quirúrgica: el ligamento debería ser fijado cuando tiene su máxima longitud, entre 20-30° de flexión de la rodilla.

Introduction Although its anatomy has been extensively studied, there is still controversy in the medical literature as regards when the anterolateral ligament should be reconstructed. Its insertion points have been modified in the most recent studies and this might play an important role in its anatomical reconstruction. This study aims to conduct a systematic review of literature in order to establish insertion points of the anterolateral ligament in the femur and tibia. Materials and methods A systematic review of literature was conducted between January 2012 and June 2017. It included post-mortem studies of dissection of the anterolateral ligament in adult knees that reported its anatomical insertions. The following databases were searched: PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and Cochrane. Results A total of 334 studies were found in the systematic review using the key words. After evaluating them, 13 papers fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the study. The anterolateral ligament was not found in the 100% of the post-mortem knees. Its tibial insertion continued to be similar to the original description: between the fibula head and Gerdy's tubercle. The femoral insertion has changed, now being posterior and proximal to the lateral epicondyle and the insertion of the lateral collateral ligament, as opposed to its initial location of anterior and distal to these structures. Discussion The femoral insertion of the anterolateral ligament is currently considered to be proximal and posterior to the origin of the lateral collateral ligament. This is important for an anatomical surgical reconstruction, when the ligament should be fixed in its maximal length, between 20-30° of knee flexion.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The heterogeneity of available cadaveric, histologic, and radiographic results related to the anterolateral ligament (ALL) does not support its existence as a discrete anatomic structure. Moreover, focusing narrowly on the ALL in isolation, what has previously been referred to as "ALL myopia," obscures a thorough appreciation for the stability contributions of both capsular and extracapsular structures. We consider injury to the soft tissues of the anterolateral knee-the anterolateral complex-just one component of what is frequently found to be a spectrum of pathology observed in the rotationally unstable, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knee. Increased lateral tibial slope, meniscal root tears, and "ramp" lesions of the medial meniscocapsular junction have all been implicated in persistent rotatory knee instability, and the restoration of rotational stability requires a stepwise approach to the assessment of each of these entities. Through an appreciation for the multifactorial nature of rotatory knee instability, surgeons will be better equipped to perform durable ACL reconstructions that maximize the likelihood of optimal clinical outcomes for patients. The purposes of this review are to provide an update on the relevant anatomy of the anterolateral knee soft tissues and to explain the multifactorial nature of rotatory knee instability in the setting of ACL deficiency.