RESUMO

Background: Socioeconomic conditions are strongly associated with breast and cervical cancer incidence and mortality patterns; therefore, social protection programmes (SPPs) might impact these cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of SPPs on breast and cervical cancer outcomes and their risk/protective factors. Methods: Five databases were searched for articles that assessed participation in PPS and the incidence, survival, mortality (primary outcomes), screening, staging at diagnosis and risk/protective factors (secondary outcomes) for these cancers. Only peer-reviewed quantitative studies of women receiving SPPs compared to eligible women not receiving benefits were included. Independent reviewers selected articles, assessed eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. A harvest plot represents the included studies and shows the direction of effect, sample size and risk of bias. Findings: Of 17,080 documents retrieved, 43 studies were included in the review. No studies evaluated the primary outcomes. They all examined the relationship between SPPs and screening, as well as risk and protective factors. The harvest plot showed that in lower risk of bias studies, participants of SPPs had lower weight and fertility, were older at sexual debut, and breastfed their infants for longer. Interpretation: No studies have yet assessed the effect of SPPs on breast and cervical cancer incidence, survival, or mortality; nevertheless, the existing evidence suggests positive impacts on risk and protective factors.

RESUMO

Importance: Women living in income-segregated areas are less likely to receive adequate breast cancer care and access community resources, which may heighten breast cancer mortality risk. Objective: To investigate the association between income segregation and breast cancer mortality and whether this association is attenuated by receipt of the Bolsa Família program (BFP), the world's largest conditional cash-transfer program. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted using data from the 100 Million Brazilian Cohort, which were linked with nationwide mortality registries (2004-2015). Data were analyzed from December 2021 to June 2023. Study participants were women aged 18 to 100 years. Exposure: Women's income segregation (high, medium, or low) at the municipality level was obtained using income data from the 2010 Brazilian census and assessed using dissimilarity index values in tertiles (low [0.01-0.25], medium [0.26-0.32], and high [0.33-0.73]). Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was breast cancer mortality. Mortality rate ratios (MRRs) for the association of segregation with breast cancer deaths were estimated using Poisson regression adjusted for age, race, education, municipality area size, population density, area of residence (rural or urban), and year of enrollment. Multiplicative interactions of segregation and BFP receipt (yes or no) in the association with mortality (2004-2015) were assessed. Results: Data on 21 680 930 women (mean [SD] age, 36.1 [15.3] years) were analyzed. Breast cancer mortality was greater among women living in municipalities with high (adjusted MRR [aMRR], 1.18; 95% CI, 1.13-1.24) and medium (aMRR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.12) compared with low segregation. Women who did not receive BFP had higher breast cancer mortality than BFP recipients (aMRR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.12-1.22). By BFP strata, women who did not receive BFP and lived in municipalities with high income segregation had a 24% greater risk of death from breast cancer compared with those living in municipalities with low income segregation (aMRR, 1.24: 95% CI, 1.14-1.34); women who received BFP and were living in areas with high income segregation had a 13% higher risk of death from breast cancer compared with those living in municipalities with low income segregation (aMRR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.19; P for interaction = .008). Stratified by the amount of time receiving the benefit, segregation (high vs low) was associated with an increase in mortality risk for women receiving BFP for less time but not for those receiving it for more time (<4 years: aMRR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07-1.27; 4-11 years: aMRR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.00-1.17; P for interaction <.001). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that place-based inequities in breast cancer mortality associated with income segregation may be mitigated with BFP receipt, possibly via improved income and access to preventive cancer care services among women, which may be associated with early detection and treatment and ultimately reduced mortality.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: There is limited evidence regarding the impact of race/racism and its intersection with socioeconomic status (SES) on breast and cervical cancer, the two most common female cancers globally. We investigated racial inequalities in breast and cervical cancer mortality and whether SES (education and household conditions) interacted with race/ethnicity. DESIGN: The 100 Million Brazilian Cohort data were linked to the Brazilian Mortality Database, 2004-2015 (n = 20,665,005 adult women). We analysed the association between self-reported race/ethnicity (White/'Parda'(Brown)/Black/Asian/Indigenous) and cancer mortality using Poisson regression, adjusting for age, calendar year, education, household conditions and area of residence. Additive and multiplicative interactions were assessed. RESULTS: Cervical cancer mortality rates were higher among Indigenous (adjusted Mortality rate ratio = 1.80, 95%CI 1.39-2.33), Asian (1.63, 1.20-2.22), 'Parda'(Brown) (1.27, 1.21-1.33) and Black (1.18, 1.09-1.28) women vs White women. Breast cancer mortality rates were higher among Black (1.10, 1.04-1.17) vs White women. Racial inequalities in cervical cancer mortality were larger among women of poor household conditions, and low education (P for multiplicative interaction <0.001, and 0.02, respectively). Compared to White women living in completely adequate (3-4) household conditions, the risk of cervical cancer mortality in Black women with 3-4, 1-2, and none adequate conditions was 1.10 (1.01-1.21), 1.48 (1.28-1.71), and 2.03 (1.56-2.63), respectively (Relative excess risk due to interaction-RERI = 0.78, 0.18-1.38). Among 'Parda'(Brown) women the risk was 1.18 (1.11-1.25), 1.68 (1.56-1.81), and 1.84 (1.63-2.08), respectively (RERI = 0.52, 0.16-0.87). Compared to high-educated White women, the risk in high-, middle- and low-educated Black women was 1.14 (0.83-1.55), 1.93 (1.57-2.38) and 2.75 (2.33-3.25), respectively (RERI = 0.36, -0.05-0.77). Among 'Parda'(Brown) women the risk was 1.09 (0.91-1.31), 1.99 (1.70-2.33) and 3.03 (2.61-3.52), respectively (RERI = 0.68, 0.48-0.88). No interactions were found for breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Low SES magnified racial inequalities in cervical cancer mortality. The intersection between race/ethnicity, SES and gender needs to be addressed to reduce racial health inequalities.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates are higher in Brazil than in western countries. Access to cytology-based screening has increased in the country in recent decades, but few studies have assessed the quality of the follow-up care of women with abnormal screening tests that require further investigation. METHODS: A record-linkage cohort study was conducted in São Paulo state. Women aged 25+ years, who were screened in 2010, and whose test revealed a high-grade, or more severe, lesion were eligible. Follow-up information on diagnostic investigations, treatments and mortality was obtained through record-linkage of health databases. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median times between screening and diagnostic investigation, and diagnosis and treatment initiation. Cox survival models were used to identify correlates of the length of these time intervals. RESULTS: 4300 women had a high-grade, or more severe, test result. Of these, 2788 (64.8 %) had a diagnostic investigation record, 1763 (41 %) a confirmed diagnosis of a precursor lesion or cancer, and 1247 (70.7 %) a treatment record. The median time to diagnosis was 190 days, with the probability of undergoing a diagnostic investigation within 30 days of the abnormal screening test being 7%. The median time to treatment was 81 days, with the probability of undergoing treatment within 60 days of a confirmed diagnosis being 44 %. Delays in diagnosis and treatment were associated with area-based healthcare indicators. CONCLUSION: Times to diagnosis and treatment were long, well above recommendations. Strategies to improve follow-up care must be prioritized to ensure screening reduces cervical cancer incidence and mortality.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The study assessed interobserver reliability in the classification of record pairs formed during probabilistic linkage of health-related databases, a key step in the methodology validation to be used in a larger on-going study on inequalities in the access to breast and cervical cancer control activities in Brazil (DAAC-SIS). METHODOLOGY: The RecLink software was used to link two databases of the Breast Cancer Control Information System (SISMAMA) in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil: a reference database, which included 301 screening mammograms with probable benign diagnosis (BI-RADS 3 category) recorded in October 2010, and a database comprising 158,517 mammograms registered in 2011. Subsequently, the 215 pairs of records that were not assigned the maximum RecLink score were independently classified as being true or false by ten independent evaluators from four participating centers. RESULTS: The Kappa coefficient ranged from 0.87 to 1.00. Six evaluators were in perfect agreement with one or more evaluators from the other centers. The global Kappa was 0.96 (95% confidence interval - 95%CI 0.94 - 0.99). DISCUSSION: Assessment of interobserver reliability is key to ensuring the quality of the record linkage, and it should be routine practice in studies of this nature. The disclosure of such results contributes to transparency in the conduct of such studies and in the reporting of their findings. CONCLUSION: Interobserver reliability in this study was excellent, indicating satisfactory team consistency in the classification of record pairs.

