RESUMO

The objective of the present work was to determine the effects of the interaction between feeding rate and area for periphyton in rearing aquaria for Nile tilapia. Twenty 25 L polyethylene outdoor aquaria were used to hold experimental fish. Three tilapia fingerlings (2.56 ± 0.14 g) were stocked in each aquarium for five weeks (12 fish m-2). There were two different feeding rates (full and full minus 30%) and two submerged areas for periphyton development (59.4% and 96.5% of the aquarium surface area; n = 5). Final body weight, specific growth rate and yield in the 96.5%-area aquaria of fish submitted to 30% less feed were significantly higher than in the 96.5%-area aquaria submitted to full feeding rates. Fish growth in the restricted-feed aquaria was favored by their better water quality (higher pH and lower total ammonia nitrogen). There were negative effects on final body weight, SGR, yield and feed conversion ratio of fish in full-feed aquaria when the area for periphyton increased from 59.4 to 96.5%. It was concluded that the combination of restricted feeding rates with large substrate areas for periphyton growth results in better water quality for fish culture than the adoption of each management alone. 

RESUMO

The objective of the present work was to determine the effects of the interaction between feeding rate and area for periphyton in rearing aquaria for Nile tilapia. Twenty 25 L polyethylene outdoor aquaria were used to hold experimental fish. Three tilapia fingerlings (2.56 ± 0.14 g) were stocked in each aquarium for five weeks (12 fish m-2). There were two different feeding rates (full and full minus 30%) and two submerged areas for periphyton development (59.4% and 96.5% of the aquarium surface area; n = 5). Final body weight, specific growth rate and yield in the 96.5%-area aquaria of fish submitted to 30% less feed were significantly higher than in the 96.5%-area aquaria submitted to full feeding rates. Fish growth in the restricted-feed aquaria was favored by their better water quality (higher pH and lower total ammonia nitrogen). There were negative effects on final body weight, SGR, yield and feed conversion ratio of fish in full-feed aquaria when the area for periphyton increased from 59.4 to 96.5%. It was concluded that the combination of restricted feeding rates with large substrate areas for periphyton growth results in better water quality for fish culture than the adoption of each management alone.

RESUMO

Present study investigated the effects of different feeding schedules on certain variables of water quality and growth performance of Nile tilapia juveniles. Fifteen 25-L aquaria were used to hold the experimental fish population for six weeks. Five fingerlings (1.86 ± 0.13 g) were stocked in each aquarium (200 fish m-3; n = 5). The diet provided to fish and the feeding rates adopted were the same for all fish. The daily ration was divided in four meals (8, 11, 13 and 16h). In the positive control group (25/25/25/25), the daily ration was equally divided in the four meals; in the negative control group (40/30/20/10), the daily ration was unevenly divided in a progressively decreasing fashion (40, 30, 20 and 10%) throughout the day; in the experimental group (10/20/30/40), the daily ration was unevenly divided in a progressively increasing fashion (10, 20, 30 and 40%) throughout the day. The feed conversion ratio results were better for 10/20/30/40 than for the other groups. The 10/20/30/40 feeding schedule probably best combined the dietary allowance for fish with the increase in water temperature during the day.

RESUMO

The present research aimed to assess a lab-scale model to study periphyton-based systems for fish culture. Twenty-five liters plastic aquaria were stocked with three Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, juveniles (0.77±0.09g; 12 fish m-2) for 6 weeks in a 2x2 factorial design. Small plastic bottles were placed in some aquaria for periphyton development. Two feeding regimes were employed: "full-fed" (standard feeding rates were fully adopted) and "half-fed" (50% of standard feeding rates). Growth performance and limnological variables were observed in each aquarium. There werefive replicates per treatment. Fish have fed actively on periphyton, especially in the half-fed aquaria. The placement of periphyton bottles had no significant effects on the water quality variables, except by the gross primary productivity which became lower. Half-fed aquaria presented lower concentrations of ammonia (0.28-0.29mg L-1), nitrite (0.33-0.37mg L-1) and phosphorus (0.42-0.43mg L-1) than full-fed aquaria (0.57-0.60mg L-1; 0.75-0.77mg L-1; 0.67-0.70mg L-1, respectively). The final body weight of fish in half-fed aquaria with periphyton bottles (6.22±0.64g) was significantly higher than in aquaria without bottles (4.65±0.36g). Although the growth rate of fish was lower in the half-fed aquaria (4.27-4.72 vs. 5.29-5.61% BW day-1), survival was significantly higher when compared to the full-fed aquaria (93.3-100.0 vs. 80.0-83.4%). Only in the aquaria with periphyton the feed conversation ratio was improved by the feeding restriction regime.

O presente trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar um modelo laboratorial para estudo de sistemas de cultivo de peixes baseados em perifíton. Aquários de 25L foram estocados com três juvenis de tilápia do Nilo, Oreochromis niloticus (0,77±0,09g; 12 peixes m-2) por seis semanas, em arranjo fatorial 2x2. Pequenas garrafas plásticas foram colocadas em determinados aquários para o desenvolvimento de perifíton. Dois regimes alimentares foram empregados: "cheio", no qual taxas alimentares padrões foram integralmente adotadas e "metade", em que 50% das taxas alimentares regulares foram empregadas. Variáveis limnológicas e de desempenho zootécnico foram observadas em cada aquário. Havia cinco repetições por tratamento. Os peixes ingeriram ativamente perifíton, especialmente os que receberam metade do arraçoamento padrão. A colocação de garrafas para o crescimento de perifíton não teve efeito significativo nas variáveis de qualidade de água, excetuando-se na produtividade primária bruta que foi menor. Os aquários arraçoados pela metade apresentaram menores concentrações de amônia (0,28-0,29mg L-1), nitrito (0,33-0,37mg L-1) e fósforo (0,42-0,43mg L-1) que os aquários arraçoados integralmente (0,57-0,60mg L-1; 0,75-0,77mg L-1; 0,67-0,70mg L-1, respectivamente). O peso corporal final dos peixes nos aquários arraçoados pela metade, mas com garrafas para perifíton (6,22±0,64g), foi significativamente maior que nos respectivos aquários sem garrafas (4,65±0,36g). Embora a taxa de crescimento dos peixes alimentados com metade das taxas regulares tenha sido menor (4,27-4,72 vs. 5,29-5,61% PC dia-1), a sobrevivência foi significativamente maior para estes, quando comparados com os peixes alimentados com taxas regulares (93,3-100,0 vs. 80,0-83,4%). Apenas nos aquários com perifíton a conversão alimentar foi melhorada pela restrição alimentar imposta.

RESUMO

The present research aimed to assess a lab-scale model to study periphyton-based systems for fish culture. Twenty-five liters plastic aquaria were stocked with three Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, juveniles (0.77±0.09g; 12 fish m-2) for 6 weeks in a 2x2 factorial design. Small plastic bottles were placed in some aquaria for periphyton development. Two feeding regimes were employed: "full-fed" (standard feeding rates were fully adopted) and "half-fed" (50% of standard feeding rates). Growth performance and limnological variables were observed in each aquarium. There werefive replicates per treatment. Fish have fed actively on periphyton, especially in the half-fed aquaria. The placement of periphyton bottles had no significant effects on the water quality variables, except by the gross primary productivity which became lower. Half-fed aquaria presented lower concentrations of ammonia (0.28-0.29mg L-1), nitrite (0.33-0.37mg L-1) and phosphorus (0.42-0.43mg L-1) than full-fed aquaria (0.57-0.60mg L-1; 0.75-0.77mg L-1; 0.67-0.70mg L-1, respectively). The final body weight of fish in half-fed aquaria with periphyton bottles (6.22±0.64g) was significantly higher than in aquaria without bottles (4.65±0.36g). Although the growth rate of fish was lower in the half-fed aquaria (4.27-4.72 vs. 5.29-5.61% BW day-1), survival was significantly higher when compared to the full-fed aquaria (93.3-100.0 vs. 80.0-83.4%). Only in the aquaria with periphyton the feed conversation ratio was improved by the feeding restriction regime.

O presente trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar um modelo laboratorial para estudo de sistemas de cultivo de peixes baseados em perifíton. Aquários de 25L foram estocados com três juvenis de tilápia do Nilo, Oreochromis niloticus (0,77±0,09g; 12 peixes m-2) por seis semanas, em arranjo fatorial 2x2. Pequenas garrafas plásticas foram colocadas em determinados aquários para o desenvolvimento de perifíton. Dois regimes alimentares foram empregados: "cheio", no qual taxas alimentares padrões foram integralmente adotadas e "metade", em que 50% das taxas alimentares regulares foram empregadas. Variáveis limnológicas e de desempenho zootécnico foram observadas em cada aquário. Havia cinco repetições por tratamento. Os peixes ingeriram ativamente perifíton, especialmente os que receberam metade do arraçoamento padrão. A colocação de garrafas para o crescimento de perifíton não teve efeito significativo nas variáveis de qualidade de água, excetuando-se na produtividade primária bruta que foi menor. Os aquários arraçoados pela metade apresentaram menores concentrações de amônia (0,28-0,29mg L-1), nitrito (0,33-0,37mg L-1) e fósforo (0,42-0,43mg L-1) que os aquários arraçoados integralmente (0,57-0,60mg L-1; 0,75-0,77mg L-1; 0,67-0,70mg L-1, respectivamente). O peso corporal final dos peixes nos aquários arraçoados pela metade, mas com garrafas para perifíton (6,22±0,64g), foi significativamente maior que nos respectivos aquários sem garrafas (4,65±0,36g). Embora a taxa de crescimento dos peixes alimentados com metade das taxas regulares tenha sido menor (4,27-4,72 vs. 5,29-5,61% PC dia-1), a sobrevivência foi significativamente maior para estes, quando comparados com os peixes alimentados com taxas regulares (93,3-100,0 vs. 80,0-83,4%). Apenas nos aquários com perifíton a conversão alimentar foi melhorada pela restrição alimentar imposta.

RESUMO

The present research aimed to assess a lab-scale model to study periphyton-based systems for fish culture. Twenty-five liters plastic aquaria were stocked with three Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, juveniles (0.77±0.09g; 12 fish m-2) for 6 weeks in a 2x2 factorial design. Small plastic bottles were placed in some aquaria for periphyton development. Two feeding regimes were employed: "full-fed" (standard feeding rates were fully adopted) and "half-fed" (50% of standard feeding rates). Growth performance and limnological variables were observed in each aquarium. There werefive replicates per treatment. Fish have fed actively on periphyton, especially in the half-fed aquaria. The placement of periphyton bottles had no significant effects on the water quality variables, except by the gross primary productivity which became lower. Half-fed aquaria presented lower concentrations of ammonia (0.28-0.29mg L-1), nitrite (0.33-0.37mg L-1) and phosphorus (0.42-0.43mg L-1) than full-fed aquaria (0.57-0.60mg L-1; 0.75-0.77mg L-1; 0.67-0.70mg L-1, respectively). The final body weight of fish in half-fed aquaria with periphyton bottles (6.22±0.64g) was significantly higher than in aquaria without bottles (4.65±0.36g). Although the growth rate of fish was lower in the half-fed aquaria (4.27-4.72 vs. 5.29-5.61% BW day-1), survival was significantly higher when compared to the full-fed aquaria (93.3-100.0 vs. 80.0-83.4%). Only in the aquaria with periphyton the feed conversation ratio was improved by the feeding restriction regime.

O presente trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar um modelo laboratorial para estudo de sistemas de cultivo de peixes baseados em perifíton. Aquários de 25L foram estocados com três juvenis de tilápia do Nilo, Oreochromis niloticus (0,77±0,09g; 12 peixes m-2) por seis semanas, em arranjo fatorial 2x2. Pequenas garrafas plásticas foram colocadas em determinados aquários para o desenvolvimento de perifíton. Dois regimes alimentares foram empregados: "cheio", no qual taxas alimentares padrões foram integralmente adotadas e "metade", em que 50% das taxas alimentares regulares foram empregadas. Variáveis limnológicas e de desempenho zootécnico foram observadas em cada aquário. Havia cinco repetições por tratamento. Os peixes ingeriram ativamente perifíton, especialmente os que receberam metade do arraçoamento padrão. A colocação de garrafas para o crescimento de perifíton não teve efeito significativo nas variáveis de qualidade de água, excetuando-se na produtividade primária bruta que foi menor. Os aquários arraçoados pela metade apresentaram menores concentrações de amônia (0,28-0,29mg L-1), nitrito (0,33-0,37mg L-1) e fósforo (0,42-0,43mg L-1) que os aquários arraçoados integralmente (0,57-0,60mg L-1; 0,75-0,77mg L-1; 0,67-0,70mg L-1, respectivamente). O peso corporal final dos peixes nos aquários arraçoados pela metade, mas com garrafas para perifíton (6,22±0,64g), foi significativamente maior que nos respectivos aquários sem garrafas (4,65±0,36g). Embora a taxa de crescimento dos peixes alimentados com metade das taxas regulares tenha sido menor (4,27-4,72 vs. 5,29-5,61% PC dia-1), a sobrevivência foi significativamente maior para estes, quando comparados com os peixes alimentados com taxas regulares (93,3-100,0 vs. 80,0-83,4%). Apenas nos aquários com perifíton a conversão alimentar foi melhorada pela restrição alimentar imposta.

RESUMO

Present study investigated the effects of different feeding schedules on certain variables of water quality and growth performance of Nile tilapia juveniles. Fifteen 25-L aquaria were used to hold the experimental fish population for six weeks. Five fingerlings (1.86 ± 0.13 g) were stocked in each aquarium (200 fish m-3; n = 5). The diet provided to fish and the feeding rates adopted were the same for all fish. The daily ration was divided in four meals (8, 11, 13 and 16h). In the positive control group (25/25/25/25), the daily ration was equally divided in the four meals; in the negative control group (40/30/20/10), the daily ration was unevenly divided in a progressively decreasing fashion (40, 30, 20 and 10%) throughout the day; in the experimental group (10/20/30/40), the daily ration was unevenly divided in a progressively increasing fashion (10, 20, 30 and 40%) throughout the day. The feed conversion ratio results were better for 10/20/30/40 than for the other groups. The 10/20/30/40 feeding schedule probably best combined the dietary allowance for fish with the increase in water temperature during the day.