RESUMO
Introducción El complejo anterolateral de la rodilla es un estabilizador secundario de la rotación tibial interna, su inserción distal esta localizada en el aspecto anterolateral de la tibia proximal y su avulsión es conocida como fractura de Segond, fue descrita hace mas de un siglo por el cirujano francés que le dio su nombre. Es frecuente la asociación de la lesión del ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA) con este complejo, tanto que en la actualidad se considera la fractura de Segond como un signo patognomónico de ruptura del cruzado anterior. Dada la importancia de brindar estabilidad rotacional desde la periferia de la articulación y las propiedades cada vez mas reconocidas de las estructuras anterolaterales, este artículo reporta un caso de fijación directa de la fractura de Segond, en el cual se buscó restituir la anatomía original de la rodilla. Métodos Revisión de la literatura relevante y reporte retrospectivo del caso de un paciente con lesión de LCA y fractura de Segond que fue llevado a reconstrucción de LCA con autoinjerto de HTH y reducción directa y fijación con sutura de anclaje de fractura de Segond por una incisión mínima, con un seguimiento clínico de 4 años. Se aplicaron escalas de valoración subjetiva previo al procedimiento y en el seguimiento postoperatorio. Resultados La inestabilidad anterior y anterolateral posterior al manejo quirúrgico presentó mejoría clínica pasando de tener Lachman IIB a negativo, y Pivot shift grado II a negativo. Las escalas de valoración subjetivas de Lysholm e IKDC mejoraron notablemente de resultados regulares previo al procedimiento a excelentes en el postoperatorio. No presentó complicaciones durante el procedimiento ni requirió reintervenciones. Discusión Aunque la fractura de Segond está descrita desde hace más de un siglo, y su asociación con lesiones de ligamento cruzado anterior se documentó hace mas de 20 años, aun no hay consenso en el manejo de esta fractura. Desde el punto de vista biomecánico, una estructura localizada en el centro de la rodilla como el LCA, de manera aislada, sería insuficiente para controlar la rotación tibial en relación al fémur. Por lo tanto, sería lógico pensar que una estructura localizada lejos del centro de rotación de la rodilla pueda ser más efectiva en controlar la rotación ya que ejerce un mayor control del torque rotacional. Reportamos resultados funcionales satisfactorios y estabilidad postoperatoria adecuada a 4 años de seguimiento, posterior a la fijación de la fractura de Segond asociada a reconstrucción de LCA; consideramos que puede ser una medida exitosa y segura para el manejo de la inestabilidad anterolateral de la rodilla.
Introduction The anterolateral complex of the knee is a secondary stabiliser of the internal tibial rotation. Its distal insertion is located in the anterolateral aspect of the proximal tibia, and its avulsion is known as Segond fracture. This was described more than a century ago by the French surgeon who gave it his name. The combination of anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL) with the anterolateral complex is so common in as much that Segond fracture is currently considered as a pathognomonic sign of rupture of the anterior cruciate. Given the importance of providing rotational stability from the periphery of the joint and the increasingly recognised properties of the anterolateral structures, this article reports a case of direct fixation of the Segond fracture, in which it was sought to restore the original anatomy of the knee. Methods Review of relevant literature and retrospective case report of a patient with ACL injury and Segond fracture who underwent ACL reconstruction with a host-to-host (HTH) autograft and direct reduction and fixation with Segond fracture anchor suture through a minimal incision. There was a clinical follow-up of 4 years. Subjective assessment scales were applied prior to the procedure and in the postoperative follow-up. Results Anterior and anterolateral instability after surgical management showed a clinical improvement, going from having Lachman IIB to negative, and from Pivot shift grade II to negative. The subjective rating scales of Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) improved markedly from regular results prior to the procedure to excellent in the postoperative period. There were no complications during the procedure and no reoperations were required Discussion Although the Segond fracture has been described for more than a century, and its association with anterior cruciate ligament injuries was documented more than 20 years ago, there is still no consensus on the management of this fracture. From the biomechanical point of view, a structure located in the centre of the knee like the ACL, in isolation, would be insufficient to control the tibial rotation in relation to the femur. Therefore, it would be logical to think that a structure located far from the centre of rotation of the knee can be more effective in controlling rotation, since it exerts a greater control of rotational torque. Satisfactory functional results are reported, together with an adequate postoperative stability at 4 years of follow-up, after the fixation of the Segond fracture associated with ACL reconstruction. It is considered that this can be a successful and safe measure for the management of anterolateral instability of the knee.
Assuntos
Humanos , Fraturas da Tíbia , Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Instabilidade Articular , JoelhoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: No consensus exists regarding the anatomic characteristics of the knee anterolateral ligament (ALL). A critical analysis of the dissections described in previous studies allows the division of the ALL into 2 groups with similar characteristics. The presence of considerable variability suggests that the authors may not be referring to the same structure. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To perform a lateral anatomic dissection, by layers, seeking to characterize the 2 variants described for the ALL on the same knee. We hypothesized that we would identify the 2 variants described for the ALL and that these variants would have distinct characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Thirteen unpaired cadaveric knees were used in this study. The dissection protocol followed the parameters described in previous studies. Immediately below the iliotibial tract, we isolated a structure designated as the superficial ALL, whereas between this structure and the articular capsule, we isolated a structure designated as the deep ALL. The 2 structures were measured for length at full extension and at 90° of flexion and for distance from the tibial insertion relative to the Gerdy tubercle. Potential contact with the lateral meniscus was also evaluated. After measurements were obtained, the 2 dissected structures underwent histologic analysis. RESULTS: The superficial ALL presented a posterior and proximal origin to the center of the lateral epicondyle, its length increased on knee extension, and it exhibited no contact with the lateral meniscus. The deep ALL was located in the center of the lateral epicondyle, its length increased on knee flexion, and it presented a meniscal insertion. Both structures had a similar tibial insertion site; however, the insertion site of the deep ALL was located more posteriorly. The analysis of the histological sections for both structures indicated the presence of dense and well-organized collagen fibers. CONCLUSION: This anatomic study clearly identified 2 structures, described as the superficial and deep ALL, which were consistent with previous but conflicting descriptions of the ALL. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study clarifies numerous controversies encountered in anatomic studies of the ALL. Knowledge regarding the existence of 2 distinct structures in the anterolateral knee will allow more accurate evaluation of their functions and characteristics.