INTRODUÇÃO: O estudo avaliou a confiabilidade interobservadores na classificação de pares de registros formados durante o processo de relacionamento probabilístico, sendo uma das etapas de validação da metodologia a ser utilizada em pesquisa sobre desigualdades de acesso às ações de controle dos cânceres de mama e do colo do útero no Brasil (DAAC-SIS). METODOLOGIA: O programa RecLink foi usado para relacionar as bases de dados do Sistema de Informação do Controle do Câncer de Mama (SISMAMA) do estado de Minas Gerais, tendo como referência 301 mamografias de rastreamento com resultado provavelmente benigno (categoria BI-RADS 3), registradas em outubro de 2010 e, como comparação, 158.517 mamografias registradas em 2011. Posteriormente, 215 pares de registros, que não obtiveram o escore máximo atribuído pelo RecLink, foram classificados independentemente por dez avaliadores, de quatro centros participantes da pesquisa, como pares verdadeiros ou falsos. RESULTADOS: O coeficiente Kappa variou de 0,87 a 1,00. Seis avaliadores obtiveram concordância perfeita com um ou mais avaliadores de outros centros. O Kappa global foi 0,96 (intervalo de confiança de 95% - IC95% 0,94 - 0,99). DISCUSSÃO: A avaliação interobservadores foi fundamental para garantir a qualidade do processo de relacionamento, e a sua prática deve ser rotina em estudos dessa natureza. A divulgação desses resultados contribui para a transparência na condução e no relato do estudo em curso. CONCLUSÃO: A confiabilidade interobservadores foi excelente, sinalizando homogeneidade satisfatória da equipe na classificação dos pares de registros.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Our objectives with this study were to describe the spatial distribution of mammographic screening coverage across small geographical areas (micro-regions) in Brazil, and to analyze whether the observed differences were associated with spatial inequities in socioeconomic conditions, provision of health care, and healthcare services utilization. We performed an area-based ecological study on mammographic screening coverage in the period of 2010-2011 regarding socioeconomic and healthcare variables. The units of analysis were the 438 health micro-regions in Brazil. Spatial regression models were used to study these relationships. There was marked variability in mammographic coverage across micro-regions (median = 21.6%; interquartile range: 8.1%-37.9%). Multivariable analyses identified high household income inequality, low number of radiologists/100,000 inhabitants, low number of mammography machines/10,000 inhabitants, and low number of mammograms performed by each machine as independent correlates of poor mammographic coverage at the micro-region level. There was evidence of strong spatial dependence of these associations, with changes in one micro-region affecting neighboring micro-regions, and also of geographical heterogeneities. There were substantial inequities in access to mammographic screening across micro-regions in Brazil, in 2010-2011, with coverage being higher in those with smaller wealth inequities and better access to health care.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Policies for early detection of breast cancer, including clinical breast examinations and mammographic screening, were introduced in Brazil in 2004, but their effect on disease stage at diagnosis is unclear. We aimed to assess whether these policies have led to a decrease in the prevalence of late-stage breast cancer at diagnosis. METHODS: In this case only analysis, using an anonymised nationwide hospital based-cancer registry network, we identified women aged 18-89 years who had been diagnosed with an invasive breast cancer in Brazil during 2001-14. We extracted individual patient-level data on patient demographics, tumour variables, and health-care provider variables for the centre where the patient was diagnosed. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of late-stage breast cancer (TNM stage III or IV) at diagnosis overall, across age groups, and by ethnoracial and social strata (ie, self-reported ethnoracial group, as white, black, brown, Asian, or Indigenous, and educational level, marital status, and region of residence) across the study period, and compare these estimates with international data from high-income countries (Norway and the USA). We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for late-stage versus early-stage (TNM stage I or II) breast cancer at diagnosis in relation to relevant exposures, either minimally adjusted (for age, year of diagnosis, and region of residence) or fully adjusted (for all patient, tumour, and health-care provider variables). FINDINGS: We identified 247 719 women who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between Jan 1, 2001, and Dec 31, 2014, with a mean age at diagnosis of 55·4 years (SD 13·3), of whom 36·2% (n=89 550) identified as white, 29·8% (n=73 826) as black or brown, and 0·7% (n=1639) as Asian or Indigenous. Prevalence of late-stage breast cancer at diagnosis remained high throughout 2001-14, at approximately 40%, was inversely associated with educational level (p value for linear trend <0·0001), and was higher for women who identified as black (minimally adjusted OR 1·61, 95% CI 1·53-1·70; fully adjusted OR 1·45, 95% CI 1·38-1·54) and brown (minimally adjusted OR 1·26, 95% CI 1·22-1·30; fully adjusted OR 1·18, 1·14-1·23) than those who identified as white. The predicted prevalence of late-stage cancer at diagnosis was highest for women who were black or brown with little or no formal education (48·8%, 95% CI 48·2-49·5) and lowest for women who were white with university education (29·4%, 28·2-30·6), but both these prevalences were higher than that of all women diagnosed with breast cancer in Norway before the introduction of mammography screening (ie, 16·3%, 95% CI 15·4%-17·2% in 1970-74). Similar ethnoracial and social patterns emerged in analyses restricted to the age group targeted by screening (50-69 years). INTERPRETATION: The persistently high prevalence of late-stage breast cancer at diagnosis across all ethnoracial and social strata in Brazil, although more substantially among the most disadvantaged populations, implies that early detection policies might have had little effect on breast cancer mortality so far, and highlights the need to focus primarily on timely diagnosis of symptomatic breast cancer rather than on screening for asymptomatic disease. FUNDING: Newton Fund, Research Councils UK, and Conselho Nacional das Fundações Estaduais de Amparo à Pesquisa.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The Brazilian Ministry of Health recommends biennial mammographic screening for women aged between 50 and 69 years. Since screening is opportunistic in the country, the actual periodicity varies. This study sought to test a methodology for estimating over-screening due to excessive periodicity, defined as a smaller than recommended interval between exams, and its association with socio-demographic characteristics. A cohort of women who underwent mammography in 2010, and whose result was normal, was assembled through probabilistic linkage SISMAMA records based on a set of personal identifiers. We used data from women living in the micro health region of Juiz de Fora/Lima Duarte/Bom Jardim, Minas Gerais State, Brazil, who were followed in the System until the end of 2012. The rate of over-screening was 150/1,000 women/year (95%CI: 144.9-155.9), affecting 21% of women. Over-screening increased by 24% during Pink October campaigns (adjusted HR = 1.24; 95%CI: 1.15-1.35). The shorter the time passed since the last mammogram, the greater the odds of over-screening. Compared with women who had never had a mammogram prior to 2010, women who had had one in the previous 2 years were two times more likely to be over-screened (adjusted HR = 2.01; 95%CI: 1.74-2.31) whilst those who had had a mammogram ≤ 1 year previously were three times more likely to be over-screened (adjusted HR = 3.27; 95%CI: 2.87-3.73). Over-screening was substantial in this population, excessively exposing women to the risks of screening with no additional benefits and overestimating mammogram coverage. The methodology proved to be successful and should be applied to representative populations in order to guide breast cancer control policies.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Resumo: No Brasil, o Ministério da Saúde recomenda o rastreamento mamográfico bienal para mulheres entre 50-69 anos. Como o rastreamento é oportunístico no país, a periodicidade efetiva varia. Esse estudo visou a testar metodologia para a estimação do sobrerrastreio por periodicidade excessiva, definido como intervalo entre exames menores que o preconizado e sua associação com variáveis sociodemográficas. Trata-se de uma coorte de mulheres com mamografia de rastreamento de resultado normal em 2010, obtida por relacionamento probabilístico valendo-se das bases identificadas do SISMAMA. Foram utilizados dados referentes a mulheres residentes na microrregião de saúde de Juiz de Fora/Lima Duarte/Bom Jardim, Minas Gerais, Brasil, acompanhadas no Sistema até o fim de 2012. A taxa de sobrerrastreio foi de 150/mil mulheres/ano (IC95%: 144,9-155,9), atingindo 21% das mulheres. O sobrerrastreio aumentou 24% durante as campanhas Outubro Rosa (HR ajustada = 1,24; IC95%: 1,15-1,35). Quanto menor o tempo desde a última mamografia, maior foi a chance de sobrerrastreio. Em relação a mulheres que nunca tinham feito mamografia anterior a 2010, as que fizeram há 2 anos foram 2 vezes mais sobrerrastreadas (HR ajustada = 2,01; IC95%: 1,74-2,31) e há ≤ 1 ano 3 vezes mais (HR ajustada: 3,27; IC95%: 2,87-3,73). Nessa população, o sobrerrastreio foi substancial, expondo excessivamente as mulheres aos riscos do rastreamento sem benefício adicional e superestimando a cobertura mamográfica. A metodologia mostrou-se efetiva e deve ser aplicada em populações representativas para orientar políticas de controle de câncer de mama.

Abstract: The Brazilian Ministry of Health recommends biennial mammographic screening for women aged between 50 and 69 years. Since screening is opportunistic in the country, the actual periodicity varies. This study sought to test a methodology for estimating over-screening due to excessive periodicity, defined as a smaller than recommended interval between exams, and its association with socio-demographic characteristics. A cohort of women who underwent mammography in 2010, and whose result was normal, was assembled through probabilistic linkage SISMAMA records based on a set of personal identifiers. We used data from women living in the micro health region of Juiz de Fora/Lima Duarte/Bom Jardim, Minas Gerais State, Brazil, who were followed in the System until the end of 2012. The rate of over-screening was 150/1,000 women/year (95%CI: 144.9-155.9), affecting 21% of women. Over-screening increased by 24% during Pink October campaigns (adjusted HR = 1.24; 95%CI: 1.15-1.35). The shorter the time passed since the last mammogram, the greater the odds of over-screening. Compared with women who had never had a mammogram prior to 2010, women who had had one in the previous 2 years were two times more likely to be over-screened (adjusted HR = 2.01; 95%CI: 1.74-2.31) whilst those who had had a mammogram ≤ 1 year previously were three times more likely to be over-screened (adjusted HR = 3.27; 95%CI: 2.87-3.73). Over-screening was substantial in this population, excessively exposing women to the risks of screening with no additional benefits and overestimating mammogram coverage. The methodology proved to be successful and should be applied to representative populations in order to guide breast cancer control policies.

Resumen: En Brasil, el Ministerio de Salud recomienda pruebas mamográficas bienales para mujeres entre 50-69 años. Como las pruebas se realizan ocasionalmente en el país, la periodicidad efectiva varía. El objetivo de este estudio fue probar la metodología para la estimación del exceso de pruebas por periodicidad excesiva, definido como un intervalo menor entre exámenes que el preconizado, y su asociación con variables sociodemográficas. Se trata de una cohorte de mujeres con mamografías para la detección de cáncer con un resultado normal en 2010, obtenida mediante relación probabilística, haciendo uso de las bases identificadas del SISMAMA. Se utilizaron datos referentes a mujeres, residentes en la microrregión de salud de Juiz de Fora/Lima Duarte/Bom Jardim, Estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil, a quienes se les realizó un seguimiento en el sistema hasta finales de 2012. La tasa de exceso pruebas fue de 150/1.000 mujeres/año (IC95%: 144,9-155,9), alcanzando un 21% de las mujeres. El exceso de pruebas aumento un 24% durante las campañas Octubre Rosa (HR ajustada = 1,24; IC95%: 1,15-1,35). Cuanto menor era el tiempo desde la última mamografía, mayor fue la oportunidad de exceso de pruebas. En relación con mujeres que nunca se habían hecho una mamografía anterior a 2010, en quienes se la hicieron hace 2 años hubo 2 veces más exceso de pruebas (HR ajustada = 2,01; IC95%: 1,74-2,31) y hace ≤ 1 año 3 veces más (HR ajustada = 3,27; IC95%: 2,87-3,73). En esta población, el exceso de pruebas fue sustancial, exponiendo excesivamente a las mujeres a los riesgos de la detección sin beneficio adicional y sobrevalorando la cobertura mamográfica. La metodología se mostró efectiva y se debe aplicar en poblaciones representativas para orientar políticas de control de cáncer de mama.

