Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Pulm Med ; 17(1): 73, 2017 Apr 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28446170

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The FACED score is an easy-to-use multidimensional grading system that has demonstrated an excellent prognostic value for mortality in patients with bronchiectasis. A Spanish group developed the score but no multicenter international validation has yet been published. METHODS: Retrospective and multicenter study conducted in six historical cohorts of patients from Latin America including 651 patients with bronchiectasis. Clinical, microbiological, functional, and radiological variables were collected, following the same criteria used in the original FACED score study. The vital status of all patients was determined in the fifth year of follow-up. The area under ROC curve (AUC-ROC) was used to calculate the predictive power of the FACED score for all-cause and respiratory deaths and both number and severity of exacerbations. The discriminatory power to divide patients into three groups of increasing severity was also analyzed. RESULTS: Mean (SD) age of 48.2 (16), 32.9% of males. The mean FACED score was 2.35 (1.68). During the follow up, 95 patients (14.6%) died (66% from respiratory causes). The AUC ROC to predict all-cause and respiratory mortality were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77 to 0.85) 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.88) respectively, and 0.82 (95% CI: 078-0.87) for at least one hospitalization per year. The division into three score groups separated bronchiectasis into distinct mortality groups (mild: 3.7%; moderate: 20.7% and severe: 48.5% mortality; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The FACED score was confirmed as an excellent predictor of all-cause and respiratory mortality and severe exacerbations, as well as having excellent discriminative capacity for different degrees of severity in various bronchiectasis populations.


Assuntos
Bronquiectasia/mortalidade , Bronquiectasia/fisiopatologia , Progressão da Doença , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Área Sob a Curva , Causas de Morte , Comorbidade , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , América Latina/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
2.
Chemosphere ; 87(9): 1003-8, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22189377

RESUMO

Open burning for waste disposal is, in many countries, the dominant source of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins, dibenzofurans and biphenyls (PCDD/PCDF/PCB) release to the environment. To generate emission factors for open burning, experimental pile burns of about 100 kg of household waste were conducted with emissions sampling. From these experiments and others conducted by the same authors it is found that less compaction of waste or active mixing during the fire--"stirring"--promotes better combustion (as evidenced by lower CO/CO(2) ratio) and reduces emissions of PCDD/PCDF/PCB; an intuitive but previously undemonstrated result. These experiments also support previous results suggesting PCDD/PCDF/PCB generation in open burning - while still highly variable - tends to be greater in the later (smoldering) phases of burning when the CO/CO(2) ratio increases.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Benzofuranos/química , Incineração/métodos , Bifenilos Policlorados/química , Dibenzodioxinas Policloradas/análogos & derivados , Poluentes Atmosféricos/química , Características da Família , Dibenzodioxinas Policloradas/química , Eliminação de Resíduos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA