RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Esophagogastric cancer (EGC) is a leading neoplasm worldwide. Perioperative chemotherapy (periCT) is currently a standard of care for most patients (pts). Prevalence of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) tumors is increasing over the last years. METHODS: The aim of this study was to retrospectively search for prognostic factors in pts. with locally advanced EGC treated with periCT. Three-year overall survival (OS) and Event-Free Survival (EFS) were main end-points. HER-2 positive tumors were defined by immunohistochemistry or FISH. RESULTS: Between June/2007 and November/2015, 128 pts. started periCT for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) or gastric adenocarcinoma (GC). Median age was 59.5 y and 64% were male. Primary site was EGJ in 27% and 65% were cN+. Diffuse subtype was seen in 42%. Ninety-seven pts. were assessed for HER-2; 14 (14.4%) were positive. After median follow-up time of 45 m, 48 deaths occurred. The 3-year OS and EFS rate was 61.3% and 51.2%, respectively. Main prognostic factors were: AJCC ypT3-T4yN1-N3 (HR 6.75 p 0.002) and EGJ primary (HR 2.64, p 0.004). Overall HER-2 was not prognostic. Still, a difference in 3-year OS was observed for GC/HER2+ compared to EGJ/HER2+ (88.9% versus 20%, p = 0.002). This difference is greater for 3-year EFS with no patient with EGJ/HER2+ free-of-event against 62.5% for GC/HER+ (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: In our analysis, pathological staging and primary site were main prognostic factors. Moreover, a small group of EGJ/HER2+ had very poor survival.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Mutations in KRAS and NRAS genes are negative predictors of anti-EGFR therapies response in metastatic colorectal cancer. There are few reports on RAS testing in synchronous primary colorectal cancer (SP-CRC) and a lack of recommendations on which tissue should be tested for the mutation in this disease. This study analyzed the RAS status of both lesions in SP-CRC patients and in their metastasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DNA was obtained from formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded tissue, and mutations were analyzed by pyrosequencing. RESULTS: RAS status was heterogeneous in 6 (75%) of 8 SP-CRC patients between primary lesions. Five showed heterogeneity regarding RAS mutational status, and from these, four presented with metastasis: 3 cases (75%) had WT metastatic tissue, and 1 case (25%) had mutated metastatic tissue. One patient showed divergence regarding RAS mutation type. DISCUSSION: RAS mutations vary significantly between SP-CRC lesions, and the status of the metastasis is unpredictable. Testing for RAS mutations in only 1 of the primary lesions can misguide clinical decisions and hind the predictive potential of anti-EGFR treatment. A more appropriate approach in metastatic SP-CRC is to test the metastatic tissue or both primary lesions for providing more accurate mutation scenery and support more assertive clinical decisions.

RESUMO

There are few data that show pathologic complete response (pCR) to imatinib treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). We describe a case of a patient with pCR of a pelvic, locally advanced, high-risk GIST who was treated with neoadjuvant imatinib and ultimately underwent a conservative procedure. A 48-year-old male presented with a pelvic mass 10 cm in diameter. Biopsy revealed a gastrointestinal stromal tumor of rectal origin. Although it was considered initially resectable, an extensive procedure would have been necessary for complete resection. Treatment with imatinib was initiated, resulting in partial response. The patient remained on imatinib for over 15 months, maintaining stable disease. Radical prostatectomy with anal sphincter preservation was performed. Pathological report revealed no viable neoplastic cells. The use of imatinib was held for 6 months after the surgery. At a follow-up 15 months after surgery, the patient had no evidence of disease. Our report may help to guide future studies of neoadjuvant imatinib for large pelvic or rectum GISTs that are initially considered unresectable.

Assuntos