Assuntos

RESUMO

RESUMO: Introdução: O estudo avaliou a confiabilidade interobservadores na classificação de pares de registros formados durante o processo de relacionamento probabilístico, sendo uma das etapas de validação da metodologia a ser utilizada em pesquisa sobre desigualdades de acesso às ações de controle dos cânceres de mama e do colo do útero no Brasil (DAAC-SIS). Metodologia: O programa RecLink foi usado para relacionar as bases de dados do Sistema de Informação do Controle do Câncer de Mama (SISMAMA) do estado de Minas Gerais, tendo como referência 301 mamografias de rastreamento com resultado provavelmente benigno (categoria BI-RADS 3), registradas em outubro de 2010 e, como comparação, 158.517 mamografias registradas em 2011. Posteriormente, 215 pares de registros, que não obtiveram o escore máximo atribuído pelo RecLink, foram classificados independentemente por dez avaliadores, de quatro centros participantes da pesquisa, como pares verdadeiros ou falsos. Resultados: O coeficiente Kappa variou de 0,87 a 1,00. Seis avaliadores obtiveram concordância perfeita com um ou mais avaliadores de outros centros. O Kappa global foi 0,96 (intervalo de confiança de 95% - IC95% 0,94 - 0,99). Discussão: A avaliação interobservadores foi fundamental para garantir a qualidade do processo de relacionamento, e a sua prática deve ser rotina em estudos dessa natureza. A divulgação desses resultados contribui para a transparência na condução e no relato do estudo em curso. Conclusão: A confiabilidade interobservadores foi excelente, sinalizando homogeneidade satisfatória da equipe na classificação dos pares de registros.

ABSTRACT: Introduction: The study assessed interobserver reliability in the classification of record pairs formed during probabilistic linkage of health-related databases, a key step in the methodology validation to be used in a larger on-going study on inequalities in the access to breast and cervical cancer control activities in Brazil (DAAC-SIS). Methodology: The RecLink software was used to link two databases of the Breast Cancer Control Information System (SISMAMA) in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil: a reference database, which included 301 screening mammograms with probable benign diagnosis (BI-RADS 3 category) recorded in October 2010, and a database comprising 158,517 mammograms registered in 2011. Subsequently, the 215 pairs of records that were not assigned the maximum RecLink score were independently classified as being true or false by ten independent evaluators from four participating centers. Results: The Kappa coefficient ranged from 0.87 to 1.00. Six evaluators were in perfect agreement with one or more evaluators from the other centers. The global Kappa was 0.96 (95% confidence interval - 95%CI 0.94 - 0.99). Discussion: Assessment of interobserver reliability is key to ensuring the quality of the record linkage, and it should be routine practice in studies of this nature. The disclosure of such results contributes to transparency in the conduct of such studies and in the reporting of their findings. Conclusion: Interobserver reliability in this study was excellent, indicating satisfactory team consistency in the classification of record pairs.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract: Our objectives with this study were to describe the spatial distribution of mammographic screening coverage across small geographical areas (micro-regions) in Brazil, and to analyze whether the observed differences were associated with spatial inequities in socioeconomic conditions, provision of health care, and healthcare services utilization. We performed an area-based ecological study on mammographic screening coverage in the period of 2010-2011 regarding socioeconomic and healthcare variables. The units of analysis were the 438 health micro-regions in Brazil. Spatial regression models were used to study these relationships. There was marked variability in mammographic coverage across micro-regions (median = 21.6%; interquartile range: 8.1%-37.9%). Multivariable analyses identified high household income inequality, low number of radiologists/100,000 inhabitants, low number of mammography machines/10,000 inhabitants, and low number of mammograms performed by each machine as independent correlates of poor mammographic coverage at the micro-region level. There was evidence of strong spatial dependence of these associations, with changes in one micro-region affecting neighboring micro-regions, and also of geographical heterogeneities. There were substantial inequities in access to mammographic screening across micro-regions in Brazil, in 2010-2011, with coverage being higher in those with smaller wealth inequities and better access to health care.

Resumo: O estudo teve como objetivos descrever a distribuição espacial do rastreamento por mamografia entre áreas geográficas pequenas (microrregiões) no Brasil, além de investigar se as diferenças observadas estavam associadas a inequidades espaciais nas condições socioeconômicas, na prestação de assistência à saúde e no uso de serviços de saúde. Este foi um estudo ecológico de base territorial, comparando a cobertura do rastreamento por mamografia em 2010-2011 com fatores socioeconômicos e de cuidados de saúde. O estudo usou 438 microrregiões sanitárias brasileiras como as unidades analíticas. Foram utilizados modelos de regressão espacial para estudar as associações. Houve uma importante variabilidade na cobertura por mamografia entre microrregiões (mediana = 21,6%; variação interquartil: 8,1%-37,9%). A análise multivariada identificou: forte desigualdade na renda familiar, número baixo de radiologistas/100 mil habitantes, número baixo de aparelhos de mamografia/10 mil habitantes e número baixo de mamografias realizadas com cada aparelho enquanto correlatos independentes da baixa cobertura mamográfica no nível microrregional. Houve evidência de forte dependência espacial nessas associações, em que as mudanças em uma microrregião afetavam as microrregiões vizinhas, além de heterogeneidade geográfica. O estudo revelou importantes inequidades no acesso ao exame de mamografia entre microrregiões brasileiras em 2010-2011, com cobertura mais alta nas microrregiões com menor desigualdade de renda e melhor acesso geral aos cuidados de saúde.

Resumen: Los objetivos de este estudio fueron describir la distribución espacial de la cobertura del cribado mamográfico, a través de pequeñas áreas geográficas (microrregiones) en Brasil, y examinar si las diferencias observadas estuvieron asociadas con inequidades espaciales, en términos de condiciones socioeconómicas, sistema de atención de salud, y utilización de servicios de salud. Se trata de un estudio ecológico, basado en áreas incluidas en la cobertura de cribado mamográfico durante 2010-2011 y relacionadas con variables socioeconómicas y de salud. Las unidades de análisis fueron 438 microrregiones de salud en Brasil. Se utilizaron modelos de regresión espacial para estudiar estas relaciones existentes. Hubo una variabilidad marcada en relación con la cobertura mamográfica a través de las microrregiones (media = 21.6%; rango intercuartílico: 8,1%-37,9%). Los análisis multivariables identificaron una alta inequidad en los ingresos por hogar, bajo número de radiólogos/100,000 habitantes, bajo número de máquinas de mamografía/10.000 habitantes, y un bajo número de mamografías realizadas por cada máquina, lo que está independiente correlacionado con la baja cobertura de mamografías en el nivel de microrregión. Hubo evidencias de una dependencia espacial fuerte de estas asociaciones, con cambios en una microrregión afectando a microrregiones vecinas, y también de heterogeneidades geográficas. Hubo inequidades sustanciales en el acceso al cribado mamográfico a través de las microrregiones en Brasil, en 2010-2011, con una cobertura superior en aquellas con pequeñas inequidades respecto a la riqueza y mejor acceso a los servicios de salud.

Assuntos

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

The recent reduction in breast cancer mortality in high-income countries resulted from improvements in early detection and treatment. Breast cancer is the most common cancer in Brazilian women. Since 2004, the government has recommended annual clinical breast examination for women aged ≥ 40 years and biannual mammograms for those aged 50-69. This article investigates the degree of implementation of these guidelines using data from the Brazilian Unified National Health System for 2010 according to major geographic region and age group. The findings showed low national mammogram coverage in the target population (32% in the 50-59-year group; 25% from 60 to 69 years). The percentage of women with abnormal radiological findings who underwent biopsy was also low (27% for 50-59 years; 63% for 60-69 years). The number of breast cancer surgeries exceeded the number of cases detected by mammography but was well below the estimated number of incident breast cancer cases in 2010. There are striking regional inequalities in access to early detection and surgery, being the lowest access in the North Region and the highest in the South Region.

Assuntos

RESUMO

A redução recente na mortalidade por câncer de mama em países de alta renda é atribuída à detecção precoce e melhorias no tratamento. O câncer de mama é o tipo mais frequente de câncer feminino no Brasil, e, desde 2004, o governo recomenda o exame clínico anual das mamas para mulheres a partir dos 40 anos e rastreio mamográfico bienal entre 50 e 69 anos. Este artigo investiga o nível de implementação dessas recomendações usando os dados dos sistemas de informações do SUS de 2010 por macrorregião e grupo etário. Evidenciou-se uma cobertura baixa de mamografia entre a população alvo (32%: 50-59 anos; 25%: 60-69 anos). A proporção de mulheres com achados radiológicos anormais submetidas à biópsia também foi baixa (27%: 50-59 anos; 63%: 60-69 anos). O número de cirurgias para câncer de mama foi maior do que o número de casos detectáveis pela mamografia, mas muito inferior ao número estimado de casos incidentes para 2010. Existem marcadas desigualdades regionais no acesso à detecção precoce e à cirurgia, sendo o acesso mais baixo na Região Norte e mais alto na Região Sul.

The recent reduction in breast cancer mortality in high-income countries resulted from improvements in early detection and treatment. Breast cancer is the most common cancer in Brazilian women. Since 2004, the government has recommended annual clinical breast examination for women aged ≥ 40 years and biannual mammograms for those aged 50-69. This article investigates the degree of implementation of these guidelines using data from the Brazilian Unified National Health System for 2010 according to major geographic region and age group. The findings showed low national mammogram coverage in the target population (32% in the 50-59-year group; 25% from 60 to 69 years). The percentage of women with abnormal radiological findings who underwent biopsy was also low (27% for 50-59 years; 63% for 60-69 years). The number of breast cancer surgeries exceeded the number of cases detected by mammography but was well below the estimated number of incident breast cancer cases in 2010. There are striking regional inequalities in access to early detection and surgery, being the lowest access in the North Region and the highest in the South Region.

La reciente reducción de la mortalidad por cáncer de mama en los países de altos ingresos se atribuye a la detección precoz y las mejoras en el tratamiento. El cáncer de mama es el cáncer femenino más común en Brasil y desde 2004 el gobierno recomienda el examen clínico anual para las mujeres después de los 40 años y la mamografía bienal entre 50 a 69 años. Este trabajo investiga el grado de aplicación de estas recomendaciones a partir de datos del Sistema de Información de Salud, en 2010 por grupos de edad. Los resultados mostraron una baja cobertura de la mamografía en la población objetivo (32%: 50-59, 25%: 60-69 años). La proporción de mujeres con hallazgos radiológicos anormales se sometió a biopsia también fue baja (27%: 50-59, 63%: 60-69 años). El número de cirugías para el cáncer de mama fue mayor que el número de casos detectados por la mamografía, pero mucho menos que el número estimado de casos nuevos para el año 2010. Existen marcadas diferencias regionales en el acceso a la detección temprana y la cirugía, siendo el acceso menor en la Región Norte y más alto en la Región Sur.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify country-level correlates of geographical variations in cervical cancer (CC) mortality in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: CC mortality rates for LAC countries (n=26) were examined in relation to country-specific socio-economic indicators (n=58) and Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) prevalence using linear regression models. RESULTS: High mortality at ages <5 years, low per capita total expenditure on health, and low proportion of the population with access to sanitation were identified as the best independent predictors of CC mortality (R² =77%). In the subset of countries (n=10) with HPV prevalence estimates, these socio-economic indicators together with high-risk HPV prevalence explained almost all the between-country variability in CC mortality (R² =98%). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that continuing socioeconomic improvements in LAC countries will be associated with further reductions in CC mortality even in the absence of organised population-based screening and vaccination programmes.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify country-level correlates of geographical variations in cervical cancer (CC) mortality in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: CC mortality rates for LAC countries (n=26) were examined in relation to country-specific socio-economic indicators (n=58) and Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) prevalence using linear regression models. RESULTS: High mortality at ages <5 years, low per capita total expenditure on health, and low proportion of the population with access to sanitation were identified as the best independent predictors of CC mortality (R² =77%). In the subset of countries (n=10) with HPV prevalence estimates, these socio-economic indicators together with high-risk HPV prevalence explained almost all the between-country variability in CC mortality (R² =98%). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that continuing socioeconomic improvements in LAC countries will be associated with further reductions in CC mortality even in the absence of organised population-based screening and vaccination programmes.

OBJETIVO: Identificar variables a nivel de país que expliquen las variaciones geográficas en la mortalidad por cáncer cervicouterino (CaCu) en América Latina y el Caribe (AL). MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Se examinaron las tasas de mortalidad por CaCu de cada país (n=26) mediante modelos de regresión lineal en relación con indicadores socioeconómicos (n=58) y prevalencia del virus del papiloma humano (VPH). RESULTADOS: Alta mortalidad en menores de cinco años, bajo gasto total en salud per-cápita y baja proporción de población con acceso a saneamiento básico son los mejores predictores de mortalidad por CaCu (R² =77%). En los países (n=10) con estimaciones de prevalencia de VPH, estos indicadores socioeconómicos y la prevalencia de VPH de alto riesgo explicaron el 98% de la variabilidad de CaCu en AL. CONCLUSIÓN: Las mejoras en el nivel socioeconómico en AL están asociadas con reducciones en la mortalidad por CaCu, a pesar de la ausencia de programas organizados de tamizaje e inmunización contra VPH.

Assuntos